Almost Complex Manifolds an Almost-Complex Manifold Is A

Almost Complex Manifolds an Almost-Complex Manifold Is A

Almost complex manifolds An almost-complex manifold is a smooth real manifold 2 M equipped with a smooth endomorphism field J : T M T M satisfying J = Ix for → x − all x M. The linear algebra introduced above may be applied pointwise to the tangent bundle∈ of M. The complexified tangent bundle is TCM := T M C, where C is regarded as a trivial 1,0 0,1 ⊗ vector bundle over M. Since TC,xM = Tx M Tx M for any point x M as above, the tensor field J splits the complexified tangent bundle⊕ into bundles of eigen∈spaces 1,0 0,1 TCM = T M T M, ⊕ and the smooth complex vector bundles (TM,J) and (T 1,0M, i) are C-linearly isomorphic. We notice that a real smooth manifold carrying an almost complex structure may not be a complex manifold. We’ll discuss later that a real smooth manifold carrying an integral almost complex structure is a complex manifold. [Example] (Almost complex structure on spheres) It is natural to ask which spheres S2n admit almost-complex structures or complex structure (or other ones such as K¨ahler structure). 2 CP1 p m R R S = is the Riemann sphere, a complex manifold. It is known HDR(S , ) = • for p =0or p = m; 0 otherwsie. On the other hand, if X is a compact K¨ahler manifold, it is known that the Betti number b (X) 1. Thus S2 is the only sphere that admits 2 ≥ a K¨ahler structure. S2 has only one almost-complex structure up to equivalence. S4 does not admit any almost complex structure. • S6 admits many non-equivalent almost complex structure, but it is an open problem • whether S6 admits an integrable complex structure18. As above, S6 cannot admit K¨ahler structure. For Sn with n 8, deep results from algebraic topology imply that there is no almost • ≥ complex structure there. n [ Example] (C is an almost-complex manifold) Let zα = xα + √ 1yα be the usual − coordinates on Cn, identified with coordinates (x, y) on R2n. 18For the definition of integrable complex structure, see the end of this section. 44 The real tangent bundle T Cn has frame ∂ , ∂ . The almost complex structure ∂xα ∂yα • J : T Cn T Cn is given by: { } → ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ J( )= , J( )= . ∂xα ∂yα ∂yα −∂xα n n TCC , the complexification of T C , has frame • ∂ 1 ∂ ∂ ∂ 1 ∂ ∂ = √ 1 , = + √ 1 ∂zα 2∂xα − − ∂yα ∂zα 2∂xα − ∂yα n n The extended almost complex structure J : TCC TCC is given by → ∂ 1 ∂ ∂ ∂ J( )= + √ 1 = √ 1 , ∂z 2 ∂y − ∂x − ∂z α α α α ∂ 1 ∂ ∂ ∂ J( )= √ 1 = √ 1 . ∂z 2 ∂y − − ∂x − − ∂z α α α α T 1,0Cn has frame ∂ , and the almost complex structure is given by J( ∂ ) = • { ∂zα } ∂zα √ 1 ∂ . − ∂zα T 0,1Cn has frame ∂ , and the almost complex structure is given by J( ∂ ) = • { ∂zα } ∂zα √ 1 ∂ . − − ∂zα Similarly a complex manifold carries a natural almost complex structure. A map f :(M,J) (M, J) between almost-complex manifolds is pseudoholomorphic if → (f∗)J = J(f∗). f e The followinge is a straightforward consequence of the chain rule and the Cauchy-Riemann equations: Let ∆n Cn be a polydisk. A map f : ∆n Cm is pseudoholomorphic if and ⊂ → only if f is holomorphic. Holomorphic tangent bundles Let X be a complex manifold which is equipped −1 with holomorphic charts (Uα, τα) of X such that the transition maps ταβ = τα τβ are { n } ◦ holomorphic. From τα : Uα C , at each point x Uα X we have the Jacobian → ∈ ⊂ n dτα : TxX C . → 45 −1 The Jacobain of the transition maps τij := τi τ is the matrix ◦ j k ∂τij (τj(z)). ∂zl k,l The holomorphic tangent bundle of a complex manifold X is the holomorphic vector bundle X on X which is given by the transition matrices T k ∂τij τij(z) := (τj(z)). ∂zl k,l Just like line bundles, transition matrices satisfying transition conditions (i.e., τjj = Id,τij · τji = Id and τij τjk τki = Id) is equivalent to existence of vector bundles. · · n We denote by TX the underlying real tangent space. As in the C case, if (z1, ..., zn) are holomorphic coordinates on an open subset U X and zj := xj +iyj, then (x1,y1, ..., xn,yn) ⊂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ define real coordinates of X on U and TX admits a basis ( , , ..., , ). The U ∂x1 ∂y1 ∂xn ∂yn | ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ almost complex structure J : TX U TX U is given by J = , J = . The | → | ∂xj ∂yj ∂yj − ∂xj complexified tangent space C TX has the eigenspace of the eigenvalues i and i, denoted 1,0 0,1 ⊗ C 1,0 0,1 −1,0 by TX and TX so that we have the spliting direct sum TX = TX TX . T X has a basis ∂ := 1 ∂ i ∂ , and T 0,1X has a basis ∂ := 1 ⊗∂ + i ∂ . ⊕ ∂zk 2 ∂xk − ∂yk ∂zk 2 ∂xk ∂yk We claim: The subspace T 1,0X is canonically isomorphic to the holomorphic tangent space X (as a complex vector bundle). In fact, let X = iUi be an open covering by T Cn −1 ∪∗ 1,0 1,0 holomorphic charts φi : Ui Vi := φi(Ui) . Then (φi ) (T X Ui ) T Vi and the latter is canonically trivialized.→ With respect⊂ to these canonical trivializations| ≃ the induced − isomorphisms T 1,0 V T 1,0 V are given by the Jacobian J(φ φ 1) φ (x). Thus both φj (x) j φi(x) i i j j 1,0 ≃ ◦ ◦ bundles T X and X are associated to the same cocycle J(φij) φj . Then they are T { ◦ } isomorphic. Hence we can also call T 1,0X the holomorphic tangent bundle of X. 0,1 Similarly the subspace T X is canonically isomorphic to the complex conjugate X (with complex structure J via the C-linear embeddings). Hence we can call T 0,1X theT anti-holomorphic tangent− bundle of X. The dual spaces V ∗, (V ∗)1,0 and (V ∗)0,1 of a real vector space V Let V be a finite dimensional real vector space endowed with an almost complex structure J. Then the dual space ∗ V = HomR(V, R) 46 has a natural almost complex structure given by J : V ∗ V ∗, f J(f) where J(f)(v) := ∗ → → ∗ f(J(v)). The induced decomposition on (V )C = HomR(V, C)=(VC) is given by ∗ ∗1,0 ∗0,1 (V )C = V V ⊕ where ∗1,0 1,0 ∗ V = f HomR(V, C) f(I(v)) = if(v) =(V ) , { ∈ | } ∗0,1 0,1 ∗ V = f HomR(V, C) f(I(v)) = if(v) =(V ) . { ∈ | − } The natural decomposition of its exterior algebra of V is •V = d k V. ∧ ⊕k=0 ∧ Also the natural decomposition of its exterior algebra of VC is • d k VC = VC. ∧ ⊕k=0 ∧ ∗ ∗ • Moreover, VC = V R C, and V is the real subspace of VC that is left invariant under complex∧ conjugation.∧ ⊗ ∧ ∧ We define p,q p 1,0 q 0,1 V := V C V , ∧ ∧ ⊗ ∧ where the exterior products of V 1,0 and V 0,1 are taken as exterior products of complex vector spaces. An element α V p,qV is of bidegree (p, q). ∈ Proposition 5.1 If V admits an almost complex structure, then p,q p+q 1. V is in a canonical way a subspace of VC. ∧ ∧ k p,q 2. VC = p q k V . ∧ ⊕ + = ∧ ∗ p,q q,p 3. Complex conjugation on VC defines an anti- C linear isomorphism V V , i.e., p,qV = q,pV . ∧ ∧ ≃ ∧ ∧ ∧ 4. The exterior product is of bidegree (0, 0), i.e., (α, β) α β maps p,q r,sV to the subspace p+r,q+sV . → ∧ ∧ × ∧ ∧ 47.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us