REGULARITY of PSEUDOGROUP ORBITS 1. Introduction Lie Pseudogroups, Roughly Speaking, Are Infinite Dimensional Counterparts of Lo

REGULARITY of PSEUDOGROUP ORBITS 1. Introduction Lie Pseudogroups, Roughly Speaking, Are Infinite Dimensional Counterparts of Lo

October 11, 2004 14:39 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in orbits REGULARITY OF PSEUDOGROUP ORBITS PETER J. OLVER ¤ School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA E-mail: [email protected] JUHA POHJANPELTO Department of Mathematics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA E-mail: [email protected] Let G be a Lie pseudogroup acting on a manifold M. In this paper we show that under a mild regularity condition the orbits of the induced action of G on the bundle J n(M; p) of nth order jets of p-dimensional submanifolds of M are immersed submanifolds of J n(M; p). 1. Introduction Lie pseudogroups, roughly speaking, are in¯nite dimensional counterparts of local Lie groups of transformations. The ¯rst systematic study of pseu- dogroups was carried out at the end of the 19th century by Lie, whose great insight in the subject was to place the additional condition on the local transformations in a pseudogroup that they form the general solution of a system of partial di®erential equations, the determining equations for the pseudogroup. Nowadays these Lie or continuous pseudogroups play an important role in various problems arising in geometry and mathemat- ical physics including symmetries of di®erential equations, gauge theories, Hamiltonian mechanics, symplectic and Poisson geometry, conformal ge- ometry of surfaces, conformal ¯eld theory and the theory of foliations. Since their introduction a considerable e®ort has been spent on develop- ¤Work partially supported by grant DMS 01-03944 of the National Science Foundation. 1 October 11, 2004 14:39 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in orbits 2 ing a rigorous foundation for the theory of Lie pseudogroups and the invari- ants of their action, and on their classi¯cation problem, see e.g. Refs. [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [11] and the references therein. More recently, the au- thors of the paper at hand have employed a moving frames construction [3], [4] to establish a concrete theory for Lie pseudogroups amenable to practical computations. As applications, a direct method for uncovering the structure equations for Lie pseudogroups from the determining equa- tions for the in¯nitesimal generators of the pseudogroup action is obtained (see, in particular, the work [1] on the structure equations for the KdV{ and KP{equations) and systematic methods for constructing complete sys- tems of di®erential invariants and invariant forms for pseudogroup actions are developed. Moreover, the new methods immediately yield syzygies and recurrence relations amongst the various invariant quantities which are in- strumental in uncovering their structure, the knowledge of which is piv- otal e.g. in the implementation of Vessiot's method of group splitting for obtaining explicit noninvariant solutions for systems of partial di®erential equations. Let G be a Lie pseudogroup (a precise de¯nition will be given in Sec. 2) acting of a manifold M. The action of G on M naturally induces an action of G on the extended jet bundle J n(M; p) of nth order jets of submanifolds of M by the usual prolongation process. Our goal in this paper is to prove that under a mild regularity condition on the action of the pseudogroup G on M the orbits of G in J n(M; p) are immersed submanifolds for n su±- ciently large. We were originally lead to the problem in connection of the research reported in Ref. [4] and the result is of importance in the the- oretical constructs therein. Interestingly, as we will see, the submanifold property of G orbits in J n(M; p) is closely related to local solvability of the determining equations for the in¯nitesimal generators of the pseudogroup action on M. The proof of our main result relies on classical work [12] on the structure of the orbits of a set of vector ¯elds originally arising in the study of the accessibility question in the context of control theory. In Sec. 2 we cover some background material on Lie pseudogroups and discuss the regularity condition for pseudogroup actions needed in our main result. Sec. 3 is dedicated to the proof of the submanifold property of orbits of the action of G on the extended jet bundles J n(M; p). October 11, 2004 14:39 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in orbits 3 2. Tameness of Lie Pseudogroups Let D = D(M) denote the pseudogroup of all local di®eomorphisms of a (n) (n) manifold. We write jz ' for the nth order jet of ' 2 D at z and : (n) (n) n D ! M for the associated jet bundle, where (jz ') = z stands for the (n) (n) (n) n source map. We furthermore write ¿ : D ! M, ¿ (jz ') = '(z) = Z for the target map. De¯nition 2.1. A subset G ½ D is called a pseudogroup3 acting on M if (1) the restriction idjO of the identity mapping to any open O ½ M belongs to G; (2) if ', Ã 2 G, then also the composition ' ± Ã 2 G where de¯ned; (3) if ' 2 G, then also the inverse mapping '¡1 2 G. A pseudogroup G is called a Lie pseudogroup if, in addition, there exists N ¸ 1 so that the following conditions are satis¯ed for all n ¸ N: (4) G(n) ½ D(n) is a smooth, embedded subbundle; n+1 (n+1) (n) (5) ¼n : G ! G is a bundle map; (n) (6) a local di®eomorphism ' of M belongs to G if and only if z ! jz ' is a local section of (n) : G(n) ! M; (7) G(n) = prn¡N G(N) is obtained by prolongation. We call the smallest N satisfying the above conditions the order of the pseudogroup, and unless otherwise speci¯ed, we will assume that n ¸ N in what follows. Note that by (1) and (2), the restriction 'jO of a transfor- mation ' 2 G to any open subset O of the domain of ' is again a member of the pseudogroup. Fix local coordinates (z1; : : : ; zm) about some p 2 M, and let (z; Z) = (z1; : : : ; zm; Z1; : : : ; Zm) denote the induced product coordinates about (p; p) 2 D(0) = M £ M. Due to conditions (4) and (6) above, pseudogroup transformations are locally determined by a system (n) F®(z; Z ) = 0; ® = 1; : : : ; k; (1) of partial di®erential equations, the determining equations for G. Here n ¸ N is ¯xed and (z; Z(n)) stands collectively for the coordinates of D(n) induced by (z; Z). By De¯nition 2.1 the above equations are locally solv- (n) (n) able, that is, given a jet go = (zo; Zo ) satisfying (1), then there is a (n) (n) solution ' 2 G of the equations so that jzo ' = go . Let X = X (M) denote the space of locally de¯ned vector ¯elds on M. Thus the domain U(v) ½ M of v 2 X is an open subset of M. The vertical October 11, 2004 14:39 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in orbits 4 lift V(n) of a vector ¯eld v 2 X to D(n) is the in¯nitesimal generator of the (n) (n) local one-parameter group ©t of transformations acting on D de¯ned (n) (n) (n) by ©t (jz ') = jz (©t ± '), where ©t stands for the ow map of v. Note that the domain of V(n) is ¿ (n)¡1(U(v)). m a m a v v a V V a Pick = Pa=1 (z)@z 2 X and write = Pa=1 (Z)@Z for the vertical counterpart of v. Then V(n) is simply given by the usual prolongation formula2, m (n) (n) a (n) V z; Z D V z; Z @ a ; ( ) = X X ( J )( ) ZJ (2) a=1 jJj·n where J = (j1; : : : ; jp) is stands for a multi-index of integers, DJ = j Dj1 ¢ ¢ ¢ Djp for the product of the total derivative operators Dj = @z + m a a Z @ a , and where the Z denote the components of the ¯ber Pa=1 PjJj¸0 Jj ZJ J (n) (n) coordinates on D induced by (z; Z). In particular, at the nth jet Iz of the identity mapping, Eq. (2) becomes m (n) a V @ J v z @ a ; (n) = X X z ( ) ZJ (3) Iz a=1 jJj·n where we have again used the obvious multi-index notation. We denote the space of n jets of local di®eomorphisms with source at a (n) (n) ¯xed z 2 M by D jz. It is easy to see that D jz is a regular submanifold (n) (n) (n) of D . Write Rh(n) for the right action of a jet h 2 D on the source (n) (n)¡1 (n) (n) (n) n ¯ber D j¿ (n)(h(n)) = (¿ (h )) by Rh(n) g = j(n)(h(n))(' ± Ã), (n) n (n) n where h = j(n)(h(n))Ã, g = j¿ (n)(h(n))'. Then, by di®erentiating the identity (n) (n) (n) (n) Rh(n) ©t (g ) = ©t (Rh(n) g ); (n) it is easy to see that V is Rh(n) -invariant, that is, (n) (n) (n) (n) Rh(n) ¤(V (g )) = V (Rh(n) g ); (4) (n) (n) (n) (n) whenever (g ) = ¿ (h ). Note that the action of Rh(n) on V(n)(g(n)) is well de¯ned since V(n) is a vertical vector ¯eld. Next let G be a Lie pseudogroup. A local vector ¯eld v 2 X on M is a G vector ¯eld if its ow map ©t is a member of G for all ¯xed t on some interval about 0.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us