CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report

CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report

CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006 HIGHLIGHTS • Federal Land Managers • IMPROVE • BART • Interstate Consultation • Interstate Transport • Reasonable Progress FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS • Intra-State Consultation • Bi-Annual Meetings • Regional Haze Teach-In IMPROVE MONITORING • Match Air Basins • Similar Elevations • Reasonable Distance • Future Growth and Land Use • Research Value • Rank Importance BART-eligible FACILITIES • Possibly 30 facilities outside the SJV and SC • Sixteen BART categories • RACT and rule stringency • Q/D elimination, then Subject-to-BART modeling • Title V permits • TPY reductions minimal FAR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA concentration extinction REDWOODS • Species Analysis Coastal Avg. Worst 18.45 dv – Haze Drivers – Seasonality TRINITY – Concentration Remote Forest Coast Range (lee) – Extinction Avg. Worst 16.32 dv • Geography LAVA BEDS Inland Plain – Terrain Avg. Worst 15.05 dv – Meteorology LASSEN VOLCANIC – Regional vs. Local Western Base of Mountain – Proximity to eight Avg. Worst 14.15 dv Class 1 Areas FAR NORTHERN ISSUES • Surrounding Land Use - Natural - Anthropogenic - Transport (Pacific, OR, WA, NV, Asia) • Species Reductions –Nitrates, sulfates, woodsmoke •Long-Term Strategy – Smoke Management – On/Off Road Mobile - BART - SB 656 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA • Species Analysis – Nitrates, Sulfates, OC, Coarse Mass, EC • Attribution – Mobile Sources primarily; Boundary Transport • Strategies (NAAQS non-attainment) – Diesel Risk Reduction, Goods Movement, BACM GLIDE PATH BENCHMARKS REGIONAL HAZE BENCHMARKS for Worst Worst 10-year 2018 Per Cent Complete California Class 1 Areas Haze Haze Change Years of Site Name Class I Area(s) Natural II Baseline Glide BENCH by 2018 Data (dv) (dv) Slope MARK • Lowest Hurdles NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REDW1 Redwood Redwood National Park 14.03 18.45 0.07 17.42 5.6% 5 TRIN1 Trinity Marble Mountain Wilderness 8.25 16.32 0.13 14.43 11.5% 3 – coast at sea level Yolla Bolly-Middle Eel Wilderness LABE1 Lava Beds Lava Beds National Monument 7.95 15.05 0.12 13.39 11.0% 4 South Warner Wilderness – lee of Sierra LAVO1 Lassen Lassen Volcanic National Park 7.38 14.15 0.11 12.57 11.2% 5 Volcanic Caribou Wilderness Thousand Lakes Wilderness SIERRA CALIFORNIA BLIS1 Bliss Desolation Wilderness 6.19 12.63 0.11 11.13 11.9% 4 • Highest Hurdles Mokelumne Wilderness HOOV1 Hoover Hoover Wilderness 8.04 12.87 0.08 11.74 8.8% 3 YOSE1 Yosemite Yosemite National Park 7.72 17.63 0.17 15.32 13.1% 5 Emigrant Wilderness – southern Sierra KAIS1 Kaiser Ansel Adams Wilderness 7.26 14.75 0.12 13.01 11.9% 2 Kaiser Wilderness John Muir Wilderness – southernmost C1As SEQU1 Sequoia Sequoia National Park 7.56 24.62 0.28 20.64 16.2% 3 Kings Canyon National Park DOME1 Dome Lands Dome Lands Wilderness 7.53 19.43 0.20 16.65 14.3% 4 COASTAL CALIFORNIA • Regional REDW1 Redwood Redwood National Park 14.03 18.45 0.07 17.42 5.6% 5 PORE1 Point Reyes Point Reyes National Seashore 15.88 22.81 0.12 21.19 7.1% 3 PINN1 Pinnacles PinnaclesWilderness 8.05 18.46 0.17 16.03 13.2% 4 Ventana Wilderness Response to RAFA1 San Rafael San Rafael 7.83 18.86 0.18 16.28 13.6% 2 SAGA1 San Gabriel San Gabriel Wilderness 7.13 19.94 0.21 16.95 15.0% 3 Cucamonga Wilderness AGTI1 Agua Tibia Agua Tibia 7.70 23.50 0.26 19.81 15.7% 4 Reductions SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SAGA1 San Gabriel San Gabriel Wilderness 7.13 19.94 0.21 16.95 15.0% 3 Cucamonga Wilderness SAGO1 San Gorgonio San Gorgonio Wildrness 7.36 22.17 0.25 18.72 15.6% 4 San Jacinto Wilderness AGTI1 Agua Tibia Agua Tibia • Gap Analysis 7.70 23.50 0.26 19.81 15.7% 4 JOSH1 Joshua Tree Joshua Tree National Park 7.25 19.62 0.21 16.73 14.7% 4 AVERAGE 8.42 18.31 0.16 16.00 12.4% 3.6 RANGE lowest 6.19 12.63 0.07 11.13 5.59% 2.00 to highest 15.88 24.62 0.28 21.19 16.16% 5.00 VISIBILITY IMPROVEMENT • San Gorgonio GAP Analysis – Achieve 70% of 2018 deciview benchmark – 45% reduction in nitrate extinction – 11% reduction in OMC; 37% reduction in EC – slight increase in sulfate, coarse mass, and fine soil extinction • Overall Trend is Improvement WHO IMPACTS WHOM • Uncontrollable Boundary Sources • BART Sources • Large Nearby Sources • Caveats for Attribution Modeling Results Phase 1 Report TSSA: Combined Nitrate & Sulfate • Relative Percentage >50% 25-50% <25% for Consultation REASONABLE PROGRESS • Justify Reasonable Progress Goal using WRAP data analyses – Wildfires – Transport – Mobile sources, transportation corridors – Population growth and land use – Nearby stationary source facility • Long Term Strategy – Explaining California SIP Commitments – Don’t shoot the messenger! CALIFORNIA Class 1 Areas.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us