Brief of Appellee, Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Virginia

Brief of Appellee, Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Virginia

Record No. 120919 In the Supreme Court of Virginia The Falls Church (also known as The Church at the Falls – The Falls Church), Defendant-Appellant, v. The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America and The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Virginia, Plaintiffs-Appellees. BRIEF OF APPELLEE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF VIRGINIA Bradfute W. Davenport, Jr. (VSB #12848) Mary C. Zinsner (VSB #31397) [email protected] [email protected] George A. Somerville (VSB #22419) Troutman Sanders LLP [email protected] 1660 International Drive, Suite 600 Troutman Sanders LLP McLean, Virginia 22102 P.O. Box 1122 (703) 734-4334 (telephone) Richmond, Virginia 23218-1122 (703 734-4340 (facsimile) (804) 697-1291 (telephone) (804) 697-1339 (facsimile) CONTENTS Table of Authorities .................................................................................... iiii Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Facts ........................................................................................................... 2 Assignment of Cross-Error .......................................................................... 5 Argument .................................................................................................... 5 Standard of Review ........................................................................... 5 I. The Circuit Court correctly followed and applied this Court’s decision in Green v. Lewis. (Assignments of Error 1, 2) ..................................................................................... 5 A. The “constitution” of the general church ................................... 6 B. The dealings between the parties ......................................... 10 C. The Circuit Court correctly considered evidence of the dealings between the parties. ......................................... 19 D. Statutes ................................................................................ 22 E. Deeds ................................................................................... 23 F. Miscellaneous neutral principles issues ................................ 26 G. Constitutionality ....................................................................... 34 II. TFC’s Assignment of Error 3 is waived and is without merit. .......................................................................................... 34 III. TFC’s Assignment of Error 4 is waived and is without merit. .......................................................................................... 35 IV. Ownership of a church’s personal property is governed by the same rules as its real property. (Assignment of Error 5) .............................................................. 37 V. The Circuit Court only granted relief that plaintiffs requested. (Assignment of Error 6) ........................................... 42 VI. The Circuit Court erred by holding that Va. Code § 57-7.1 does not validate trusts for the benefit of a hierarchical church. (Assignment of Cross-Error) ...................... 44 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 50 Certificate ..................................................................................................... 52 Addendum 1: Va. Code § 57-7. What transfers for religious purposes valid. (Repl. Vol. 1969). (Repealed, 1993 Va. Acts, ch. 370) Va. Code § 57-7.1. What transfers for religious purposes valid. Addendum 2: Episcopal Diocese of Ohio v. Anglican Church of the Transfiguration, No. CV-08-654973 (Ohio Common Pleas, Cuyahoga Co., Sept. 29, 2011) ii AUTHORITIES Page(s) VIRGINIA CASES Bankers Credit Service of Vermont v. Dorsch, 231 Va. 273, 343 S.E.2d 339 (1986) .................................................... 28 Brooke v. Shacklett, 54 Va. (13 Gratt.) 301 (1856) .......................................... 7, 26, 33, 45, 46 C.G. Blake Co. v. Smith, 147 Va. 960, 133 S.E. 685 (1926) ................................................... 30-31 Commonwealth v. Bruhn, 264 Va. 597, 570 S.E.2d 866 (2002) .................................................... 45 Dale v. City of Newport News, 243 Va. 48, 412 S.E.2d 701 (1992) ...................................................... 45 Delta Star, Inc. v. Michael’s Carpet World, 276 Va. 524, 666 S.E.2d 331 (2008) .................................................... 28 Diocese of Southwestern Va. of the Protestant Episcopal Church v. Buhrman, 5 Va. Cir. 497 (Clifton Forge 1977), pet refused, Rec. No. 780347 (Va. June 15, 1978) ....................................... 24-25, 42 Flippo v. CSC Associates, III, LLC, 262 Va. 48, 547 S.E.2d 216 (2001) ...................................................... 36 Gottlieb v. Economy Stores, Inc., 199 Va. 848, 102 S.E.2d 345 (1958) ...................................................... 8 Green v. Lewis, 221 Va. 547, 272 S.E.2d 181 (1980) .................................... 1, et passim. Jenkins v. Bay House Assocs., 266 Va. 39, 581 S.E.2d 510 (2003) ......................................................... 42 Kemp v. Miller, 166 Va. 661, 186 S.E. 99 (1936) .......................................................... 38 Lee v. Lee, 12 Va. App. 512, 404 S.E.2d 736 (1991) .............................................. 45 iii L.F. v. Breit, ___ Va. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, Record No. 120158 (Va. Jan. 10, 2013) ............................................... 48 Linn v. Carson, 73 Va. (32 Gratt.) 170 (1879) ................................................................. 8 Moore v. Perkins, 169 Va. 175, 192 S.E. 806 (1937) ........................................................ 46 National R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Catlett Volunteer Fire Co., 241 Va. 402, 404 S.E.2d 216 (1991) .................................................... 28 Norfolk Presbytery v. Bollinger, 214 Va. 500, 201 S.E.2d 752 (1974) .................................... 1, et passim. Nusbaum v. Berlin, 273 Va. 385, 641 S.E.2d 494 (2007) .................................................... 36 Protestant Episcopal Church v. Truro Church, 280 Va. 6, 694 S.E.2d 555 (2010) (“Truro”) ..................... 2, 5, 6-7, 41, 42 Reid v. Gholson, 229 Va. 179, 327 S.E.2d 107 (1985) ............................................ 2, 7, 33 Reston Recreation Center Associates v. Reston Property Investors Ltd. Partnership, 238 Va. 419, 384 S.E.2d 607 (1989) .................................................... 32 Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. O’Neal, 224 Va. 343, 297 S.E.2d 647 (1982) .................................................... 31 Town of Vinton v. City of Roanoke, 195 Va. 881, 80 S.E.2d 608 (1954) ...................................................... 31 Unit Owners Ass’n v. Gillman, 223 Va. 752, 292 S.E.2d 378 (1982) .................................................... 26 Woods v. Mendez, 265 Va. 68, 574 S.E.2d 263 (2003) ...................................................... 45 FEDERAL CASES Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993) .......................................................................... 45, 48 iv Falwell v. Miller, 203 F. Supp. 2d 624 (W.D. Va. 2002) ..................................................... 47 Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595 (1979) ........................................... 17-18, 29, 34, 45, 48-50 Larkin v. Grendel’s Den, Inc., 459 U.S. 116 (1982) ............................................................................. 34 Maryland and Virginia Eldership v. Church of God at Sharpsburg, Inc. 396 U.S. 367 (1970) ........................................................................ 49-50 Presbyterian Church v. Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church, 393 U.S. 440 (1969) ............................................................................. 50 Serbian Eastern Orthodox Dioscese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696 (1976) ............................................................................. 50 Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 60 (1985)............................................. 45, 48 Watson v. Jones, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 679 (1871) ............................................................... 34 OTHER CASES Episcopal Church Cases, 198 P.3d 66 (Cal. 2009) .......................................................................... 49 Episcopal Diocese of Ohio v. Anglican Church of the Transfiguration, No. CV-08-654973 (Ohio Common Pleas, Cuyahoga Co., Sept. 29, 2011) .............................................................................................. 43 Episcopal Diocese of Rochester v. Harnish, 899 N.E.2d 920 (N.Y. 2008) ................................................................. 30 In re Church of St. James the Less, 833 A.2d 319 (Pa. Commw. 2003), aff’d in part, 888 A.2d 795 (Pa. 2005) ................................................... 30 Rector, Wardens and Vestrymen of Christ Church in Savannah v. Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Ga., Inc., 699 S.E.2d 45 (Ga. App. 2010) (“Savannah I”), aff’d, 718 S.E.2d 237 (Ga. 2011), cert. dismissed, 132 S.Ct. 2439 (2012) .......................................................................... 30 v Rector, Wardens and Vestrymen of Christ Church in Savannah v. Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Ga., Inc., 718 S.E.2d 237 (Ga. 2011) (“Savannah II”), cert. dismissed, 132 S.Ct. 2439 (2012) ..................................... 25, 29-30 STATUTES 1992 Va. Acts, ch. 564.. ...........................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    67 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us