2012 WL 12109913 (NM) (Appellate Brief) Supreme Court of New Mexico

2012 WL 12109913 (NM) (Appellate Brief) Supreme Court of New Mexico

THE BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustees for Popular..., 2012 WL 12109913... 2012 WL 12109913 (N.M.) (Appellate Brief) Supreme Court of New Mexico. THE BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustees for Popular Financial Services Mortgage/Pass Through Certificate Series #2006-D, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Joseph A. ROMERO and Mary Romero a/k/a Mary O. Romero a/k/a Maria Romero, Defendants-Appellants. No. 33,224. February 3, 2012. On Writ of Certiorari from the New Mexico Court of Appeals Brief of Amicus Curiae Attorney General of New Mexico Gary K. King, New Mexico Attorney General, Joel Cruz-Esparza, Assistant Attorney General, Karen Meyers, Assistant Attorney General, Consumer Protection Division, Office of New Mexico Attorney General, Gary K. King, 408 Galisteo Street, Santa Fe, NM 87501, (505) 827-6000, (505) 827-5826 (Fax). *i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTEREST OF AMICUS ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ................................................................................................................... 4 3. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ......................................................................................................... 5 4. STANDARD OF REVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 8 5. ARGUMENTS I. THERE IS GUIDANCE IN NEW MEXICO ON THE PROPER REASONABLE AND NET 8 TANGIBLE STANDARD IN HOME LOAN TRANSACTIONS ................................................................. A. THE HOME LOAN PROTECTION ACT WAS ADOPTED TO ELIMINATE ABUSIVE 8 MORTGAGE LENDING PRACTICES ......................................................................................................... B. GENERAL STATUTORY AND REGULATORY INTERPRETATION PRINCIPLES MUST 13 BE USED TO DETERMINE WHETHER A HOME-LOAN TRANSACTION PROVIDES A REASONABLE AND NET TANGIBLE STANDARD ................................................................................ C. THE RULE ON THE PROHIBITION AGAINST FLIPPING PROVIDES APPROPRIATE 16 GUIDELINES TO DETERMINE REASONABLE TANGIBLE NET BENEFIT ........................................ D. THE CORRECT STANDARD WAS NOT USED BY THE COURTS BELOW TO DETERMINE 20 WHETHER THE HOME LOAN WAS FLIPPED ......................................................................................... II. FEDERAL PREEMPTION DOES NOT PROTECT NATIONAL BANKS FORECLOSING IN NEW 22 MEXICO FROM COMPLIANCE WITH THE HOME LOAN PROTECTION ACT .................................. *ii A. NATIONAL BANKS AND TRUSTEES ARE SUBJECT TO STATE ENFORCEMENT LAWS 23 OF GENERAL APPLICATION SUCH AS THE HLPA AND THE UPA ................................................... B. BONY'S STATUS AS “TRUSTEE” OF THE MORTGAGE ON ITS FACE PRECLUDES A 28 FINDING OF PREEMPTION ........................................................................................................................ III. CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 29 *iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES New Mexico Cases: Ashlock v. Sw, Bank of Roswell, 107 N.M. 100, 103, 753 P. 26, 27 2d 346, 349 (1988) overruled on other grounds by Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp., 120 N.M. 133, 899 P.2d 576 (1995) ........ Cooper vs. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 2002 NMSC 20, 132 N.M. 8 382, 49 P.3d 61 ..................................................................... Fiser v. Dell Computer Corp., 2008-NMSC-46, ¶ 11, 144 1, 2 N.M. 464, 188 P.3d 1215 ...................................................... © 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 THE BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustees for Popular..., 2012 WL 12109913... Humphries v. Pay and Save, Inc., 2011-NMCA-035,¶7, 261 27 P.3d 592 ................................................................................. Lohman v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 2007- NMCA- 100, ¶ 8 25, 142 N.M. 437, 442-443, 166 P.3d 1091; cert denied, 142 N.M. 434 ............................................................................... Morning Star Water Users Ass ‘n v. N,M. Pub. Util. Comm 16 ‘n, 120 N.M. 579, 583, 904 P.2d 28, 32 (1995) .................... Pub. Serv. Co. v. Diamond D Constr. Co., 2001- 8 NMCA-082, ¶ 48, 131 N.M. 100, 33 P.3d 651 ..................... Salmeron vs. Highlands Ford Sales, Inc. 271 F.Supp.2d 8 1314, 1318 (D.N.M. 2003 ..................................................... State vs. Alvarado, 1997-NMCA-26,¶6, 123 N.M. 187, 936 16 P.2d 869 ................................................................................. State ex rel. Stratton vs. Gurley Motor Co., 105 N.M. 803, 15 737 P.2d 1180 (Ct. App. 1987) ............................................. *iv Truong vs. All State Insurance Company, 2010 NMSC 14, 16 9,¶ 37, 147 NM 583; 227 P.3d 73 ......................................... The Bank of New York as Trustee for Popular Financial 5, 6, 22 Services Mortgage/Pass Through Certificate Series #2006 vs. JOSEPH A. ROMERO, et al. 2011-NMCA-110,¶6, 2011 N.M. App Lexis 96 ............................................................... Trujillo vs. City of Albuquerque, 1998-NMSC-31 ¶44, 125 16 N.M. 721, 965 P.2d 305 ........................................................ New Mexico Lower Court Cases: Bank of New York as Trustee for Popular Financial 4 Services Mortgage/Pass through Certificate Series #2006-D vs. Joseph A. Romero and Mary Romero, No. CV-2008-139 (1st Jud. Dist. Ct. September 1, 2009) .................................. State of New Mexico ex rel. Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney 9 General of New Mexico vs. Ameriquest Mortgage Company; Town & Country Credit Corporation; AMC Mortgage Services, Inc., f/k/a Bedford Homes Loans;, and ACC Capital Holding Corporations, No. CV-2006-00628 ( 1st Jud. Dist. Ct. March 21, 2006) .............................................. State of New Mexico ex rel. Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney 9 General of New Mexico vs. Household International, Inc., No. CV-2002-02739 (1st Jud. Dist. Ct. December 16, 2002) Federal Cases: Anderson Nat'l Bank v. Luckett, 321 U.S. 233, 248 (1944) 24, 25 and at 252, 88 L. Ed. 692, 64 S. Ct. 599 (1944) ................... *v Agustin v. PNC Financial Services Group, 707 F. Supp. 27 2d 1080, 1092 (D. Hawaii 2010) .......................................... Barnett Bank of Marion County vs. Nelson, 517 U.S. 25, at 7, 24, 26, 28 33 (1996) and 30-33 and 517 U.S. at 33-34 .......................... Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass'n, LLC 557 U.S. 519, ___, , 129 S. Ct. 2710, 2720 (2009) 7, 8, 16, 23, 26, 27 129 S. Ct. 2710, 2720 (2009) and 129 U.S. at 2719 .............. English v. Gen, Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 78-79 (1990) ........... 24 Fifth Third Bank v. CSX Corp., 415 F. 3d 741, 745 (7th Cir. 28 2005) ...................................................................................... In Re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, 694 F. Supp. 27 2d 1302, 1310-1314 (SD Fla. 2010) ..................................... Jefferson v. Chase Home Finance, 2008 WL 1883484 27 *10-15 (ND Cal. 2008) ......................................................... McClellan v. Chipman, 164 U.S. 347, 358, 41 L. Ed. 461, 25 17 S. Ct. 85 (1896) ............................................................... National Bank v. Commonwealth, 76 U.S. 353, 9 Wall. 353, 23, 25 362, 19 L. Ed. 701 (1870) ..................................................... © 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2 THE BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustees for Popular..., 2012 WL 12109913... Perdue v. Crocker Nat. Bank, 702 P.2d 503, 523 (Cal. 1985) 27 ................................................................................................. Preston State Bank v. Ainsworth, 552 F. Supp. 578 (D Tex. 7 1982) ...................................................................................... Sheinkin v. Simon Property Group, Inc., 931 NYS2d 823 27 (NY Sup. 2011) ..................................................................... *vi Thomas v. U,S. Bank National Ass ‘n, 575 F.3d 794 27 (8th Cir. 2009) ....................................................................... Watters v. Wachovia Bank, 550 U.S. 1 (2007) ...................... 23, 24 CONSTITUTIONS, STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND RULES New Mexico Statutes and Regulations: New Mexico Unfair Practices Act (“UPA‘), NMSA 1978, 1 Sections 57-12-1 to 57-12-26 (1967, as amended through 2009) ...................................................................................... NMSA 1978, § 8-5-2(J) (1975) ............................................. 1 NMSA 1978, § 12-2A-19 (Uniform Statute and Rule 14 Construction Act) .................................................................. Home Loan Protection Act (“HLPA”), NMSA 1978, §§ 2 58-21A-1 to 14 ...................................................................... NMSA 1978, § 58-21A-2 ...................................................... 13 NMSA 1978, § 58-21A-4(B) ................................................ 3, 6, 14 NMSA 1978 § 58-21A-12 ..................................................... 2, 4 NMSA 1978, § 58-21A-13 .................................................... 3, 16 NMSA 1978, § 58-21A-14 (2003) ........................................ 15 NMRAP 12-215 .................................................................... 4 New Mexico Admin. Code at 12.5.5.1 through 12.5.5.9 6 NMAC ................................................................................... NMAC at 12.15.5.9(A) ........................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us