1 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background to the Study the Deregulation and Liberalisation of the Air Transport Industry Have In

1 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background to the Study the Deregulation and Liberalisation of the Air Transport Industry Have In

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background to the Study The deregulation and liberalisation of the air transport industry have influenced significantly the operational and institutional structure of the aviation industry globally. This regime has created a strong competitive environment among airline operators with a clear-cut impact scale from local to global aviation markets. This has brought about the formation of alliances, mergers and acquisitions to gain a competitive edge. The United States of America pioneered the deregulation of domestic air transport market in 1978 (Miyoshi, 2007). The deregulation of the US domestic market and the Canada-US open skies agreement greatly relaxed the regulatory restraints of the advancement of airline networks in North America (Oun and Lee, 2002). Page (2005) following the work of Chou and Shaw (1993) observed that from the transport geographer’s point of view, a distinguishing spatial structure in air travel has emerged in the USA, whereby the major US airlines have initiated a hub-and-spoke structure as spatial and commercial strategies for arranging airlines operations in a deregulated environment. This is in contrast with the Civil Aeronautic Board (CAB) regulation era where inter-urban routes were often 805km or more in length while little or no attention was given to integrating the route networks amongst operators. O’Kelly (1986), on the spatial effects of deregulation on Aviation in the US, posits that hub and spoke spatial structure have developed, as hubs are least-cost solutions for airlines and may combine a range of airports in a region, helping the airline in running a high-frequency service along trunk routes between hubs. As it were, along the spokes, regional carriers, often code sharing under the major’s identification to provide feeder services. The outcome has been a geographical concentration of airline hubs in major US cities, based on historical ties with certain airports, airline mergers, the servicing of niche tourist markets, and responses to competitors so that major operators provides 100-200 departures each day from some of the key hubs. 1 In Europe, the process of liberalisation was accomplished bit by bit in three phases, and took ten years from 1987 to 1997 (Chang and Williams 2002). A standout amongst the hugest results of deregulation in Europe has been the emergence of low-cost scheduled airlines. The low-cost sector has been expanding rapidly and growing at between 20 and 25% a year. This has upgraded the business relationship that exists between airports and low-cost carriers (Barrett 2004). Barret (2004) argues that the amalgamation of low-cost carriers (LCC) and secondary airports has been noteworthy both in terms of LCCs’ gaining market share and expanding the size of the overall market, as a result of willingness of passengers to use remote airports which are normally more distant than the traditional hubs from the major cities. Near similar outcomes were noted in Asia and Japan, on the effects of deregulation on the aviation market. Miyoshi (2007) on the effects of liberalisation on the domestic market in Japan observed that the Tokyo route market has high volume demand, influence of slots, different features of each market category, relatively low load factors, significant market seasonality, competition among network carriers, competition with high-speed rail and high fares. Conversely, these outcomes of the study when compared with the experiences in the intra-EU liberalized market serving the UK which showed three significant effects among which include decreased demand, increased fares and new entrants’ failures. Whilst studies on deregulation and liberalisation in air transport in US, Europe and Japan (Chou and Shaw, 1993; Oum and Lee, 2002; Barrett, 2004; Page, 2005 and Miyoshi, 2007) have shown that deregulation and liberalisation have led to the development of airline network, distinctive spatial network structure such as hub and spoke, emergence of low-cost scheduled airlines, enhanced service levels, flexible airfare regimes, increased route and network structure and increased passenger demands on niche route. Following the impacts of the execution of air liberalisation policies in the US and Europe, African states arrived at the general accord on the need to draft a new policy that requires the liberalisation of the African airline industry. This agreement known as the Yamoussoukro Declaration is planned to avoid the bilateral air service agreements (BASA) that impose several restrictions on African carriers and rather create a single domestic market in Africa (Abate, 2007;Aberyratene, 2003). The African civil aviation liberalisation is based on the fifth air transport right. This is the right to carry a passenger from home country to another intermediate 2 country and from that to the third country. The commencement date for the African civil aviation policy dated back to the year 2001. 1.2 Statement of Problem Globalisation has no doubt reduced the world to a global village. Distance no longer seems to be a major consideration in inter-governmental relations, choosing locations for global events, conventions and inter-governmental meetings. Similarly, corporations now have outstations and offices where manufacturing and distribution activities are carried out. One major transport mode that has contributed immensely in redefining the way socio-economic relationship across the world is organised is the air transport. As the pair, farthest location on the earth can be traversed under twenty-four hours ( Bel and Fageda, 2008). The deregulation of the air transportation is perceived as the major policy adoption that has changed the global aviation subsector. The US pioneered the deregulation of her domestic aviation market. The benefits include the emergence of a hub and spoke spatial structure, route integration and high-frequency service along trunk route between hubs. The success recorded prompted other parts of the world to quickly embrace the policy in order to improve and enhance air travel (Miyoshi,2007; Oun and Lee, 2002). The actual and perceived gains of this policy made African countries to come together to draft a new policy that requires the liberalisation of the African air transport subsector. It was expected that the treaty dubbed Yamoussoukro Declaration which was signed in 1988 would transform the continent and regional aviation sector. The goal is to remove the restriction naturally imposed by the need to sign bilateral air service agreement before air services between countries is allowed. It was expected that between these periods the air transport sub-sector of the region would have been greatly enhanced. Consequently, the fifth freedom right would be fully maximised to the growth of regional aviation subsector (Richman and Lyle, 2005). In Nigeria, earlier studies on air transport, air transport deregulation and liberalisation have focused mainly on the domestic air travel market (Filani, 1972; 1973; 1975; 1978; Akpogomeh, 1984; 1999; Olojo, 1996; Ogunsanya, 2005; Ogunbodede, 2006; Aderamo, 2010 Daramola and Jaja, 2011). Some of the works mainly examined the changing spatial configuration of aviation network since deregulation and the emergent structure. Most of these studies fail to establish the 3 spatial patterns of regional airline service structure from Nigeria given the importance of liberalisation as collective regional efforts for the West African socio-economic development. Also, the challenges militating against regional city accessibility and inclusion from Nigeria appears not to have been given consideration in the literature. Moreover, the air traffic movements from Nigeria to the regional cities between 1988 and 2011 have been bewildered with a myriad of issues that have hampered the purpose of regional aviation liberalisation. The pattern of air traffic flow from Nigeria to other West Africa cities seems to be stagnant rather than expanding, and unpredictable. Issues of a flight delay, cancellation and non-availability characterised the nature of air traffic services from Nigeria to other West Africa cities. Against this background, this study seeks to provide answers to the following research questions: 1. What is the spatial pattern of air traffic flow between Nigeria and other cities in West African sub-region in a pre- and post-liberalisation eras? 2. What is the temporal pattern of air traffic flow between Nigeria and other West African countries in pre and post-liberalisation eras? 3. What are the challenges facing the air transportation in West African in pre- and post- liberalisation eras? 4. Has the city-pair category influenced regional passenger flow in West Africa since the liberalisation? 1.3 Aim and Objectives The main aim of this study is to analyse the impact of liberalisation on air traffic flow from Nigeria to other West African countries. Basically, the study involves a spatio-temporal analysis of the regional air traffic structure from Nigeria to other West African countries in the pre- and post-liberalisation eras. The specific objectives are to: 1. Examine the spatial pattern of air traffic flow between Nigeria and the West Africa sub- region in pre- and post-liberalisation eras. 4 2. Examine the temporal pattern of air traffic flow from Nigeria to West Africa in pre- and post-liberalisation. 3. Provide a comparative analysis of the challenges of air transportation pre- and post- liberalisation. 4. Determine the significance of regional city pair passenger movement in West

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    220 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us