Bohm's approach to quantum mechanics: Alternative theory or practical picture? A. S. Sanz∗ Department of Optics, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Pza. Ciencias 1, Ciudad Universitaria E-28040 Madrid, Spain Since its inception Bohmian mechanics has been generally regarded as a hidden-variable theory aimed at providing an objective description of quantum phenomena. To date, this rather narrow conception of Bohm's proposal has caused it more rejection than acceptance. Now, after 65 years of Bohmian mechanics, should still be such an interpretational aspect the prevailing appraisal? Why not favoring a more pragmatic view, as a legitimate picture of quantum mechanics, on equal footing in all respects with any other more conventional quantum picture? These questions are used here to introduce a discussion on an alternative way to deal with Bohmian mechanics at present, enhancing its aspect as an efficient and useful picture or formulation to tackle, explore, describe and explain quantum phenomena where phase and correlation (entanglement) are key elements. This discussion is presented through two complementary blocks. The first block is aimed at briefly revisiting the historical context that gave rise to the appearance of Bohmian mechanics, and how this approach or analogous ones have been used in different physical contexts. This discussion is used to emphasize a more pragmatic view to the detriment of the more conventional hidden-variable (ontological) approach that has been a leitmotif within the quantum foundations. The second block focuses on some particular formal aspects of Bohmian mechanics supporting the view presented here, with special emphasis on the physical meaning of the local phase field and the associated velocity field encoded within the wave function. As an illustration, a simple model of Young's two-slit experiment is considered. The simplicity of this model allows to understand in an easy manner how the information conveyed by the Bohmian formulation relates to other more conventional concepts in quantum mechanics. This sort of pedagogical application is also aimed at showing the potential interest to introduce Bohmian mechanics in undergraduate quantum mechanics courses as a working tool rather than merely an alternative interpretation. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ca,03.65.Ge,03.65.Ta,03.75.-b I. INTRODUCTION around the question of whether it is possible to find a compromise between the internal consistency of the In 1917 Einstein settled down the theoretical founda- quantum theory and its apparently statistical or prob- tions for the maser and the laser with the introducing of abilistic nature, quite distant from the classical causality the notion of stimulated radiation emission [1]. By the we are used to. In 1952, moved by the need to understand end of the same year, David Bohm, Einstein's \spiritual and provide a clear answer to this fundamental question, son", was born in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. About 35 Bohm proposed [2, 3] what he called an \interpretation years later, Bohm proposed what is now widely known as of the quantum theory in terms of \hidden" variables". Bohmian mechanics [2, 3], an alternative way to look at Several decades later, this interpretation started being quantum phenomena that would have a strong influence referred to as Bohmian mechanics and became one of on John Bell and his celebrated theorem { which led to the warhorse issues within the still open debate on the new research areas in quantum mechanics, such as the interpretation of the quantum realm, with a strong influ- quantum information theory and the so-called quantum ence on the perception and understanding of Reality and technologies. But, just when this work on the reformu- the Universe we live in [4, 5]. arXiv:1707.00609v2 [quant-ph] 3 Oct 2018 lation of quantum mechanics has turned 65, how much Leaving aside such deep matters and remaining at a of its pedagogical value to describe, understand and ex- bare formal level { i.e., taking on a more pragmatic view- plain quantum phenomena is actually known out of the point { what Bohmian mechanics does is to provide us quantum foundations community? Indeed, one may even with a precise mathematical language to tackle quan- wonder whether it would not be worth taking it out of tum problems [6{11], complementary to the mathemati- such a community, and incorporate it into the curricular cal language involved in other more widely known quan- scopes of quantum mechanics courses, in the same way tum pictures [12], such as those proposed by Schr¨odinger, we learn, for instance, to operate with the Schr¨odinger Heisenberg, Wigner and Moyal, or Feynman, for instance and Heisenberg formulations. (for the interested reader, an enlightening perspective on Since the 1930s there has been an active discussion the different formulations of quantum mechanics is pro- vided by Styer et al. in \Nine formulations of quantum mechanics" [13]). Such a language has a strong reminis- cence of classical hydrodynamics, offering an alternative ∗ a.s.sanz@fis.ucm.es way to represent quantum phenomena in terms of swarms 2 of time-evolving streamlines or trajectories. In spite of first criticism is very common: because the outputs ren- this neat single-event dynamics, the results obtained from dered by Bohmian mechanics are equivalent to those pro- a statistical analysis of the behavior of these swarms of vided by other quantum pictures, this approach is redun- trajectories is in direct correspondence with the expecta- dant and, therefore, unnecessary. Trivial, but accept- tion value associated with quantum observables in those able. Although it is also unfair, unless the same is rigor- other quantum pictures. ously applied to other pictures. Of course, this leads us The main goal of this work is to introduce a discussion to the absurd situation that all pictures except one are on an updated view of Bohmian mechanics beyond its also redundant and unnecessary, which is not the case. more widely known ontological side. This is done tak- The Schr¨odingerand Heisenberg pictures, for instance, ing advantage of the gradual transition in the perception are conceptually different, not only in their origin, but of this approach, from its origins as a nonlocal hidden- also concerning their mathematical languages. However, variable model to the current wider view as a quantum both have proven to be very useful to tackle quantum picture. This discussion is thus guided by two intertwined problems, providing us with different perspectives and/or questions: strategies on the same issue. In general, once a quantum picture is accepted, even • After 65 years of Bohmian mechanics, should its if it makes the same predictions as other available pic- interpretational aspect still be its prevailing ap- tures, there are at least two intertwined aspects that set praisal? a difference: • Is Bohmian mechanics a legitimate picture of quan- (1) A physical aspect. This is analogous to what hap- tum mechanics, on equal footing in all respects with pens in classical mechanics, where each (classical) any other quantum picture? picture allows us to approach the same physical Accordingly, the work has been organized around two problem from a different perspective, highlighting complementary building blocks. The first block, Sec. II, a particular feature or concept, and thus providing enters a discussion on the origin and role of Bohmian us with alternative insights { think, for instance, mechanics as a hidden-variable model [14], introducing of Newton's forces at a distance versus Faraday's the issue through two of its most common criticisms and fields. This aspect, connected to the way how we concluding it with a discussion on how the idea of moni- explain and understand physical phenomena, has toring waves (not necessarily quantum ones) by means of an intrinsic interest (interpretational) at the fun- streamlines or trajectories has been used in the literature damental level. with other purposes than fundamental ones. Because (2) A practical aspect. It is associated with the poten- it covers both fundamental and computational aspects, tiality of the picture as a resource to generate and this block offers a wider perspective on questions that do develop new numerical tools based on it, aimed at not usually appear together in the context of the quan- solving in a more efficient way quantum problems. tum foundations in spite of the relevance of a joint view. This important feature allows us to recreate (sim- The second block, Sec. III, addresses in a simplified man- ulate) quantum phenomena and, therefore, to ex- ner the more basic formal aspects of Bohmian mechan- tend the theory beyond the limitations of analytical ics, useful to interpret quantum outcomes obtained from treatments, which is the case in most cases of prac- Schr¨odinger'sequation on a hydrodynamic basis with tical interest. Usually this is precisely the aspect the aid of Bohmian trajectories. Other Bohmian-related behind the fact that a given picture will eventually quantities, such as the local quantum phase field, the become or not widely accepted (or, at least, it has quantum velocity, or the quantum potential are also dis- an important weight on this fact). cussed. As an illustration of these concepts, and partic- ularly with the purpose to explicitly show how Bohmian It is by virtue of these two aspects that we do not need mechanics operates or what kind of information it may to chose between one approach and the rest. Same hap- provide us, this block also includes a revision and dis- pens with Bohmian mechanics. In this particular case, cussion of a simple implementation of Young's two-slit apart from its intrinsic physical interest, the practical experiment. Finally, in Sec. IV a series of remarks sum- side is also backed by the number and variety of nu- marize the main points stressed in this work.