DOCUMENT RESUME ED 105 628 EA 007 064 AUTHOR Booher, David E. TITLE Citizen Participation in Planning: Selected Interdisciplinary Bibliography. Exchange Bibliography No. 718. INSTITUTION Council of Planning Librarians, Monticello, Ill. PUB DATE Jan 75 NOTE 22p.; Exchange Bibliography No. 718 AVAILABLE FROM Council of Planning Librarians, P. O. Box 229, Monticello, Illinois 61856 ($2.00) EDES PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.58 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Bibliographies; *Citizen Participation; *Interdisciplinary Approach; *Planning; *Public Policy ABSTRACT This bibliography is an inventory of relevant materials in planning and related disciplines. It draws on research and theoretical perspectives from planning literature, economics, political science, psychology, public administration, and sociology. Section one suggests references that offer general and theoretical perspectives useful in the development of research frameworks. Section two contains selected references to empirical research and case studies that may provide useful background. Section threelists references that focus on research in other countries. (Author /MLF) Council of Planning LibrariansEXCHANGE BIBLIOGRAPHY January 1975 1-.14 TV. NT OF HEALTH CNd WELFARE iNS7ITUTE OF 718 ,t.CATION iK. 41 P640 .41 CITIZEN PARTICI!'ATION IN PLANNING: SelectedInterdisciplinary Bibliography David E. Booher Research Center, Graduate School of Planning University of Tennessee Mrs. Mary Vance, Editor Post Office Box 229 Monticello, Illinois 61856 LI:chant,e Libliography I PL.1'1,111TG: .33LECT.,D LIZLIOGRk_PHY by David E. Booher Research Center Graduate Schodl of Planning University of Tennessee LYqppucricg. Citizen involvement in public policy formation has been a topic of concern in scholarly research since political theorists turned their attention to it in earliercenturies. hore recently, citizen participation has becamea topic of interest not only for academicians but for public policy practioners as well. Planners in particular seem to be vitally concerned with the importance of citizenparticipation in the planning process. Perhaps one element of this concern is the recognition that plans created without meaningful citizen input may be greeted with apathyor even open hostility. gut an equally important element is a relatively recent sensitivity to the need fir the planningprocess to reflect the values of those for whom the planningis accomplished. Russell Train, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 1.gency, recently discussed the cruci alissues facing Lmerica in a speech before the iuuericanAssociation for the Axancement of Scienee. He suggested two needs which must be met if the issuesare to be resolved. 'IAA all levels of government,we need first, to strengthen our ability toassess problems and programs not simply in isolation, but in their interrelationships; not simply over the short- run, but over the longer span of 10 or 20 or 30 years; and second, to devise ways of keeping citizens abreast and involved in these longer- rake analyses and, on the basis of these, in developing and deciding upon basic plans and priorities as well as strategies for achieving them.-* 4WI1he quality of Growth.li ;3ciailce, CXXCIV, June 19 4, 1052. 2. CPL Exchange Bibliography 0718 Given the nature of these needs, it seems significant that Nr. Train focused upon them at a meeting of non-planners. Yet, while rapid technological advances seem to be making advances toward meeting the first need, little in the form of substantive accomplishments has been realized in the second. By-and-large planners and others still must rely primarily upon intuition and political "instinct" in efforts to involve citizens in the planning process. And while numerous general perspectives and limited case studies are being reported in the literature and at professional conferences, apparently no systematic research efforts are being directed at this important need. Perhaps a first step toward such a Systematic effort is inventory of relevant materials in planning and related disciplines. That is the purpose of this bibliography.It draws upon research and theoretical perspectives not only from planning literature, but also from economics, political science, psychology, public administration, and sociology. Section one suggests references which offer general and theoretical perspectives that may be useful in the development of frameworks to help guide research. Section two suggests selected references to empirical research and case studies that may provide useful background.And section three suggests references which focus upon research in other countries. A brief note on selection criteria seems appropriate. With the exception of particularly noteworthy works or significant works which have escaped attention, selection of entries has been limited to comparatively recent works. Past exchange bibliographies should be consulted for earlier sources. Selection of entries has also been guided by the importance of research in related fields. Rather than providing an exhaustive selection from one field, the compiler has attempted to include a typical sample from several literatures. Reference to these sources will help guide the reader toward additional sources.In addition, the following related Council of Planning Librarian Exchange Bibliographies may prove helpful:Numbers 5, 72, 76, 125, 187, 208, 210-211, 246, 258, 268, 396, and 559. 3. CPL BcchangeBibliography #718 I. THEOMICAL AND GEVIIAL PERSPECTIVES Abrahamsson, Bengt. "Homans onExchange."American Journal of Sociology., LXXVI, September1970, 273-283: Allutto, Joseph 4. and James A. Belasco. "ATypology for Participation in OrganizationL1 Decision Making." 1.dministrative Science Quarterly, XVII, March1972. Arnold, John E. "People Involvement:Participation to Restore Confidence." Public Management, LIII, September 1971, 11. Arnstein, Serry R. "A Ladder of Citizen Participation." Journal of the 14Jnerican Institute of Planners, XXXV, July3369;716-22/4. Bachrach, Peter and Morton S. Baratz. Power and Povertyj Them and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970. Bonfield, Edward C. Political Influence.New York: Free Press,1961. The Unheavenly City. Boston: Little, brown,1970. Barker, Michael B. "Advocacy and ;.ins Architects." Journal of the American Institute of Architects LIV, July1970, 54. Barnard, Chester I. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,W Baskin, Darryl. "American Pluraliaa:Theory, Practice, and Ideology." Journal of Politics, XXXII, February1970, 71-95. Berelson, Bernard R."Democratic Practice and Democratic Theory."Public Opinion and PublicPolio".Edited by Mormon Luttbeg. Homewood, Illinois: The Dorcey Press, 1968. Bettelheim, Bruno. The Informed Heart: Autonomy in a Mass 1123. New York: Free Press 190. Blau, Peter M. Exchange and Power in Social Life.New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,19614. Bolle, Arnold N. "Public Participation and Environmental Quality." Natural Resources Journal, XI, July1971, 497-506. 14. CPL Exchange Bibliography / /718 Bonjean, Charles N., Terry Clark and Robert L. Lineberry, edo, CommunitypaliticaLILBehavioral Approach.New York: The Free Press, 1971. Booher, David E. "A Theory of Participatory Planning." Unpublished M.S.P. Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1974. Bresnick, David. "Decentralizing the City: Who Gets Control?" National Civic Review, LXII, October 1973, 146-1493.. Brooks: Bichael P. Social Plantlys and Cit Plannin . Planning Advisory Service Report Ho. 2 1.Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials. September 1970. Browne, Ivore. "Why Community Participation?" Administration XXI, Spring 1973, 41-44. Buchanan, James M. and Gordon Tullock. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962. Burke, D. Barlow, Howard H. Foster and Peter H. Nash. "Urban Public Policy Participation Networks."Urban and Social Chanseppview, III, Spring 1970, 15-19. Burke, Edmund Ni. "Citizen Participation Strategies." Journal of the American Institute of Planners, XXXIV, September 196B, 287-293. Cartwright, Dorwin. "Achieving Change in People: Some Applications of Group Dynamics Theory." el.;_a,tHlmanRdons IV, No. 4, 1951, 387. ed. Studies in Social Power.Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, 19 Chatterjee, Pranab and Raymond k. Koleski. "The Concepts of Community and Community Organization: A Review." Social Work, XV, July 1970, 82-92. Cheney, Ruth."Advocacy Planning: What It Is How It Works." Progressive Architecture, XLIV, September 1968. Coleman, James S.Ccamunity Conflict.Hew fork: The Free Press, 1957. Conn, Paul H. "Social Pluralism and Democracy." American Journal of Political Science, XVII, May 1973, 213-236. Cunningham, James V. "Citizen Participation in Public Affairs."Public Administration Review XXXII, October 1972, 589-652.-- 5. CPL rachange Bibliography 016 Dahl, Robert A. "The Analysis of Influence in LocalCcmmunitie:l." SociE.' Science and CommunityAc :ion. Edited by Charles Adrian. East Lansing: Institute for Community Development and Services, 1960. E2L.ya re Participation and Cpposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971. Preface to Democratic Theom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956. Davidoff, Paul. "Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning." Journal of the American Institute ofPlanners, XXXI, Hovember 1965, 331-337. and Linda Davidoff. "Commentary: Underlying hssumptions of Advocacy Planning." Journal of the American Institute of Planners,XL, January 1974, 39, 46. and Thomas Reiner. hi. Choice Theory of Planning." Journal of the American Institute