Modeling Network Dynamics: the Lac Operon, a Case Study

Modeling Network Dynamics: the Lac Operon, a Case Study

JCBMini-Review Modeling network dynamics: the lac operon, a case study José M.G. Vilar,1 Ca˘ lin C. Guet,1,2 and Stanislas Leibler1 1The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021 2Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 We use the lac operon in Escherichia coli as a prototype components to entire cells. In contrast to what this wide- system to illustrate the current state, applicability, and spread use might indicate, such modeling has many limitations. limitations of modeling the dynamics of cellular networks. On the one hand, the cell is not a well-stirred reactor. It is a We integrate three different levels of description (molecular, highly heterogeneous and compartmentalized structure, in cellular, and that of cell population) into a single model, which phenomena like molecular crowding or channeling which seems to capture many experimental aspects of the are present (Ellis, 2001), and in which the discrete nature of system. the molecular components cannot be neglected (Kuthan, Downloaded from 2001). On the other hand, so few details about the actual in vivo processes are known that it is very difficult to proceed Modeling has had a long tradition, and a remarkable success, without numerous, and often arbitrary, assumptions about in disciplines such as engineering and physics. In biology, the nature of the nonlinearities and the values of the parameters however, the situation has been different. The enormous governing the reactions. Understanding these limitations, and www.jcb.org complexity of living systems and the lack of reliable quanti- ways to overcome them, will become increasingly impor- tative information have precluded a similar success. Currently, tant in order to fully integrate modeling into experimental bi- there is a renewal of interest in modeling of biological systems, ology. largely due to the development of new experimental methods We will illustrate the main issues of modeling using the on December 30, 2005 generating vast amounts of data, and to the general accessibility example of the lac operon in Escherichia coli. This classical of fast computers capable, at least in principle, to process genetic system has been described in many places; for instance, this data (Endy and Brent, 2001; Kitano, 2002). It seems we refer the reader to the lively account by Müller-Hill that a growing number of biologists believe that the interactions (1996). Here, we concentrate our attention on the elegant of the molecular components may be understood well experiments of Novick and Weiner (1957). These experi- enough to reproduce the behavior of the organism, or its ments demonstrated two interesting features of the lac parts, either as analytical solutions of mathematical equations regulatory network. First, the induction of the lac operon The Journal of Cell Biology or in computer simulations. was revealed as an all-or-none phenomenon; i.e., the pro- Modeling of cellular processes is typically based upon the duction of lactose-degrading enzymes in a single cell could assumption that interactions between molecular components be viewed as either switched on (induced) or shut off (unin- can be approximated by a network of biochemical reactions duced). Intermediate levels of enzyme production observed in an ideal macroscopic reactor. Although some spatial aspects in the cell population are a consequence of the coexistence of cellular processes are taken into account in modeling of cer- of these two types of cells (Fig. 1 a). Second, the experi- tain systems, e.g., early development of Drosophila melanogaster ments of Novick and Weiner (1957) also showed that the (Eldar et al., 2002), it is customary to neglect all the spatial state of a single cell (induced or uninduced) could be trans- heterogeneity inherent to cellular organization when dealing mitted through many generations; this provided one of the with genetic or metabolic networks. Then, following standard simplest examples of phenotypic, or epigenetic, inheritance methods of chemical reaction kinetics, one can obtain a set (Fig. 1 b). We will argue below that even these two simple of ordinary differential equations, which can be solved features cannot be quantitatively understood using the computationally. This standard modeling approach has been standard approach for modeling of networks of biochemical applied to many systems, ranging from a few isolated reactions. This example will also allow us to explain the different levels at which biological networks need to be Address correspondence to José M.G. Vilar, The Rockefeller University, modeled. 1230 York Avenue, Box 34, New York, NY 10021. Tel.: (212) 327- 7642. Fax: (212) 327-7640. E-mail: [email protected] The lac operon *Abbreviation used in this paper: TMG, thiomethyl-␤-D-galactoside. Key words: gene expression; induction; lac operon; computational mod- The lac operon consists of a regulatory domain and three eling; regulation genes required for the uptake and catabolism of lactose. A The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/05/471/6 $8.00 The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 161, Number 3, May 12, 2003 471–476 http://www.jcb.org/cgi/doi/10.1083/jcb.200301125 471 472 The Journal of Cell Biology | Volume 161, Number 3, 2003 Levels of organization and modeling Despite its apparent simplicity, the lac operon system dis- plays much of the complexity and subtlety inherent to gene regulation. In principle, its detailed modeling should in- clude, among many other cellular processes, transcription, translation, protein assembly, protein degradation, binding of different proteins to DNA, and binding of small mole- cules to the DNA-binding proteins. In addition, the lac op- eron system is not isolated from the rest of the cell. Induc- tion changes the growth rate of individual cells, which in turn also affects the cell population behavior. For instance, if a gratuitous inducer is used, induction will slow down cell growth. Therefore, extrapolating directly from the molecular level all the way up to the cell population level requires addi- tional information about cellular processes that is not readily available. Moreover, most of the molecular details of the cell are not going to be relevant for the particular process under study. The first step of modeling is, therefore, to identify the relevant levels, their interactions, and the way one level is in- corporated into another. Fig. 2 illustrates schematically the separation of the lac system into molecular, cellular, and Downloaded from population levels. Molecular level. The molecular level explicitly includes the binding of the inducer to the repressor, changes in re- pressor conformation, binding of the repressor to the opera- tor, binding of the RNA polymerase to the promoter, initia- Figure 1. Different induction states. (a) All-or-none phenomenon. tion of transcription, production of mRNA, translation of www.jcb.org For low inducer concentrations, the enzyme (␤-galactosidase) the message, protein folding, and so forth. Almost all the content of the population increases continuously in time. This quantitative aspects of the in vivo dynamics of these pro- increase is proportional to the number of induced cells, represented cesses are unknown. The lack of information is typically here by full ellipses. Empty ellipses correspond to uninduced cells. filled out with assumptions based on parsimony. Fortu- on December 30, 2005 (b) Maintenance concentration effect. When induced cells at high inducer concentration are transferred to the maintenance concen- nately, not all the details are needed. At this level, what tration, they and their progeny will remain induced. Similarly, when seems relevant is the production of permeases expressed as a uninduced cells at low inducer concentration are transferred to the function of the inducer concentration inside the cell. To ob- maintenance concentration, they and their progeny will remain tain theoretically even a rough approximation of this func- uninduced. tion, one would need detailed information about many mo- lecular interactions. Therefore, a more reasonable approach The Journal of Cell Biology regulatory protein, the LacI repressor, can bind to the opera- at the present stage of knowledge would be to extract this tor and prevent the RNA polymerase from transcribing the function directly from the experimental data. Indeed, one three genes. Induction of the lac operon occurs when the in- can measure the rate of production of ␤-galactosidase in mu- ducer molecule binds to the repressor. As a result, the repres- tant strains lacking the permease (Herzenberg, 1958). In this sor cannot bind to the operator and transcription proceeds case, external and internal inducer concentrations are both at a given rate. The probability for the inducer to bind to the the same once equilibrium between the medium and the cy- repressor depends on the inducer concentration inside the toplasm is reached. This relies on the absence of nonspecific cell. The induction process is thus helped by the permease import or export mechanisms. The other key piece of infor- encoded by one of the transcribed genes, which brings in- mation is that the production of permeases is, to a good ap- ducer into the cell. In this way, if the number of permeases is proximation, proportional to the production of ␤-galactosi- low, the inducer concentration inside the cell is low and the dase, as both are produced from the same polycistronic production of permeases remains low. In contrast, if the mRNA. The results obtained in this way could be used as an number of permeases is high, the inducer concentration is estimate for modeling the molecular level of wild-type cells. high and the production of permeases remains high. Cellular level. The core of the all-or-none process resides This heuristic argument is useful for understanding the at the cellular level. Some of the permeases produced will presence of two phenotypes, but it does not actually explain eventually go to the membrane and bring more inducer. why the cells remain in a given state, or what makes the cells Novick and Weiner (1959) inferred from experiments that switch from the uninduced to the induced state.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us