■ Streptococcus alactolyticus ■ Atopobium vaginae ■ Prevotella denticola ■ Candida famata ■ Streptococcus anginosus ■ Bacteroides caccae ■ Prevotella intermedia ■ Candida freyschussii ■ Streptococcus canis ■ Bacteroides eggerthii ■ Prevotella melaninogenica ■ Candida glabrata ■ Streptococcus constellatus ssp. ■ Bacteroides fragilis ■ Prevotella oralis ■ Candida guilliermondii constellatus ■ Bacteroides ovatus ■ Prevotella oris ■ Candida haemulonii ■ Streptococcus constellatus ssp. ■ Bacteroides stercoris ■ Propionibacterium acnes ■ Candida inconspicua / pharyngis ■ Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ■ Propionibacterium granulosum Candida lambica ■ Streptococcus cristatus ■ Bacteroides uniformis ■ Propionibacterium propionicum ■ Candida intermedia ■ Streptococcus downei ■ Bacteroides vulgatus (Propionibacterium propionicus) ■ Candida kefyr ■ Streptococcus dysgalactiae ssp. ■ Bifidobacterium spp. ■ Staphylococcus saccharolyticus ■ Candida krusei ID & AST Cards dysgalactiae ■ Campylobacter (Bacteroides) ■ Trueperella pyogenes ■ Candida lipolytica ■ Streptococcus dysgalactiae ssp. ureolyticus (Arcanobacterium pyogenes) ■ Candida lusitaniae RELIABLE SAFE RAPID equisimilis ■ Clostridium barati ■ Turicella otitidis ■ Candida magnoliae ■ Streptococcus equi ssp. equi ■ Clostridium bifermentans ■ Veillonella spp. ■ Candida norvegensis ■ Streptococcus equi ssp. zooepidemicus ■ Clostridium butyricum ■ Candida parapsilosis ■ Streptococcus equinus ■ Clostridium cadaveris ■ Candida pelliculosa ■ Streptococcus gallolyticus ssp. ■ Clostridium chauvoei ■ Candida pulcherrima gallolyticus ■ Clostridium clostridiiforme NEISSERIA ■ Candida rugosa ■ Streptococcus gallolyticus ssp. ■ Clostridium difficile HAEMOPHILUS ■ Candida sake pasteurianus ■ Clostridium glycolicum ■ Candida spherica ■ IDENTIFICATION Streptococcus gordonii ■ Clostridium group ■ Candida tropicalis ■ Streptococcus hyointestinalis ■ Clostridium histolyticum VITEK 2 NH CARD ■ Candida utilis ■ Streptococcus infantarius ssp. coli 1. ■ Ayats J., Cisnal M., Lucena J., and Marin R. Analysis ■ Clostridium paraputrificum REF. 21346 ■ Candida zeylanoides (Str. lutetiensis) of the Impact of Using a VITEK 2 COMPACT® System in ■ Clostridium perfringens ■ Cryptococcus albidus ■ a Clinical Microbiology Laboratory: Comparison with the Streptococcus infantarius ssp. ■ Clostridium ramosum ■ Cryptococcus laurentii infantarius MicroScan WalkAway System®. ASM 2007; Poster C-158. 2. ■ Clostridium septicum ■ Cryptococcus neoformans ■ Barry J., Brown A., Ensor V., Lakhani U., Petts D., Warren ■ Streptococcus intermedius ■ Clostridium sordellii ■ Actinobacillus ureae ■ Cryptococcus terreus REFERENCES C., Winstanley T. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2 ■ Streptococcus mitis / ■ Clostridium sporogenes ■ Aggregatibacter ■ Cryptococcus uniguttulatus Advanced Expert System (AES) in five UK hospitals. Journal Streptococcus oralis ■ Clostridium subterminale actinomycetemcomitans ■ Geotrichum klebahnii of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2003; 51: 1191–1202. 3. ■ ■ Streptococcus mutans ■ Clostridium tertium ■ Aggregatibacter aphrophilus ■ Kloeckera spp. Blondel-Hill E., Jang W., Lee I., Borton N., Book L., Thomas ■ Streptococcus ovis ■ Collinsella aerofaciens ■ Aggregatibacter segnis ■ Kodamaea ohmeri E. Comparison of Phoenix™ and VITEK® 2 Compact for ■ Streptococcus parasanguinis Performance of Identification and Susceptibility Testing, ■ Corynebacterium amycolatum ■ Campylobacter coli ■ Malassezia furfur ■ Streptococcus pluranimalium Workflow, and Time to Report. ICAAC 2006; Poster D-691. ■ Corynebacterium diphtheriae ■ Campylobacter fetus ssp. fetus ■ Malassezia pachydermatis ■ Streptococcus pneumoniae 4. ■ Bobenchik A.M., Deak E., Hindler J.A., Charlton C.L., ■ Corynebacterium jeikeium ■ Campylobacter jejuni ssp. jejuni ■ Millerozyma farinosa (Pichia ■ Streptococcus porcinus Humphries R.M. Performance of VITEK® 2 for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae ■ Corynebacterium minutissimum ■ Capnocytophaga spp. farinosa) ■ Streptococcus pseudoporcinus with VITEK® 2 (2009 FDA) and 2014 CLSI Breakpoints. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2014; 53(3):816- ■ Corynebacterium pseudodiphteriticum ■ Cardiobacterium hominis ■ Prototheca wickerhamii 823. 5. ■ Bobenchik A.M, Hindler J.A., Giltner C.L., Saeki S., Humphries R.M. Performance of VITEK® 2 ■ Streptococcus pyogenes ■ Corynebacterium striatum ■ Eikenella corrodens ■ Prototheca zopfii for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. Journal of Clinical ■ Streptococcus salivarius spp. salivarius ■ Corynebacterium ulcerans ■ Gardnerella vaginalis ■ Rhodotorula glutinis / Microbiology, 2014; 52(2):392-397. 6. ■ Doat V., Roubille M., and Turner R. Analysis of the Comparative ■ Streptococcus salivarius spp. ■ ■ Haemophilus haemolyticus Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Workflow and Accuracy of the VITEK® 2 Compact and the Combination Mini-API®/Agar diffusion Corynebacterium urealyticum thermophilus 242 B 398 RCS 160 Lyon ■ ■ Eggerthella lenta ■ Haemophilus influenzae ■ Rhodotorula minuta SIRSCAN® Method. ECCMID 2007; Poster P-1727. 7. Eigner U., Schmid A., Wild U., Bertsch D., Fahr ■ Streptococcus sanguinis théra A.M. Analysis of the Comparative Workflow and Performance Characteristics of the VITEK 2 and Phoenix ■ Eggerthella catenaformis ■ Haemophilus parahaemolyticus ■ Saccharomyces cerevisiae ■ Streptococcus sobrinus Systems. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005; 43(8): 3829–3834. 8. ■ Galar A., Yuste J.R., Espinosa (Lactobacillus catenaformis) ■ Haemophilus parainfluenzae ■ Saprochaete capitata ■ Streptococcus suis l M., Guillén-Grima F., Hernáez-Crespo S., and Leiva J. Clinical and economic impact of rapid reporting ■ Eubacterium limosum ■ Kingella denitrificans (Geotrichum capitatum) ■ Streptococcus suis ll of bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results of the most frequently processed ■ Finegoldia magna ■ Kingella kingae ■ Sporobolomyces salmonicolor ■ Streptococcus thoraltensis specimen types. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2012; 31 (9): 2445-2452. 9. ■ Heller-Ono A. Ergonomic ■ Fusobacterium mortiferum ■ Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis ■ Stephanoascus ciferrii ■ Streptococcus uberis Analysis Comparison of the VITEK® 2 and VITEK® 2 Compact with the Microscan WalkAway® 96 and ■ Fusobacterium necrophorum ■ Neisseria cinerea ■ Trichosporon asahii ■ Streptococcus vestibularis Phoenix™ For Work Flow Efficiency and the Likelihood of Distal Upper Extremity Strain. bioMerieux White ■ Fusobacterium nucleatum ■ Neisseria elongata ■ Trichosporon inkin Paper, 2008. 10. ■ Hooper M., Hill C., Hadwell V., Blondel-Hill E. Comparison of bioMerieux VITEK 2 ■ Vagococcus fluvialis ■ Fusobacterium varium ■ Neisseria gonorrhoeae ■ Trichosporon mucoides XL, BD Phoenix, and Seimens MicroScan Walkaway96 plus choosing an identification and antimicrobial ■ Lactobacillus acidopihlus ■ Neisseria lactamica ■ Zygosaccharomyces bailii susceptibility testing system for a medium sized microbiology laboratory. ECCMID 2013; Poster P-1536. ■ ■ Lactobacillus buchneri ■ Neisseria meningitidis 11. LaBombardi V.J. Maximizing the Use of the Advanced Expert System™ to Improve Patient Care. bioMerieux White Paper, 2011. 12. ■ Larone D.H, Tucci L.J., Samide D.O. Time Study of Three Automated ■ Lactobacillus casei ■ Neisseria sicca MICROBIOLOGY WITH CONFIDENCE ANAEROBE Systems for the Identification and Susceptibility of Bacteria: The MicroScan WalkAway 96, VITEK, and VITEK ■ Lactobacillus fermentum ■ Oligella urethralis CORYNEBACTERIA 2. ASM 2000; Poster C-279. 13. ■ Livermore DM., Struelens M., Amorim J., Baquero F., Bille J., Canton R., ■ Lactobacillus gasseri ■ Suttonella indologenes IDENTIFICATION Henning S., Gatermann S., Marchese A., Mittermayer H., Oakton KJ., Praplan F., Ramos H., Schito GC., Van ■ Lactobacillus hilgardii Eldere J., Vaerhaegen J., Verhoef J., and Visser MR. Multicentre evaluation of the VITEK 2 Advanced Expert VITEK 2 ANC CARD ■ Lactobacillus parabuchneri System for interpretive reading of antimicrobial resistance tests. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, ■ Lactobacillus paracasei ■ REF. 21347 2002; 49 (2): 289–300. 14. Römmler W., Beer L., Kessler M., and Kaehler K. Analysis of the Comparative ■ Lactobacillus plantarum YEAST Workflow and ID/ AST Test Result Accuracy of the VITEK® 2 compact and the Phoenix™ Systems. ASM 2006; Poster C-123. 15. ■ Sanders CC., Peyret M., Moland ES., Cavalieri SJ., Shubert C., Thomson KS., ■ Microbacterium flavescens IDENTIFICATION 1) Burkholderia cepacia, Cronobacter ■ Micobacterium ssp sakazakii, Enterobacter cloacae Boeufgras JM., and Sanders WE. Potential Impact of the VITEK® 2 System and the Advanced Expert System™ on the Clinical Laboratory of a University-Based Hospital. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001; ■ Actinobaculum schaalii ■ Parabacteroides distasonis 2) Salmonella enterica ssp enterica, VITEK 2 YST CARD 39 (7): 2379-2385. ■ Actinomyces bovis ■ Parabacteroides merdae REF. 21343 S.typhimurium, S.enteritidis, S.spp, ■ Actinomyces israelii ■ Parvimonas micra S.ser.Paratyphi B, S.ser.Paratyphi C 3) Serratia grimesii, Ser.liquefaciens, ■ Actinomyces meyeri ■ Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus Ser.proteamaculans ssp proteamaculans ■ Actinomyces naeslundii ■ Peptoniphilus indolicus 4) Shigella flexneri, Shi.boydii, ■ Actinomyces neuii ■ Peptostreptococcus anaerobius bioMérieux S.A. ■ Candida albicans Shi.dysenteriae ■ Actinomyces odontolyticus ■ Porphyromonas gingivalis 69280 Marcy l’Etoile ■ Candida boidinii 5) Burkholderia cepacia, B.multivorans, ■ Actinomyces