Successful Strategies for Managing the Complex Ebart Extension 1 Maurice “Ric” Rattray, PE  Group Manager, Capital Program  BART 1 Andy Kleiber, PE

Successful Strategies for Managing the Complex Ebart Extension 1 Maurice “Ric” Rattray, PE  Group Manager, Capital Program  BART 1 Andy Kleiber, PE

Successful Strategies for Managing the Complex eBART Extension 1 Maurice “Ric” Rattray, PE Group Manager, Capital Program BART 1 Andy Kleiber, PE Principal Construction Manager MNS Engineers, Inc. AGENDA 0 1 Introduction 2 Project Background 3 Management of Complex Project 4 Planning and Implementation 5 Project Success 6 Questions and Answers 1 Team PROJECT BACKGROUND 2 2 Project Background Adopted by BART Board in April 2009 Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) technology State Route 4 median alignment Facilities Ten-mile extension to City of Antioch . Transfer Platform at Pittsburg/Bay Point . Pittsburg Center Station . Antioch Station . Maintenance Facility 2 Project Background Pittsburg Center Station Transfer Platform BART/eBART Antioch Station Existing Alignment eBART Extension Transfer Platform Pittsburg Center Station Antioch Station 2 Technologies Evaluated Conventional BART Conventional BART Light Rail Vehicle DMU Trains DMU Bus Rapid Transit 2 Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) Technology Service proven EPA Tier 4 compliant Self propelled Reliable – redundancy Light weight Low floor Capable of operating at 75 mph 2 Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) Technology Capacity Bio Diesel 3 car consists Crash Energy Management 2 Vehicle Layout Description Dimension Fixed Seats 88 Flip Up Seats 16 Total Seats 104 Standing Area 26 m² Standees (4 Pers/m²) 96 Total Passenger Capacity, max 200 MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX PROJECT 3 3 Construction Complexity 15 overlapping construction contracts 12 agencies 10 utility companies 6 years of environmental, design, and Caltrans coordination 7 years of construction 3 Multiple Contracts BART Construction CCTA/Caltrans/ BART Procurement Contracts Highway Contracts Contracts . Transfer Platform . Caltrans . Vehicles Segment 0 . Maintenance . Rail Procurement Facility Shell and . Caltrans . Station Equipment Parking Lot Segment 1 . Parking Lot Solar . Trackwork, . Caltrans Panels Systems, and Segment 2 Station Finishes . Caltrans . Sanitary Sewer Segment 3A . Final Paving . Caltrans Segment 3B . Landscaping 3 Multiple Agencies Funding Agencies Support Agencies . The Metropolitan . City of Pittsburg Transportation . City of Antioch Commission (MTC) . City of Oakley . Contra Costa . City of Brentwood Transportation . Contra Costa Authority (CCTA) County . East Contra Costa . Tri Delta Transit Regional Fee and Finance Authority . Caltrans (ECCRFFA) . The State of California 3 Packaging . Scopes Strategies to – Structures and underground early Minimize Risk – BART interface isolated – Early procurement for long lead items 3 Packaging . Contract Milestone Strategies to – 9 included in main BART contract Minimize Risk . Access and availability dates – 19 included in main BART contract . Area 1 and Area 2 for vehicle testing 3 Pittsburg Center Station Increased eBART ridership by 20% Complies with BART’s system expansion policy and MTC’s TOD policy Low incremental operating costs for additional riders PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION 4 4 Schedule First Vehicle On Site Pre-Revenue and Simulated Testing MAY 2018 4 Project Budget Description Budget Conventional BART Conceptual/Environmental $11.2 $11.2 Preliminary Engineering $14.9 $20 Final Design $38.5 $45 Construction and Procurement $384.1 $1015 Construction Management (CM) & Design Service During Construction $49.0 $55 (DSDC) Right-of-Way $13.0 $31 Program Reserve $14.2 $45 TOTAL $524.9 $1,222.2 4 BART/CCTA/Caltrans Cooperation Median Guideway Utility Duct Banks Bridges Pedestrian Overcrossing Bridges 4 Antioch Station 4 Antioch Station and Pedestrian Bridge 4 eBART Maintenance Facility 4 eBART Maintenance Facility 4 Management Strategies CM software MS access PDFs with hyperlinks Inspector workbooks weekly check-in meetings with ALL involved 4 Vehicle Fabrication 2 9 4 Vehicle Journey 3 0 4 Vehicle Journey 4 Vehicle Unloading—Maintenance Facility 3 2 PROJECT SUCCESS 5 5 Project Success . More than double the ridership – Predicted 3,995 trips/day $525M vs $1B – More than traditional BART 8,000 trips/day currently Cost-effective, timely . solution New parking lot being planned already QUESTION AND ANSWER.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    35 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us