Marine ==- Biology © Springer-Verlag 1988

Marine ==- Biology © Springer-Verlag 1988

Marine Biology 98, 39-49 (1988) Marine ==- Biology © Springer-Verlag 1988 Analysis of the structure of decapod crustacean assemblages off the Catalan coast (North-West Mediterranean) P. Abell6, F.J. Valladares and A. Castell6n Institute de Ciencias del Mar, Passeig Nacional s/n, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain Abstract Zariquiey Alvarez 1968, Garcia Raso 1981, 1982, 1984), as well as different biological aspects of the economically We sampled the communities of decapod crustaceans important species (Sarda 1980, Sarda etal. 1981, etc.). inhabiting the depth zone between 3 and 871 m off the More recently, some studies of the species distribution of Catalan coast (North-West Mediterranean) from June the decapod crustacean communities of the North-West 1981 to June 1983. The 185 samples comprised 90 species Mediterranean have been published (Sarda and Palo- differing widely in their depth distributions. Multivariate mera 1981, Castellon and Abello 1983, Carbonell 1984, analysis revealed four distinct faunistic assemblages, (1) Abello 1986). However, the quantitative composition of littoral communities over sandy bottoms, (2) shelf com­ the decapod crustacean communities of this area remain munities over terrigenous muds, (3) upper-slope com­ largely unknown, and comparable efforts to those of munities, and (4) lower-slope or bathyal communities. The Arena and Li Greci (1973), Relini (1981), or Tunesi (1986) brachyuran crab Liocarcinus depurator is the most abun­ are lacking. dant species of the shelf assemblage, although L. vernalis The present study contributes to the knowledge of the dominates over the shallow sandy bottoms of the shelf. ecology of soft-bottom decapod-crustacean communities The dominant species of the upper-slope assemblage are off the Catalonian coast by (1) describing their faunistic nektobenthic species (Solenocera membranacea, Plesionika composition, (2) quantifying the depth distribution and heterocarpus, Processa canaliculata), pelagic species (Pasi- relative abundance of the individual decapod species, and phaea sivado, Sergestes arcticus), and benthic species (Ma- (3) defining the main faunistic assemblages of the area. cropipus tuberculatus, Munida intermedia, Nephrops nor- The composition of the assemblages has been established vegicus). Aristeus antennatus comprise most of the biomass using cluster analysis and correspondence analysis of the lower-slope community, which supports a greater (Chardy etal. 1976, Lleonart 1981, Gonzalez Gurriaran diversity than the other assemblages. The main assem­ 1982, Penas and Gonzalez Gurriaran 1982, Romero blages appear to be related to different hydrological etal. 1982, Wenner and Read 1982, Lleonart and Roel characteristics, the extent of seasonal fluctuations, and to 1984, Gonzalez Gurriaran 1986, inter alia). the changes in sediment structure associated with changes in the steepness of the bottom. Materials and methods This study is part of a broader research program of the Introduction Instituto de Ciencias del Mar (Barcelona) directed to the study of the demersal fisheries off the Catalan coast. The The study of the benthic animal communities inhabiting decapod crustacean communities were sampled from com­ the continental shelf and slope is an important aspect of mercial trawlers using bottom nets of 9 mm-mesh size. marine ecology, particularly in areas such as the Spanish Trawls of 1 to 2 h were made, depending on the char­ Mediterranean coast, where these communities have a acteristics of the sampling area along the shelf and slope significant commercial value. Unfortunately, the ecology (3 to 871 m depth range, Fig. 1). A total of 185 trawls and biology of the decapod crustacean communities of this were completed between June 1981 and May 1983. area have received little attention. Most studies examine The animals captured in each trawl were sorted to different aspects of the taxonomy of these animals (e.g. species, weighed and counted, and the data for each 40 P. Abell6 et al.: Decapod crustacean assemblages off the Catalan coast /:,;.;;.:.:///.;.:>;•;•;.';:;••.:::•:< 1 ROSBS^V.^ ' § jte^PT*^^! )•% •* • : T V / : -:i'-$ <£rv\ Palamos 2* ./H f^^^^::^::-^ \ Blanes^X *!•• Barcelona / *• • *• • Vilanova^. Y */ % Tarra 0 9 ?^irff»V'.vV.. y^^^ • j •• L'Ametlla/ \ **,»£ A.* ' • • .. **v i • VJ • „ Sant/=-^;.. \ * CarleaA^ •» . • /."\. " / * **.» / *» * / • * / • Fig. 1. Position of trawls made in 1981-1983 off the Catalan coast, North-West Mediterranean species was expressed as number and weight of individuals pair group method of analysis) aggregation algorithm per hour of trawling. Because the trawls were made using (Lleonart and Roel 1984). Correspondence analysis was different vessels, the quantitative data gathered can be used because it allows the simultaneous comparison of the regarded only as approximative. Any such imprecision distribution of species and their association with particular must, however, be small, since the differences in the depth trawls in the same space. The diversity index was cal­ distribution and relative abundance of the different species culated using the equation of Shannon-Wiener (Margalef were remarkably clear. 1974). The depth distributions of the various species was obtained by calculating their average abundance over depth intervals of 100 m for the slope (> 200 m deep), and for narrower strata on the shelf (0 to 25 m, 25 to 50 m, 50 Results to 100 m, 100 to 150 m and 150 to 200 m deep). The narrower depth strata of the shelf zone were selected to Faunistic composition account for the greater steepness of the environmental gradients associated with depth variations within this zone. The samples were comprised of 90 species of decapod The average depth of each trawl path was used to assign crustaceans (Table 1). The Brachyura was the infraorder it to a depth stratum. with most species (35 species), followed by the Caridea (22 The composition of the species collected on each trawl species), Anomura (17), and the suborder Dendrobran- was used to define faunistic assemblages. This was achieved chiata (9). Only four species of Palinura were found; the through cluster analysis and correspondence analysis infraorder Thalassinidea was represented by only two applied to the presence-absence data for the most im­ species, and the Astacidea by a single species. portant species (42) obtained in 95 trawls. Only 42 species were used in these analyses because the remaining were too rare (i.e., large number of absences), and therefore Species bathymetric distribution and abundance must play a minor role in structuring the communities. Those trawls where the difference between maximum and The dominant species differed among depth strata (Ta­ minimum depth was greater than 50 m on the slope and ble 2), confirming the importance of depth in structuring 20 m on the shelf were excluded from the analyses, crustacean decapod communities. The depth range, total because they could have sampled different communities. number of presences, and average abundance within the For the analyses, the presence-absence of the species was different strata for each species (Table 3) also demonstrate preferred to their abundances, since a large number of quantifiable differences in the distribution of crustaceans. absences weakens the robustness of abundance data The depth differences in the structure of decapod crusta­ (Lleonart 1979, Lleonart and Roel 1984). cean communities is further evidenced by examination of The cluster analyses were performed using the point- the relative abundances (Fig. 2) and biomass (Fig. 3) of correlation similarity-index and the UPGMA (unweighted the dominant species within each depth stratum. Table 1. Decapod crustacean species (order Decapoda) by trawling off Catalan coast (North-West Mediterranean) during sampling program (1981-1983) Suborder Dendrobranchiata Anapagurus laevis (Bell, 1846) Superfamily Penaeoidea Pagurus alatus Fabricius, 1775 Family Aristeidae Pagurus cuanensis Bell, 1845 Aristaeomorphafoliacea (Risso, 1827) Pagurus excavatus (Herbst, 1791) Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) Pagurus forbesii Bell, 1845 Gennadas elegans (S. I. Smith, 1884) Pagurus prideaux Leach, 1815 Family Penaeidae Family Galatheidae Parapenaeus longirostris (H. Lucas, 1846) Galathea cenarroi Zariquiey Alvarez, 1968 Penaeus kerathurus (Forskal, 1775) Galathea dispersa Bate, 1859 Family Solenoceridae Galathea intermedia Lilljeborg, 1851 Solenocera membranacea (Risso, 1816) Munida intermedia A. Milne Edwards & Bouvier, 1899 Family Sicyoniidae Munida iris Zariquiey Alvarez, 1952 Sicyonia carinata (Brilnnich, 1768) Munida tenuimana G. O. Sars, 1872 Superfamily Sergestoidea Family Porcellanidae Family Sergestidae Pisidia longicornis (Linnaeus, 1767) Sergestes arcticus KrOyer, 1855 Infraorder Brachyura Sergia robusta (S. I. Smith, 1882) Section Archaeobrachyura Family Homolidae Suborder Pleocyemata Homola barbata (Fabricius, 1793) Infraorder Caridea Paromola cuvieri (Risso, 1816) Family Oplophoridae Section Oxystomata Acanthephyra eximia S. I. Smith, 1886 Family Dorippidae Acanthephyra pelagica (Risso, 1816) Ethusa mascarone (Herbst, 1785) Family Pasiphaeidae Medorippe lanata (Linnaeus, 1767) Pasiphaea multidentata Esmark, 1866 Family Calappidae Pasiphaea sivado (Risso, 1816) Calappa granulata (Linnaeus, 1767) Family Palaemonidae Family Leucosiidae Periclimenes granulatus Holthuis, 1950 Ebalia deshayesi Lucas, 1846 Family Alpheidae Ilia nucleus (Linnaeus, 1758) A Ipheus glaber (Olivi, 1792) Section Oxyrhyncha Family Hippolitidae Family Majidae Ligur ensiferus

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us