Mikalojewska

Mikalojewska

The Place of Recurrent Novae among the Symbiotic Stars Joanna Mikołajewska Copernicus Astronomical Center Warsaw, Poland Symbiotic stars S(stellar) normal giant 80% -7 Mg~10 Msun/yr Porb ~ 1-15 yr •Accreting white dwarf majority •Neutron star D(dusty) •Disk-accreting MS star? Mira + dust evelope •Black hole? 20% -5 a few Mg~10 Msun/yr Porb > 50 yr RS Oph, T CrB, V3890 Sgr & V745 Sco are S-type RNe Points to be addressed • Orbital parameters • The hot component & its activity • The cool giant & mass transfer Orbital parameters • 70 SyS – known orbital periods (Belczyński et al. 2000, Mikołajewska 2003, 2004; Gromadzki et al. 2007) • 32 SyS – known spectroscopic orbits for the cool giant (Mikołajewska 2003; Hinkle et al. 2006 – V2116 Oph; Brandi et al. 2006 - Hen3- 1761) T CrB: 227.6d RS Oph: 453.6d • 19 SyS – mass ratios (Mikołajewska 2003; 2007) In both symbiotic RNe: • Mg<Mh, and the lowest among SyS • Mh~1.1-1.4 Msun -the highest among SyS Spectroscopic orbits The hot component Quiescence: AG Dra •Overlap with central stars of PNe •TNR-powered white dwarfs •Stable /quasi-stable H-shell burning of the accreted matter or very slow TNR on low mass wd’s •Galactic and MC SyS overlap in HR diagram; MC systems are among the hottest and brighest systems However: Far UV SEDs for RW Hya, SY Mus and EG And indicate much lower T than emission lines (Sion et al. 2002, 2004) The hot component Iben & Tutukov (1996): accreting cold WDs Paczyński-Uus relation for AGB stars with CO cores •HCs cluster around the M-L relations for stars leaving the AGB with a CO core and the RG with a He core Hot He cores Iben & Tutukov 1996 •Symbiotic WDs could still be hot at the onset of the mass transfer from the cool giant The hot component Outbursts: •Symbiotic novae (AG Peg, RX Pup + 6); both S- and D-type •Stable (RW Hya, SY Mus) – -8 must accrete ~10 Msun/yr or extremely slow symbiotic novae: both S- and D-type majority? •Multiple outbursts Z And- type: only S-type how many? SyRNe: activity between outbursts Anupama & Mikołajewska (1999, and ref. therein): RS Oph, T CrB, V3890 Sgr & V745 Sco •Variable A-F shell source with LUV/opt~50-500 Lsun •Emission line spectrum: T>~50000 K and LEUV~LUV/opt but HeII and other high-ionization lines rarely observed •Flickering in RS Oph & T CrB correlated with the activity Mikołajewska et al. (1998): RX Pup -the same post-nova-outburst behaviour as in RS Oph & T CrB as well as the accretion-powered symbiotic CH Cyg -7 LEUV/opt ~100-500 Lsun consistent with unstable accretion at ~10 Msun/yr whereas LX indicates 1-2 orders of mag lower Mdot RSOph SyRNe: activity between outbursts Gromadzki et al. (2007, poster): Z And-type outburst activity between the nova eruptions in RS Oph RX Pup Z And What powers the multiple outburst activity? •TNR instability on high-mass (>1Msun) WD (Paczyński & Rudak 1980)? Problem: <Mwd> ~ 0.5 Msun (JMik 2003) •Accretion disc instability on accreting MS star (Duschl 1988, JMik & Kenyon 1992)? Problem: only a few SyS may host an MS star •Combination-nova scenario: accretion disc instability on more or less stably burning WD (JMik 2001; 2002; Sokolski et al. 2005) The link between the SyRNe & Z And-type symbiotics • Both the activity of Z And-type SyS and the high & low states of SyRNe due to unstable disc-accretion onto WD • The WDs in Z And-type SyS burn the accreted hydrogen more or less stably wheras in SyRNe they don’t The cool giant •S-types: Sp types between M3 and M6, with a peak at M5 •D-types: peaks at M6 and M7 •The frequency of Miras higher among symbiotic giants Muerset & Schmid (1999) Yellow SyS: S-types •S: K III (e.g.AG Dra) •D’ G III & warm dust M giants in the (e.g. HD 330036) Hipparcos Cat. D-types RS Oph T CrB V3890 Sqr V745 Sco Symbiotic Miras •Longer pulsation periods •Optically thick dust envelopes Single Symbiotic •Higher mass loss rates, -6 -5 10 -10 Msun/yr, as compared to -7 average field LPVs, 10 Msun/yr •Dust obscuration in RX Pup and other symbiotic Miras can be related to intensive and variable mass loss The cool giant Most contain SRVs & thus may have mass loss rates -7 ~a few 10 Msun/yr (Gromadzki et al. 2006) The cool giant Large radius & high mass loss from the red giant are the key parameters for triggering the symbiotic phenomenon Red giant radii & distance scale 48 SyS – vrot,g sin i (Fekel et al. 2003; Zamanov et al. 2006; Hinkle et al. 2007) 31 SyS – also Porb Are the giants synchronized? Yes if Porb < 1000d Red giant radii & distance scale Generally the radii derived from vsini agree with the radii predicted by Sp type Rg~0.4-0.5 RRL but in some SyS they are larger although consistent with Rg~RRL H-R Diagram for cool giants Both galactic and MC symbiotics are low- mass systems Mg <2-3 Msun AGB giants in MC symbiotics and yellow galactic systems with P>900 days T CrB - normal RGB RS Oph – metal-poor AGB? What we know about chemical abundances of symbiotic stars? UV emission line analysis of 24 SyS (Nussbaumer et al. 1988): relative CNO ratios place SyS among red giants. Photospheric abundances: •AG Dra, BD-21 3873 & He2-467, yellow SYS, with K giants: metal poor with [Fe/H]<-1 & s-process overabundant (Smith et al. 1996, 1997; Pereira et al. 1998) •HD 330036, AS 201 & StHA 190, D’ systems with G giants & warm dust: high vgsini, [Fe/H]~0 & s-process overabundant (Smith et al. 2001; Pereira et al. 2005) • S-types with M giants: CH Cyg & V2116 Oph ~ solar abundaces; no evidence for s-process overabundances in red SyS... (Schmidt et al. 2006, Hinkle et al. 2006) Carbon abundance Single M giants Symbiotic giants Comparison of symbiotic stars (black) with single field M giants (magenta) from Schmidt & Mik 2003 RS Oph: [C/H]~ -3 /-4 (!!!); 12C/13C=10 (Scott et al. 1994) Metal-poor field halo giants: [C/H]~ -3, 12C/13C=10 & [Fe/H] ~ -2 (Keller et al. 2001) Consistent with with the position of RS Oph in H-R diagram & d~3 kpc Mass transfer in symbiotics 3D HD models: the cool giant wind must be focused towards the orbital plane (Mastrodemos & Morris 1998, 1999; Gawryszczak et al. 2002, 2003): In agreement with observations: • resolved nebulae in D-types (e.g. Corradi 2003) • spectroscopic evidence for jets & bipolar outflows in active S-types (e.g. Tomov 2003) Mass transfer in S-type symbiotics: via stellar wind? YES (Nussbaumer & Co), because: Sp types, vsini indicate Rg ~0.4-0.5 RRL no evidence for ellipsoidal variability, or Roche lobe owerflow? YES in multiple outburst systems (JMik et al. 2001; 2002, etc...) need red/near-IR photometry at quiescence to see the ellipsoidal variability Multiple outburst symbiotics CI Cyg: quiescent LC (Mik 2001) sinusoidal but with Porb in U & Porb/2 in VRI... AR Pav • A/F continuum most of time • Secondary P, also visible in JHK ... Z And q=Mg/Mh=3 … and even my best examples of the stable SyS!!! JHK(L) light curves • Ellipsoidal LC’s in AR Pav & Z And (active) but also in stable SyS RW Hya & SY Mus • No ellipsoidal changes in the classical symbiotic nova AG Peg • Secondary P, eclipses & ellipsoidal variability in high-eccentricity BX Mon T CrB Roche lobe filling giant q=Mg/Mh~0.6 i~60 Belczynski & Mikołajewska 1998 RS Oph Poster by Gromadzki et al.: •Primary minimum at the time of the spectroscopic conjunction with the red giant is in front. •Secondary minumum veiled by a moving bump? but If synchroneus rotation, vsini implies RL-filling giant AR Pav: A moving bump veils the secondary minimum in the visual LC… Ellipsoidal variability in SyS: • Absent in symbiotic novae (AG Peg) • Present in all (i>60; LC available) multiple outburst (Z And-type) SyS at quiescence (VRI) and activity (near-IR) • Present (at least in some) in steady SyS (near-IR) • Present in T CrB; need near-IR for RS Oph • All 12 SyS with ellipsoidal variability have d Porb <1000 and circular (e~0) orbits except BX Mon The RG radius – vsini problem What about the radius/v sin i ? • Asynchronous rotation? unlikely because of circular orbits • RL shinkage (up to 2-3 times!) expected in luminous stars with strong winds if some force drives the mass loss & almost compensates the gravity (e.g. Schuerman 1972) -7 very promising in Sys with strong (10 Msun/yr) and nearly constant speed winds A-F shell M giant Hot comp In AX Per, AR Pav & other active SyS associated with the hot comp (Mik & Kenyon 1992; Quiroga et al. 2002; Brandi et al. 2005; 2007) Departures from the expected circular orbit correlated with activity & due to stream res Hot comp In RS Oph – confusing (poster by Brandi et al.) Significant contribution from the stream? M giant Note the L1 point on the opposite side of CM as compared with the other SyS Main points: • Symbiotic RNe, RS Oph & T CrB, and V2116 Oph/GX1+4 are the only SyS with the cool giant being the less massive component, with mass < 1 Msun in all cases. The WDs in the SyRNe are the most massive, with M~1.1-1.4 Msun sufficient for them to become SNIa. • Tidally distorted red giants and RF owerflow are present in T CrB & RS Oph.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    36 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us