A Bibliography on Event Semantics and Related Matters

A Bibliography on Event Semantics and Related Matters

A Bibliography on Event Semantics and Related Matters Events: Modification, Aspect and Lexical Meaning Cleo Condoravdi and Hana Filip LSA Institute Stanford July, 2007 References [1] Abusch, Dorit. 1985. On Verbs and Time. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. [2] Abusch, Dorit. 1986. Verbs of Change, Causation, and Time. Technical Report CSLI-86-50, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. [3] Abusch, Dorit. 2005. Causatives and Mixed Aspectual Type. In Gregory N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier, eds., 29–61. [4] Abusch, Dorit and Mats Rooth. 1990. Temporal Adverbs and the English Perfect. NELS 20, 1–15. [5] Alexiadou Artemis, Monika Rathert and Arnim von Stechow (eds.). 2003. Perfect Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [6] Allen, James. 1983. Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals. CACM 26, 832–843. [7] Allen, James. 1984. Towards a General Theory of Action and Time. Arti- ficial Intelligence 23, 123–154. [8] Arregui, Ana. To appear. When aspect matters: the case of would- conditionals. Natural Language Semantics. [9] Artstein, Ron. 2006. Quantificational Arguments in Temporal Adjunct Clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 541–597. 1 [10] Asher, Nicholas. 1992. A Default, Truth Conditional Semantics for the Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 463–508. [11] Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dor- drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [12] Asher, Nicholas and Pierre Sablayrolles. 1995. A Typology and Discourse Semantics for Motion verbs and Spatial PPs in French. Journal of Seman- tics 12, 163–209. [13] Bach, Emmon. 1981. On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics. In Peter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics, 63–81. New York: Academic Press. [14] Bach, Emmon. 1986. The Algebra of Events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5-16. [15] Bartsch, Renate. 1976. The Grammar of Adverbials. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company. [16] Bartsch, Renate. 1995. Situations, Tense and Aspect. Dynamic Discourse Ontology and the Semantic Flexibility of Temporal System in German and English. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [17] Barwise, K. Jon. 1981. Scenes and Other Situattions. The Journal of Phi- losophy 77, 369–397. [18] Bayer, Samuel. 1995. Confessions of a Lapsed Neo-Davidsonian. Doctoral dissertation, Brown University. [19] Bayer, Samuel. 1996. The Size of Events. Semantics and Linguistic Theory VI , 1–16. [20] Beaver, David and Cleo Condoravdi. 2003. A Uniform Analysis of Before and After. Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIII, 37–54. [21] Beck, Sigrid and Arnim von Stechow. 2006 Dog after Dog Revisited. SSinn und Bedeutung 10. [22] Bennett, Brandon, and Antony P. Galton. 2004. A Unifying Semantics for Time and Events. Artificial Intelligence 153, 13–48. [23] Bennett, Jonathan. 1988. Events and their Names. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [24] van Benthem, Johan. 1983. The Logic of Time. A Modeltheoretic Investi- gation into the Varieties of Temporal Ontology and Temporal Discourse. Dordrecht: Reidel. 2 [25] Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1994. Statives, progressives, and habituals: Analo- gies and differences. Linguistics 32, 391–423. [26] Binnick, Robert I. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [27] Bohnemeyer, J¨urgen and Mary Swift. 2004. Event realization and aspectual interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27: 263–296. [28] Bonomi, Andrea. 1997. The Progressive and the Structure of Events. Jour- nal of Semantics 14, 173–205. [29] Bonomi, Andrea and Paolo Casalegno. 1993. Only: Association with Focus in Event Semantics. Natural Language Semantics 2, 1–45. [30] Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [31] Brand, Myles. 1982. Physical Objects and Events. In Werner Leinfellner, Eric Kraemer and Jeffrey Schank, eds., 106–116. [32] Butt, Miriam and Wilhelm Geuder (eds.). 1998. The Projection of Argu- ments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413–58. [33] Carlson, Gregory N. 1984. On the Role of Thematic Roles in Linguistic Theory. Linguistics 22, 259–279. [34] Carlson, Gregory N. 1998. Thematic Roles and the Individuation of Events. In Susan Rothstein, ed., 35–51. [35] Carlson, Gregory N. and Francis J. Pelletier. 2005. Reference and Quan- tification: The Partee Effect. Festschrift for Barbara Hall Partee. Stanford: CSLI Publications. [36] Carlson, Lauri. 1981. Aspect and Quantification. In Philip J. Tedeschi and Annie Zaenen, eds., 31–64. [37] Casta˜neda, Hector-Neri. 1967. Comments. In Nicholas Rescher, ed., The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. [38] Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Individual-Level Predicates as Inherent Gener- ics. In Gregory N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier, eds., The Generic Book, 176–223. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [39] Cipria, Alicia and Craige Roberts. 2000. Spanish Imperfecto and Pret´erito: Truth Conditions and Aktionsart Effects in Situation Semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8, 297–347. 3 [40] Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [41] Condoravdi, Cleo. 2002. Temporal Interpretation of Modals: Modals for the Present and for the Past. In David Beaver, Stefan Kaufmann, Brady Clark and Luis Casillas, eds., The Construction of Meaning. Stanford: CSLI Publications. [42] Condoravdi, Cleo. 2007. NPI Licensing in Temporal Clauses. In Hedde Zeijl- stra and Jan-Philipp Soehn, eds., Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Polarity. University of T¨ubingen. [43] Condoravdi, Cleo. In press. Punctual Until as a Scalar NPI. In Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas, eds., The Nature of the Word. Cambridge: MIT Press. [44] Cresswell, Max J. 1995. Adverbial Modification. Dordrecht: Reidel. [45] Davidson, Donald. 1967. The Logical Form of Action Sentences. Reprinted in Donald Davidson 1980, 105–122. [46] Davidson, Donald. 1969. The Individuation of Events. Reprinted in Donald Davidson 1980, 163–180. [47] Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [48] Decklerck, Renaat. 1979. Aspect and the Bounded/Unbounded (Telic/ Atelic) Distinction. Linguistics 17, 761–794. [49] Dekker, Paul. 1997. Cases, Adverbs, Situations and Events. In Hans Kamp and Barbara H. Partee, eds., Context Dependence in the Analysis of Lin- guistic Meaning, 383–404. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [50] Deo, Ashwini. 2006. Tense and Aspect in Indo-Aryan Languages: Variation and Diachrony. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. [51] D¨olling, Johannes, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow and Martin Sch¨afer(eds.). 2007. Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [52] Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. [53] Dowty, David. 1982. Tenses, Time Adverbs and Compositional Theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 405–426. 4 [54] Dowty, David. 1986. The Effects of Aspectual Class on the Temporal Struc- ture of Discourse: Semantics or Pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 37–61. [55] Dowty, David. 1989. On the Semantic Content of the Notion “Thematic Role.” In Barbara Partee, Gennaro Chierchia and Ray Turner, eds., Prop- erties, Types, and Meanings, vol. II , 69–130. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [56] Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Lan- guage 67, 547–619. [57] Eberle, Kurt. 1990. Eventualities in a Natural Language Understand- ing System. In Karl Hans Bl¨asius,Ulrich Hedtst¨uck, and Claus-Rainer Rollinger, eds., Sorts and Types in Artificial Intelligence, 209–239. Berlin: Springer–Verlag. [58] Eckardt, Regine. 1994. Does Information Flow in Event Structures? Manuscript, Universit¨atT¨ubingen. [59] Eckardt, Regine. 1998. Adverbs, Events and other Things. Issues in the Semantics of Manner Adverbs. T¨ubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Linguis- tische Arbeiten, 379. [60] Eckardt, Regine. 2002. Event Semantics. In Fritz Hamm and Thomas Ede Zimmermann, eds., Semantics, 91–127. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag. [61] Egg, Markus. 1995. The Intergressive as a New Category in Verbal Aktion- sart. Journal of Semantics 12, 311–356. [62] van Eijck, Jan and Hans Kamp. 1997. Representing Discourse in Context. In Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, eds., Handbook of Logic and Language, 179–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [63] Engelberg, Stefan. 2002. Intransitive Accomplishments and the Lexicon: The Role of Implicit Arguments, Definiteness, and Reflexivity in Aspectual Composition. Journal of Semantics 19, 369–416. [64] Fernando, Timothy. 2004. Inertia in Temporal Modification. Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIV, 56–73. [65] Filip, Hana. 1990. Thematic Roles and Aktionsart. Proceedings of the West- ern Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) 20, 88–99. Fresno: California State University. [66] Filip, Hana. 1992. Aspect and Interpretation of Nominal Arguments. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 28, 139–158. 5 [67] Filip, Hana. 1993. Aspect, Situation Types and Noun Phrase Semantics. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley. [68] Filip, Hana. 1996. Integrating Telicity, Aspect and NP Semantics: the Role of Thematic Structure. In Jindrich Toman, ed., Approaches to Slavic Lin- guistics III , 61–96. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. [69] Filip, Hana. 1999.Aspect, Eventuality Types, and Noun Phrase Semantics. New York: Garland Publishing. [70] Filip, Hana. 2000. The Quantization Puzzle.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us