Advocacy Planning Toward the Development of Theory N and Strategy

Advocacy Planning Toward the Development of Theory N and Strategy

4-0 DOCUMENT "BESUHE ED 106 954 * El OCT7 147 AUTHOR Hazzio^ti, Donald F. ." TITLE Advocacy Planning Toward the Development of Theory N and Strategy. Exchange Bibliography No. 241. INSTITUTION Council of Planning Librarians, Bonticello, 111. PUB DATE Nov 71 ' ­ \ - NOTE ^ 10p. ' ' . AVAILABLE FROM Council, of Planning Librarians, P.O. Box 229, Hon^icello* Illinois'61856 ($1.50) * , * *.*"* EDES PRICE HF-S0.76 HC-$1.5S PLUS POSTAGE + ' DESCRIPTORS ^Bibliographies; *Change Agents; *Change 'Strategies,; Citizen. Participati-on^.^eity Planning; Com»anity Planning; Higher Education; *Planning; Publications;. Reference Haterials; Social Planning IDENTIFIERS *Advocacy Planning [ ABSTRACT "' , : This bibliography lists publications relevant to ,the- topic of, advocacy planning, with a view toward encouraging*and facilitating initial or staging* research ip. that policy area. Entries are organized- into separate sections-for articles, in professional journals, books, articles in contemporary periodicals, and v newsletters,- article^ in legal periodicals, reports and studies, and . proceedings and conferences.* Within each section,, citations listed alphabetically by author*s name. (Author/JGf \ Council of Planning librarians EXCHANGE BIBLIOGRAPHY CD November 1971 «i .^ -.1. « Advocacy Planning-Towqrd the.bevelopment of Theory and Sfrofegy Donald F. Mazziptti 4 . ; y Graduate Program in Urban and Regional Planning . University, of Iowa ;. * . .i u S OE»«»TWENT Of M6ALTM EDUCATION a *ELP ARC* " NATIONAL INS1J1TUT.E Of EDUCATION -» \ COUNCIL' OFTLANNDJ^CLIBRARIANS. Exchange Bibliography #2ia ADVOCACY 'tfLAWING r TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF TH30RY AND STRATEGY Donald F. Mazziott: . / Graduate Program in Urban' and . ' Regional Planning' ^ I \ » . University of Iowa / '' . * "A r.aw, important, and difficult problem is emerging in the administration of public planning agencies, that is, < there is'a growing number of instances of professional staff members who dissent-publicly from the official agency position on a .planning issue."^ \ I * ­ The concept of ."advocacy planning" the' origin of which is generally credited to an article appearing in the Journal of the American Institute of Planners by .Paul Davidoff2- has .proliferated in planning and architectural writings for tihe better part .of a .' . .. 0 '*-.-. decade. Despite the flurry of writing on the topic by a great rum­ '" 'ber " of" writers" "" ' who*-' range the entire political spectrum, it would . be difficult tcr recount an instance where an equally popular notion * , - \- ** '' £* ' .had remained virtually undeveloped in theory and parctice. * * ^ <Hfliile*it is possible to trace the political theory underlying the concept.of advocacy planning to "pluralism," nowhere does the \. '\ . literature seek a well-considered, theoretical definition ofvthe ... - ' * ' ^^ * -^ * * ' subject. Although it. is possible to link the advocacy spoken of r" * to the subjective urging of a particular person of persons'on * * * . * * behalf of a particular group-related issue,3 the student,' l<£arl Finkler^, "Dissent and Independent Initiative in Plan­ ning Offices." (Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials, Planning Advisory Service, Report Ho. 269, May, Paul Davidoff>~-nAd'SDcacy «TMJ Pluraliaitt Journal' of the American Institute of Planners. THJ (H6v«9Bdber> 396$)*' 330L-' i-'f:'';:&&f<J ) i^:¥sC';;^&^: __^^^^ g5.,,^,.._ >.,,,. ^2s;(^s«,SiSi3i«s?aRSisai f^^'^fsSf&S&KSiSSsSS. sSSSSiSs \­ A " 'n_ - - -. = *« r 2 -"/^ CPL Exchange'Bibliography-#2lA' 'r researchers, profe'ssor and'professional encounter an -abrupt gap on- issues .which appear to Be at'* least r^Tated and, perhaps', crucial to group or professional,' - advocacy., ' ." For' -exairple,\ the literature: y. .ignores any comprehensive analysis of power relationships.,"group. ' '.\ - ' ' ' * ' '-' '" dynamics, the' logic- of collective as opposed to individual action^ '" »". - '-.'..- : ^ the characteristics of pressure group ^politics,-' or special 6"' interest theories As planning schools and agencies begin to feel. the pressures ­ j . ' " / ' ' ^ '-..- " » :.-. of advocacy or dissent approaches* to the heretofore "professional ­ - * ' '--.' '- ^ ' " '. ., tests of objectivity and analysis,'* the lack of a1 " coherent "defini- ' ..... ' » - '':.'* ' .' ' tion an* theory ^ of advocacy will inevitably lead- to both.disrup­ * * f ' t * ' *-. tions in institutional behavior and failures in the practical ' . .* . - t +*.. * . 4 .. -*N.. ; - application of such a ubiqutuous notion. Indeed,- on the heels of ­ Ralph Naders* suggestions -'for action programs rfat the 197C^. Annual Convention of. the American Institute of Planners? and a subsequent study of, the implications of such programs ahd/cr behavior^ it seems - ^ - ' * * . .* clear that analysis of advocacy in a« planning context has -failed- to " '. - ». keef> the pace of social change. , ' ' 6 ' - ' " . * Based upon the foregoing comments, the following" bibliography . I ' - -''.. on the tropic of advocacy-planning has been developed with.a view ^ * * -v ** " " " ' tgvrar^Lenc'ouraging and facill tating 'inJtiai- or research in S * ' /* . chi's policy area. -Areas of agreement and divergence of thought be-' i ' ' ? * ' * come apparent upon study of %the-references included; once these' - :. ' ' ' '"..'. elements have been identified, serious analysis and. theoretical ieSiXff a Profes­ V /- I - V ». .«K . '. \ *' ' --3. , V CPL Exchange Bibliography , ' . ' Advocacy Planning A Selected Bibliography ^ -"' ". '' '.*'' c- Professional JourAals* ,'*'.* '* ,. Arnstein* Sherry ft. *"A"1 Ladder*^f^C^tizen Participation." .Journal- .. - of21b the-2^ American ;- .- Institute.- V:,. .of FLanjiers," " "'' XXXV (July, ­2 ' * , ^ ' *" . _ \ I- ,3 ' ,\ * 'Berkeleor; E.i*. '"^prfcshpps iVvi^atts." .Architectural Forum, : . .., . ' Brager, George A. '|AdVbbacy aad-Political Behavior.-"- Social Work, _ .of _t^ American'association .of Social Workers. -Vol. % 2, (April, 19.68),, 5-15i : rrr Brager, George A. and Valerie Jorrin.' '-"Bargaining: A Method in ." CcaEnrunity^hange. 11 Social Work;" Journal of ^the National ' ; - ' Associatio'a of Social VJorkers. Vol.' 1%, llps'k, (Oetpber,1969), ** - 73-83.- " ~r~. ' Btirke,D.-Barlow, Jri, Howard: H. Foster, <Jr., and Pefcefjfi. Nash. "Urban'Pubiic-Policy Participation. Networks.-" The( Urban'-and Social Change ge^iew» 3 (Spring, 1970); Burke, .Edmuiid K* "Citizen Participation,Strategies." 'Journal of ,' 'tha^'Americali Institute of Planaet^j XXXIV. (September, 1968)', -».. * . ­ Chatter,jee, Pranab ,and Raymond A. KoleskL. "The Concepts of. Com­ munity and Community Orgahi'zation." 'Journal of the National t 'Association of Social Worlcers. Vol., 15, »P> 3, (Jul^, 1970)> .- '. \ 82-92. "^"^ r~~^ rrT~ - " -,. *~ / . .' , f Clark»H.*Sol. "Today's-Advocate. n Case and CoJmnent. Vol. 76," No.".- 2, .(March/April, -" ;1971X'26-3^1 ^\ "1 \v'. -,- /."- - "**. " " Davidoff, T.lnda and Paul,' andJfeiV Newton Gold; "Suburban .Action: Advocate Planning for-an Open Society,"Journal pf the >. AToerican Institute of Planners.' Vol. iix.vi, No. 1, (Januazy, . "«,. M97Q), 12-21. *~" "~~~ . .. -. *. ' ,''-__ .' ' -- *. Davidoff, Paul. "Advocacy and Pluralist in Planning." Journal of * the American Institute of Planners-.^ Vol". XXXI, (November^ 1965) i X 331-338. ~ ._v. ­ Buhl,-*:*'-"- Leonard J* and '. Janicp Volkmarui. ^Pagicapatory. ' Deaocracy:- - ­ I:-.'- Netwbrfc > as a Strategy for Changed" Drban and Social-Change. 7ol. 3, No. 2, (Spring^ 1970>, ll-12t'. ^ 1|. , CPL'Exchange Bibliography #2Ul" Editors. "Advocacy .Planning and Hoto it Works." Progressive Arch­ itecture, (September, I960), 101-115. , Gilbert, Heil, and Joseph >/. Eaton. "l«Jho Speaks -for the' Poor?" ^Journal-xof the Amei?ican JEnstitute of Planners., Vol. XXXVI (November, 1970), lill-Wo. I ! ' - ' - . _' * V. Hatch, Richard C, 'JSome -Thoughts on-Advocacy Planning." Architec­ tural Forum, .(June., £968)1 -72. ' . « Hyman, Herbert, ^'planning with Citizens: Two Styles." Journal of % 105-12.the Amerioari Institute: ' ";of Planners.! Vol.. XXXV,v (March,:1969), Kahh, Alfred J. ""Perspectives on Access to Social .Senjices." " . Social .Work? Journal'yf the^Hatagnal Association of Social , ' Workers. Vol. 15, No,- 2, (AprilV 1970j[,-95-101.. ^~~~ Kaplan, Marshall. "Advocacy and the Urban Poor;" Journal of the American Institute of Planners. Vol. XXXV, Ho. 2, (March, . I, 96-101. Xeyes^ Langley C^, Jr. and Sdirard Teitcher. "T.inritations «of* Advo­ cacy Planning:.A Viqw from the Sstablistoaent. " Journal of the" i - Anerican- Institute of Planners. Vol. XXXVI, No. Ii, (July, 7 197C), 225-226. v. '. ; . V _ " . '." - ' > ' . w * Norton. "The Local jCoBBnunity as an Ecology of Games. " ' . Americari Journal of Sociology. Vol'.- 3U, (March, '"19^8)^ 80-87. " ' v ^ ' . ' r Theodore. "Decision Making vs .Policy Kaki.'ngt. Toward an Anti­ dote for Technocracy." Pjjbiic_Admnisteati^_BBview.- (May/ June,,1970), 31U-325. Lowry, Sitctiie IP. "Power to the People Political Evolution or Revolution?"' Urban and Social Change Review^ V.ol. 3> No. .2 - ' > (Spring, 1970), 2-6.. - Hashy. Peter H. and Dennis . "A Task Force Approach, to Replace 'the Planning Board.?, J of the American Institute of Planners. .Vol. XXX, No. 170.961^ Ohlin & Rein. ''Social* Planning for Institutional Change." The Social Welfare Forum. 85 Page, Clinton. "Getting Involved." Arc&itectural and Kngi neering Hews, (Deceniber, 1969), 28-37. .Peattie, Lisa R. % "Comraanity Drama and Advocacy Planning. " * Journal 'of the American Insti-fote

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us