Draft version July 31, 2018 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 IMPROVED MAIN SEQUENCE TURNOFF AGES OF YOUNG OPEN CLUSTERS: MULTICOLOR UBV TECHNIQUES & THE CHALLENGES OF ROTATION Jeffrey D. Cummings1 & Jason S. Kalirai2,1 Draft version July 31, 2018 ABSTRACT Main sequence turnoff ages in young open clusters are complicated by turnoffs that are sparse, have high binarity fractions, can be affected by differential reddening, and typically include a number of peculiar stars. Furthermore, stellar rotation can have a significant effect on a star’s photometry and evolutionary timescale. In this paper we analyze in 12 nearby open clusters, ranging from ages of 50 Myr to 350 Myr, how broadband UBV color-color relations can be used to identify turnoff stars that are Be stars, blue stragglers, certain types of binaries, or those affected by differential reddening. This UBV color-color analysis also directly measures a cluster’s E(B–V) and estimates its [Fe/H]. The turnoff stars unaffected by these peculiarities create a narrower and more clearly defined cluster turnoff. Using four common isochronal models, two of which consider rotation, we fit cluster parameters using these selected turnoff stars and the main sequence. Comparisons of the photometrically fit cluster distances to those based on Gaia DR2 parallaxes find that they are consistent for all clusters. For older (>100 Myr) clusters, like the Pleiades and the Hyades, comparisons to ages based on the lithium depletion boundary method finds that these cleaned turnoff ages agree to within ∼10% for all four isochronal models. For younger clusters, however, only the Geneva models that consider rotation fit turnoff ages consistent with lithium-based ages, while the ages based on non-rotating isochrones quickly diverge to become 30% to 80% younger. This illustrates the importance of rotation for deriving ages in the youngest (<100 Myr) clusters. 1. INTRODUCTION cluster distances. Differential reddening and binarity Open clusters provide an ideal environment to study can further compound the challenge of MSTO analysis. star formation, stellar physics, and nearly all aspects of One of the most complex challenges for MSTO analysis stellar evolution. This is driven by their large sample is stellar rotation. The understanding of rotation and of stars being at effectively the same initial composi- its models have improved (see the review in Maeder & tion, age, distance, and reddening. For characterizing Meynet 2000 and subsequent work by the Geneva group processes of stellar evolution using clusters, one of the and Choi et al. 2016), but there remain limitations and most important factors is cluster age. This allows mul- inconsistencies between models. Rotation affects nearly tiple clusters across different ages to be used to trace all aspects of stellar evolution, including the observed the evolution of, for example, stellar rotation rates (e.g., characteristics of stars. MSTOs with stars spanning a Kawaler 1988, Barnes 2003), lithium abundances (e.g., large range of rotations and observation angles are sig- Cummings et al. 2012, 2017), cluster metallicity or α nificantly broadened (Georgy et al. 2014). abundances (e.g., Reddy et al. 2016), and their popu- These MSTO challenges are the most important in ≤ lations of peculiar stars (e.g., Marco et al. 2007). The younger clusters ( 200 Myr). Their MSTOs are defined most straightforward method of analyzing cluster ages by intermediate and higher mass stars, which are fewer is simply through analysis of their highest mass stars in number, have high binarity fractions (Raboud 1996, that are beginning to evolve beyond the main sequence Dunstall et al. 2015), and have rotation rates spanning arXiv:1807.10772v1 [astro-ph.SR] 27 Jul 2018 in the main sequence turnoff (hereafter MSTO). Plotting from slow to nearly critical rotation (Huang et al. 2010). the cluster stars in a color-magnitude diagram (hereafter Such rapidly rotating stars not only undergo the effects CMD) and fitting the main sequence, the MSTO, and, of rotation but can also expel material into circumstellar when available, the giants with a theoretical isochrone decretion disks. These ‘Be’ stars are typically B dwarfs provides a cluster age. and produce Balmer emission lines. While they are very Multiple challenges exist, however, with deriving pre- well studied objects, understanding their formation and cise cluster ages from fitting the MSTO. For example, the evolution remains complex (see Rivinius et al. 2013). In isochrones themselves are sensitive to the model assump- general, however, they can either appear bright and blue tions, including how convection and overshoot are han- or faint and red based on the angle of observation and the dled. Next, fitting isochrones is dependent on adopted disk’s contribution to or occultation of the star’s light. cluster reddening, cluster chemical compositions, and These Be stars further broaden MSTO photometry, but even after their removal the current rotational models alone still cannot explain the full widths of young cluster 1 Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Johns Hopkins Univer- sity, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; MSTOs (e.g., Milone et al. 2015, Correnti et al. 2017). [email protected] A method to determine young cluster ages that by- 2 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, passes many of these challenges is to derive ages from Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; [email protected] the rich sample of lower-mass cluster members. For ex- 2 Cummings et al. ample, the lithium depletion boundary (hereafter LDB) hereafter Y2 isochrones) and PARSEC isochrones (Bres- method uses lithium (hereafter Li) abundances of low- san et al. 2012) version 1.2S3. In this paper we continue mass M dwarfs (e.g., D’Antona & Mazzitelli 1994, Jef- to use the original Y2 isochrones and the newly updated fries & Naylor 2001). LDB ages are believed to be less PARSEC isochrones (version 1.2S+COLIBRI PR16 from sensitive to model assumptions (Soderblom et al. 2014), Marigo et al. 2017). These updated PARSEC isochrones but they still have moderate sensitivity to magnetic fields include better post-main sequence evolution and improve and surface activity (e.g., Somers & Pinsonneault 2014). the main sequence colors and matching. Additionally, the challenge of spectroscopically observing To expand the analysis of cluster parameters and to Li abundances in the lowest-mass members of a young consider the important effects of rotation, we will also cluster is difficult to overcome in all but the nearest and compare to the MIST isochrones (Dotter 2016, Choi most well defined Galactic clusters. However, these LDB et al. 2016; version 1.1), which are based on Modules ages provide a valuable independent check of MSTO ages for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA; Paxton and methods. et al. 2011, 2013, 2015). MIST has isochrones for both In Cummings et al. (2016; hereafter Paper I), we used non-rotating stars and for stars initially rotating at 0.4 Johnson UBV color-colors of young cluster to analyze of their critical rotation velocity (hereafter vcrit). Choi their reddening and metallicity, as is traditionally done, et al. (2016) applies these initial rotations only for stars but we also used color-color analysis to identify higher- more massive than 1.8 M⊙, followed by a gradual slow mass MSTO stars unaffected by peculiarities or differ- down to zero rotation from 1.8 to 1.2 M⊙. Rotation ential reddening. The CMD analysis of these selected in these lower-mass stars was not considered by Choi MSTO stars provided a uniformly analyzed set of clus- et al. (2016) because they did not model magnetic brak- ter ages. These six clusters also had white dwarf mem- ing, which becomes crucial for angular momentum loss bers with spectroscopically determined masses and cool- in these lower masses (<1.2 M⊙) with surface convection ing ages, and combined with the cluster ages this gave zones (Kraft 1967). For the higher-mass stars, the adop- each white dwarf’s progenitor evolutionary timescale, tion of 0.4 of vcrit is appropriate based on cluster B-star and hence its progenitor mass. These improved MSTO observations (Huang et al. 2010), where there is a broad cluster ages gave an initial-final mass relation with ob- observed distribution spanning the full range of rotation served scatter ∼50% smaller than previous relations. rates and with a peak near 0.4 to 0.5 of vcrit. To further Here we will improve this UBV color-color technique consider the effects of rotation in the MIST models, Choi and more directly analyze which MSTO challenges it can et al. (2017) also give isochrones for stars initially rotat- mitigate, if not address, and reanalyze these six original ing at 0.5 and 0.6 of vcrit, but they only include stellar clusters plus six additional young clusters. An advan- parameters and not UBV photometry. tage of this technique is that Johnson broadband UBV Driven by the differences in current rotational model photometry of cluster MSTO stars is relatively easy to predictions (see Section 2.1), here we also consider the acquire, if not already available, compared to other tech- Geneva stellar models (Ekstr¨om et al. 2012, Georgy niques to analyze peculiarities that require either narrow- et al. 2013, 2014; hereafter the SYCLIST models). The band photometry or spectroscopy of MSTO stars. More SYCLIST models model initial rotation rates from non- broadly speaking, while it will not be analyzed here, sim- rotating to nearly critical rotation for stars from 1.7 to ilar techniques can likely also be applied to color-color re- 15 M⊙. For the full stellar mass range they model non- lations involving near-ultraviolet (NUV) filters like Sloan rotating stars and those with initial rotations at 0.568 u and HST’s F336W. of their critical angular momentum, which is equivalent The layout of the paper is as follows.