Eugenics, Nazi and Soviet Psychiatry Jason Luty

Eugenics, Nazi and Soviet Psychiatry Jason Luty

Advances in psychiatric treatment (2014), vol. 20, 52–60 doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.112.010330 ARTICLE Psychiatry and the dark side: eugenics, Nazi and Soviet psychiatry Jason Luty Jason Luty is consultant in restrict liberty, that tends towards abuse if not SUMMARY addictions psychiatry at Borders regulated by the legal or political system. In the Health. He has published in the Psychiatrist Thomas Szasz fought coercion past, there have been abuses of psychiatrists’ addictions field and trained at (compulsory detention) and denied that mental the Maudsley Hospital, London powers to detain people, but these have been illness existed. Although he was regarded as a and spent 8 years as consultant instigated at the direction of governments such maverick, his ideas are much more plausible when in addictions at the South Essex as that in Nazi Germany (leading to genocide of Partnership University NHS one discovers that between 1939 and 1941, up to Foundation Trust. He has a PhD in 100 000 mentally ill people, including 5000 children, mentally ill people) and the USSR (where political pharmacology following a study were killed in Nazi Germany. In the course of the dissidents were detained with a diagnosis of of the molecular mechanisms Nazi regime, over 400 000 forced sterilisations took ‘sluggish schizophrenia’). of receptor desensitisation and place, mainly of people with mental illnesses. Other tolerance. He is a wobbly member of the English Conservative Party. countries, including Denmark, Norway, Sweden Psychiatry and eugenics and Switzerland, had active forced sterilisation Correspondence Dr Jason Luty, The science of eugenics emerged during the Borders Addiction Service, The programmes and eugenics laws. Similar laws were Range, Tweed Road, Galashiels TD1 implemented in the USA, with up to 25 000 forced late Victorian era, with the aim of reducing the 3EB, UK. Email: jason.luty@yahoo. sterilisations. These atrocities were enabled and rates of physical and mental illness, hereditary co.uk facilitated by psychiatrists of the time and are only diseases and ‘morally deviant behaviours’. It was one example of the dark side of the profession. promoted throughout industrial countries amid This article re views some of these aspects of the fears of ‘degeneration, race suicide, and the threat history of psychiatry, including Germany’s eugenics of disordered sexualities’ (Mottier 2008: p. 34). programme and the former USSR’s detention of The 1933 Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily dissidents under the guise of psychiatric treatment. Diseased Offspring (Das Gesetz zur Verhütung DEclARATION OF INTEREST erbkranken Nachwuchses ) required German None. doctors to register hereditary illnesses in their patients. In the course of the Nazi regime, over 200 ‘hereditary health courts’ were set up, which ‘Men (wretched creatures that they are) worry less authorised over 400 000 sterilisations. Most of the about doing an injury to one who makes himself people sterilised between 1934 and 1939 in Nazi loved than to one who makes himself feared’ (The Germany were labelled ‘mentally ill’ (Cocks 1997; Prince , Niccolo Machiavelli, 1532). Mottier 2007). The objective of this article is to familiarise Eugenics and forced sterilisation programmes mental health professionals and lay readers tend to be associated with Nazi Germany. However, with the rather colourful and disdainful history other countries had active forced sterilisation of psychiatry, particularly the political abuses programmes and eugenics laws, among them the of mental health legislation. The debate about USA, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland legislative changes (including legislation for (Weiss 2010). In 1912, Switzerland introduced laws ‘dangerous severe personality disorder’ in the UK) prohibiting marriage for the ‘mentally deficient’ often seems arcane and unnecessary until set in and ‘legally irresponsible’ (Mottier 2007). Eugenics the context of these historical abuses of the mental sterilisation laws were introduced in the US State health system. of Indiana in 1907 (Fig. 1), and in two-thirds of the Some psychiatrists have abused power in remaining states by the 1930s. Havelock Ellis was general. For example, although the war crimes for a British physician and psychologist who actively which Radovan Karadžic´ is currently standing promoted eugenics, although these programmes trial do not arise from his psychiatric practice, it were never enacted in the UK. Eugenics was is salutary to note that he is far from being the supported by many leading psychiatrists, such as first psychiatrist to be accused (or convicted) of Emil Kraepelin, Eugen Bleuler and especially the crimes against humanity. However, Thomas Szasz Swiss psychiatrist Auguste Forel, who pioneered controversially argued that there is something the first sterilisations without consent in German- inherent in psychiatry, particularly the power to speaking nations in 1886 (Kuechenhoff 2008). 52 Psychiatry and the dark side Psychiatrists were particularly active in the eugenics field and were often directly involved in CHAPTER 215. identifying victims for forced sterilisation. In 1934, AN ACT entitled an act to prevent procreation of confirmed criminals, idiots, imbeciles and rapists; providing that the Journal of the American Medical Association superintendents and boards of managers of institutions where published a lengthy report on the German eugenics such persons are confined shall have the authority and are empowered to appoint a committee of experts, consisting of law and its many expected benefits. In 1936, the two (2) physicians, to examine into the mental condition of such authors of Eugenical Sterilization, led by Abraham inmates. Myerson, one of America’s most respected psy- [H. 364. Approved March 9, 1907.] chiatrists, praised Hitler’s eugenics legislation. Preamble. Whereas, Heredity plays a most important part in the Indeed, the prosecution at the Nuremberg Trials transmission of crime, idiocy and imbecility; of 1945–1949 felt unable to classify forced Penal Institutions—Surgical Operations. sterilisations as war crimes, because similar laws Therefore, Be it enacted by the general assembly of the State of Indiana, That on and after the passage of this act it shall had been implemented in the USA, where up to be compulsory for each and every institution in the state, 25 000 such sterilisations took place (Cocks 1997; entrusted with the care of confirmed criminals, idiots, rapists and imbeciles, to appoint upon its staff, in addition to the Mottier 2007). regular institutional physician, two (2) skilled surgeons of recognised ability, whose duty it shall be, in conjunction with the chief physician of the institution, to examine the mental Psychiatry and the Holocaust and physical condition of such inmates as are recommended The Nazi regime considered that life was a matter by the institutional physician and board of managers. If, in the judgment of this committee of experts and the board of of survival of the fittest. Concepts such as equality managers, procreation is inadvisable and there is no probability and justice were creations of ‘inferior’ groups of improvement of the mental condition of the inmate, it shall designed to weaken the true, pure stock of the be lawful for the surgeons to perform such operation for the prevention of procreation as shall be decided safest and most ‘master race’. Hence, it became the responsibility effective. But this operation shall not be performed except in of the state and true Aryan people to ensure that cases that have been pronounced unimprovable: Provided, That in no case shall the consultation fee be more than three ($3.00) racially desirable members of society thrived and dollars to each expert, to be paid out of the funds appropriated that biologically inferior or defective people were for the maintenance of such institution. extinguished (‘racial hygiene’). Poverty and disease were thought to arise from hereditary defects due FIG 1 The Indiana eugenics law: this text is reprinted from to non-Aryans contaminating the gene pool and the laws of the State of Indiana for 1907 (Indianapolis also to misguided ideals of welfare and equality. State Assembly 1907: pp. 377–378). Nazi policy recognised that German people had to be trained to extinguish their biological inferiors, and disability, were crucial predecessors of the to prevent both ‘racial degeneration’ and their euthanasia programmes for the murder of mentally continued drain on resources (Cocks 1997). ill people in Germany. The T-4 ‘euthanasia’ The Nazi regime considered people with incur- programme A k t ion T-4, named after the Berlin able mental illness as having a ‘life not worth living’ address of its coordinating office (Tiergartenstrasse or ‘life unworthy of life’. German psychiatrists 4), was established in 1939 to ensure the ‘genetic were therefore required to identify people with purity of the German population’ by killing or these forms of ‘hereditary’ mental illness. sterilising German and Austrian citizens who were disabled or mentally ill (Cocks 1997). Eminent The rise of eugenics German psychiatrists were actively involved in the Psychiatrists in Germany and abroad had been T-4 euthanasia programme at all stages, including enthusiastically promoting eugenics programmes selection and execution. Again, propaganda was involving sterilisation of the mentally ill decades used to promote the programme. before Hitler came to power. Many German psychi- Under the T-4 programme, hundreds of atrists

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us