NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Procurement & Contract Administration Section 28 MauueArea, G-9/1,Islamabad I 051-9032727,E 051-9260419 [Ri[no,vriSn*Avs /L No. 6(408)/GM (P&cA)/NHF.I17lclg^ lo June,2Ol7 Director General Public Procurement Regulatory Authority lst Floor FBC Building near State Bank, SectorG-512, Islamabad. Subject: ANNOUCNEMENT OF EVALUATION REPORT (PPRA Rule-351i Consultancy Senrices for Detailed Design Review and Construction Supenrision of Improvement and Widening of Chakdara - Mingora - Fatehpur Section_of National Highway N- 95 (82 Kml Reference: PPRA Rule-3 5 Kindly find attached the duly filled and signed Evaluation Report along with Bid Evaluation Criteria (Annex-I) pertaining to the procurement of subject services in view of above referred PPRA Rule-35 for uploading on PPRA website at the earliest, please. //e%Z (Muhammad Azam) Director (P&CA) Encl: Evaluation Report along with Annex-I Coplfor kind information to: - Member (Planning), NHA - Member (Engineering-Coord),NHA General Manager (P&CA),NHA S.O (Tech.)to Chairman, NHA EVALUATIONREPgRT (As PerRule 35 of PP Rules,2004) 4 I Nameof ProcurinqAqencv: NationalHiqhway Authority 2. Methodof Procurement: SinqleStaqe Two Envelop Procedure 2 Titleof Procurement: ConsultancyServices for DetailedDesign Review and ConstructionSupervision of lmprovementand Widening of Chakdara- Mingora- FatehpurSection of National HiohwavN-95 (82 Km) 4. TenderInquiry No.: 6(408) Date & Time of Bid Closinq: 2'1.'October,2017 at 1130 hours local time 7. Date& Timeof Bid Openinq: 21"'October.2017 at 1200hours local time 8. No of Bids Received: Eiqht(8) Proposalswere received Criteriafor BidEvaluation: Criteriaof BidEvaluation is attachedat Annex-l 10. Detailsof Bid(s)Evaluation: As below Marks Rule/Regulation/SBD*/Poli Nameof Bidder Evaluated cy/ Basis for Rejection/ Technical Financial Cost Acceptanceas per Rule35 (if (if of PP Rules,2004. applicable) applicable) (PKR) 1) M/sNESPAK (P\,/t.) Ltd. Topscoring firm in combined in JV with M/s MM Pakistan 614 184 74,842,096 evaluation(PPRA Rule 36(b) (Pvt.)Ltd. (ix)) 2) M/sAsif Ali Associates (Pvt.)Ltd in JV with M/s EngineeringConsultancy 606 to/ 82,884,611 2nd ServicesPunjab (Pvt.) Ltd. & M/sAA Associates 3) M/sAssociated ConsultancyEngineers- 594 169 81,681,574 ACE(Pvt.) Ltd. 4) M/sPrime Engineering & TestingConsultants (Pvt.) Ltd in associationIV/s Finite 599 162 85,314,723 4th Engineeringand [V]/s Water Wise 5) M/sPEAS Consulting (Pvt.)Ltd. in JV with M/s RepublicEngineering 't 561 200 69.017. 56 c Corporation- REC (Pvt.) Ltdand M/s Loya Associates. 6) M/sEA Consulting(Pvt.) 594 131 105.270.560 o Ltd. 7) M/sZeeruk Int. (Pvt.) 547 PPRARule (v) Ltd. 36(b) 8) M/sEngineering General Consultants- EGC (Pvt.) Ltd.in JV with M/sAL- 518 PPRA (v) KASIBGroup of Rule36(b) EngineeringServices AGES(Pvt.) Ltd. Top Ranked Bidden M/sNESPAK (Pvt.) Ltd. in JV with M/s MM pakistan (pvt.) Ltd. 11. Any other additional/ supportinginformation, the procuringagency may like to share: The Procurementwas carriedout in linewith PPRARules & Regulations.The biddingwas done on QCBSmethod with 80:20 Technicalto Financial Proposals ratio. Signature: Genqd*'--ager (PACA) OfficialStamp: .-.Notian glrwoyAuthority * d stan d a rd Bi dd i n g ooc u me JfJ tgg$f National Highway Authority tRifno,rrri$ru'Ars Annex-I Criteria EOR- Bid Evaluation ConsultancyServices for DetailedDesign Review and ConstructionSupervision of Improvement and Widening of Chakdara- Mingora - Fatehpur Sectionof National Highway N-95 (82 Km) June,2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Procurement & Contract Administration Section 28-Mauve Area, G-9I l,Islamabad Tel: 9032727 , Fax: 9260419 Ref:6(408)/cM (P&cA)/NHAIt6 I | 5 57 14th October.2016 All Prospective Consultants Subject: Minutes of Pre-Proposal Meeting and Addendum No.I for: Consultancy Services for Detailed Desihn Review and Con Chakdara - Mingora - Fatehpur Section of National Hiehway N-95 (e2x*l .' Reference: Request for Proposal Notice for subject Ser:iices appeared in dailg newspapers on 29th September, 2016 'l,.iriii, il:::t Minutes of Pre-Proposal Meeting.:--fi i$n sth October, 2016 and Addend.um No.l alongwith Attachments No.- I A If for subject Services being integral part of the Request for Proposal;;;[1$',,.enc1osedherewith, for necessary action, please. ::= li :::::::: .:t:lll / ". ' -ti) "::'lii: r' / / ^,/ ',+''':': ..._..:_;=t;;;:,- (Muhammad Azamf !!!:!:"= Director (P&CA) Enclosure: )lit*i, = ,..,,,,,7 tgPS;;r:_. -'i\rrir,', Minutes of Pre-Propop"g_l eeting (O6 Pages) Addendum No.1 (O1 Pagef Attachment I&II (O2 Page) -'{!lit,. for kind to: Member (Plannin$), NHA, Islamabad; Member.(engineeiing Coordination), NHA, Islamabad; Genera',I.Manaler (P&CA), NHA, Islamabad; SO (Tech=;)# Chairman, NHA; Office Copy. .a ConsultancvServices for DetailedDesign Review and ConstructionSupervision of Imnrovementand Widenine of Chakdara - Mineora - Fatehpur Sectionof National Hiehway N-95 (82 Km) A Pre-ProposalMeeting was held in NHA Auditorium at 1100hours on 5thOctober, 2016 to discuss the Request for Proposal (RFP) for subject Services.Following NHA officers and representativesof prospectiveconsultants attended the meeting: ' National Highway Authority GeneralManager @ltruring) i. ... GeneralManager (Design) Director(P&GA:) - lll Depufy,Dire&r(P&CA) - II . Consultants ri'i, , , ", Mr. AishaNawaz MA EA consulting(pvt.) Ltd. ' Mr. NaeemMahmood .., s eGC @vt.)Ltd. ,:: .:::aaa::.,.-iVlS Mr. TanveerAhmad pakisran "4 MM (pvt.) Lrd. Mr. MuhammadAbdul Hameed , ,jl'u M/s REC (pvt.) Ltd. Lt. Col. @MuhammadHani9:;itii "'=.',-:,,,,, Awan ,:,,i:a 2' The queries submitted during the abgyementioned pre-proposalmeeting and their clarifications/ repliesare summarized below for informationlofalj prospectivebidders: ::i;;i?.i. ":t:.::::::= Refering to article 3.1 (iii) {fiage'SOof RFP}, FWD data of existing road is available the arlicle 3.4 (viii) {page i2.,p-fzRFP} and article consultant shall augment the back calculation 4.2,9 parugrapha {pa$ffiEr6f.,R.FP}.It appears through DestructiveTesting (DT) at minimum 1 Ihat test on existinfa.@p;rvementand soil per Km or evenlesser length of the road asper unit investigationthrough test pits for pavement delineationof FWD results. design are included'i'n Consultant'sscope of servicesand soil'invei@ion throughbore holes shall be carrieil out,by fhe contractor in order to validate ui.rd',,friaJize the design of bridges. However lfieqffency/interval of test are not mentioned.=-P16aseclari$' the interval of test pits since numbers of pits have direct financial implication. Further no line item in for FIN-6 lpage 42 of RFP is provided for cost of soil Refeningto article 5.1 paragraph5 [page 60 of The three Person Months are intermittent. for RFP], It is mentioned that during Defect periodic inspectionand finalization of bill, spread Liability Period (DLP) the Resident Engineer over [the Defect Liability Period (DLP) and three (RE) and selectedstaff shall continue on paft more months]fifteen months. time basisand after end of DPL, RE is expected to need three (03) more months to close the contract.However the person months allocated Sr. No. Queries Reply to RE and other selectedstaff comprise 24+3 that is construction time of 24 months and project closing tirne of 3 months,No time to act on part time basis during DLP is provided. Pleaseclarifv? Refering to article5.1.2 [page62 of RFP]. It is Yes, freshtraffic count is required. mentionedthat Traffic/ PavementEngineer shall validate the Traffic Survey, it is required to clarify that whether fresh traffic count shall be conducted by the consultant to validate the Traffic Survey or only the review of already canied out survey shall be sufficient to validate the proiectedtraffic 4. Refering to article 5.6 table of qualificationand Any personnot;.ha {ig'fraduate degreeshall be experience [page 63 of RFP]. The marking markedzero as far asqitalification is concerned. ,!i : criteria against each proposed position is Af,r: "::':aaaa= 'i,rt!'li = establishwith respectto academicqualification such as 100% for PhD and 70%-60% for BE/ B.Sc.Please clarify if any proposedprofessional having qualification below required minimum, no mark shall be given or the marking shall be accordingly as per criteria of academic qualification? 5. Datasheet- 5.2.1 ,:,-. gir (i) Generalexperience ,,.,,""-,+i!:: ".,4M The consultantsneed to provideas much How many prolect referencesare required? informationwithin p..r.iib.d pagelimit in their ' 6. (ii) SpecificExperience own interest. How manyproiect references are required?l 7. TOR -3.1at page50, 3.4 at Page S2;:'Design ' Yes detailed design as well as Construction ViewReport at Page58 , .,_ drawings have to be issuedby the design review u,t" l'-# consultant. The Consultantshall-.tr'"ansfoiiii' the Outline Designto DetailedDBS.Efiff the servicesis requiredfor DetailedDesi$n not Design Review. Pleaseclarify? "i',,. 8. We find it adequate;however, the consultantsmay utilize the provision underFoot Note underTech-4 ooComments/ Suggestions of Consultant" of Requestfor Proposal. 9. Section 4.4 of Data Sheetat page14 Not accededto, proceedas per RFP, please. Submissiondeadline may pleasebe extended by at least15 days 10, Referenceclause 3.1 (i) of TOR: it is mentioned The consultantshall carrvoutthe survev. that the consultants shall carryout Detailed Topographic Survey consolidation/updation.In our view, this task relatesto Design Consultants not DesignReview Consultants. Please clarify, if the assignmentfor Design Review or New Design. 11 ReferenceClause 3.3