Instruction Set Architecture How to Speak Computer Crafting an ISA Where Are the Instructions?

Instruction Set Architecture How to Speak Computer Crafting an ISA Where Are the Instructions?

How to Speak Computer High Level Language temp = v[k]; Program v[k] = v[k+1]; v[k+1] = temp; Compiler lw $15, 0($2) Instruction Set Architecture Assembly Language lw $16, 4($2) Program sw $16, 0($2) sw $15, 4($2) Assembler or 1000110001100010000000000000000 Machine Language 1000110011110010000000000000100 “How to talk to computers if Program 1010110011110010000000000000000 you aren’t on Star Trek” 1010110001100010000000000000100 Machine Interpretation Control Signal Spec ALUOP[0:3] <= InstReg[9:11] & MASK CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Crafting an ISA Where are the instructions? • Designing an ISA is both an art and a science • Harvard architecture • Von Neumann architecture • ISA design involves dealing in an extremely rare resource – instruction bits! inst & inst cpu data • Some things we want out of our ISA storage storage – completeness cpu data “stored-program” computer – orthogonality storage – regularity and simplicity – compactness – ease of programming L1 – ease of implementation inst cache L2 cpu Mem cache L1 data cache CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Key ISA decisions Choice 1: Operand Location destination operand operation • operations y = x + b • Accumulator –how many? • Stack – which ones source operands Registers • operands • –how many? • Memory – location –types • We can classify most machines into 4 types: accumulator, – how to specify? how does the computer know what stack, register-memory (most operands can be registers or • instruction format 0001 0100 1101 1111 means? memory), load-store (arithmetic operations must have –size register operands). – how many formats? CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Choice 1B: How Many Operands? Alternative ISA’s Basic ISA Classes • A = X*Y - B*C Accumulator: Stack Architecture Accumulator GPR GPR (Load-store) 1 address add A acc ← acc + mem[A] Stack: 0 address add tos ← tos + next General Purpose Register: 2 address add A B EA(A) ← EA(A) + EA(B) 3 address add A B C EA(A) ← EA(B) + EA(C) Stack Memory Accumulator Load/Store: A ? 3 address add Ra Rb Rc Ra ← Rb + Rc X 12 load Ra Rb Ra ← mem[Rb] R1 Y 3 B 4 store Ra Rb mem[Rb] ← Ra R2 C 5 R3 temp ? A load/store architecture has instructions that do either ALU CSE 240Aoperations or access memory, but never both. Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Choice 2: Addressing Modes Addressing Mode Utilization how do we specify the operand we want? • Register direct R3 R6 = R5 + R3 TeX 1% Memory indirect spice 6% • Immediate (literal) #25 R6 = R5 + 25 gcc 1% • Direct (absolute) M[10000] R6 = M[10000] TeX 0% Scaled spice 16% • Register indirect M[R3] R6 = M[R3] gcc 6% (a.k.a register deferred) TeX 24% • Memory Indirect M[M[R3] ] Register deferred spice 3% gcc 11% • Displacement M[R3 + 10000] ... TeX 43% • Index M[R3 + R4] Immediate spice 17% 39% • Scaled M[R3 + R4*d + 10000] gcc TeX 32% • Autoincrement M[R3++] Displacement spice 55% • Autodecrement M[R3 - -] gcc 40% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Frequency of the addressing mode Conclusion? CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Displacement Size Choice 3: Which Operations? 30% • arithmetic Integer average – add, subtract, multiply, divide 25% • logical Floating-point average 20% Percentage of – and, or, shift left, shift right displacement 15% • data transfer 10% – load word, store word • control flow 5% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Does it make sense to have more complex instructions? Value -e.g., square root, mult-add, matrix multiply, cross product ... • Conclusions? CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Types of branches (control flow) Conditional branch • conditional branch beq r1,r2, label • jump jump label • How do you specify the destination (target) of a • procedure call call label branch/jump? • procedure return return • How do we specify the condition of the branch? CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Branch distance Branch condition Condition Codes Processor status bits are set as a side-effect of arithmetic instructions or explicitly by compare or test instructions. ex: sub r1, r2, r3 bz label Condition Register Ex: cmp r1, r2, r3 bgt r1, label Compare and Branch Ex: bgt r1, r2, label • Conclusions? CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Choice 4: Instruction Format The Customer is Always Right Fixed (e.g., all RISC processors -- SPARC, MIPS, Alpha) • Compiler is primary customer of ISA opcode addr1 addr2 addr3 • Features the compiler doesn’t use are wasted Variable (VAX, ...) • Register allocation is a huge contributor to performance opcode+ spec1 addr1 spec2 addr2 ... specn addrn • Compiler-writer’s job is made easier when ISA has Hybrid – regularity – primitives, not solutions – simple trade-offs • Summary -> simplicity over power • Tradeoffs? • Conclusions? CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen Our desired ISA MIPS instruction set architecture • Registers, Load-store • 32 32-bit general-purpose registers • Addressing modes – R0 always equals zero – immediate (8-16 bits) – 32 or 16 FP registers – displacement (12-16 bits) • 8-, 16-, and 32-bit integers, 32- and 64-bit fp data types – register deferred (register indirect) • immediate and displacement addressing modes • Support a reasonable number of operations – register deferred is a subset of displacement • Don’t use condition codes • 32-bit fixed-length instruction encoding • Fixed instruction encoding/length for performance • regularity (several general-purpose registers) CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen MIPS Instruction Format RISC vs CISC • MIPS is a classic RISC architectures (as are SPARC, Alpha, PowerPC, …) • RISC stands for Reduced Instruction Set Computer. RISC architectures are load-store, few formats, minimal instruction sets. • They were in contrast to the 70s and 80s which proliferated CISC ISAs (VAX, Intel x86, various IBM), which were characterized by complex and comprehensive instruction sets, and complex instruction decoding. • RISC architectures thrived not because they supported fewer operations, but because they enabled parallelism. CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen MIPS Operations and ISA ISA Key Points • Read on your own! • Modern ISA’s typically sacrifice power and flexibility for • Get comfortable with MIPS instructions and formats regularity and simplicity; code density for parallelism and throughput. • instruction bits are extremely limited, particularly in a fixed-length instruction format. • Registers are critical to performance – we want lots of them, and few strings attached. • Displacement addressing mode handles the vast majority of memory reference needs. CSE 240A Dean Tullsen CSE 240A Dean Tullsen.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us