Jacksonian America Readings (In Order of Discussion)

Jacksonian America Readings (In Order of Discussion)

Mr. Levin Spring 2012 American Political Thought POLS 5025 Jacksonian America Readings (in order of discussion): Henry Clay, Speech on the Tariff, 389 John Quincy Adams, First Annual Message to Congress, 392 Andrew Jackson, First Annual Message to Congress, 419; Veto of Maysville Road Bill, 424; Bank Veto Message, 427 Daniel Webster, Speech on Jackson’s Veto of the United States Bank Bill, 443 George Bancroft, “The Office of the People in Art, Government, and Religion,” 451 James Fennimore Cooper, The American Democrat, 465 Major Themes for Discussion: The Jacksonian period is most notable for its great debates over the definition of American national state. Comparing the State of the Union addresses of J.Q. Adams and Andrew Jackson provides one with a sense of that debate, as does the contrast between Jackson’s “Bank Veto Message” and Daniel Webster’s speech in response to Jackson’s veto message, and the visions of George Bancroft and James Fennimore Cooper. All of these debates seemingly continue in the modern day and age, no matter that our circumstances as a nation have changed so greatly. Questions for Readings: Compare the State of the Union addresses of J.Q. Adams and Andrew Jackson. What kind of nation does each new president envision? In which ways are these visions opposed? What are the assumptions behind each president’s visions? Which is more closely connected to our modern understanding of American politics? Andrew Jackson, in his Bank Veto Message and Daniel Webster, in his Speech on Jackson’s Veto of the United States Bank Bill, provide us with directly opposing views regarding the Bank. How much of the conflict is about the Bank itself, and how much is about differing visions for the United States? What are those visions? George Bancroft, in his “The Office of the People in Art, Government, and Religion,” and James Fennimore Cooper, in his The American Democrat, present different visions of the meaning of equality. Is Bancroft’s lofty vision of the common people truly democratic, or does it ask them to aspire to be like the academic elite of which Bancroft was a member? Is Cooper’s vision aristocratic or is he the true Democrat in his insistence on letting people be as he finds them? .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us