Rob Huebert Rhueb Ert@ Ucal Gary.Ca

Rob Huebert Rhueb Ert@ Ucal Gary.Ca

Centre for Military and Strategic Studies THE CONTINUALLY CHANGING ARCTIC SECURITY ENVIRONMENT TThe Society Of Naval Architects And Marine Engineers – Arctic Section Rob Huebert Rhue ber t@ucal gary.ca Calgary April 20 , 2012 Main Themes • Increasing International and Canadian Debate as to what the Arctic will look like in the future – physical; economic; cultural; and geopolitical • A New Arctic Security Environment is Forming on a Global Basis – What will it look like? • How will this impact Canada? United S?WhdCddhUidStates? What does Canada and the United States need to do? The Transforming Arctic • The Arctic is a state of massive transformation – Climate Change – Resource Development – (was up to a high $140+ barrel of oil- now $108 barrel) – Geopolitical Transformation/Globalization The Image of Change: Accessibility The Melting Ice: Movement of Ice Sept 2007-April 2008 Source: Canadian Ice Service The Economics: The Hope of Resources Oil and Gas: Oil Resources and Gas of the North Source: AMAP Uncertain Maritime jurisdiction & boundaries in the Arctic www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/resources/arctic The Changing Technologies: PdAiLNGProposed Arctic LNG Source: Samsung Heavy Industries New Signs of Cooperation • Public Pronouncements • Creation of Arctic Council • Application of UNCLOS • Norway-RiMiiBRussia Maritime Bound ary Delimitation 2010 • Arctic Council – Search and Rescue Agreement 2010 • Public Pronouncements….. New Signs of Competition • Russia – Renewed Assertiveness/ Petrodollars • United States – Multi-lateral reluctance/emerging concern to act – International Role as remaining Superpower •Norway – Refocus on North/ Growing Interest (Concern?) with Russia •Denmark – Issues with Greenland – social; energy – Rebuilding Armed Forces • Iceland – Economic melt-down/Volcano melt-down – Developpging relationship with China • Finland/Sweden – Closer cooperation with NATO • Canada – Re-examining its Arctic capabilities – Renewed Assertiveness Policy Statements • United States – National Security Presidential Directive 66 Arctic Region Policy (January 9 2009) – USN Arctic Roadmap • Russia – Russian State Rearmament Programme 2007 -2015 – Principles of State Policy in the Arctic to 2020, (September, 2008)[ • Norway – The Soria Moria Declaration on International Policy, ” (April 2007) – Norwegian Defence 2008 (June 2008): • Canada – Northern Strategy (July 2009) •Denmark – Danish Defence Agreement 2010-2014 Copenhagen (June 2009) Source: http://cmss.ucalgary.ca/foreignpolicy New and Developing Arctic Force Capa biliti es • Russia – 6 - Borey SSBN; 2- Yasen SSN; 5-6 Carrier Groups; New Bomber 2020; 2 4Misteal Assault Vessels • United States – F-22, Virginia class; ABM • Norway – Fridtjof Nansen Frigates; F-35; Svalbard • Canada – Arctic Offshore Patrol Vessels, F-35 •Denmark – NThiKdRNavy: Thesis; Knud Ramussen; FlfiklFlyvefisken classes Exercises • RiRussia – 8-9,000 troops 09; 2 Delta’s IV 09; 16 Bomber Patrols 2010; 12 naval operations 2010 • United States – Northern Edge – 1993-1/; 8 -10, 000 troops •Norway – CldRCold Response -2006-2010; 7-9, 000 troops – 2010 in Norway and Sweden • CdCanada – Op Nanook 2002-2011 – 750 troops • Finl and/S we den – Loyal Arrow 2009 3000 troops Russia Renewed Russian Strengths (?) • 1990s – Period of Red uction – AMEC/G-8 assistance in Sub Decommissioning • 2000s – Renewal • 6 SSBN 995 Borey – 1 built; 3 building • 6 SSN 885 Yasen/Graney – 1 built; 2 building Yury Dolgoruky • EiChllEconomic Challenges • Putin’s Control Resumption of Russian TU -95 (Bear) Arctic Flights, August 18, 2007 • If US/EU position on Northwest Passage is correct then these aircraft have the right of over-flight US Arctic Interests • National Security Presidential Directive -Arctic Region Policy (January 9, 2009) • “The United States has broad and fundamental national security interests in the Arctic region and is prepared to operat e eith er idindepen den tly or in conjunction with other states to safe-guard these interests” – missile defence and early warning; – deployment of sea and air systems for strategic sealift, strategic deterrence , maritime presence , and maritime security operations; – ensuring freedom of navigation and over-flight. • But will the US have political will/economic capabilities to be an Arctic Power? US Arctic Forces • Submarine Forces: • US – Seawolf and Los Angles Class; Virginia Class • Cooperation with UK • ICEX March 2009 – 2 LA class SSN • ICEX March 2011 – 1 Seawolf and 1 Virgina • Miss ile D eve lopment Missile Defence – Ft. Greely ICEX 2011 HMS Tireless 2007 after accident Alaska Aerospace Defence • 186 F-22 to be built – 36 are being deployed to Alaska • 20% o f tota l arsena l • Ft. Greeley - ABM Norway Norwegian Arctic Focus • The High North is the most important priority area of the Norwegian Defence- Norwegian Minister of Defence Anne-Grete Strøm-Erichsen – April 2008 • 5 New Ice-Capable Frigates – Very capable • Helicopters stationed at northern base of BdfBardufoss • Purchase 48 F-35s November 2008 New Norwegian Maritime Forces • Fridtjof Nansen class • 5 built in Spanish Yards • Aegis system • Coast Guard armed Roald Amundsen Svalbard- Norwegian Coast Guard Finland/Sweden • Loyal Arrow – June 2009 • 200 aircraft; 2000 troops; 50 vessels • Finland developing closer links with NATO HMS AkRArk Royal in Swedish waters Swedish/Baltic Response to French Sales to Russia • Nordic-Baltic Summit Jan 2011 – UK, Norway, Sweden, Latvia, Estonia , Lithuania plus Finland, Sweden • Swedish FM - Submarines Mistral China •Snow Dragon was not detected by Canada until arriving in Tuk -1st Arctic Voyage: July-Sept 1999 -2nd Arctilic Voyage: July-Sept 2003 -3rd Arctic Voyage Summer 2008 •Polar Research Institute of China New Chinese Icebreaker French Arctic Deployments • Annual French Arctic submarine missions • 27th mountain infantry brigade – Arctic Operations • Airforce operations in Sweden , Finland , Norway • All surf ace naval uni ts must carry out A rcti c deployment – Ministry of Defence June 22, 2010 What is Canada doing? • New Military O perati ons si nce 2002 • 6-8 Arctic Offshore Patrol Vessels • Nanisivik Refueling Facility • Resolute Bay Training Facility • Increased Rangers Patrols -Number 58 to 61 -Training and Equipment • Northern Watch • Throne Speech Oct 2007 – Northern Strategy ( Sovereig nty /Securit y) Canadian Actions (cont.) • Feb 2008 B udget – $720 Million Icebreaker • June 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy (Harper White Paper) - Focus on Arctic Security • Northern Strategy summer 2009 - Four pillars • Mandatory Reporting of Ship Traffic – Nordreg Arctic Offshore Patrol Vessel General Arrangements – Upper Deck 15 Source: Canadian Navy B Canadian Northern Exercises • Resumed in 2002 – Operation Narwhal • Hudson Sentinel – 2 005 Hudson Bay • Operation Nanook – Eastern Arctic – 750 troops an d OGD • Operation Nunakput –Western Arctic • Operation Nunalivut – Ranger Patrol The Emerging Arctic Security Regime • Circumpolar states have called for cooperation – What will be the new international governance regime? • Circumpolar states are building up their combat capable force for the Arctic – New Equipment – Ice and Combat Capable – New Policies – Unilateral “concern” – New Training The Future for Canada -US The Need for Cooperation • Need to resolve ongoing diplomatic disputes –NWP – Beaufort Sea • Opportunity to develop further develop cooperation – Chairpersonship of Arctic Council – Operation Nanook – New Icebreakers? • Need to avoid pointless differences – Fishi ng Morator ium.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    29 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us