Teaching and Learning 1 IL 2230

Teaching and Learning 1 IL 2230

<p> About the Somewhat Much Same More More</p><p>1.1 Amount that you contributed to your learning. 10% 30% 60%</p><p>1.2 Amount that you learned. 20% 10% 70%</p><p>1.3 Amount of increased interest in the subject. 10% 40% 50% Teaching and Learning 1 – IL 2230 Questionnaire Results Fall 2014 Amber Pabon</p><p>To a considerable degree To a very high degree</p><p>2.1 The instructor presented the course in an organized manner. 30% 60%</p><p>2.2 The instructor was well-prepared for class. 20% 80%</p><p>2.3 The instructor managed class activities effectively. 20% 70%</p><p>2.4 The instructor interpreted difficult concepts clearly. 30% 70%</p><p>2.5 The instructor showed enthusiasm in teaching the class. 10% 90%</p><p>2.6 The instructor facilitated the development of problem-solving skills. 30% 60%</p><p>2.7 The instructor maintained an environment where students felt comfortable asking questions. 0% 100%</p><p>2.8 The instructor showed respect for the questions and perspectives of students. 0% 100%</p><p>2.9 The instructor gave students sufficient guidance for assigned work. 40% 50%</p><p>2.10 The instructor evaluated my work fairly. 10% 90%</p><p>2.11 The instructor provided helpful feedback 20% 80%</p><p>2.12 The instructor was available for assistance when needed. (Answer only if you sought assistance.) 0% 30%</p><p>Well Above Average Excellent 2.13 Express your judgment of the instructor’s overall teaching 30% 70% effectiveness: To a small To a moderate To a considerable To a very high degree degree degree degree</p><p>3.1 Course was well organized. 10% 10% 20% 60%</p><p>3.2 Course objectives and 0% 0% 10% 90% requirements were presented.</p><p>3.3 Course covered stated objectives. 0% 0% 10% 90%</p><p>To a To a To a small To a very high **contributed to learning** moderate considerable N/A degree degree degree degree</p><p>3.4 Written assignments 10% 10% 30% 50% 0%</p><p>3.5 Readings 0% 20% 30% 50% 0% 3.6 Handouts 20% 20% 30% 20% 10%</p><p>3.7 Small group discussions 0% 0% 30% 70% 0%</p><p>3.8 Laboratory 0% 0% 0% 20% 80%</p><p>Yes No</p><p>3.9 Would you recommend this course to other students? 90% 10%</p><p>3.10 Would you recommend this instructor to other students? 100% 0%</p><p>4.1 Instructor strengths:</p><p> Open to students about self; approachable; created safe space/comfortable environment  Knowledge/insight about subjects; articulate concepts well  Open to student ideas; thoughtful responses  Eager to create discussion; motivated  Organization of material; made material easy to understand/interesting 4.2 Instructor weaknesses:  None (40%)  Assignment expectations/guidelines unclear  Conversation too long; rushed/incomplete; ran out of time to talk about readings  Confusing class structure  Appeared unapproachable</p><p>5.1 Course benefits:  Small group discussions  Lesson plan exercise  Artifacts  Feedback from peers; reflection  Everything</p><p>5.2 Course Suggestions:  Nothing  More time for readings; slower pace; time management  More work on “how to” lesson plan</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us