Annex 1 Carbon Sequestration Rate (T CO2-Eq

–1 –1 Annex 1 Carbon sequestration rate (t CO2-eq. ha year ) (upper Table) and number of trees in maximum stand density (lower Table) of the four main tree species in the study sites per age and yield class. Values in italics are estimated (A. Sudnik, pers. comm.). 90 year old Betula trees were treated as Betula in age class 61–80Pinus sylvestrisYield class I II III IV VAge (years) 0–20 7.59 6.51 3.96 2.81 2.0421–40 6.88 5.35 4.79 3.47 2.4041–60 6.82 5.62 4.63 3.70 2.7161–80 6.62 5.16 4.32 3.48 2.8681–120 4.86 4.06 3.22 2.79 2.20Yield class I II III IV VAge (years) 0–20 3330 3701 5906 8364 1711821–40 1685 1910 2626 3696 570941–60 959 1097 1335 1859 239061–80 669 853 925 1187 139481–120 458 547 671 773 885 Betula pendulaYield class I II III IV VAge (years) 0–20 14.5 12.1 9.8 7.1 7.121–40 16.2 14.2 11.4 8.4 8.441–60 14.5 12.7 10.1 7.8 7.861–80 10.1 9.1 7.3 6.0 6.0Yield class I II III IV VAge (years) 0–20 6507 8725 10692 11640 -21–40 1343 1828 2305 3363 -41–60 656 890 1238 1723 -61–80 449 600 838 1129 -Populus tremulaYield class I II III IV VAge (years) 0–20 11.9 7.9 4.0 4.0 4.021–40 8.8 7.2 5.6 5.6 5.641–60 6.2 5.2 4.2 4.2 4.261–80 3.9 3.1 2.4 2.4 2.4Yield class I II III IV VAge (years) 0–20 3513 5468 - - -21–40 1742 2463 - - -41–60 964 1247 - - -61–80 658 781 - - - Picea abiesYield class I II III IVAge (years) 0–20 7.3 5.4 4.0 2.921–40 15.1 11.2 8.0 7.541–60 19.1 14.7 10.8 8.161–80 14.8 11.7 8.8 6.7Yield class I II III IVAge (years) 0–20 8319 8686 9100 953421–40 2866 3218 3592 399441–60 1239 1459 1694 195061–80 748 917 1120 1338 –1 Annex 2 Tree carbon sequestration (t CO2-eq. yr ) in Ostrovskoe in 2009 and in the baseline and project scenario. In order to perform calculations the area was stratified into 43 subareas. The sequestration rate is calculated using the proportion of tree species according to the State Forest Inventory (2008) and the respective sequestration rate (Annex 1). For the recently burnt subareas 20 and 30 an increase in stand density is assumed for 2039. For subareas 34–39 and 41, in 2039 a yield class of V and a proportion of Betula of 100% is assumed (for the not extracted subarea 39: 60% Betula, 40% Pinus). For the project scenario, it is assumed that each subarea will have yield class conditions one class higher (i.e. lower quality) than in 20092009 2039Current Baseline scenario Project scenarioSeques- Relative Seques- Relative Seques- Relative Seques- Seques- Seques- Subarea Area tration stand tration stand tration stand tration tration tration rate density rate density rate density(t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (ha) ha–1 yr–1) yr–1) ha–1 yr—1) yr–1) ha–1 yr–1) yr–1)1 1.2 8.1 0.5 4.8 8.3 0.5 4.9 6.3 0.5 3.72 22.8 9.7 0.8 176 8.3 0.8 152 6.7 0.8 1223 12.6 4.0 0.7 35 10 0.7 90 7.7 0.7 684 29.7 10 0.5 151 9 0.5 133 7.0 0.5 1045 4.3 13 0.8 43 14 0.8 48 11 0.8 376 19.7 9.3 0.7 128 7.0 0.7 96 5.6 0.7 777 16.1 10 0.5 82 9.0 0.5 72 7.0 0.5 578 79.4 4.6 0.3 111 3.8 0.3 90 3.3 0.3 799 2.8 8.9 0.9 23 8.4 0.9 21 6.8 0.9 1710 1.4 5.7 0.7 5.5 6.0 0.7 5.8 5.3 0.7 5.111 1.8 11 0.5 9.6 8.8 0.5 8.0 7.5 0.5 6.812 3.2 12 0.7 26 12 0.7 27 9.5 0.7 2113 3.5 12 0.6 25 12 0.6 25 9.5 0.6 2014 2.3 12 0.6 16 12 0.6 17 9.5 0.6 1315 1.6 12 0.7 13 12 0.7 13 9.5 0.7 11 16 4.1 12 0.7 34 12 0.7 34 9.5 0.7 2717 3.8 12 0.7 32 13 0.7 34 10 0.7 2718 7.2 7.1 0.3 15 8.4 0.8 49 8.4 0.2 9.119 5.0 2.7 0.3 4.0 2.9 0.3 4.3 2.9 0.3 4.320 3.9 7.1 0.3 8.2 8.4 0.8 26 8.4 0.3 9.721 2.5 9.0 0.5 11 7.8 0.5 9.7 6.3 0.5 7.922 37.0 8.9 0.5 165 7.8 0.5 145 6.3 0.5 11623 5.7 11.0 0.5 32 8.7 0.5 25 7.5 0.5 2124 8.3 7.5 0.7 43 7.8 0.7 45 6.3 0.7 3425 16.5 2.8 0.6 28 3.7 0.6 37 2.7 0.6 2726 31.7 13 0.6 246 7.8 0.6 148 6.3 0.6 12027 1.6 12 0.6 12 13 0.6 12 10 0.6 9.928 57.8 4.6 0.2 54 4.3 0.2 50 3.8 0.2 3329 11.7 6.6 0.6 47 6.1 0.6 43 6.1 0.6 4330 10.0 5.6 0.4 22 6.3 0.8 50 6.3 0.4 2531 30.1 3.7 0.6 67 3.0 0.6 54 3.0 0.6 5432 7.5 3.2 0.5 12 2.6 0.6 12 3.2 0.5 1233 7.6 10 0.7 55 7.9 0.7 42 6.7 0.7 3634 15.6 0 0 0 8.4 0.8 105 0 0 035 21.9 0 0 0 8.4 0.8 147 0 0 036 23.0 0 0 0 8.4 0.8 155 0 0 037 18.8 0 0 0 8.4 0.8 126 0 0 038 18.2 0 0 0 8.4 0.8 123 0 0 039 1.2 0 0 0 6.0 0.3 2.1 0 0 040 2.4 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 041 1.2 0 0 0 8.4 0.3 3.0 0 0 042 35.7 3.7 0.6 80 3.0 0.6 63 3.0 0.6 6343 36.2 4.9 0.4 72 4.2 0.4 61 3.8 0.4 55Total 628.6 1886 2406 1376Annex 3 Carbon sequestration by trees in Vygonoshanskoe in 2009 and in two baseline scenarios. See Annex 1 for sequestration rates (2009: Betula pendula 0–20 years, yield class IV; 2039: Betula pendula 21–40 years, yield class IV)2009 2039Baseline scenario 1 Baseline scenario 2 Current (abandonment) (ongoing agriculture)Subarea Subare Subarea Subarea with a with with with Seques- Seques- Seques- Vegetation relative relative Seques- relative Seques- relative Seques- tration tration tration type stand stand tration stand tration stand tration rate rate rate density density density density 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8(t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (t CO2-eq. (ha) (ha) (ha) ha–1 yr–1) yr–1) ha–1 yr–1) yr–1) ha–1 yr–1) yr–1)Moderatel y moist - - - - 421 8.4 2831 73 8.4 487 forb meadowsMoist forb 158 173 7.1 1187 550 8.4 3693 331 8.4 2226 meadowsVery moist 0.0 68 7.1 289 68 8.4 456 68 8.4 456 reeds Total 1476 6980 3169 Annex 4 Characteristics of vegetation types in Ostrovskoe in 2009 (excluding ‘bare peat’ and the mixed type ‘bare peat with Calluna and Eriophorum’; selected species only). Ellenberg et al. (1992) moisture indicator values (for 25 vascular plant species and 11 moss species separately) and cover percentages are presented as mean values ±SD of presences. Species are presented with their constancy (I = species present in 1–20%, II = 21–40%, III = 41–60%, IV = 61–80%, V = 81–100% of all relevés, modified after Dierschke, 1994) and mean percentage cover. Tree species were not used for classificationBare peat Very Bare peat Bare peat Moist Wet with Dry moist Vegetation type with with bog Sphagnu Polytrichu grassland bog Calluna Eriophorum heath m lawn m heath Number of relevés 3 3 3 3 12 12 3GWP of part without trees –1 –1 (CO2 -eq. ha a ) 7.5/12.5 7.5/3.5 7.5 20 12.5 10 5Ellenberg et al. (1992) moisture indicator value (vascular plants) 9.0 ±0 9.0 ±0.2 8.8 ±0.2 5.6 ±1 8.4 ±1 8.0 ±1 8.8 ±0.02Ellenberg et al. (1992) moisture indicator value (mosses) 2.0 ±3 6.0 ±0 6.0 ±0 2.8 ±2 4.0 ±1 5.5 ±1 7.2 ±0.3Cover of shunt species (%) 2 ±1 46 ±12 4 ±4 0.5 ±0 14 ±21 5 ±6 8 ±00.1 Cover of bare peat (%) 28 ±14 46 ±12 13 ±7 - ±0.2 - -Cover of open water (%) - - - - - 0.5 ±0 13 ±17Calluna vulgaris V/62 V/0.4 V/20 II/4 IV/22 V/30 -Eriophorum vaginatum V/2 V/46 IV/4 II/0.5 IV/18 IV/4 V/6Polytrichum strictum II/0.5 V/3 V/38 II/0.5 III/0.6 V/5 V/2Funaria hygrometrica - V/0.4 V/19 - - - -Drosera rotundifolia - II/0.5 - - II/0.5 - -Calamagrostis epigejos - - - V/10 - - -Dryopteris filix-mas - - - III/5 - - -Dicranum scoparium - - - IV/0.5 III/3 - IV/1Pleurozium schreberi - - - II/0.5 III/4 IV/22 - Vaccinium vitis-idae - - - II/0.5 II/4 II/17 -Ledum palustre - - V/0.5 - II/3 IV/4 -Chamaedaphne calyculata - - - - I/0.1 IV/6 -Dicranum polysetum - - - - II/0.5 V/1 -Cladonia sp. - - - - III/0.5 IV/5 -Vaccinium uliginosum - - - - II/0.4 II/7 -Sphagnum magellanicum - - - - - IV/0.5 -Aulacomnium palustre - - - - - V/2 -Sphagnum angustifolium - - - - - V/4 V/69Sphagnum cuspidatum ------V/22Juncus filiformis ------III/1Carex canescens ------V/0.8Carex nigra ------IV/2Carex vesicaria ------V/2Cover of trees (%) 2 ±2 1 ±1 73 ±10 64 ±2 47 ±22 23 ±16 -Pinus sylvestris - - V/8 - I/0.5 IV/24 -Betula pendula IV/2 V/1 V/66 IV/64 IV/52 II/13 -Betula pubescens - - - - III/20 II/4 - Annex 5 Characteristics of vegetation types in Vygonoshanskoe in 2009 (selected species only). Ellenberg et al. (1992) moisture indicator values (for 87 vascular plant species and 7 moss species separately) and cover values are presented as mean percentage cover ±SD of presences. Species are presented with their constancy (I = species present in 1–20%, II = 21–40%, III = 41–60%, IV = 61–80%, V = 81–100% of all relevés, modified after Dierschke, 1994) and mean percentage cover in the vegetation types. Tree species were not used for classification.Moderately moist forb Moist forb Vegetation type meadows meadows Very moist reeds Number of relevés 17 13 6–1 –1 GWP of part without trees (CO2-eq. ha yr ) 20 12.5 3.5Ellenberg et al. (1992) moisture indicator value (vascular plants) 6.7 ±1 7.3 ±1 7.3 ±1Ellenberg et al. (1992) moisture indicator value (mosses) - 1.5 ±2.8 4.8 ±3.3Cover of shunt species (%) 4 ±2 62 ±34 91 ±6Cover of bare peat (%) 30 ±27 2 ±1 12 ±8Cover of open water (%) 4 ±1 - 46 ±32Urtica dioica III/45 - -Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. pallida I/22 - -Elytrigia repens IV/68 II/40 -Poa palustris II/33 II/39 -Agrostis gigantea I/14 III/27 -Phleum pratense I/85 II/7 -Bidens frondosa III/49 III/11 I/8Phalaris arundinacea I/5 IV/61 I/8Festuca rubra - II/78 -Carex lasiocarpa - I/21 II/89Juncus articulatus - II/9 II/6Agrostis stolonifera - III/23 V/11Lysimachia vulgaris - II/8 IV/8 Ranunculus repens - V/19 III/4Juncus effuses - III/36 II/8Calamagrostis canescens I/4 - IV/17Phragmites australis I/4 - IV/51Carex elata ssp. omskiana - - I/11Equisetum fluviatile - - I/3Carex serotina - - II/63Molinia caerulea - - II/40Cover of trees (%) - 44 ±27 54 ±24Betula pendula - II/31 V/43Betula pubescens - III/13 I/4Pinus sylvestris - - II/28

Annex 1 Carbon Sequestration Rate (T CO2-Eq

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support