![Page 16, 1.6 the Sentence; the Word Hatha Is Divided Into Two Life Force Energy (Prana)](https://data.docslib.org/img/3a60ab92a6e30910dab9bd827208bcff-1.webp)
<p>Errata:</p><p>In thesis, Page 16, 1.6 the sentence; The word hatha is divided into two life force energy (prana) channels, Ha = sun/surya/right/yin and tha = moon/chandra/left/yang. Should be; The word hatha is divided into two life force energy (prana) channels, Ha = sun/surya/right/YANG and tha = moon/chandra/left/YIN. Result section (with graphs): Page 39; 5.4 Should be: FVC increased significantly in CTP group, but with no effect on FEV1. Please also look in Article III, Table 2, pp. 22-23! Page 46, Figure 21 median in box-plot in middle (12 weeks) is 80 for CTP group (highest in the box, therefore not visible and should be marked with a thicker line) In Article I (after all references), p. 5, Table 2; Diastolic blood pressure missing; p- value diastolic blood pressure 0.17 (n=12), effect size, 0.34, p-value diastolic blood pressure 0.17 (n=9), effect size, 0.53</p><p>In Article III: Page numbers are missing. </p><p>Article III; P. 5, Figure 1: Flow-chart; the number of subjects followed-up in the yoga group should be 15, and in the conventional training group 15</p><p>In Article III, strict intention to treat model (ITT) is using last observation carried forward (LOCF) calculations, this was also calculated but not shown in table 2:</p><p>Article III, Table 2 P.22-23.; ANOVA (group x time) i.e exactly the same as without LOCF calculation (for T3 were most drop-outs)</p><p>CRQ-fatigue p-value 0.04 (huynh– feldt correction for repeated measure)</p><p>CRQ-emotion p-value 0.02 (huynh – feldt correction for repeated measure)</p><p>T-tests or Wilcoxon calculations with LOCF;</p><p>Table 2, Article III, 6MWT NEW p-value=0.10, T1-T3 differences between groups (HY/CTP) with LOCF calculation (without LOCF p= 0.04). With LOCF the significance between T1-T3 disappeared between groups for differences between groups.</p><p>Between groups T1-T3 differences, CRQ-emotional p=0.004</p><p>Between groups T1-T3 differences, CRQ-fatigue p=0.017 (i.e significant with LOCF)</p><p>Within YE group T2-T3 FVC p=0.051 (not significant with LOCF)</p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages1 Page
-
File Size-