Page 16, 1.6 the Sentence; the Word Hatha Is Divided Into Two Life Force Energy (Prana)

Page 16, 1.6 the Sentence; the Word Hatha Is Divided Into Two Life Force Energy (Prana)

<p>Errata:</p><p>In thesis, Page 16, 1.6 the sentence; The word hatha is divided into two life force energy (prana) channels, Ha = sun/surya/right/yin and tha = moon/chandra/left/yang. Should be; The word hatha is divided into two life force energy (prana) channels, Ha = sun/surya/right/YANG and tha = moon/chandra/left/YIN. Result section (with graphs): Page 39; 5.4 Should be: FVC increased significantly in CTP group, but with no effect on FEV1. Please also look in Article III, Table 2, pp. 22-23! Page 46, Figure 21 median in box-plot in middle (12 weeks) is 80 for CTP group (highest in the box, therefore not visible and should be marked with a thicker line) In Article I (after all references), p. 5, Table 2; Diastolic blood pressure missing; p- value diastolic blood pressure 0.17 (n=12), effect size, 0.34, p-value diastolic blood pressure 0.17 (n=9), effect size, 0.53</p><p>In Article III: Page numbers are missing. </p><p>Article III; P. 5, Figure 1: Flow-chart; the number of subjects followed-up in the yoga group should be 15, and in the conventional training group 15</p><p>In Article III, strict intention to treat model (ITT) is using last observation carried forward (LOCF) calculations, this was also calculated but not shown in table 2:</p><p>Article III, Table 2 P.22-23.; ANOVA (group x time) i.e exactly the same as without LOCF calculation (for T3 were most drop-outs)</p><p>CRQ-fatigue p-value 0.04 (huynh– feldt correction for repeated measure)</p><p>CRQ-emotion p-value 0.02 (huynh – feldt correction for repeated measure)</p><p>T-tests or Wilcoxon calculations with LOCF;</p><p>Table 2, Article III, 6MWT NEW p-value=0.10, T1-T3 differences between groups (HY/CTP) with LOCF calculation (without LOCF p= 0.04). With LOCF the significance between T1-T3 disappeared between groups for differences between groups.</p><p>Between groups T1-T3 differences, CRQ-emotional p=0.004</p><p>Between groups T1-T3 differences, CRQ-fatigue p=0.017 (i.e significant with LOCF)</p><p>Within YE group T2-T3 FVC p=0.051 (not significant with LOCF)</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us