Table S1. the Effects of MLP on Lifespan

Table S1. the Effects of MLP on Lifespan

<p>Table S1. The effects of MLP on lifespan. Exprement Strain Condition Deaths Mean lifespan±SEM Increase P value (day) (%) 1 N2 Control 107 17.54±0.48 25mg/L MLP 110 21.67±0.35 23.54 <0.001 N2 (25℃ ) Control 95 13.64±0.74 25mg/L MLP 102 15.93±0.34 16.78 <0.001 daf-16(mu86)I Control 97 14.02±0.56 25mg/L MLP 106 14.55±0.72 3.78 >0.05 daf- Control 85 13.02±0.34 12(rh61rh411) 25mg/L MLP 94 13.58±0.46 4.30 >0.05 nhr-80(tm1011)III Control 79 16.38±0.78 25mg/L MLP 86 16.70±0.26 1.95 >0.05 pha-4(zu225)V Control 91 14.78±0.37 25mg/L MLP 103 15.13±0.51 2.36 >0.05 skn-1 (zu67)IV Control 123 8.54±0.39 25mg/L MLP 108 9.12±0.48 6.79 <0.05 sir-2.1(ok434)IV Control 98 18.03±0.19 25mg/L MLP 104 19.56±0.61 8.48 <0.01 mev-1(kn1)III Control 90 9.08±0.29 25mg/L MLP 89 10.89±0.76 19.93 <0.001 glp-1(e2141)III Control 86 19.13±0.77 25mg/L MLP 93 18.89±0.49 -1.25 >0.05 2 N2 Control 94 17.85±0.43 25mg/L MLP 102 23.51±0.67 31.70 <0.001 N2 (25℃ ) Control 120 14.58±0.19 25mg/L MLP 115 17.91±0.56 22.84 <0.001 daf-12(m20)X Control 88 13.18±0.19 25mg/L MLP 98 13.76±0.64 4.40 >0.05 nhr-80(tm1011)III Control 97 15.67±0.37 25mg/L MLP 134 16.01±0.47 2.16 >0.05 pha-4(zu225)V Control 89 14.43±0.19 25mg/L MLP 100 15.12±0.84 4.78 >0.05 skn-1 (zu67)IV Control 120 8.01±0.97 25mg/L MLP 131 9.13±0.16 13.98 <0.001 sir-2.1(ok434)IV Control 83 17.13±0.84 25mg/L MLP 96 18.67±0.23 8.99 <0.01 mev-1(kn1)III Control 70 8.58±0.29 25mg/L MLP 69 10.89±0.76 26.92 <0.001 glp-1(e2141)III Control 98 19.35±0.37 25mg/L MLP 102 19.74±0.15 2.02 >0.05 daf-16(mu86)I Control 78 14.38±0.37 25mg/L MLP 84 14.91±0.34 3.68 >0.05 3 N2 Control 110 18.08±0.73 25mg/L MLP 121 22.07±0.54 22.06 <0.001 N2 (25℃ ) Control 113 14.11±0.37 25mg/L MLP 99 18.03±0.77 27.78 <0.001 daf-12(m20)X Control 87 13.97±0.46 25mg/L MLP 91 14.35±0.59 2.72 >0.05 nhr-80(tm1011)III Control 105 16.02±0.80 25mg/L MLP 112 16.49±0.43 2.93 >0.05 pha-4(zu225)V Control 120 15.31±0.91 25mg/L MLP 131 15.97±0.34 4.31 >0.05 skn-1 (zu67)IV Control 99 9.10±0.46 25mg/L MLP 110 10.21±0.37 12.20 <0.01 sir-2.1(ok434)IV Control 99 18.47±0.91 25mg/L MLP 121 20.08±0.28 8.72 <0.01 mev-1(kn1)III Control 90 8.38±0.39 25mg/L MLP 89 10.13±0.96 20.88 <0.001 glp-1(e2141)III Control 103 18.13±0.45 25mg/L MLP 124 18.32±0.28 1.04 >0.05 daf-16(mu86)I Control 119 14.34±0.37 25mg/L MLP 105 14.87±0.58 3.70 >0.05 Sum of 3 experiments Total Mean increase (%) Lifespan tests of glp-1(e2141)III were performed at 25℃ , lifespan of N2 worms were performed at 20 and 25℃. Lifespan tests of other mutants were all performed at 20℃ . The table shows the number of dead animals. Animals that crawled off the plate, bagged, or burst were censored and were therefore excluded from all analysis. P values were calculated for individual experiments. All statistics were calculated using SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The log rank (Kaplan-Meier method) test was used for statistical analysis. SEM: standard error of mean. Table S 2. Results of dosage response analysis. Concentration 1 5 25 125 312.5 625 (mg/L) Extension fold 0.97±0.13 1.13±0.08 1.26±0.05 0.98±0.09 0.86±0.04 0.82±0.01 (average ±SD)</p><p>P value >0.05 <0.01 <0.001 >0.05 <0.01 <0.01 (vs control)</p><p>Extension fold: average of 3 independent experiments. SD: standard deviation P value: t-test Tabler S 3. Treatment with MLP improved H2O2 resistance.</p><p>0.5 mM H2O2 1 mM H2O2 1.5 mM H2O2 Control 25mg/L MLP Control 25mg/L MLP Control 25mg/L MLP</p><p>1 0.85 0.95 0.64 0.83 0.16 0.59 2 0.91 0.97 0.59 0.86 0.24 0.62 3 0.87 0.98 0.73 0.91 0.14 0.47 average 0.88 0.96 0.65 0.86 0.18 0.56 SD 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.08 t-test 0.010 0.010 0.002 The data showed the survival fractions of day 6 MLP-treated worms after incubated in indicated concentrations of </p><p>H2O2 for 5 hours. SD: standard deviation. Tabler S 4. Treatment with MLP improved oxidant resistance induced by paraquat.</p><p>Experiment Treatment Survival fraction 8 day 10 day 12 day 14 day 16 day 1 Control 0.91 0.81 0.65 0.42 0.16 25mg/L MLP 0.97 0.90 0.77 0.61 0.34 2 Control 0.93 0.85 0.51 0.37 0.11 25mg/L MLP 0.99 0.97 0.72 0.58 0.35 3 Control 0.95 0.84 0.59 0.39 0.08 25mg/L MLP 1.00 0.96 0.83 0.41 0.27 Average ± SD Control 0.93±0.02 0.83±0.02 0.58±0.07 0.39±0.03 0.12±0.04 25mg/L MLP 0.98±0.02 0.94±0.04 0.77±0.06 0.53±0.11 0.32±0.04 t-test 0.018 0.012 0.021 0.094 0.004 The data showed the survival franctions. The survival fractions were caulated every other day from day 8 after treated by 25 mg/L MLP. SD: standard deviation. Table S 5. Effects of MLP on reproduction of wild type worms at 20℃ strain total progeny of P value days of laying P value(vs n, N one worms eggs control) t-test N2 control 213.15±40.09 5.75±1.03 57,3 25 mg/L MLP 155.29±21.13 <0.05 4.13±0.75 <0.0001 69,3 Reproduction assays, using N2 worms treated with the compound from hatching, single L4 worm was transferred to a fresh plate, then transferred at the same time each day. The offspring of each worm were hatched at 25 ℃ and counted at L4 or young adult. P values were carried out by using t-test n: total worms number of all trails in each treatment N: number of independent experiments Table S 6. The average intensity of sudan black B stained droplets in MLP-treated N2 worms.</p><p>Worms Control 25mg/L MLP 1 689.40 839.43 2 764.37 872.46 3 590.59 747.97 4 713.83 923.54 5 523.55 860.34 6 561.62 888.45 7 588.76 741.16 8 556.07 787.99 9 515.02 747.76 10 695.56 831.96 11 613.50 788.87 12 569.64 771.99 13 613.21 811.74 14 524.17 795.76 15 555.61 878.12 16 561.53 862.83 17 534.94 730.56 18 578.10 772.95 19 583.46 914.03 20 565.34 758.37 Average 594.91 816.31 SD 68.80 60.56 T-test <0.001 Relative 1.00±0.12 1.37±0.10 fold±SD</p><p>The intensity was calculated using the Metamorph software package (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). SD: standard deviation. Table S 7. The average intensity of sudan black B stained droplets in MLP-treated CF1903 worms.</p><p>Worms Control 25mg/L MLP 1 704.52 831.91 2 982.80 807.13 3 557.91 689.04 4 956.48 879.16 5 598.59 727.29 6 569.26 826.62 7 699.60 617.90 8 658.26 694.16 9 632.16 689.95 10 827.37 736.20 11 775.89 706.52 12 713.62 621.58 13 776.02 613.60 14 616.88 671.17 15 639.28 693.82 16 650.74 751.30 17 618.28 636.37 18 696.78 633.31 19 690.91 856.84 20 642.00 717.67 Average 700.37 720.08 SD 114.88 82.26 T-test 0.54</p><p>The intensity was calculated using the Metamorph software package (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). SD: standard deviation. Worm Gene Relative expression fold (vs Average SD P value (t-test) control) N2 Exp1 Exp 2 Exp 3 sod-3 4.14 3.58 3.89 3.87 0.28 <0.001 lipil-4 2.95 2.46 3.02 2.81 0.31 <0.001 fard-1 2.07 1.88 2.18 2.04 0.15 0.002 unc- 1.93 1.85 2.32 2.03 0.25 0.002 51 fat-6 3.78 4.17 3.95 3.96 0.20 <0.001 gst-4 1.85 2.01 2.12 1.99 0.14 <0.001 CF1903 sod-3 1.06 1.02 1.18 1.08 0.08 0.14 lipil-4 0.89 1.22 1.21 1.10 0.18 0.38 fard-1 1.08 1.18 0.93 1.06 0.12 0.43 unc- 0.86 1.03 1.21 1.03 0.18 0.76 51 fat-6 0.95 1.12 1.08 1.05 0.08 0.38 gst-4 1.77 1.98 1.67 1.80 0.16 <0.001</p><p>Table S 8. Gene expression regulated by 25mg/L MLP.</p><p>△△ The relative expression levels of genes were carried out using 2- CT method and normalized to act-1 Table S 9. Primers sequences. unc-51 F 5'-GCTGCTCTTGACGAGCTTTT-3' unc-5R 5'-ACAAATCCCTGTCGTTCCAG-3' fat-6 F 5'-GTCTCTGGTCCCACAAATCA-3' fat-6 R 5'-TGGATCAGCATCGGTATCAG-3' lipl-4 F 5'-ATGGCCGAGAAGTTCCTACATCGT-3' lipl-4 R 5'-GGTGAATTGGCGACCCAATCGAAA-3' gst-4 F 5’- TCCGTCAATTCACTTCTTCCG -3’ gst-4 R 5’- AAGAAATCATCACGGGCTGG-3’ sod-3 F 5’--3AGCATCATGCCACCTACGTGA-3’ ’ sod-3 R 5’-CACCACCATTGAATTTCAGCG-3’ fard-1 F 5’-GGGTTTTTGGGAAAGGTGAT-3’ fard-1 R 5’-CCACCGATTGCTTTCAATTT-3’ccaccgattgctttcaattt act-1 F 5’-TCGGTATGGGACAGAAGGAC-3’ act-1 R 5’-CATCCCAGTTGGTGACGATA-3’ Article title: Mulberry leaf polyphenols delay aging and regulate fat metabolism via the germline signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans</p><p>Journal name: AGE</p><p>Author names: Shanqing Zheng, Sentai Liao, Yuxiao Zou, Zhi Qu, Weizhi Shen, Ying Shi</p><p>Affiliation: Sericulture & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 133 Yiheng ST Dongguanzhuang RD, Guangzhou 510610, China</p><p>Correspondence to: Shanqing Zheng, Ph.D., E-mail:[email protected] Sentai Liao, MD, E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +86-020-8759-6248; Fax: +86-020-8723-6354.</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us