Ballot Adjudication Summary

Ballot Adjudication Summary

<p> Ballot Adjudication Summary 2013 Cycle 1 REGION: North America COMMITTEE: EHS EVENT: NA Standards Spring 2013 Meetings DATE OF MEETING: April 4 2013 PLACE OF MEETING: SEMI Headquarters in San Jose, California COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS: Sean Larsen/Lam Research AG, Chris Evanston/Salus SEMI STAFF: Paul Trio</p><p>I. Document Number & Title Document Reapproval of SEMI S6-0707E, EHS Guideline for 5522 Exhaust Ventilation of Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment</p><p>II. Tally (Staff to fill in)</p><p>Voting Tally: As-cast tally after close of voting period A minimum of 60% of the voting interests that have voting members within the technical committee must return votes. (Regulations ¶ 9.6.1) III. Rejects Reject 1 (KLA-Tencor: Lauren Crane) Negative 2 of Reject 1 Referenced *TF/Committee to fill in if necessary Section 6.3.1 *Original negative comment and justification should be included.</p><p>N Negative: e S6 is not limited in scope to consideration of “process chemicals” (see, for g example, 5.2.49). Therefore this section is inappropriately narrow. a t i Reason Proposed Solution: v Change to the effect of e “…should be compatible with the substances of concern specified by the SME supplier….”</p><p>Technical GO TO “Related” x No withdrawal made section Withdrawal GO TO “Final”  Withdrawal document received by staff on XXXX (A) “Related” is mutually agreed upon. x *This motion can be appended to the motion for Persuasive (See Persuasive Section) Motion and Reason Negative is related (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) Negative is not related (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) R Reason XXXX e l Motion by/2nd by Name (Company)/Name (Company) a Discussion t e XX-XX d [Negative is related] > 1/3 GO TO “Persuasive” Result of Vote [Negative is not related] < 2/3 (check ONE) 2/3=< [Negative is not related] GO TO “Final”  (B)</p><p>P x Negative is related and persuasive (needs over 1/3 votes to pass) Motion and e Negative is related and not persuasive (needs 2/3 or more votes to pass) r Reason Reason XXXX s u Motion by/2nd by John Visty (Salus) / Bert Planting (ASML) a Discussion None s 10-0 x [Negative is related and persuasive] > 1/3 GO TO “Final”  (E) [Negative is related and not persuasive] < 2/3 Result of Vote GO TO “Final”  i (check ONE) 2/3=<[Negative is related and not persuasive] <90% (C) v e 90% =< [Negative is related and not persuasive] GO TO “Not Signifi- cant Finding Option”</p><p>N o t This option can only be used “if the committee finds a negative not persuasive by a vote equal to or greater than 90% of the persons voting on the action”. (Regulations ¶ S 9.5.3.3.2) i g n It is mutually agreed upon to term the negative “not significant” GO TO  i (D) f GO TO  i It is mutually agreed upon to term the negative “significant” c (C) a Motion The negative is “not significant”. n t Motion by/2nd by Name (Company)/Name (Company)</p><p>F XX-XX Motion passed with simple majority GO TO  (D) i n d i n g Vote XX-XX Motion failed with simple majority GO TO  (C) O p t i o n Negative is: (A) withdrawn (counted under h in disposition) Final (B) not related (counted under i in disposition) (C) related and not persuasive (significant) (D) not significant (counted under j in disposition) x (E) related and persuasive DOCUMENT FAILS Comment generated. See comment #x</p><p>Reject votes were also received from the following voters:  QSES: Tomokatsu Sano  TUV SUD: Glenn Holbrook  TUV Rheinland: David Sexton  Lam Research AG: Sean Larsen IV. Comments Comments were received from the following voters:  Lam Research AG: Sean Larsen V. Action for this document M This document passed committee review as balloted and will be forwarded to the A&R for o procedural review. t This document passed committee review with editorial changes and will be forwarded to the i A&R for procedural review. o n x This document failed committee review and will be returned to the task force for rework. This document failed committee review and work will be discontinued. Motion by/2nd John Visty (Salus) / Bert Planting (ASML) by Discussion None Vote 12-0 x Motion passed Final Action Motion failed </p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us