Faculty Personnel Action Summary

Binghamton University FACULTY PERSONNEL ACTION SUMMARYNote: These sheets must be submitted/copied on blue paperName: Present Title: Academic Subdivision: Date Present Appointment Expires: Mandated Tenure Date:Personnel ActionRenewal of Term for ____ years Tenure Promotion to Sr. Assistant Librarian Promotion to Associate Professor/Associate Librarian Promotion to Full Professor/Librarian Promotion to Distinguished ProfessorPersonnel Action * Renewal Promotion Tenure Date IPC Department Chair Dean/Director UPC Provost President*Indicate Y (yes) or N (no) in the appropriate column.Revised March 25, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageCurriculum Vitae 1Recommendation by Initiating Personnel 2 Committee Listing of IPC Members 3Recommendation by Department Chair 4Response by Candidate 5Recommendation by the Dean or Director 6Recommendation by the UPC 7Recommendation by the Provost 8President’s Decision 9Teaching Accomplishments 10-16Research Accomplishments 17-23Service Accomplishments 24-28Revised March 25, 2009 1Up-to-date and complete Curriculum Vitae must followRevised March 25, 2009 2IPC’s written evaluation of the candidate’s overall performance followsRecommendation by Initiating Personnel Committee( ) JPC ( ) SPCRenewal for ___ years Effective Date Non-renewal Effective Date Tenure Effective Date Promotion to ______Effective Date Total Number of committee members in residence, plus those that are not in residence but voting ______NOTE: If department chair is the IPC chair, that member is non-votingVote of Committee: _____ For; _____ Against; _____AbstainingName of IPC ChairName of IPC SecretaryThe IPC report has been reviewed by all members of the IPC and approved by a majority of them YesWas a copy of the IPC report given to the faculty member? (include copy of notification memo) YesRevised March 25, 2009 3IPCList all eligible members Signatures of those participating**Explain why a member did not participateRevised March 25, 2009 4Evaluation by the department chair (in departmentalized schools) followsRecommendation by Department ChairRecommends renewalDoes not recommend renewalRecommends promotionDoes not recommend promotionRecommends tenureDoes not recommend tenureWas a copy of the Chair’s report given to the faculty member? Yes (Include copy of notification memo)Was a copy of the Chair’s report given to the IPC Chair? Yes (Include copy of notification memo)Revised March 25, 2009 5Response by the candidate to the IPC reportYes (Please include copy)NoRevised March 25, 2009 6Recommendation by the Dean or DirectorRecommends renewalDoes not recommend renewalRecommends promotionDoes not recommend promotionRecommends tenureDoes not recommend tenureORFormal ReviewWas a copy of the Dean’s report given to the faculty member? YesWas a copy of the Dean’s report given to the IPC Chair? YesRevised March 25, 2009 7Recommendation by the UPCRecommends renewalDoes not recommend renewalRecommends promotionDoes not recommend promotionRecommends tenureDoes not recommend tenureORFormal ReviewRevised March 25, 2009 8Recommendation by the ProvostRecommends renewalDoes not recommend renewalRecommends promotionDoes not recommend promotionRecommends tenureDoes not recommend tenureORFormal ReviewRevised March 25, 2009 9President’s DecisionRenewalNon-renewalPromotionPromotion not grantedTenureTenure not grantedRevised March 25, 2009 10Teaching AccomplishmentsCandidate’s statement of philosophy of teaching and how his/her teaching has evolved since his/her initial appointment or last promotion must followRevised March 25, 2009 11Summary of materials used by IPC in evaluating teaching [check those used in this review] the S.O.O.T. or other systematic survey of student opinion _____ a) (Insert a numerical summary of these results after this page) reports from student advisory committees: Undergrad ____ Grad ______b) (Insert reports after this page)_____ c) observation of teaching by peers (Insert reports after this page)_____ d) development of new courses or course materials_____ e) course syllabi and reading lists library reserve lists and development of special library collections for _____ f) courses or programs_____ g) documentation of pedagogical innovations information on student performance (honors work, continuation in _____ h) graduate programs, post-graduate achievements)_____ i) supervision of undergraduate and graduate projects and theses_____ j) organization and supervision of internship programs_____ k) involvement in collegiate or other extra-curricular student activities organization of workshops to help students develop ancillary skills _____ l) (library skills, use of computer programs, writing skills, artistic performances, literary/technical publications, etc.)_____ m) surveys of graduating students and/or alumni_____ n) Other ____________Materials relevant to Items d) through n) and not included elsewhere in this form should be collected and submitted separately with this completed form.Revised March 25, 2009 12SOOT’s Numerical SummaryInstructor: Course: Semester: Enrollment: Responses:Student Opinion of Teaching (SOOT) Survey – Fall 2008 and AfterNot Very Low or Average Very High or Question Applicable Never Always # % # % # % # %1 The instructor is well prepared for classThe instructor demonstrates a thorough 2 knowledge of the subjectThe instructor communicates his/her 3 subject wellThe instructor explains complex ideas 4 clearlyThe instructor stimulates my interest in 5 the core subject6 The instructor is receptive to questionsThe instructor is available to help me 7 outside of classThe instructor encourages me to think 8 analyticallyOverall, the instructor is an effective 9 teacherRevised March 25, 2009 13Instructor: Course: Semester: Enrollment: Responses:Student Opinion of Teaching (SOOT) Survey – Prior to Fall 2008Question 8: How would you describe the instructor’s knowledge of the matter of the course? # % Inadequate Somewhat adequate Good Very impressiveQuestion 9: How well did the instructor explain complex ideas? # % Very well Well Somewhat well Not wellQuestion 11: How prepared did the instructor appear to be for class most of the time? # % Very prepared Generally prepared Somewhat prepared Inadequately preparedQuestion 20: How important was the instructor to your learning in this course? # % Unimportant Somewhat important Generally important Very importantQuestion 23: Overall, how would you rate the instructor? # % Very high High Low Very lowRevised March 25, 2009 14If written evaluations of the candidate’s teaching have been solicited from individuals or groups other than those indicated on page 11, indicate who requested them, who provided them, and whether they have been released. These evaluations follow(Include a copy of letter of solicitation) TEACHING EVALUATIONSReleasedYes with name Name Yes of No Solicited by evalua tor remov ed1. [ ] [ ] [ ]2. [ ] [ ] [ ]3. [ ] [ ] [ ]4. [ ] [ ] [ ]5. [ ] [ ] [ ]6. [ ] [ ] [ ]7. [ ] [ ] [ ]8. [ ] [ ] [ ]9. [ ] [ ] [ ]10. [ ] [ ] [ ]11. [ ] [ ] [ ]12. [ ] [ ] [ ]Revised March 25, 2009 15Unsolicited materials relevant to the candidate’s teaching used by the IPC as part of the evaluation of a faculty member follow Author’s signature is required The option of release without author identification is not available for unsolicited materialsRevised March 25, 2009 16IPC’s written evaluation of teaching performance follows(Include caucus reports as required and minority reports, if submitted) Revised March 25, 2009 17Research AccomplishmentsCandidate’s statement of research interests, accomplishments, and future directions must followRevised March 25, 2009 18List on this page materials, other than outside letters of evaluation, used by the IPC in evaluating researchRelevant materials not included elsewhere in this form should be collected and submitted separately with this completed formRevised March 25, 2009 19List all individuals asked to provide an evaluation of the candidate’s research who declined to participate in the reviewName Institution Reason for declining1.2.3.4.5.Revised March 25, 2009 20List all individuals asked to provide an evaluation of the candidate’s research who participated in this review. Indicate whether the reviewer has given permission for the letter to be released to the candidate. Also, indicate with an asterisk any evaluator(s) designated by the candidate. It is important that two-thirds of the referees be designated by the IPC(Include a copy of letter of solicitation)ReleasedYes with name Name Yes of No Solicited by evalua tor remov ed1. [ ] [ ] [ ]2. [ ] [ ] [ ]3. [ ] [ ] [ ]4. [ ] [ ] [ ]5. [ ] [ ] [ ]6. [ ] [ ] [ ]7. [ ] [ ] [ ]8. [ ] [ ] [ ]9. [ ] [ ] [ ]10. [ ] [ ] [ ]11. [ ] [ ] [ ]12. [ ] [ ] [ ]Revised March 25, 2009 21Outside letters of evaluation and a brief description of the reviewers’ credentials must follow [complete curriculum vitas of reviewers must be submitted for distinguished cases]Revised March 25, 2009 22Unsolicited materials relevant to the candidate’s research used by the IPC as part of the evaluation of a faculty member follow Author’s signature is required The option of release without author identification is not available for unsolicited materialsRevised March 25, 2009 23IPC’s written evaluation of research performance must followRevised March 25, 2009 24Service AccomplishmentsCandidate's statement of service interests and accomplishments must followRevised March 25, 2009 25List on this page the materials used by the IPC in evaluating serviceRelevant materials not included elsewhere in this form should be collected and submitted separately with this completed formRevised March 25, 2009 26If evaluations of the candidate’s service have been solicited, indicate who requested them, who provided them, and whether they have been released. The evaluations should be attached to this form(Include a copy of letter of solicitation)OTHER SOLICITED EVALUATIONSRevised March 25, 2009 ReleasedYes with name Name Yes of No Solicited by evalua tor remov ed1. [ ] [ ] [ ]2. [ ] [ ] [ ]3. [ ] [ ] [ ]4. [ ] [ ] [ ]5. [ ] [ ] [ ]6. [ ] [ ] [ ]7. [ ] [ ] [ ]8. [ ] [ ] [ ]9. [ ] [ ] [ ]10. [ ] [ ] [ ]11. [ ] [ ] [ ]12. [ ] [ ] [ ]Revised March 25, 2009 27Unsolicited materials relevant to the candidate’s service used by the IPC as part of the evaluation of a faculty member follow Author’s signature is required The option of release without author identification is not available for unsolicited materialsRevised March 25, 2009 28IPC’s written evaluation of service performance must followRevised March 25, 2009

Faculty Personnel Action Summary

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support