Faculty Personnel Action Summary

Binghamton University FACULTY PERSONNEL ACTION SUMMARY

Note: These sheets must be submitted/copied on blue paper

Name: Present Title: Academic Subdivision: Date Present Appointment Expires: Mandated Tenure Date:

Personnel Action

Renewal of Term for ____ years Tenure Promotion to Sr. Assistant Librarian Promotion to Associate Professor/Associate Librarian Promotion to Full Professor/Librarian Promotion to Distinguished Professor

Personnel Action * Renewal Promotion Tenure Date IPC Department Chair Dean/Director UPC Provost President

*Indicate Y (yes) or N (no) in the appropriate column.

Revised March 25, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

Curriculum Vitae 1

Recommendation by Initiating Personnel 2 Committee Listing of IPC Members 3

Recommendation by Department Chair 4

Response by Candidate 5

Recommendation by the Dean or Director 6

Recommendation by the UPC 7

Recommendation by the Provost 8

President’s Decision 9

Teaching Accomplishments 10-16

Research Accomplishments 17-23

Service Accomplishments 24-28

Revised March 25, 2009 1

Up-to-date and complete Curriculum Vitae must follow

IPC’s written evaluation of the candidate’s overall performance follows

Recommendation by Initiating Personnel Committee

( ) JPC ( ) SPC

Renewal for ___ years Effective Date Non-renewal Effective Date Tenure Effective Date Promotion to ______Effective Date

Total Number of committee members in residence, plus those that are not in residence but voting ______NOTE: If department chair is the IPC chair, that member is non-voting

Vote of Committee: _____ For; _____ Against; _____Abstaining

Name of IPC Chair

Name of IPC Secretary

The IPC report has been reviewed by all members of the IPC and approved by a majority of them Yes

Was a copy of the IPC report given to the faculty member? (include copy of notification memo) Yes

List all eligible members Signatures of those participating*

*Explain why a member did not participate

Evaluation by the department chair (in departmentalized schools) follows

Recommendation by Department Chair

Recommends renewal

Does not recommend renewal

Recommends promotion

Does not recommend promotion

Recommends tenure

Does not recommend tenure

Was a copy of the Chair’s report given to the faculty member? Yes (Include copy of notification memo)

Was a copy of the Chair’s report given to the IPC Chair? Yes (Include copy of notification memo)

Response by the candidate to the IPC report

Yes (Please include copy)

Recommendation by the Dean or Director

Recommends renewal

Recommends tenure

Formal Review

Was a copy of the Dean’s report given to the faculty member? Yes

Was a copy of the Dean’s report given to the IPC Chair? Yes

Recommendation by the UPC

Recommends renewal

Recommends tenure

Formal Review

Recommendation by the Provost

Recommends renewal

Recommends tenure

Formal Review

President’s Decision

Renewal

Non-renewal

Promotion

Promotion not granted

Tenure

Tenure not granted

Teaching Accomplishments

Candidate’s statement of philosophy of teaching and how his/her teaching has evolved since his/her initial appointment or last promotion must follow

Summary of materials used by IPC in evaluating teaching [check those used in this review]

the S.O.O.T. or other systematic survey of student opinion _____ a) (Insert a numerical summary of these results after this page) reports from student advisory committees: Undergrad ____ Grad ______b) (Insert reports after this page)

_____ c) observation of teaching by peers (Insert reports after this page)

_____ d) development of new courses or course materials

_____ e) course syllabi and reading lists

library reserve lists and development of special library collections for _____ f) courses or programs

_____ g) documentation of pedagogical innovations

information on student performance (honors work, continuation in _____ h) graduate programs, post-graduate achievements)

_____ i) supervision of undergraduate and graduate projects and theses

_____ j) organization and supervision of internship programs

_____ k) involvement in collegiate or other extra-curricular student activities

organization of workshops to help students develop ancillary skills _____ l) (library skills, use of computer programs, writing skills, artistic performances, literary/technical publications, etc.)

_____ m) surveys of graduating students and/or alumni

_____ n) Other ______

______

Materials relevant to Items d) through n) and not included elsewhere in this form should be collected and submitted separately with this completed form.

SOOT’s Numerical Summary

Instructor: Course: Semester: Enrollment: Responses:

Student Opinion of Teaching (SOOT) Survey – Fall 2008 and After

Not Very Low or Average Very High or Question Applicable Never Always # % # % # % # %

1 The instructor is well prepared for class

The instructor demonstrates a thorough 2 knowledge of the subject

The instructor communicates his/her 3 subject well

The instructor explains complex ideas 4 clearly

The instructor stimulates my interest in 5 the core subject

6 The instructor is receptive to questions

The instructor is available to help me 7 outside of class

The instructor encourages me to think 8 analytically

Overall, the instructor is an effective 9 teacher

Instructor: Course: Semester: Enrollment: Responses:

Student Opinion of Teaching (SOOT) Survey – Prior to Fall 2008

Question 8: How would you describe the instructor’s knowledge of the matter of the course? # % Inadequate Somewhat adequate Good Very impressive

Question 9: How well did the instructor explain complex ideas? # % Very well Well Somewhat well Not well

Question 11: How prepared did the instructor appear to be for class most of the time? # % Very prepared Generally prepared Somewhat prepared Inadequately prepared

Question 20: How important was the instructor to your learning in this course? # % Unimportant Somewhat important Generally important Very important

Question 23: Overall, how would you rate the instructor? # % Very high High Low Very low

If written evaluations of the candidate’s teaching have been solicited from individuals or groups other than those indicated on page 11, indicate who requested them, who provided them, and whether they have been released. These evaluations follow

(Include a copy of letter of solicitation) TEACHING EVALUATIONS

Released

Yes with name Name Yes of No Solicited by evalua tor remov ed

1. [ ] [ ] [ ]

2. [ ] [ ] [ ]

3. [ ] [ ] [ ]

4. [ ] [ ] [ ]

5. [ ] [ ] [ ]

6. [ ] [ ] [ ]

7. [ ] [ ] [ ]

8. [ ] [ ] [ ]

9. [ ] [ ] [ ]

10. [ ] [ ] [ ]

11. [ ] [ ] [ ]

12. [ ] [ ] [ ]

Unsolicited materials relevant to the candidate’s teaching used by the IPC as part of the evaluation of a faculty member follow

 Author’s signature is required

 The option of release without author identification is not available for unsolicited materials

IPC’s written evaluation of teaching performance follows

(Include caucus reports as required and minority reports, if submitted)

Research Accomplishments

Candidate’s statement of research interests, accomplishments, and future directions must follow

List on this page materials, other than outside letters of evaluation, used by the IPC in evaluating research

Relevant materials not included elsewhere in this form should be collected and submitted separately with this completed form

List all individuals asked to provide an evaluation of the candidate’s research who declined to participate in the review

Name Institution Reason for declining

List all individuals asked to provide an evaluation of the candidate’s research who participated in this review. Indicate whether the reviewer has given permission for the letter to be released to the candidate. Also, indicate with an asterisk any evaluator(s) designated by the candidate. It is important that two-thirds of the referees be designated by the IPC

(Include a copy of letter of solicitation)

Released

1. [ ] [ ] [ ]

2. [ ] [ ] [ ]

3. [ ] [ ] [ ]

4. [ ] [ ] [ ]

5. [ ] [ ] [ ]

6. [ ] [ ] [ ]

7. [ ] [ ] [ ]

8. [ ] [ ] [ ]

9. [ ] [ ] [ ]

10. [ ] [ ] [ ]

11. [ ] [ ] [ ]

12. [ ] [ ] [ ]

Outside letters of evaluation and a brief description of the reviewers’ credentials must follow [complete curriculum vitas of reviewers must be submitted for distinguished cases]

Unsolicited materials relevant to the candidate’s research used by the IPC as part of the evaluation of a faculty member follow

IPC’s written evaluation of research performance must follow

Service Accomplishments

Candidate's statement of service interests and accomplishments must follow

List on this page the materials used by the IPC in evaluating service

Relevant materials not included elsewhere in this form should be collected and submitted separately with this completed form

If evaluations of the candidate’s service have been solicited, indicate who requested them, who provided them, and whether they have been released. The evaluations should be attached to this form

(Include a copy of letter of solicitation)

OTHER SOLICITED EVALUATIONS

Revised March 25, 2009 Released

1. [ ] [ ] [ ]

2. [ ] [ ] [ ]

3. [ ] [ ] [ ]

4. [ ] [ ] [ ]

5. [ ] [ ] [ ]

6. [ ] [ ] [ ]

7. [ ] [ ] [ ]

8. [ ] [ ] [ ]

9. [ ] [ ] [ ]

10. [ ] [ ] [ ]

11. [ ] [ ] [ ]

12. [ ] [ ] [ ]

Unsolicited materials relevant to the candidate’s service used by the IPC as part of the evaluation of a faculty member follow

IPC’s written evaluation of service performance must follow

Revised March 25, 2009