<p> Executive Board Tuesday, November 8, 2011 SAC W314 8:00 pm</p><p>I. Call Meeting to Order</p><p> Guests not allowed to speak unless yielded floor or recognized by chair</p><p> Lots of guests this meeting</p><p> Motion to move campus freedom resolution to top of agenda</p><p> Approved</p><p>II. Roll Call</p><p>III. Election Rules</p><p> Three separate documents: supreme court rules, Senior Advisor Max </p><p>Morley has changes, Senator Graudick has changes</p><p> President Frizzell would like to go through like the constitution</p><p> Chapter 100</p><p> President Frizzell would like to add potential run-off dates</p><p> Chief Justice McReynolds is allowing a week between file deadline for </p><p> cases and run-offs, run-off held from March 5th 12am-March 7th 12pm</p><p> Max reminded that Senate passed second day of formal campaigning not </p><p> allow for active campaigning due to Rally and State of Student Body</p><p> President Pappe yield floor to Skylar Senator Graudick would like the Court to hold debate for Top 4 and </p><p> councils as well</p><p> President Wetterer says law elections later than timeline</p><p> Senator Graudick says specific amendments for other schools</p><p> Max says could make it for all schools participating in SGA general </p><p> election</p><p> Chief Justice McReynolds reminds all schools participate because vote for </p><p>President and Top 4</p><p> President Frizzell thinks good to have council debate, overshadowed by </p><p>Top 4, fair, Feb 9th-12th , shortly after Top 4 debate</p><p> Senator Graudick doesn’t care when as long as get out</p><p> Senator Mattingly suggests write a separate act to have separate debate</p><p> Max agrees that debates are not necessarily election rule, pass an act</p><p> EVP Sangoi: recommendation for debates but do as separate act, </p><p> approved</p><p> Approved Chapter 100 as is</p><p> Chapter 101</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 102</p><p> President Frizzell yield to Skylar</p><p> Senator Graudick would like to designate slate affiliation on ballot President Wetterer asks if everyone on slates, might vote as whole slate </p><p> only</p><p> Senator Graudick says still vote individually for each position</p><p> President Wetterer thinks then voter should know names</p><p> Max believes this would increase number of uninformed voters, just vote </p><p> based on name, even if convenient </p><p> Senator Schoen agrees with Max, if you don’t know who voting for then </p><p> rather you not vote</p><p> President Frizzell says a problem could occur with candidates running </p><p> under false name</p><p> Approved as is</p><p> Chapter 200</p><p> Max change 200.2, unfair opportunity to run twice for positions, not fair </p><p> to undergraduates</p><p> President Harris asks who able to do that</p><p> Max replies graduate school, other professional schools, A&S not able to </p><p> do this, unfair</p><p> President Wetterer says that elected office separate from Law school </p><p> elected office</p><p> President Frizzell realizes two different things for professional schools</p><p> Senator Schoen thinks autonomy of councils may not be able to tell </p><p> councils not to pick who they want</p><p> EVP Sangoi suggests figure out what constitution says about this Max replies the Constitution does not address it</p><p> President Frizzell says it is very unclear, put bluntly what we are trying to</p><p> fix, motion to discuss not run for Top 4 and Senate seat</p><p> President Navale thinks the clearer we are less ambiguity</p><p> President Frizzell says Dean Mardis said specifics great</p><p> Presidetn Smithson asks what if resign, can we appoint a new person</p><p> Max believes that would be special election, they are not running</p><p> President Navale asks if elected in Kent</p><p> President Smithson says they are not elected, appointed by previous </p><p> council, by application</p><p> EVP Sangoi asks what does constitution say about appointed seats vs </p><p> elected seats</p><p> Chief Justice McReynolds responds have to look at what councils have </p><p> done in the past</p><p> Move to approve Max’s recommendations</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 201</p><p> President Heisler notices 2010 should be 2012</p><p> Approved as friendly</p><p> Chapter 300</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 301 Approved</p><p> Chapter 302</p><p> Senator Graudick believes allows for loophole, intentional nature is </p><p> problem with messing with flyers, violation of person’s voice, award </p><p> highest penalty</p><p> President Frizzell disapprove of adding Class 1 sanction because </p><p> disqualification, not like assessment of sanctions, important for court to </p><p> have authority</p><p> Senator Graudick would at least keep “bad faith”, creating a loophole, </p><p> intentionally placing flyers as to hinder other candidate</p><p> EVP Sangoi asks how know who is doing bad faith things</p><p> Senator Graudick answers he addressed in 800.2</p><p> Max likes it, whole boards designed to prevent all candidates from getting</p><p> publicity, that fall under bad faith, word better</p><p> Senator Graudick says Max said my intention</p><p> President Frizzell still thinks it is bad, more court cases based on </p><p> ambiguity, competitive advantage to slate is good thing, display materials </p><p> better</p><p> Senator Graudick states issue with flyers is ambiguity over whole thing, </p><p> take pictures, high violation</p><p> Senator Mattingly has a problem with second sentence, too specific</p><p> Presidetn Pappe knows random people could walk by and change things, </p><p> asks how can you regulate that, so ambiguous, look at other avenues EVP Sangoi says more of a problem to whatever already is a problem, </p><p>“bad faith” too ambiguous</p><p> President Harris reminds there is a fine line between smart and sneaky, </p><p> give time frame to fix it</p><p> President Frizzell says a flyer violation has been filed every year, court </p><p> sends email to inform, can call it “bad faith”</p><p> Motion to approve 302.4 as written by Court</p><p> Motion to approve all of Chapter 302</p><p> Senator Graudick thinks we should do something about it, issue because </p><p> happened last year</p><p> President Heisler says call the question</p><p> Approved as is</p><p> Chapter 303</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 304</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 305</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 306</p><p> President Pappe add 306.2 all election materials be recycled</p><p> Motion to add 306.2 that all recyclable campaign materials are </p><p> encouraged to be recycled Senator Schoen vote nay</p><p> Chapter 400</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 500</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 501</p><p> President Heisler ask why and ink or paper</p><p> President Frizzell says flyers reported, ink and paper could be included</p><p> Chief Justice McReynolds explains there were inquiries in past</p><p> Max asks what if already has ink</p><p> Chief Justice McReynolds says try it</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 502</p><p> Max says current rules don’t allow for RSOs to endorse or make </p><p> donations, organ of the university is still undefined, both changed in </p><p> rules, RSO should be allowed to endorse, look at Max’s changes</p><p> Chief Justice McReynolds says 502.2 largest concern, defining what an </p><p>“organ of the university” means is very vague, watch how do language, </p><p> could cause problems</p><p> President Frizzell says does cause major headaches, organ of university is</p><p> anything funded by university, athletics ran a campaign a few years ago, must be funded, strike out necessarily and change to monetarily funded, </p><p> go through previous court cases</p><p> Max says it is vague, but better than ever had, need definition</p><p> Motion to approve Chapter 502 as amended</p><p> Senator Schoen says with respect to Province and Cardinal Towne still </p><p> carry same weight, close to organ</p><p> President Frizzell thinks same as restaurant example</p><p> Max says endorse and cause problems too, negatives outweigh positives</p><p> President Schwenker adds management company pays me not Cardinal </p><p>Towne</p><p> Jeff Lamb adds all three are UofL Housing affiliated</p><p> President Schwenker says there are different levels of affiliation</p><p> Max states Province paying University, not other way around</p><p> President Frizzell problem if use monetarily funded because on website, </p><p> funded by university </p><p> Max thinks would be in-kind donation</p><p> EVP Sangoi asks if good idea to get specific</p><p> President Smithson understands what doing but huge amount of power </p><p> to student, asks how safeguard</p><p> Senator Schoen says not cater exclusively to students, affiliated to </p><p>University</p><p> Senator Graudick says candidate running alone or for first time, set them </p><p> up for trap, create list of prohibited organizations Max thinks need to define one way or other with affiliated housing, </p><p> ambiguous possible gain better than ambiguous guaranteed loss</p><p> Justice Thomas suggests situation to defer to court, define what organ </p><p> means, removes process from potential candidates</p><p> President Frizzell says trying to be more detailed, struck it completely, </p><p> only individuals and RSOs</p><p> Senator Schoen likes what Kurtis said, do same things from departments</p><p> Max reminds still doesn’t define organ</p><p> President Nasseri likes referring to court</p><p> Motion withdrawn</p><p> President Nasseri: Motion to refer to the court for an organ of the </p><p> university definition</p><p> President Frizzell suggests recommend use specific language</p><p> President Wetterer reminds can’t tell Court what to do or how to say</p><p> Max suggests request by next Senate meeting</p><p> Approved</p><p> Motion to approve 502.1 and 502.3 of Max’s changes</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 503</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 600</p><p> Approved Chapter 601</p><p> Senator Graudick says we should make every attempt to send emails </p><p> about elections</p><p> Max says no reason shouldn’t if could</p><p> Chief Justice McReynolds says he drafts email and sent to someone else</p><p> Motion to add Skylar’s amendment</p><p> President Pappe asks isn’t already in there</p><p> Max change will to shall</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 700</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 701</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 800</p><p> Motion to set time to adjourn at 10 pm</p><p> Approved</p><p> Senator Graudick thinks there should be high penalty for intentional</p><p> President Frizzell says still issue with Class 1 sanction</p><p> Motion to approve Chapter 800 as is</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 801</p><p> Max say use based on votes for specific candidates President Schwenker: Motion to approve Chapter 801 as amended by </p><p>Max</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 802</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 803</p><p> Senator Graudick thinks change to 48 hours to make more fair</p><p> Max agrees, 24 hours is quick turn around, have lives</p><p> Senator Schoen says all in college and stuff comes up</p><p> Motion to amend the minimum to 72 hours</p><p> President Wetterer asks is that going to mess up timeline with court</p><p> President Frizzell says that’s 6 days after campaign</p><p> Max believes makes for more fair case</p><p> Seantor Schoen says in the end only comes down to extra 4 days from </p><p> what it is now</p><p> President Frizzell asks turned in early, can Court act earlier</p><p> Approved</p><p> Chapter 900</p><p> Approved</p><p> Go back to Chapter 801</p><p> Senator Graudick believe unfair, add bad faith definition Max states those words mean different things to different people, ask </p><p>Skylar to talk about 801.11 and 801.12</p><p> Senator Graudick says target people who committed offense, 801.12 </p><p> important for new candidates</p><p> Chief Justice McReynolds says it is all online</p><p> President Frizzell says if already doing it then add to rules</p><p> Motion to include 801.11 and 801.12 of Skylar’s changes to Chapter 800</p><p> Approved</p><p> President Frizzell: Motion to have court define “bad faith”and present at </p><p> next Senate Meeting</p><p> President Wetterer asks if realistic to have 2 opinions</p><p> Approved</p><p>IV. New Business</p><p> Campus Freedom Resolution</p><p> Preston Bates says working with non-partisan group, rate first </p><p> amendment rights of colleges, red/yellow/green rankings, no school in ky</p><p> has green light, red light reflects unconstitutional, FIRE, how to fix </p><p> unconstitutional policies, administration please do something about it</p><p> EVP Sangoi says first reading here, second reading will be at senate</p><p> Preston explains having meeting this week about it and want some </p><p> support</p><p> Max went and put what each light means</p><p> EVP Sangoi asks what makes UofL red light Preston says one red light policy makes you a red light, computer usage </p><p> policy, vague phrases that can group people in broad categories, </p><p> prosecuted for large amount of things because of broad language, no </p><p> academic freedom, one specific red light policy that we can try to fix, </p><p> consider policy recommendation</p><p> EVP Sangoi asks if have idea of what it could be</p><p> Preston says would get it this week and be able to present it to senate</p><p> Max is amenable to changing wording, use “consider” instead in therefore</p><p> be it resolved</p><p> Preston says that would be fine</p><p> Max: motion to change to “consider the proposed changes”</p><p> Friendly</p><p> President Frizzell would like to show senate what we would like to </p><p> change, some stuff would probably want to be the same</p><p> Preston says difference between unconstitutional restrictions and </p><p> unrestricted campus, red light policy is unconstitutional, civilly liable, </p><p> yellow lights are not necessarily unconstitutional</p><p> President Frizzell would want to see changes before go to President </p><p>Ramsey</p><p> Preston says hope conversation not reduce down to that, can’t take </p><p> unconstitutional policies in public university, just be constitutional</p><p> EVP Sangoi syas E-board reccomend show exact policy change to Senate</p><p> Preston would also send to Faculty Senate President Frizzell suggests talk to AVP Heil about introducing it to Faculty</p><p>Senate, go with him</p><p> Motion to pass as amended</p><p> Approved</p><p>V. Announcements</p><p>A&S Lunch with Dean tomorrow</p><p>VI. Adjourn Meeting</p><p>Motion to adjourn</p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages14 Page
-
File Size-