List of Cases Filed on Grant of MACP on Promotional Hierarchy

List of Cases Filed on Grant of MACP on Promotional Hierarchy

<p>List of cases filed on grant of MACP on Promotional Hierarchy</p><p>GRANT OF MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY:</p><p>LIST OF CASES FILED</p><p>The list of cases filed on the subject is given below for your reference.</p><p>O.A.No., S Date of Name of CWP.No. SLP Parties Remarks L Order court Civil (CC) No</p><p>RAJPAL Vs UoI & Others</p><p>OA Raj Pal s/o OA is allowed for No.1038/CH/2 Tilak Ram, 31.5.201 CAT, grant of MACP in 1 010 (Advocate CAT, 1 Chandigarh. the hierarchy of : Mr. Chandigarh Promotional post. V.K.Verma) 2 CWP Union of India 19.10.20 High Court Order dated 31-</p><p>No.19387 of represented by 11 of Punjab 5-2011 of </p><p>(O&M) DoP&T and and Hon’ble CAT, </p><p>(Advocate : others Vs. Raj Haryana at Chandigarh is </p><p>D.K.Bhisnoi) Pal and Chandigarh upheld. CWP filed by </p><p> another. Respondents </p><p> dismissed. SLP No.cc- Union of India 7467 of 2013 represented by against order Supreme SLP filed by the DoP&T and 15.4.201 3 dated 19-10- Court of Union of India is others Vs. Raj 3 2011 of the India dismissed Pal and Hon’ble High another. Court</p><p>SANJAY KUMAR & Ors Vs UoI & Ors</p><p>OA is allowed for Sanjay Kumar, OA grant of MACP in UDC and 18 CAT, No.904/2012 next promotional others Vs. UOI 26.11.20 Principal 4 (Mr. post i.e. nted byMinistry 12 Bench, New M.K.Bhardwaj Assistant in PB- of Defense and Delhi. ) 2+Grade others. PayRs.4200. 5 W.P.(C) UNION OF Delhi High Hearing Date </p><p>4552/2013 INDIA Vs. Court Court No. 5 Next [PENDING] SANJAY </p><p>(Mr. M.K. KUMAR & Date: 04/09/2014</p><p>Bhardwaj) ORS. M V Mahanan Nair Vs UoI & Ors</p><p>M.V.Mohanan </p><p>Nair, S/o </p><p>M.R.Vishwanat CAT, OA is allowed for han Nair, PrincipalBen consideration of Photocopier 29.1.201 6 OA No.816/12 ch MACP in the CAT, 3 Ernakulam hierarchy of Ernakulam Bench promotional post. Bench & others</p><p>Vs Union of </p><p>India UOI & In the result, this OP(CAT). ORS. .Vs. High court 24.06.20 original petition is 7 NO.2000 OF M.V. of Kerala at 13 dismissed in 2013 (Z) MOHANAN Ernakulam limine NAIR 8 Special Leave UOI & ORS. Supreme PENDING</p><p>Petition (Civil) .Vs. M.V. Court of 21803 OF MOHANAN India 2014 NAIR Mahendra </p><p>Kumar Dubey, </p><p>S/o Sh. R.D. </p><p>Dubey, </p><p>Working as OA is allowed for</p><p>OA No.1798 Programme consideration of </p><p> of 2014 Executive, In MACP in the 22.05.20 9 Advocate : Doordarsan Cat Delhi hierarchy of 14 Shri Yogesh Kendra, Delhi promotional post </p><p>Sharma VS UOI within a period of</p><p> through the one month</p><p>Secretary, </p><p>Ministry of </p><p> lnformation & </p><p>Broadcastin KISHAN SWARUP SHARMA Vs SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF</p><p>AGRICULTURE</p><p>1 OA Kishan Swarup 31.07.20 CAT, New OA is allowed Sharma, </p><p>No.2548/2014 working as For consider the MA PPO(E), case of the No.2167/2014 Meerut & 28 0 14 Delhi applicants in the (Advocate : others V/S light of the Shri Secretary, aforesaid orders M.K.Bhardwaj Ministry of </p><p>Agriculture, PRADEEP KUMAR Vs SECRETARY MIN. OF INFORMATION &</p><p>BROADCASTING</p><p>1 OA No.988 of Pradeep 22.03.20 CAT. New in view of the </p><p>1 2014 MA Kumar. AE (C) 14 Delhi above position. </p><p>No.872 of Rohini, Delhi & we dispose of </p><p>2014 20 others VS this OA at the </p><p>(Advocate : Secretary, admission stage </p><p>Shri M.K. Ministry of itself with the </p><p>Bhardwaj Information & direction to the </p><p>Broadcasting, respondents to </p><p>Shastri consider the </p><p>Bhawan. New representations Delhi of the applicants </p><p> in the light of the </p><p> judgment of </p><p>Punjab and </p><p>Haryana High </p><p>Court in CWP </p><p>No.19387/2011 </p><p>(supra) as upheld</p><p> by the Apex </p><p>Court in SLP </p><p>(CC) </p><p>No.7467/2013(su</p><p> pra) and decide </p><p> their cases under</p><p> intimation to </p><p> them. The </p><p> aforesaid </p><p> exercise shall be </p><p> completed within </p><p> a period of one </p><p> month from the date of receipt of </p><p> a copy of this </p><p> order. There </p><p> shall be no order </p><p> as to costs. 1 O.A. No. Mohd Hamid 23.05.20 Central In view of the </p><p>2 1834/2014 Hussain, 14 Administrati aforesaid </p><p>Advocate: Shri Working as ve Tribunal submission made</p><p>Yogesh APRO PrincipalBen by the applicants </p><p>Sharma. (Defence), ch New and the </p><p>Sr.Grade Delhi documents </p><p>Group B available on </p><p>Officer In the record. we </p><p> office of: DPR, dispose of this </p><p>Ministry of OA at the </p><p>Defence New admission stage </p><p>Delhi- & 34 itself with a </p><p> others VS UOI direction to the </p><p> through the respondents to </p><p>Secretary, consider the </p><p>Ministry of case of the applicants in </p><p> terms of the </p><p> aforesaid orders </p><p> within a period of</p><p> two months from </p><p>Information the date of </p><p> and receipt of a copy </p><p>Broadcasting, of this order. if </p><p> the applicants </p><p> are similarly </p><p> placed, they shall</p><p> also be treated </p><p> alike OM PRAKASH Vs SECRETARY, NCERT</p><p>1 OA 864/2014 Shri Om 12.3.201 Central In view of the </p><p>3 Advocate: Shri Prakash 4 Administrati above position. </p><p>M.K. NCERT, New ve Tribunal we dispose of </p><p>Bhardwaj) Delhi VS PrincipalBen this OA at the </p><p>Secretary ch, New admission stage </p><p>(NCERT) New Delhi itself with the Delhi direction to the </p><p> respondents to </p><p> consider the </p><p> representations </p><p> of the applicants </p><p> in the light of the </p><p> judgment of </p><p>Punjab and </p><p>Haryana High </p><p>Court in CWP </p><p>No.19387/2011 </p><p>(supra) as upheld</p><p> by the Apex </p><p>Court in SLP </p><p>(CC) </p><p>No.7467/2013(su</p><p> pra) and decide </p><p> their cases under</p><p> intimation to </p><p> them. The </p><p> aforesaid exercise shall be </p><p> completed within </p><p> a period of one </p><p> month from the </p><p> date of receipt of </p><p> a cop of this </p><p> order. NCERT,New High court CWP filed by 1 W.P.(C) Delhi VS Shri 14.07.20 of Delhi at Respondents 4 3608/2014 Om Prakash & 14 New Delhi dismissed. others BABU RAM VS UoI</p><p>1 O.A. Sh. Babu Ram, 09.05.20 CAT allow this OA in </p><p>5 1281/CH/2012 working as 13 CHNDIGAR terms of the view</p><p>ADVOCATE: Upper Division H BENCH obtained in terms</p><p>SHRI ROHIT Clerk, working of the view </p><p>SETH in the Central obtained in the </p><p>Administrative OA. </p><p>Tribunal, 1038/CH/11and </p><p> opposite the judgments (Annexures A-11 </p><p> to A-13). The </p><p> compliance of </p><p> the order must </p><p> ideally come Shivalik View about within two Hotel, Sector months from the 17, Chandigarh date a copy of VS UOI this order is </p><p> presented in the </p><p> office of the </p><p> competent </p><p> authority. see order of even</p><p> date passed in HIGH U.O.I. .Vs. CWP No.24278 1 CWP No. 07.11.20 COURT OF BABU RAM & of 2013 (UOI and 6 24279 of 2013 13 PUNJAB & ORS. another versus HARYANA Smt.Reeta Devi </p><p> and another 1 Special Leave U.O.I. .Vs. Supreme Pending to Petition BABU RAM & Court of 7 (Civil)10435 ORS India OF 2014 DHIRENDER SINGH & Ors Vs UoI</p><p>For orders, see </p><p> order of even </p><p>Civil Writ date passed in High Court Petition U,O.I. .Vs. CWP No.24278 1 07.11.20 Of Punjab & No.24253 of DHIRENDER of 2013 (Union of 8 13 Haryana At 2013 Date of SINGH & ORS. India and another Chandigarh Decision: versus Smt. </p><p>Reeta Devi and </p><p> another). Special Leave</p><p> to U.O.I. .Vs. Supreme 1 Petition(Civil) DHIRENDER Court of Pending 9 …. 10436 OF SINGH & ORS. India</p><p>2014 2 O.A. Smt. Reeta 22.05.20 Cat After going </p><p>0 12/CH/2013 Devi, Senior 13 Chandigarh through the </p><p>By Advocate: Library Bench judgment passed Mr.Madan Attendant, CAT in the case of Raj</p><p>Mohan Bench. Pal (supra), we </p><p>Chandigarh. are in full </p><p>Versus Union agreement with </p><p> of India the learned </p><p> counsel for the </p><p> parties. </p><p>Accordingly, the </p><p> present original </p><p> application is </p><p> allowed in same </p><p> term as of Raj </p><p>Pal (supra). </p><p>Consequently, </p><p> we quash the </p><p> orders at </p><p>Annexures A-1 &</p><p>A-2. The </p><p> respondents are </p><p> further directed </p><p> to grant the benefit of 2nd </p><p>MACP in the pay </p><p> band of Rs.9300-</p><p>34800 with grade</p><p> pay of Rs.4600/- </p><p> from 1.3.2009 </p><p>(which is the pay </p><p> scale of next post</p><p> in the hierarchy). </p><p>The respondents </p><p> are directed to </p><p> comply with the </p><p> judgment within a</p><p> period of three </p><p> months from the </p><p> date of receipt of </p><p> a copy of this </p><p> order. 2 CWP No. Union of India 07.11.20 High Court CWP filed by </p><p>1 24278 of 2013 VS Smt. Reeta 14 Of Punjab Respondents </p><p>Devi, & and &Haryana dismissed others Special Leave U.O.I. & ORS. Supreme 2 Petition(Civil) Vs. REETA Court of pending 2 22181 OF DEVI India 2014 NARAYAN KALITA Vs UoI</p><p>OA is allowed. </p><p> for grant of Narayan Kalita Date of MACP in the CPWD order hierarchy of Guwahati VS 25.06.20 Promotional O.A. No. UOI CAT 2 14 Date post. 040/00052/20 Represented Guwahati 3 of Respondent is 14 by Secretary Bench Delivery directed to grant GOI, Ministry of Order scale of pay (PB- of Urban and 7.8.2014 3) of Rs. 15600- Develoment 39100 + Grade </p><p> pay 6600/- 2 OA( 1727/201 CAT, next date of its </p><p>4 4) was filed Principal hearing has been</p><p> by CPWD Bench, New fixed by CAT on Engineers‘ </p><p>Association in </p><p> regarding </p><p>MACP as per Delhi on 24/09/2014</p><p> promotional </p><p> hierarchy on </p><p>19.5.2014 case filed by </p><p> the Junior next date of its </p><p>2 Clerks of hearing has been CAT Kolkata 5 Railway -OA fixed by CAT on </p><p>No. 1509 of 8th Dec. 2014</p><p>2013</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us