<p>List of cases filed on grant of MACP on Promotional Hierarchy</p><p>GRANT OF MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY:</p><p>LIST OF CASES FILED</p><p>The list of cases filed on the subject is given below for your reference.</p><p>O.A.No., S Date of Name of CWP.No. SLP Parties Remarks L Order court Civil (CC) No</p><p>RAJPAL Vs UoI & Others</p><p>OA Raj Pal s/o OA is allowed for No.1038/CH/2 Tilak Ram, 31.5.201 CAT, grant of MACP in 1 010 (Advocate CAT, 1 Chandigarh. the hierarchy of : Mr. Chandigarh Promotional post. V.K.Verma) 2 CWP Union of India 19.10.20 High Court Order dated 31-</p><p>No.19387 of represented by 11 of Punjab 5-2011 of </p><p>(O&M) DoP&T and and Hon’ble CAT, </p><p>(Advocate : others Vs. Raj Haryana at Chandigarh is </p><p>D.K.Bhisnoi) Pal and Chandigarh upheld. CWP filed by </p><p> another. Respondents </p><p> dismissed. SLP No.cc- Union of India 7467 of 2013 represented by against order Supreme SLP filed by the DoP&T and 15.4.201 3 dated 19-10- Court of Union of India is others Vs. Raj 3 2011 of the India dismissed Pal and Hon’ble High another. Court</p><p>SANJAY KUMAR & Ors Vs UoI & Ors</p><p>OA is allowed for Sanjay Kumar, OA grant of MACP in UDC and 18 CAT, No.904/2012 next promotional others Vs. UOI 26.11.20 Principal 4 (Mr. post i.e. nted byMinistry 12 Bench, New M.K.Bhardwaj Assistant in PB- of Defense and Delhi. ) 2+Grade others. PayRs.4200. 5 W.P.(C) UNION OF Delhi High Hearing Date </p><p>4552/2013 INDIA Vs. Court Court No. 5 Next [PENDING] SANJAY </p><p>(Mr. M.K. KUMAR & Date: 04/09/2014</p><p>Bhardwaj) ORS. M V Mahanan Nair Vs UoI & Ors</p><p>M.V.Mohanan </p><p>Nair, S/o </p><p>M.R.Vishwanat CAT, OA is allowed for han Nair, PrincipalBen consideration of Photocopier 29.1.201 6 OA No.816/12 ch MACP in the CAT, 3 Ernakulam hierarchy of Ernakulam Bench promotional post. Bench & others</p><p>Vs Union of </p><p>India UOI & In the result, this OP(CAT). ORS. .Vs. High court 24.06.20 original petition is 7 NO.2000 OF M.V. of Kerala at 13 dismissed in 2013 (Z) MOHANAN Ernakulam limine NAIR 8 Special Leave UOI & ORS. Supreme PENDING</p><p>Petition (Civil) .Vs. M.V. Court of 21803 OF MOHANAN India 2014 NAIR Mahendra </p><p>Kumar Dubey, </p><p>S/o Sh. R.D. </p><p>Dubey, </p><p>Working as OA is allowed for</p><p>OA No.1798 Programme consideration of </p><p> of 2014 Executive, In MACP in the 22.05.20 9 Advocate : Doordarsan Cat Delhi hierarchy of 14 Shri Yogesh Kendra, Delhi promotional post </p><p>Sharma VS UOI within a period of</p><p> through the one month</p><p>Secretary, </p><p>Ministry of </p><p> lnformation & </p><p>Broadcastin KISHAN SWARUP SHARMA Vs SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF</p><p>AGRICULTURE</p><p>1 OA Kishan Swarup 31.07.20 CAT, New OA is allowed Sharma, </p><p>No.2548/2014 working as For consider the MA PPO(E), case of the No.2167/2014 Meerut & 28 0 14 Delhi applicants in the (Advocate : others V/S light of the Shri Secretary, aforesaid orders M.K.Bhardwaj Ministry of </p><p>Agriculture, PRADEEP KUMAR Vs SECRETARY MIN. OF INFORMATION &</p><p>BROADCASTING</p><p>1 OA No.988 of Pradeep 22.03.20 CAT. New in view of the </p><p>1 2014 MA Kumar. AE (C) 14 Delhi above position. </p><p>No.872 of Rohini, Delhi & we dispose of </p><p>2014 20 others VS this OA at the </p><p>(Advocate : Secretary, admission stage </p><p>Shri M.K. Ministry of itself with the </p><p>Bhardwaj Information & direction to the </p><p>Broadcasting, respondents to </p><p>Shastri consider the </p><p>Bhawan. New representations Delhi of the applicants </p><p> in the light of the </p><p> judgment of </p><p>Punjab and </p><p>Haryana High </p><p>Court in CWP </p><p>No.19387/2011 </p><p>(supra) as upheld</p><p> by the Apex </p><p>Court in SLP </p><p>(CC) </p><p>No.7467/2013(su</p><p> pra) and decide </p><p> their cases under</p><p> intimation to </p><p> them. The </p><p> aforesaid </p><p> exercise shall be </p><p> completed within </p><p> a period of one </p><p> month from the date of receipt of </p><p> a copy of this </p><p> order. There </p><p> shall be no order </p><p> as to costs. 1 O.A. No. Mohd Hamid 23.05.20 Central In view of the </p><p>2 1834/2014 Hussain, 14 Administrati aforesaid </p><p>Advocate: Shri Working as ve Tribunal submission made</p><p>Yogesh APRO PrincipalBen by the applicants </p><p>Sharma. (Defence), ch New and the </p><p>Sr.Grade Delhi documents </p><p>Group B available on </p><p>Officer In the record. we </p><p> office of: DPR, dispose of this </p><p>Ministry of OA at the </p><p>Defence New admission stage </p><p>Delhi- & 34 itself with a </p><p> others VS UOI direction to the </p><p> through the respondents to </p><p>Secretary, consider the </p><p>Ministry of case of the applicants in </p><p> terms of the </p><p> aforesaid orders </p><p> within a period of</p><p> two months from </p><p>Information the date of </p><p> and receipt of a copy </p><p>Broadcasting, of this order. if </p><p> the applicants </p><p> are similarly </p><p> placed, they shall</p><p> also be treated </p><p> alike OM PRAKASH Vs SECRETARY, NCERT</p><p>1 OA 864/2014 Shri Om 12.3.201 Central In view of the </p><p>3 Advocate: Shri Prakash 4 Administrati above position. </p><p>M.K. NCERT, New ve Tribunal we dispose of </p><p>Bhardwaj) Delhi VS PrincipalBen this OA at the </p><p>Secretary ch, New admission stage </p><p>(NCERT) New Delhi itself with the Delhi direction to the </p><p> respondents to </p><p> consider the </p><p> representations </p><p> of the applicants </p><p> in the light of the </p><p> judgment of </p><p>Punjab and </p><p>Haryana High </p><p>Court in CWP </p><p>No.19387/2011 </p><p>(supra) as upheld</p><p> by the Apex </p><p>Court in SLP </p><p>(CC) </p><p>No.7467/2013(su</p><p> pra) and decide </p><p> their cases under</p><p> intimation to </p><p> them. The </p><p> aforesaid exercise shall be </p><p> completed within </p><p> a period of one </p><p> month from the </p><p> date of receipt of </p><p> a cop of this </p><p> order. NCERT,New High court CWP filed by 1 W.P.(C) Delhi VS Shri 14.07.20 of Delhi at Respondents 4 3608/2014 Om Prakash & 14 New Delhi dismissed. others BABU RAM VS UoI</p><p>1 O.A. Sh. Babu Ram, 09.05.20 CAT allow this OA in </p><p>5 1281/CH/2012 working as 13 CHNDIGAR terms of the view</p><p>ADVOCATE: Upper Division H BENCH obtained in terms</p><p>SHRI ROHIT Clerk, working of the view </p><p>SETH in the Central obtained in the </p><p>Administrative OA. </p><p>Tribunal, 1038/CH/11and </p><p> opposite the judgments (Annexures A-11 </p><p> to A-13). The </p><p> compliance of </p><p> the order must </p><p> ideally come Shivalik View about within two Hotel, Sector months from the 17, Chandigarh date a copy of VS UOI this order is </p><p> presented in the </p><p> office of the </p><p> competent </p><p> authority. see order of even</p><p> date passed in HIGH U.O.I. .Vs. CWP No.24278 1 CWP No. 07.11.20 COURT OF BABU RAM & of 2013 (UOI and 6 24279 of 2013 13 PUNJAB & ORS. another versus HARYANA Smt.Reeta Devi </p><p> and another 1 Special Leave U.O.I. .Vs. Supreme Pending to Petition BABU RAM & Court of 7 (Civil)10435 ORS India OF 2014 DHIRENDER SINGH & Ors Vs UoI</p><p>For orders, see </p><p> order of even </p><p>Civil Writ date passed in High Court Petition U,O.I. .Vs. CWP No.24278 1 07.11.20 Of Punjab & No.24253 of DHIRENDER of 2013 (Union of 8 13 Haryana At 2013 Date of SINGH & ORS. India and another Chandigarh Decision: versus Smt. </p><p>Reeta Devi and </p><p> another). Special Leave</p><p> to U.O.I. .Vs. Supreme 1 Petition(Civil) DHIRENDER Court of Pending 9 …. 10436 OF SINGH & ORS. India</p><p>2014 2 O.A. Smt. Reeta 22.05.20 Cat After going </p><p>0 12/CH/2013 Devi, Senior 13 Chandigarh through the </p><p>By Advocate: Library Bench judgment passed Mr.Madan Attendant, CAT in the case of Raj</p><p>Mohan Bench. Pal (supra), we </p><p>Chandigarh. are in full </p><p>Versus Union agreement with </p><p> of India the learned </p><p> counsel for the </p><p> parties. </p><p>Accordingly, the </p><p> present original </p><p> application is </p><p> allowed in same </p><p> term as of Raj </p><p>Pal (supra). </p><p>Consequently, </p><p> we quash the </p><p> orders at </p><p>Annexures A-1 &</p><p>A-2. The </p><p> respondents are </p><p> further directed </p><p> to grant the benefit of 2nd </p><p>MACP in the pay </p><p> band of Rs.9300-</p><p>34800 with grade</p><p> pay of Rs.4600/- </p><p> from 1.3.2009 </p><p>(which is the pay </p><p> scale of next post</p><p> in the hierarchy). </p><p>The respondents </p><p> are directed to </p><p> comply with the </p><p> judgment within a</p><p> period of three </p><p> months from the </p><p> date of receipt of </p><p> a copy of this </p><p> order. 2 CWP No. Union of India 07.11.20 High Court CWP filed by </p><p>1 24278 of 2013 VS Smt. Reeta 14 Of Punjab Respondents </p><p>Devi, & and &Haryana dismissed others Special Leave U.O.I. & ORS. Supreme 2 Petition(Civil) Vs. REETA Court of pending 2 22181 OF DEVI India 2014 NARAYAN KALITA Vs UoI</p><p>OA is allowed. </p><p> for grant of Narayan Kalita Date of MACP in the CPWD order hierarchy of Guwahati VS 25.06.20 Promotional O.A. No. UOI CAT 2 14 Date post. 040/00052/20 Represented Guwahati 3 of Respondent is 14 by Secretary Bench Delivery directed to grant GOI, Ministry of Order scale of pay (PB- of Urban and 7.8.2014 3) of Rs. 15600- Develoment 39100 + Grade </p><p> pay 6600/- 2 OA( 1727/201 CAT, next date of its </p><p>4 4) was filed Principal hearing has been</p><p> by CPWD Bench, New fixed by CAT on Engineers‘ </p><p>Association in </p><p> regarding </p><p>MACP as per Delhi on 24/09/2014</p><p> promotional </p><p> hierarchy on </p><p>19.5.2014 case filed by </p><p> the Junior next date of its </p><p>2 Clerks of hearing has been CAT Kolkata 5 Railway -OA fixed by CAT on </p><p>No. 1509 of 8th Dec. 2014</p><p>2013</p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages16 Page
-
File Size-