Supplementay Table 2 Parameters Associated Postoperative Ileus and Anastomotic Complicationsa

Supplementay Table 2 Parameters Associated Postoperative Ileus and Anastomotic Complicationsa

<p>Supplementay Table 2 Parameters associated postoperative ileus and anastomotic complicationsa</p><p>Parametersb 3-year LR, % P-valuec OR 95% CI P-valued</p><p>Associated with postoperative ileus Sex, female versus male 38/779 vs. 121/1335 <0.001 1.775 1.092-2.887 0.021</p><p>(4.9 vs. 9.1) Procedure, versus APR vs. SSO 104/1095 vs. 55/1019 <0.001 0.856 0.525-1.397 0.534</p><p>(6.7 vs. 2.4) Procedure: ULAR, ISR− versus + 70/603 vs. 30/406 0.031 0.64 0.392-1.046 0.075</p><p>(11.6 vs. 7.4) Preoperative CRT, no versus yes 78/1328 vs. 81/786 <0.001 0.865 0.449-1.665 0.663</p><p>(5.9 vs. 10.3) Ileal diversion, no versus yes 66/1451 vs. 93/663 <0.001 2.603 1.478-4.584 0.001</p><p>(4.5 vs. 14) Tumor growth, E versus I 78/1353 vs. 79/737 <0.001 1.107 0.622-1.969 0.729</p><p>(5.8 vs. 10.7) CRM, no versus yes 150/2542 vs. 7/39 0.024 2.698 0.701-10.379 0.149</p><p>(7.3 vs. 17.9) </p><p>Associated with anastomotic complications</p><p>Sex, female versus male 30/779 vs. 78/1335 0.051 1.85 1.049-3.263 0.034</p><p>(5.8 vs. 3.9) Tumor location, U+M versus L 60/1340 vs. 48/773 0.1 0.98 0.583-1.706 0.943</p><p>(4.5 vs. 6.2) Procedure: ULAR, ISR− versus + 35/603 vs. 35/406 0.1 1.503 0.88-2.567 0.136</p><p>(5.8 vs. 8.6) PNI, no versus yes 82/1752 vs. 24/319 0.039 1.22 0.603-2.47 0.58</p><p>(4.7 vs. 7.5) </p><p>Transfusion >400 ml, no versus yes 100/2028 vs. 8/86 0.079 1.621 0.546-4.815 0.384</p><p>(4.9 vs. 9.3) </p><p>OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; APR, abdominoperineal resection; SSO, sphincter-saving operation;</p><p>ULAR, ultra-low anterior resection; ISR, intersphincteric resection; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; E/I,</p><p>1 expanding/infiltrative; CRM, circumferential resection margin; U/M/L, upper/middle/lower; PNI, perineural invasion. aAnastomotic complications include leak, abscess, fistula, and stricture. bValues in parentheses are percentages. cAll parameters were compared using Fisher’s exact test with two-sided verification. dPotential variables were verified by multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression.</p><p>2</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us