<p>Minutes from SCI Joint Meeting </p><p>Meeting Date/Time  November 9, 2014, 2:00 – 4:00 PM</p><p>Meeting Location  Sheraton Denver Downtown, Denver, CO</p><p>Attendees  Roy Schubert – Shell </p><p> John Nyholt – BP </p><p> Mark Carte – Stress Engineering</p><p> Mark Geisenhoff – Flint Hills</p><p> Josh Yoakam - Holly Frontier </p><p> Brent Ray – Marathon </p><p> Travis Harrington – Chevron</p><p> John Reynolds – Intertek </p><p> Clay White – P66</p><p> Ray Konet – Valero </p><p> David Wang – Shell</p><p> Steve Crimaudo – API</p><p> Tina Briskin – API </p><p> Rick Nichols </p><p>Agenda  Approved</p><p>Minutes from the 2014 API Spring Meeting  Will be issued soon.</p><p>Old Business  581 Issues & Progress o See Activity Tracker below. </p><p>New Business  Task Group Chair Roles and Responsibilities</p><p> o TG chairs are invited and strongly encourage to attend the SCI Executive Meeting. </p><p> 587 Intent and Content</p><p> o See Activity Tracker below. </p><p> QUTE/QUSE Program Direction </p><p> o The funding is not there to continue supporting the program. The program is barely breaking even now. </p><p> o CRE approved $90k and $60k for further development in 2014 and 2015, respectively. However, the funding should come from ICP, and ICP has not approved the funding. No work has been done yet. </p><p> o We are just getting into breaking even and should be able to show profit. </p><p> o Three possible options were discussed.</p><p>1. Do nothing – Not invest the $150k (default option) </p><p>2. Get commitment from owner/users to drive testing up to help the program be profitable</p><p>3. Use alternate source of funding (e.g., JIP) or “privatize” the program</p><p> o Will discuss the issue again at the SCI Joint Meeting to get consensus on path forward. Currently we are at option 1. </p><p> API Summit</p><p> o Not discussed (multiple IS coordination meetings planned this week)</p><p> Ballot Status</p><p> o Covered under Activity Tracker</p><p>Activity Tracker  510 – 10th edition due in 2019</p><p> 570 – 2nd ballot passed but has 7 negatives  571 – Needs to be SCCM/SCI co-chaired and co-balloted. 3rd edition due in 2016. Clay White will be the liaison to SCCM. Suggest Mike Urzendowski as the co-chair. </p><p> 572 – 3rd edition due in 2014. Will ask for two year extension. The entire document will be open for balloting. </p><p> 574 – Ballot passed with 5 negatives. </p><p> 575 – Published April 2014. Next edition due in 2019.</p><p> 576 – CRE approved for extension to 2016. 2nd edition ballot passed with 6 negatives. ng in July.</p><p> 577 – Published in December 2013. 3rd edition due in 2018.</p><p> 578 – 3rd edition due in 2015. Will have the first draft for balloting in 2015. </p><p> 580 – Ballot passed but has 6 negatives. </p><p> 581 – 2nd edition due in 2013. Need to be extended to 2015. 3rd ballot passed. Will have the 4th ballot for the complete document in 1Q/2015. There are potential contractors identified but no commitment from any of them to develop software in accordance with the 2nd edition of 581 within 6 months of the RP publication. </p><p> 583 – Published on May 15, 2014</p><p> 584 – Published on May 16, 2014</p><p> 585 – Published in April 2014 </p><p> 586 – There is budget approved for a master editor but no RFP has been developed. </p><p> 587 – 1st edition balloted. Did not pass on response. The intent is to document what is considered “equivalent to API QUTE/QUSE”. Agree that we need at least a document. Two issues to be resolved: 1) Cannot use API IP (e.g., QUTE/QUSE program info) without API’s approval. 2) Whether the document should be published as an RP, a publication, or an API internal document. </p><p> 939C (Sulfidation) – 1st edition to be co-balloted by SCCM and SCI. Need to encourage SCI members to participate in the 939C TG. </p><p> 941 (HTHA) – Ballot is still open for SCI to comment. Will use the 653 model to determine whether to vote in the future. </p><p> 970 (Corrosion Control Document) – Is seeking a master editor. </p><p>ICP Report  Not discussed. SCI Budget  QUTE/QUSE budget issue needs to be brought up to CRE. </p><p> $50k allocated to 581 for E2G methodology review will not be spent by YE. Will re-submit the SR3 request in 2015 for 3rd party validation of E2G’s Level 2 probability of failure calculator in 2016. Need to have the contract signed this year (which is highly unlikely) to avoid losing the money approved for this year. </p><p>Next Meeting  Seattle, WA, April 12, 2015</p>