Gender and Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness: a Meta-Analysis of Contextual Moderators

Gender and Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness: a Meta-Analysis of Contextual Moderators

<p> Supplemental Materials Gender and Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual Moderators by S. C. Paustian-Underdahl et. al. 2014, Journal of Applied Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036751 Eagly Ma and correlation 1995, Fe 18 5 effectivene Means/S Fs, ts, or s or chi- data leaders ? each? ss? D Zs squares not ? Authors Year Abbreviated Titles found? The relationship of selected factors to administrative effectiveness in the Holsclaw 1967 principalship Y unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Maier 1970 not locate Y THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF A UNION STEWARD CHANGE: ROLE AND N SEX EFFECTS’ VS. A TIME-STUDY Maier and Sashkin 1971 MAN IN INTRODUCING Support for Women's Lib: Y Y Y N Martin 1972 Management Performance Male versus female leaders: Effects on perceived leader behavior Y Y Y Y No DF and satisfaction in a Bartol, Wortman 1975 hospital Perceived Performance differences between women and men supervisors and Francke 1975 implications for training SELF*PERCEPTIONS OF LEADERSHIP N BEHAVIORS AND Quinn 1976 DECISIONMAKING LEADER SEX-ROLE STEREOTYPING IN A FEMALE- Y Y Y Y N N N DOMINATED WORK Petty, Miles 1976 CULTURE Mohr and Downey 1977 Are women peers? Y An examination of the moderating effects of Y Y Y Y N N N Petty, Odewahn, Bruning, supervisor and subordinate Thomason 1977 sex A Multivariate Study of Subordinate Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward Y Y Y Y N N N Minority and Majority Adams 1978 Managers unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Y Y Y Y Y, no Ns King 1978 not locate N Women and ROTC Mohr, Rowen, & Reidy 1978 Summer Camp (cadets) Sex Effects in Emergent Y Y Y N Schneier and Bartol 1978 Leadership Men and Women Executives and Processes Y Y Y N Related to Decision Muldrow, Bayton 1979 Accuracy unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Pate 1979 not locate Y Female and male Waetjen, Schuerger, and managers: self-concept, Y Y Y N Schwartz 1979 success, and failure Archambeau 1980 Sex role flexibility Y Sex and Least Preferred Co-Worker Score Effects Y Y Y N Arnett, Higgins, Priem 1980 in Leadership Behavior An analysis of the MEANS Y Y Y Y background profiles of and ONLY Frosch 1980 self-assessed effectiveness Smith & George 1980 unknown--was an Eagly et Y al (1995) study we could not locate Comparison of the Relationships Between Subordinates' Perceptions of Supervisory Behavior Y Y Y Y N N N and Measures of Subordinates' Job Satisfaction for Male and Petty, Bruning 1980 Female Leaders unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Friedman 1981 not locate Y unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Young 1981 not locate Y Androgyny and leadership: ? Y Y Y Y Hamilton 1981 an empirical field study A study of leadership styles and their Y Y Y Y Y, no Ns relationship to Beard 1982 management effectiveness Leadership Style and effectiveness in summer Y Y Y Y N N N Legrand 1982 camps Sex Differences in the Incidence and Evaluation of Y Y Y N Participative Leader Jago, Vroom 1982 Behavior unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Hughes, Copeland et al. 1983 not locate Y Gender, Self Confidence, and Social Influence Strategies: Y Y Y N An Organizational Instone, Major, Bunker 1983 Simulation unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Peregrin 1983 not locate Y The Relationship among Perceptual Similarity, Sex, and Performance Ratings Y Y Y Y N ? N in Manager- Pulakos, Wexley 1983 Subordinate Dyads Employee Reactions to Supervision and Work Evaluation as a Function N of Subordinate Terborg and Shingledecker 1983 and Manager Sex Adams, Rice Instrone 1984 Y Y Y Y N ? N Follower Attitudes toward Women and Judgments concerning Performance Y Y Y N by Female and Rice, Instone, Adams 1984 Male Leaders Females in charge: Effects of sex of subordinate and romantic N attachment status upon self-ratings of Snodgrass and Rosenthal 1984 dominance unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Wakefield 1984 not locate Y Sex and Situational Influences on the Use N of Power: A Follow-Up Koberg 1985 Study Female Perceptions of no direction Female and Male Y Y Y Y reported Liden 1985 Managerial Behavior An analysis of selected biographical and Y Y Y N Riggins 1985 personality characteristics Sex Differences in Nonverbal and Verbal CommunicationWith N Bosses, Peers, and Steckler and Rosenthal 1985 Subordinates Teacher satisfaction with leadership based on </p><p> principal sex role Simpson 1985 orientation unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Yoder, Adams, & Hicks 1984 not locate Y The role of gender, androgyny, and attraction in predicting the identity and effectiveness of Goktepe 1986 emergent leaders Y Effects of Dispositional Dominance and Sex Role Y Y Y N Expectations Nyquist, Spence 1986 on Leadership Behaviors unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Farokhi, F. R. 1987 not locate Y Emerging leadership Y Y Y Y N N N Gallegos 1987 among hispanic women Upward-Influence Styles: Relationship with Y Y Y N Perfornnance Evaluations, Kipnis, Schmidt 1988 Salary, and Stress Are androgynous managers really more Y Y Y Y N N N Baril, Elbert et al 1989 effective? Lindholm 1989 N N N unknown--was an Eagly et al (1995) study we could Sadeghi-Nejad 1989 not locate Y Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational N Demography in Superior- Tsui and O'Reilly 1989 Subordinate Dyads Bourantes and Sex differences in Y Y Y Y N N N Papalexandris 1990 leadership styles Nonverbal Affect Responses to Male and Female Leaders: Y Y Y Y F ONLY Implications for Butler and Geis 1990 Leadership Evaluations Age and leadership effectiveness: from the Y Y Y Y N N N Gilbert et al 1990 perceptions fo the follower Examining Contextual Differences in the Development of Y Y Y Y N N N Instructional Leadership Heck and Marcoulides 1990 and School Achievement The Interdependence of Self-Reported Estimates of Y Y Y Y N N N Individual and Unit Lakhani 1990 Performance peer nomination for leadership and likability in N Petzel, Johnson et al 1990 problem solving groups Transformational Leadership Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers' Trust In Leader, Y Y Y Y N N N Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Podsakoff et al 1990 Behaviors Leadership Behavior and Supervisory Performance: Y Y Y Y N N N York and Denton 1990 The View From Below Gender and Managerial Leadership Styles: A Y Y Y N Comparison of Arizona Kelly et al 1991 Public Administration The Effects of Prototype- Based Biases on Leadership Appraisals A Y Y Y Y F ONLY Test of Leadership Nye and Forsyth 1991 Catigorization Theory Leadership Ratings: Toward Focusing More on Y Y Y N Uleman 1991 Specific Behaviors Leadership and Social Intelligence: Linking Social Perspectiveness and N N N N Behavioral Flexibility to Zaccaro et al 1991 Leader Effectiveness Sex and Gender Differences in Group N N N N Communications: Impact Andrews 1992 on the Facilitation Process Gender Orientation and N Gurman and Long 1992 Emergent Leader Behavior The Effect of Leader's Sex on Group Performance and no direction on Leadership Behavior Y Y Y Y Y, no Ns N reported under Varying Group Verkerk 1993 Compositions Perceptions of Appropriate Leadership Style: Participation Versus Y Y Y Y F ONLY Consultation Across Two Campbell et al 1993 Cultures Leaders' Gender-Role as a Correlate of Subordinates' Perceptions of Y Y Y Y N N N Effectiveness and Hackman et al 1993 Satisfaction Perceptions of Effectiveness and the Y Y Y Y Y No SDs N N Satisfaction of Principals Johnson and Holdway 1993 in Elementary Schools Managers' Conflict Management Style and Leadership Effectiveness: Y Y Y Y N N N The Moderating Effects of Korabik et al 1993 Gender An Examination of the Relationships among Self- Perception Accuracy, Self- Y Y Y Y N N N Awareness, Gender, and Lee. Smith, Cioci 1993 Leader Effectiveness Van Velsor 1993 Y Y Y N Transformational Leadership and Y Y Y Y N N N Performance: A Yammarino et al 1993 Longitudinal Investigation Adler and Roush 1994 N Shatter the Glass Ceiling: Women May Make Better Y Y Y Y N N N Bass and Avolio 1994 Managers Leadership Profiles, Situation and Y Y Y Y N N N Ekvall and Arvonen 1994 Effectiveness Leader Traits and Behavior as Determinants of Leadership Y Y Y N Effectiveness in a Military Hall 1994 Academy Effects of Sex and Gender Role on Leader N Ken and Moss 1994 Emergence Leadership Practices of Effective Student Leaders: Y Y Y Y Gender Makes No Posner and Brodsky 1994 Difference The Evaluation of Effectiveness and Likability of Gender-Role Y Y Y Y F ONLY Congruent and Gender- Rojahn and Willemsen 1994 Role Incongruent Leaders The Glass Ceiling: Are Women Where They N Chaffins et al 1995 Should Be? When the Sales Manager is a Woman: An Exploration into the Relationship Between Y Y Y Y N N N Salespeople's Gender and Their Responses to Comer, Jolson, Dubinsky 1995 Leadership Styles An Investigation of Gender Differences in Y Y Y ? Leadership Across Four Gibson 1995 Countries Superior and Subordinate Gender and the Y Y Y Y N N N Acceptance of Superiors Javidan, Bremmels, Devine 1995 as Role Models Sex and Gender N Murphy, Eckstat, Parker 1995 Differences in Leadership Leadership Since 1975: N Phillips 1995 Advancement or Inertia? Moderating Effects of Leader Sex and the Relation Between MEANS N Y Y Y Leadership Style and ONLY Perceived Behavior Millard, 1996 Patterns Gender and Leadership in Work Groups: Six N Berdahl 1996 Alternative Models Women - The New Heroes n Brandster 1996 of the Business World? New Directions for Research and Practice in n Chen and Van Velsor 1996 Diversity Leadership School Context, Principal Leadership, and Student Y Y Y Y N N N Hallinger et al 1996 Reading Achievement Gender Issues in School Headship: Quality Versus y y y y n n n Kruger 1996 Power? Gender Differences in Evaluation of Performance and Leadership Ability: Y Y N Y Autocratic vs. Democratic Luthar 1996 Managers The Superintendency: An Analysis of Leadership y y y n Role and Gender Martinek 1996 Differences Gender Role, Decision n n n n Park 1996 Style and Leadership Style Leadership Emergence in Task Groups with N Egalitarian Gender-Role Sapp, Harrod, Zhao 1996 Expectations Gender, Interaction, and Y Y Y Y N N N Walker 1996 Leadership School Contexts, Principal Characteristics, and Instructional Leadership Y Y Y Y No df Effectiveness: A Statistical Zheng 1996 Analysis A Study of the Relatipnship of the Job Satisfaction of Chief Academic Officers of Institutions of High y y y n Education and the Perceived Leadership Style of Institution's Crist 1997 President Dorfman 1997 y y y y n n n The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo N House and Aditya 1997 Vadis? Kingman 1997 A Gender Study on Y Y Y N Leadership: The Female and Male Principals of Hong Kong Secondary Schools as Perceived by Teachers and the Principals Themselves Are We Still Stereotyping Leadership?: A Look at Gender and Other N Predictors of Leader Kolb 1997 Emergenc The Effects of Interactive Leadership on Human Resource Management in Y Y Y Y N N N Singapore's Banking Li, Koh, Hia 1997 Industry Perceptions of Women N (FE</p><p>Principals' Leadership and ONLY) Shum and Cheng 1997 Teachers' Work Attitudes The Cross-National Cross- Gender Study of Managerial Task y y y n Preferences and Evaluation of Work Toren et al 1997 Characteristics Leader Effectiveness: The Influence of Leader y y y y F only Weiner 1997 Behavior and Gender Social-Role Versus Structural Models of n Gender and Influence Use Aguinis and Adams 1998 in Organizations Gender Differences and Managerial Competencies: Federal Supervisor y y y y n Perceptions of the Job of Daley and Naff 1998 Management The Influence of Gender and Organization Level on Perceptions of Leadership y y y n Behaviors: A Self and Lewis and Fegenson-Eland 1998 Supervisor Comparison Eight Parameters of Managerial Effectiveness: y y y n A Study of Senior Analoui 1999 Managers in Ghana Influence Bahaviors and Managerial Effectiveness y y y y n n n Church and Waclawski 1999 in Lateral Relations Leadership Effectiveness n Gedney 1999 and Gender Gender Differences in Transformational Leadership Among The y y y y No N No df Field Leaders of new South Wales Police Panapoulos 1999 Students Filipina Managers and Entrepreneurs: What n Roffey 1999 Leadership Models Apply? Effects of Leader Style, Leader Sex, and Subordinate Personality on n y y y Leader Evaluations and Future Subordinate Cellar et at 2001 Motivation Relationshpis Among Gender, Type of Humor, y y y y n n n And Perceived Leader Decker 2001 Effectiveness Examining the Relatipnships Between Leadership and Emotional y y y n Intelligence in Senior Gardner et al 2001 Level Managers A Diagnostic-Ratio Appriach to Measuring Beliefs About The y y y n Leadership Abilities of Male and Female Martell et al 2001 Managers Faculty and Staff Members' Perceptions of Effective Leadership: Are y y y y y There Differences Between Women and Men Rosser (same as 2003 data) 2001 Leaders? Emotional Intelligence, Moral Reasoning and y y y n Transformational Sivanathan et al 2001 Leadership A Study of Principals' Leadership Effectiveness In Implementing no direction Multicultural Education In y y y y reported North Carolina Public Elementary and Middle Chavis 2002 Schools Increasing Initial Leadership Effectiveness: n Assisting Both Women Hogue et al 2002 and Men An Examination of Leadership Style and Player-Coach y y y n Relationships in College- Lii 2002 Level Soccer Programs Women-Better Leaders Than Men? In General and n Educational Management Pounder and Coleman 2002 it Still "All Depends " Gender Differences in Leadership: Current Social Issues and Future n Organizational Stelter 2002 Implications Images of Leadership and Their Effect Upon School y y y n Gaziel 2003 Principals' Performance Perception of Leadership Qualities in Higher Education: Impact Of Professor Gender, n Professor Leader Style, Situation and Participant Larocca 2003 Gender Executive Blind Spots: Discrepancies Between y y y y n n n Sala 2003 Self- and Other-Ratings Perceived Effectiveness of Career Technical Education Administrators y y y y n n n as Influenced by Leadership Style and Wanstreet 2003 Gender An Examination of the Realtionship Between Emotional Intelligence, y y y y n n n Leadership Style and Perceived Leadership Weinberger 2003 Effectiveness Leadership and Gender in Public Relations: Perceived Effectiveness of N Y Y N Transformational and Transactional Leadership Aldoory 2004 Styles Military Leadership Evaluations: Effects of n Sex, Leadership Style, and Looney 2004 Gender-Role Attitudes Emergence of Women in Healthcare Leadership: n Transforming the Impact Neubert et al 2004 of Gender Differences Principals' Sense of Efficacy: Assessing a y y y y n n n Tschannen-Moran et al 2004 Promising Construct A Study of Relatipnships Between Selected Demographic Variables y y y y n n n and the Principals' Self- Perception of Technology White 2004 Leadership Gender Differences in perceived Leadership n y y y y Effectiveness in Hong Chow 2005 Kong Gender Differences in Social and Emotional y y y n Skills and Charismatic Groves 2005 Leadership Servant Leadership and the Effectivesness of y y y y n n n Irving 2005 Teams 2004 Division 35 Presidential Address: n Gender and Leadership In Madden 2005 Higher Education Perceptions of Effective Leadership in Schools for Students with Visial y y y y n n n Impairments: A National Oyinlade et al 2005 Study Leader Group Prototypicality and Leadership Effectiveness: y y y y n n n The Moderating Role of Need for Cognitive Pierro 2005 Closure The Glass Vliff: Evidence that Women are Over- y y y n Represented in Precarious Ryan 2005 Leadership Positions Physician Leadership Styles and Effectivesness: y y y y n n n Xirasagar et al 2005 An Empirical Study A Cross Cultural Perspectives On Perceived n Yan 2005 Leadership Effectiveness Professors' Teaching Effectiveness in Relation to Self-Efficacy Beliefs n and Perceptions of Student Balam 2006 Rating Myths Demographic Category Membership and Leadership in Small y y y y n n n Groups: A Social Identity Hogg et al 2006 Analysis Effective Leadership and Successful Career n (just Advancement: fe) Perspectives From Women Hopkins et al 2006 in Health Care Perception of Leader Effectivesness as a Function of Gendered n Language in Electronic Luong 2007 Mail Gender's Unspoken Role n Lyons et al 2007 in Leadership Evaluations Wu 2007 y y y n A Cross-Cultural study Into Peer Evaluations of N (FE</p><p>Women's Leadership ONLY) Jogulu et al 2008 Effectiveness School Leadership, Sex and Gender: Welcome to n Kruger 2008 Difference Managers' Perceptions of Women and Men Leaders: n A Cross Cultural Prime et al 2008 Comparison Teacher Union Leader and Executive Committee Member Attitudes Towards Five Components no direction y y y y of Union Leadership and reported Union Leader Effectivesness in Long Smith 2008 Island, New York School Leadership, Followership, y y y n Van Vugt 2008 and Evolution Revisiting Leadership Styles and Attitudes y y y y n n n Towards Women as Galanaki 2008 Managers in Greece Queens of the Hill: Creative Destruction and N (FE the Emergence of ONLY) Executive Leadership of Furst et al 2008 Women The Road to the Glass Cliff: Differences in the Perceived suitability of Men and Women for n Leadership Positions in Succeeding and Failing Haslam et al 2008 Organizations Competent Yet Out In The Cold: Shifting Criteria For y y n Hiring Reflect Backlash Phelan et al 2008 Toward Agent Women Are Female Executives Over-Represented in y y y n Precarious Leadership Adams et al 2009 Positions? The Moderating Effect of Gender on Leadership n (meta) Intervention Impact: An Avolio et al 2009 Exploratory Review The Evolving Manager Stereotype: The Effects of Industry Gender Typing n y y y on Performance Expectations for Leaders Cabrera et al 2009 and their Teams Organizational Change: Motivation y y y y n n n Communication, and Gilley et al 2009 Leadership Effectiveness Choosing the Best (Wo)Man for the Job: The Effects of Mortality n Salience, Sex, And Gender Stereotypes on Leader Hoyt et al 2009 Evaluations Women and the Vision n Ibarra et al 2009 Thing Gender and the Career Aspirations, Professional Assets, and Personal y y y n variables of Higher Lepkowski 2009 Education Administrators Women "Take Care", Men "Take Charge": Managers' n Stereotypic Perceptions of Prime et al 2009 Women and men Leaders Leadership Style and Percetion of Effectiveness: y y y y n n n Enlightening Malasian Jayasingam et al 2009 managers Leadership: Why Gender n Ayman et al 2010 and Culture Matter Gender Typing in Management: Evaluation y y y n of Magerial Subroles for Burton et al 2010 Sport Perceived Leadership Effectiveness and the Role of Transformational n y y Behaviors, Culture, and Castano 2010 Gender of the Leader Wimpy and undeserving of respect: Penalties for n men's gender-inconsistent Heilma et al 2010 success Hoyt et al 2010 Choosing the Best n (Wo)Man for the Job: The Effects of Mortality Salience, Sex, And Gender Stereotypes on Leader Evaluations A Qualitative Study of N (FE Faculty Members' Views y y n ONLY) Isaac et al 2010 of Women Chairs Kark 2010 n Managerial Leadership is Associated With Self- Reported Sickness y y y y n n n Absense and Sickness Presenteeism Among Nyberg et al 2010 Swedish Men and Women Agentic Women and Communal Leadership: How Role Presecription n Confer Advantage to Top Rosette and Tost 2010 Women Leaders Think Crisis-Think Female: The Glass Cliff and Contextual Variation n in the Think Manager- Ryan et al 2010 Think Male Stereotype Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: Exploring y y y n the Relevance of Gender Reuvers et al 2011 Differences Running Head: Principal Leadership and Student y y y y n n n Moreno 2011 Performance </p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    19 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us