Purpose: Identify the Effect of Corner Fillet on Contact Pressure Distribution

Purpose: Identify the Effect of Corner Fillet on Contact Pressure Distribution

<p>Bushing analysis</p><p>Purpose: Identify the effect of corner fillet on contact pressure distribution.</p><p>Units: Length = mm, mass = kg, time = sec, force = mmN, pressure = kPa</p><p>Model: Bearing is modeled as a spring with stiffness = 106 mmN/mm</p><p>Boundary Condition: 1. Bushing is fixed in x and z direction. 2. 100 N (105 nnN) is applied to the bushing in y-direction. This force is evenly distributed on all the nodes at the outer surface of the bushing 3. Two bearings are fixed 4. Long end of the shaft is fixed in x- and z-directions.</p><p>Approach: Model 1: No corner fillet Model 2: Corner fillet with radius = 1 mm.</p><p>Figure 1: Model 1 results: (a) deformed geometry, (b) von Mises stress, and (c) contact pressure Figure 2: Model 1 contact pressure distribution along the cordlength (a) Top (b) Bottom</p><p>Cordlength Top Bottom 0 17956 0 0.35379 14495 0 0.70757 11034 0 1.0614 7572.6 0 1.4151 4111.5 0 1.7689 3083.6 0 2.1227 2055.7 0 2.4765 1027.9 0 2.8303 1.37E-12 0 3.1841 0 0 3.5379 0 0 3.8916 0 0 4.2454 0 0 4.5992 0 0 4.953 0 0 5.3068 0 0 5.6606 0 0 6.0144 0 0 6.3681 0 0 6.7219 0 0 7.0757 0 0 7.4295 0 1867.6 7.7833 0 3735.2 8.1371 0 5602.8 8.4909 0 7470.4 8.8446 0 11808 9.1984 0 16146 9.5522 0 20484 9.906 0 24822 Figure 3: Model 2 results: (a) deformed geometry, (b) von Mises stress, (c) contact pressure, and (d) von Mises stress at bushing</p><p>Figure 4: Model 2 contact pressure distribution along the cordlength (a) Top (b) Bottom</p><p>Cordlength Top Bottom 0 0 0 0.25882 0 0 0.51764 14523 0 0.81225 27715 0 1.1069 16618 0 1.4363 4190.3 0 1.7657 2095.2 0 2.2598 0 0 2.7539 0 0 3.0834 0 0 3.4128 0 0 3.7422 0 0 4.0716 0 0 4.401 0 0 4.7304 0 0 5.0599 0 0 5.3893 0 0 5.7187 0 0 6.0481 0 0 6.3775 0 0 6.7069 0 0 7.2011 0 0 7.6952 0 4320.9 8.0246 0 8641.9 8.354 0 24087 8.6486 0 37877 8.9432 0 19766 9.2021 0 0 9.4609 0 0 9.5914 0 0 9.7219 0 0 9.8525 0 0 9.983 0 0 10.114 0 0 10.244 0 0 Conclusion: The bushing with fillet has higher contact stress than that without fillet. This possibly happens because the fillet reduces the actual length of contacting length of the bushing. This observation can be supported from the fact that the maximum displacement of the bushing with fillet is about 2.5% larger than that without fillet. The conclusion is that the fillet cannot reduce the concentration of contact pressure.</p><p>Using the optimization technique, the profile of the inner diameter can be determined so that the contact pressure is evenly distributed inside busing.</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us