Economic Relations Between Third-World Marxist Nations and the Soviet Bloc : * a Case Study of Grenada, 1979 - 198 3

Economic Relations Between Third-World Marxist Nations and the Soviet Bloc : * a Case Study of Grenada, 1979 - 198 3

FINAL REPORT TO NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : Economic Relations betwee n Third-World Marxist Nation s and the Soviet Bloc : A Case Study of Grenada : 1979 - 198 3 AUTHOR : Frederic L . Pryo r CONTRACTOR : Swarthmore Colleg e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Frederic L . Pryor COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 800-2 2 DATE : April, 198 6 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . TABLE OF CONTENT S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ii i A . Introduction 1 B . Research Materials 2 C . Background on Grenada, 4 1 . The Coup 2 . Events Leading to the Coup D . The Economic Context of Events 1 4 1 . Background 2 . PRG Economic Policie s 3 . Some Basic Political Factors E . The Quest for Foreign Aid 1 9 1 . Background 2 . The Diplomatic Offensiv e 3 . The Strategy of the Ques t 4 . A Perspective F . Technical Assistance 3 6 1 . Planning 2 . Specialist s 3 . Other G . Trading with the Soviet Bloc 4 0 1 . Sale s 2 . Prices H . Some Conclusions 46 1 . Soviet Bloc Relations with th e Marxist Third World as a Whole 2 . A Perspective on Grenad a ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On March 13, 1979, the New JEWEL Movement overthrew Eri c Gairy, Prime Minister of Grenada, and established a Marxist-Leninist government on this, one of the smallest , poorest, and most densely-populated Caribbean Island . Committed to the construction of communism in their island nation, th e leaders of the People's Revolutionary Government inherited a weak agricultural economy which depended primarily on the expor t of tree products (nutmeg, cocoa, and bananas) and tourism fo r hard currency . To finance the transformation of Grenada's Thir d World culture into a modern socialist state, the leaders turne d to outside sources of funding . First and foremost, they turne d to their elder brothers in socialism, the Soviet Bloc . Traditionally the Soviet Bloc has given few trad e concessions and relatively small amounts of economic aid t o their Third World allies . They are thus able to hold thes e allies rather inexpensively . Military aid is considerably mor e important than such economic aid and appears to be heavil y concentrated in a few countries . This military aid has provide d the USSR with the leverage to maintain discipline among it s allies in various international forums . Unlike most Third World Marxist nations, Grenada from 197 9 to 1983 was able to obtain considerable amounts of foreign ai d from the Soviet Bloc . The PRG, under the direction of Prim e iii Minister Maurice Bishop and Minister of Trade, Planning, an d Finance Bernard Coard, may be characterized as "foreign ai d socialism ." That is, Grenada's short-live Marxist experimen t under Bishop was an attempt to introduce socialism by a government that was completely dependent on foreign grants an d concessionary loans of like-minded nations to achieve it s economic aims . Grenada's experience with the USSR and othe r socialist nations provides insight into the process by whic h Soviet Bloc economic ties are structured with Third Worl d nations with a socialist orientation . Internationally, the PRG reoriented Grenada's foreign polic y to forge close links with Cuba and the Soviet Union . A usefu l indicator for this change is its voting pattern in the U .N . General Assembly in 1980, the year after the coup . Grenad a voted with Cuba 92 percent of the time (and never in opposition ) and with the Soviet Union 79 percent of the time (and only 6 percent in opposition .) The PRG's foreign relations were a crucial part of its economic strategy since it attempted to us e its political services to the Soviet Bloc and the radical Thir d World as a lever with which to obtain foreign aid . The PRG was extremely successful in this strategy . Cuba wa s the most important patron to the island, giving about 30 percen t of the total economic and military aid . It is noteworthy tha t most of the aid from other Marxist nations came in the form o f grants and that the Soviets contributed much more military tha n economic aid . Aid from Western nations was quite small and, i n the case of British and Finnish loans, was tied to the purchas e iv of equipment from these countries . U .S . aid came primaril y through the Caribbean Development Bank, a multilateral lendin g agency which did not accede to U .S . requests to limit aid t o Grenada, even though the U .S . was the principal donor to th e Bank . Average annual grants and loans were about U .S . $25,000,000 . For a nation with a population of roughly 90,000 , this is quite significant, for the ratio of such aid to th e average gross domestic product was roughly 30 percent for th e five year period . Since it actually took the PRG almost a yea r to get the flow started, the actual ratio of foreign ai d received to gross domestic product was much higher than 3 0 percent in the early years of the regime . Cuba's major support of Grenada consisted of EC $82,000,00 0 for the construction of a modern airport to attract mor e tourism, given in the form of both manpower and equipment . Bu t Cuba also gave EC $17,000,000 for other projects . At the tim e of the intervention there were about 784 Cubans on the island , of which about 636 were working on the airport, 22 served a s military advisors, 17 worked as physicians and dentists, an d others worked as teachers, advisors to the Ministry of Interior , and other governmental bureaus . The Cuban aid was said to be given without strings and wa s particularly helpful to the PRG because it was continuous , responsive to the PRG's needs of the moment, directed at a variety of problems, and given as grants . It seems that th e Cubans made few demands of the Grenadians . They did, of course , v keep a close eye on them, and it is alleged that in the firs t years of the revolution the Cuban ambassador attended cabine t meetings . Further, the Cubans placed technicians in some ke y ministries . In any case, the PRG appeared most willing t o coordinate its foreign policy efforts with the Cubans and t o draw lessons from the "Cuban experience ." Although the Cuban s occasionally manifested displeasure in the course of Grenadia n events, they tried for the most part to maintain their role as a wise and generous uncle with considerable tolerance . The U .S .S .R . was a rather phlegmatic partner in Grenada' s construction of socialism . The stinginess of Soviet aid may b e attributed to two causes . First they did not wish to rile th e United States by developing unnecessarily close relations with a nation close to its shores . Second, they preferred to let Cub a carry the brunt of the aid, especially since Cuba had mor e experience in dealing with Caribbean conditions . In 1980, th e Soviet Union signed an agreement to send arms to Grenada durin g the 1980 - 1983 period . However, they did not prove ver y generous with regard to economic aid . Although scholarships an d military grants were forthcoming, it was difficult for Grenad a to obtain much economic aid from the U .S .S .R . With regard t o agriculture, the Soviets noted that their aid efforts i n mechanized tropical agriculture had not been very successful an d had resulted in a loss of prestige ; therefore, they recommende d that the Grenadians try the Bulgarians and Hungarians for suc h aid . They also refused to help with the design of buildings , noting that the U .S .S .R . generally built much larger building s vi than those requested by the PRG ; again they recommended th e Bulgarians . They said further that they did not want to set an y precedents with Grenada . They stressed that the Sovie t bureaucracy needed a great deal of time to study various ai d requests . In 1981, 1982, and 1983, the Soviet Union did make severa l small grants for economic purposes, but these amounted to onl y EC $7,000,000 (US $2 .5 million) . The Soviets did not appea r interested in helping to finance the airport and they seemed t o respond slowly to the PRG's perceived economic needs . Nevertheless, the Soviet Union did send a series of missions t o Grenada, and they also established an embassy on the island . By 1983, Soviet interest had finally been seriously aroused : a t the time of the intervention, 49 Soviet diplomats and advisors , headed by a three-star general, were on the island . In sum , Grenada was a political plum which unexpectedly fell in the la p of the Soviet Union and it took them considerable time t o appraise its worth . The other major figure in Grenada's network of socialis t financing was the GDR, which provided the PRG with a series o f grants, concessionary loans, and some technical assistance . I t seems that the GDR profited much more than did Grenada in thi s relationship, as the GDR foreign trade enterprises took grea t advantage of Grenadian incompetency or ignorance to obtai n highly advantageous import prices from the PRG, and at the sam e time, to sell obsolete equipment to them . Such other states a s North Korea, Czechoslovakia and Hungary offered technica l vii advice, but little else .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    86 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us