Phylogenetics and Evolution of the Aphid Genus Uroleucon Based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Sequences

Phylogenetics and Evolution of the Aphid Genus Uroleucon Based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Sequences

R Systematic Entomology (1999) 24, 85±93 Phylogenetics and evolution of the aphid genus Uroleucon based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences NANCY A. MORAN, MATTHEW E. KAPLAN, MICHAEL J. GELSEY, TROY G. MURPHY and EDWIN A. SCHOLES Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, U.S.A. Abstract. The genus Uroleucon, and the related genus Macrosiphoniella, represent a large Tertiary radiation of aphids, with a total of about 300 species distributed throughout the world, primarily on host plant species in the family Asteraceae. A molecular phylogenetic study was conducted to identify major clades within Uroleucon and to address the cladistic validity of current subgeneric categories, the evolution of host plant associations, the age of origin, and intercontinental movements in this genus. The seventeen study species included members of the three major subgenera of Uroleucon, species from Europe and North America, one member of Macrosiphoniella, and two outgroups. Data consisted of DNA sequences for three mitochondrial regions and the nuclear gene EF1alpha, for a total of 4287 sites. Nodes supported strongly in both parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses suggest that: (1) Nearctic Uromelan are a monophyletic group branching near the base of the genus and not related to European Uromelan, (2) the New World subgenus Lambersius is possibly monophyletic but is not a tightly related group and is not closely related to other North American species, and (3) Nearctic members of subgenus Uroleucon are a closely related monophyletic group not allied with Nearctic Uromelan or Lambersius. Instead they represent a separate colonization by an Old World ancestor, as they are nested within a strongly supported clade containing European members of both subgenera Uroleucon and Uromelan. Neither of these subgenera is monophyletic. Molecular clock calculations, based on calibrations of mitochondrial divergences from other insects, suggest that Uroleucon + Macrosiphoniella is a relatively recent radiation, probably no more than 5±10 million years old. Although largely con®ned to Asteraceae, this clade did not radiate in parallel with its host plants. Rather, lateral movement between lineages of Asteraceae must have occurred repeatedly. Introduction regions (Heie, 1996). The genus Uroleucon Mordvilko and close relatives, particularly the genus Macrosiphoniella del Although aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) date to the Jurassic Guercio, are characteristic of this late phase in aphid evolution. or earlier (Heie, 1987), much of modern species diversity in Uroleucon and Macrosiphoniella are species-rich genera of aphids is the result of radiation that occurred in the second half host-speci®c aphids, most of which are con®ned to host plants of the Tertiary (Heie, 1996). This relatively recent radiation is in the large family Asteraceae or the related family concentrated in the family Aphididae and is correlated with the Campanulaceae (e.g. Smith & Parron, 1978; Heie, 1995). diversi®cation of herbaceous angiosperms, especially grasses There are 197 and 122 valid species of Uroleucon and (Poaceae) and composites (Asteraceae) in north temperate Macrosiphoniella, respectively (Remaudiere & Remaudiere, 1997); almost certainly, others remain to be described. The Correspondence: Dr N. A. Moran, Department of Ecology and Asteraceae, one of the largest plant families, and the Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721, Campanulaceae are among the numerous families of herba- U.S.A. Fax: +1 520 621 9190. E-mail: [email protected] ceous angiosperms that became abundant in north temperate # 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd 85 L 86 Nancy A. Moran et al. Table 1. Species included in the phylogenetic analysis. Outgroups were Schizaphis graminum (Aphidini, abbreviated Sg) and Acyrthosiphon pisum (Macrosiphini, abbreviated Ap). E = Europe, NA = North America. Ul. = Uroleucon, Um. = Uromelan,L.=Lambersius,M.=Macrosiphoniella. Sub- Native Genus genus Species Author range Host genus, higher taxon Abbreviation Ul. Um. aeneum (Hille Ris Lambers) E Carduus (Asteraceae: Cardueae) Uae Ul. Ul. ambrosiae (Thomas) NA Ambrosia (Asteraceae: Heliantheae) Uam Ul. Ul. astronomus (Hille Ris Lambers) NA Aster (Asteraceae: Astereae) Uas Ul. L. caligatum (Richards) NA Solidago (Asteraceae: Astereae) Uc Ul. L. erigeronense (Thomas) NA Erigeron (Asteraceae: Astereae) Ue Ul. Um. helianthicola (Olive) NA Helianthus (Asteraceae: Heliantheae) Uh Ul. Um. jaceae (Linnaeus) E Centaurea (Asteraceae: Cardueae) Uja Ul. Ul. jaceicola (Hille Ris Lambers) E Centaurea (Asteraceae: Cardueae) Ujl Ul. Ul. obscurum (Koch) E Hieracium (Asteraceae: Lactuceae) Uo Ul. Um. rapunculoidis (Borner) E Campanula (Campanulaceae) Urp Ul. Il. rudbeckiae (Fitch) NA Rudbeckia (Asteraceae: Heliantheae) Urd Ul. Um. rurale (Hottes & Frison) NA Helenium (Asteraceae: Heliantheae) Urr Ul. Um. solidaginis (Fabricius) E Solidago (Asteraceae: Astereae) Usl Ul. Ul. sonchi (Linnaeus) E Sonchus (Asteraceae: Lactuceae) Usn M. ludovicianae (Oestlund) NA Artemesia (Asteraceae: Anthemiidae) Ml regions as climates became cooler and drier beginning in the (Hille Ris Lambers, 1939; Olive, 1965a; Heie, 1995). Species Oligocene (Muller, 1981). that are red, brown or black in life with uniformly dark The allegiance of most Uroleucon and Macrosiphoniella siphunculi are classi®ed in subgenus Uroleucon Mordvilko if to Asteraceae typi®es the host plant ®delity of many of the the cauda is pale and in subgenus Uromelan Mordvilko if the aphid groups arising during this late episode of aphid cauda is pigmented. Species that are green in life with diversi®cation on herbs. It contrasts with the promiscuity of siphunculi pale basally are classi®ed as Lambersius Olive certain other groups diversifying during the same period, (1965a). Uroleucon and Uromelan are distributed throughout notably the genus Aphis L., which contains approximately the northern hemisphere, with some representatives in the the same number of species as Uroleucon plus Macro- southern hemisphere, especially South America (de Carvalho siphoniella but occurs on a comparatively vast number of et al., 1998). Lambersius is con®ned to the New World and plant families (Eastop, 1977). Individual species of includes a number of South American representatives (Olive, Uroleucon are typically con®ned to one host plant species 1965a; Robinson, 1986; de Carvalho et al., 1998). A number of or to several plants within the same genus (Hille Ris red or brown species have intermediate caudal pigmentation Lambers, 1939; Moran, 1984). In some cases, species and thus are not easily categorized under the current complexes are restricted to groups of closely related plants. subgeneric framework (e.g. Olive, 1965b). Additionally, some For example, the Uroleucon jaceae complex occurs on other morphological characters appear to contradict the genera within the tribe Cardueae, the Uroleucon cichorii division between subgenera Uroleucon and Uromelan, sug- complex occurs on genera in the tribe Lactuceae (Hille Ris gesting that caudal pigmentation is homoplasious at the level Lambers, 1939), and North American species in the of the genus. For example, most Nearctic species of all three subgenus Lambersius Olive are concentrated on members subgenera are united in possessing pale coxae, in contrast to of the tribe Astereae. These patterns of host plant Old World species of both Uroleucon and Uromelan, most of af®liations within Uroleucon raise the possiblity of parallel which have brown or black coxae. diversi®cation, i.e. that aphid speciation has occurred more In this paper, a molecular phylogenetic dataset and or less synchronously with speciation of the corresponding analysis is presented for some representative species of host plants. A consistent pattern of cospeciation could be Uroleucon. The aim of the study is to address the detected by comparing the reconstructed phylogenies of following interrelated questions about the evolution of this insects and hosts, as for the leaf beetles Phyllobrotica, for group. (1) Is Uroleucon monophyletic? In particular, do which evidence supports parallel diversi®cation with hosts Uroleucon species have a common ancestor occurring after in the Lamiaceae (Farrell & Mitter, 1990), and Ophraella, the split from Macrosiphoniella? (2) Which, if any, of the for which phylogenetic evidence contradicts parallel diver- three major subgenera of Uroleucon are monophyletic? (3) si®cation with lineages of Asteraceae (Funk et al., 1995). What is the pattern of colonization between Old World and Uroleucon has been subdivided into three major subgenera, New World? (4) Can the nature of the shared history of primarily on the basis of three characters: pigmentation of the Uroleucon and its host plants be characterized? For cauda, pigmentation of the siphunculi, and the colour in life example, has Uroleucon diversi®ed through cospeciation # 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd, Systematic Entomology, 24, 85±93 R Phylogenetics and evolution of Uroleucon 87 Table 2. Collection data for species included in study. Full species names are in Table 1. Species Collection details A. pisum USA: cultured on Vicia faba, gift of D. Voegtlin M. ludovicianae USA: Arizona, Pima County, Mt Lemmon, 17 July 1996, Artemisia ludoviciana, N. Moran S. graminum biotype E, cultured on wheat, gift of P. Baumann U. aeneum Sweden: RaÈvsnaÈs, 8 April 1996, Cirsium vulgare, J. SandstroÈm U. ambrosiae USA: Minnesota, St. Paul, 20 July 1995, Ambrosia tri®da, N. Moran U. astronomus USA:

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us