Vector4Peace № 16 23/09/2015 International Day of Peace The international day of peace — is celebrated on September 21 since 2002. It was founded at the 36th session of the United Nations General Assembly (The resolution No. A/RES/36/67 of November 30, 1981). In the beginning the holiday was celebrated on the third Tuesday of September — in the opening day of annual session of the United Nations General Assembly. The decision on celebration of the International day of the world was made on September 21 at the 55th session of the United Nations General ceremony at a world Bell, are being held. The Assembly (the special resolution No. ceremony begins with the address of the UN A/RES/55/282 of September 28, 2001). Secretary General after he strikes the bell. The General Assembly proclaimed this day as Then, after a moment of silence, the President a day of refusal of violence and ceasefire of the Security Council of the UN addresses. around the world. It was offered to all Wide popularity and influence was received countries to abstain from carrying out military by Peace One Day non-profit organization operations this day. which seeks to achieve realization of annual Annually on September 21 in the UN various day of the world ceasefire and refusal of events, which traditionally begin with a violence. 1 Quasi Peacemaking Quasi Peacemaking - political process, which is incorrectly perceived as peacemaking. Today so-called peacemaking process is in analysts say that the conflicts were preserved or crisis. And it isn't so bad. As this "peacemaking "frozen" what is a very controversial statement, process" - wasn't peacemaking at all. It might as in spite of the fact that the armed have some relation to the “peace”, but none to confrontation was stopped, the political conflict the “making” process for sure. It is the case, and its components tended to development, to when a course of treatment which doesn't help escalation. Actually, with the connivance of the the patient anyways. When huge efforts and international organizations and, first of all the funds for the treatment of this illness are spent, UN, not the conflict was frozen", but but it is not cured, on the contrary – develops in peacemaking process, and its certain imitation a negative way. It is a typical case of Post- was created. Soviet medicine. A case when from the patient and his relatives "doctors" exhaust the last This quasi peacemaking process was presented penny. The richer and sillier relatives are, the by several negotiation formats the structures of worse for patient. It is not treatment; it is a dirty which guarantee not the search of the solution of business having nothing in common with human the conflict, but its maintenance at the stage morals. Audit is necessary. Revision of all which is favorable to the main player – the diagnostic data and carrying out new, complex Russian Federation. research is necessary. And the situation for audit Actually these formats, allowed the Russian ripened. But not everybody wants an audit. Federation to win time and to become stronger "Doctors" and "hospital attendants" of various on South Caucasus and in Northern Black Sea calibers adapted to the existing situation and Coast. Certainly, it is achievement of the don't intend to concede the situation, to refuse Russian diplomacy which successfully "fools" the existing income. After all through this big everybody else. Post-Soviet "peacekeeping hospital", passed and are passing billions of dollars to one direction Well realizing the fact that the organization of and millions of crippled destinies in another. military presence by means of existence of And they will protect this provision up to the military bases and objects at Georgia is end by all means. But it is necessary to change a complicated by geopolitical circumstances, and, situation. Also new strategic reference points are in particular, by partial presence on its territory necessary. of the countries of NATO, the Russian Federation promoted creation of the ethno- Events of August, 2008 in Georgia, and also tic character events in Ukraine showed that transformation of separatist modes of “ethnocra ” complected not only by local staff, but also a situation, without serious analysis, without citizens of the Russian Federation, generally adequate plan of transition of process to a new officers or the former officers of armed stage is fraught with escalation of the conflict – departments. and its strengthening. During these years of "freezing" in the territory . Quasi peacemakingin Caucasus of Abkhazia and the former South Ossetia At the beginning of the 90th was created a quasi autonomous region, the Russian Federation peacemaking process which set as the purpose made it possible to illegally, without not the solution of the conflict, but its full coordination with the Government of Georgia, submission to the Kremlin. Most of experts and carry out a large-scale action of issue of 2 passports of the Russian Federation to . Structure of the Quasi peacemaking inhabitants of these territories, expanding by In the conditions of quasi peacemaking, that a zone of its actual jurisdiction in territories negotiation formats don't reflect the valid picture of neighboring states, having prepared thereby of the conflict. The structure of negotiation conditions for occupation of these territories. process is incongruent to structure of the Thanks to errors of the leadership of Georgia conflict. However it can be quite congruent to and full powerlessness of the international structure of the pseudo-conflict. So in structures, the Russian Federation worked well negotiations on the Abkhazian conflict, interests by means of August military campaign of 2008, of the two parts of the Abkhazian society and also recognition of independence of the divided by war weren't presented evenly. The separatist rejimes, actually to secure these separatist party – as the direct participant – is territories. presented, and Unionists - the population of Abkhazia which does not wish separation from Georgia isn't presented. Despite the fact that in this part of the population exists the strong structure of social institutes capable to present interests both on official, and on informal levels. The situation changed after creation of a new Geneva format in which, representatives of the divided societies, are somewhat presented with the status of experts a little. It is nothing else than a discrimination of the political rights of the most part of the population of Abkhazia. (It is necessary to consider that Abkhazia is not Kosovo. If in Kosovo not separatist community of Kosovan Serbians, make less than 10% now, in Abkhazia they makes not less than 30% of total number of the population – and it, apart from huge army of displaced persons). The negotiation format on settlement of the conflict in the Southern Ossetia / the Tskhinvali region had absolutely comic character. On the one hand Georgia, and on the other hand – three subjects waere presented: separatist authorities of "South Ossetia", Northern Ossetia- 3 Alania (territorial subject of the Russian professional and social responsibility leaves Federation) and the Russian Federation. much to be desired. They become subjects of the conflicts, being distributed into the parties of the Could such a hyper-asymmetric format be conflicts, serving these parties. Thus, they feed effective? Of course, not. system of the conflict, but not system of peacemaking process. It is the parody to peacemaking and mockery not only at living people, but also at memory of . Pseudomediation thousands of citizens who were victims of the conflict. These processes are formed proceeding from interests of the main political players, who There is a question – why not include autocratically assign roles and rules. There representatives of the society divided by war might be considered the conflict of interests. into this negotiation format – (pro-Georgian Why interested party has to be a mediator? Why orientation, opponents of secession)? Why one the international organizations don't react to part of society has the right to declare the rights such situation? Why civil society and, in and to protect them, and the second part of particular, the human rights and peacemaking society does not? Why peace talks aren't organizations don't react to such policy of the organized between these two parts of society? international institutes responsible for safety and the peace on the planet? And at last, why at the Why Northern Ossetia-Alania had the right for level of analysts and intellectual elite this participation in a negotiation format, despite that problem isn't analyzed sufficiently? armed conflict didn't affect (Thank God!) the territory of this North Caucasian autonomy, but . Ideological aspects of quasi the authorities of Shida Kartli (the Georgian peacemakin administrative unit) corresponding to the rank of North Ossetia-Alania, in the territory of which Ideological conflict. It has a psychological basis. armed clashes happened does not have this It is the conflict between various perceptions of right? It is not the full list of questions on which the existing armed conflict and, the conflict there is no adequate answer. It is and between various interpretations. international lawlessness. In research the core conflict between two main . Reducibility of peacemaking process to perceptions of this conflict is analyzed. the quasi peacekeeping The chronic irresolution of these and other . First "ethnocentric" – dominating and modern conflicts is the result of, first of all, successfully initiated at the international what we, without remorse, call peacemaking level by the Russian diplomatic school and process, which is not. Analyzing this issue, it is having active supporters both among experts possible to come to one unpleasant conclusion. of Georgia and among the western experts. There is a lack of effective system of monitoring In this ethnical measurement the main and an assessment of the existing conflicts in the parties of the conflict, and "peacemaking" world and so-called peacemaking processes process are considered ethnic groups.