Causes of Cyclicity of Epirrita Autumnata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae): Grandiose Theory and Tedious Practice

Causes of Cyclicity of Epirrita Autumnata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae): Grandiose Theory and Tedious Practice

Popul Ecol (2000) 42:211–223 © The Society of Population Ecology and Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2000 SPECIAL FEATURE: REVIEW Kai Ruohomäki · Miia Tanhuanpää · Matthew P. Ayres Pekka Kaitaniemi · Toomas Tammaru · Erkki Haukioja Causes of cyclicity of Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae): grandiose theory and tedious practice Received: April 6, 1999 / Accepted: April 18, 2000 Abstract Creating multiyear cycles in population density Key words Cyclic population dynamics · Host plant quality demands, in traditional models, causal factors that operate · Inducible resistance · Parasitism · Predation · Winter on local populations in a density-dependent way with time mortality lags. However, cycles of the geometrid Epirrita autumnata in northern Europe may be regional, not local; i.e., succes- sive outbreaks occur in different localities. We review pos- sible causes of cycles of E. autumnata under both local and regional scenarios, including large-scale synchrony. Assum- Introduction ing cyclicity is a local phenomenon, individual populations of E. autumnata display peaks but populations all over the Most natural populations of herbivorous insects do not outbreak range fluctuate in synchrony. This concept as- reach outbreak densities (Mattson and Addy 1975; Mason sumes that the peaks at most localities are so low that they 1987; Hunter 1995) while a few others (Baltensweiler et al. do not lead to visible defoliation and easily remain unno- 1977; Ginzburg and Taneyhill 1994; Myers 1993; Berryman ticed. In this scenario, populations are able to start recovery 1995) display irregular outbreaks or regular cycles, an out- a few years after the crash, i.e., at the time of the mitigation break being defined as an “explosive increase in the abun- of detrimental delayed density-dependent factors, such as dance of a particular species that occurs over a relatively delayed inducible resistance of the host plant or parasitism. short period of time” (Berryman 1987). In that case, the same factors that lead to crashes also ex- The geometrid Epirrita autumnata (Borkhausen) (earlier plain the periodicity of cyclic fluctuations. According to the called Oporinia autumnata) displays outbreaks in mountain regional cyclicity scenario, different factors can be impor- birch [Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii (Orlova) Hämet- tant in different phases of the cycle. The key is to identify Ahti, earlier called B. pubescens ssp. tortuosa (Ledeb.) the factors that tend to produce outbreaks with a periodicity Nyman] forests that form the tree line in northwest Europe. of about 10 years. Initiation of the increase phase seems to During the outbreaks, northern birch forests may become coincide with maxima in sunspot activity, but causal connec- totally defoliated in limited areas or defoliations may cover tions remain unclear. Climatic factor(s) associated with the hundreds of square kilometres. Trees may occasionally die solar cycle could contribute to the large-scale geographic over vast areas (Fig. 1) (Tenow 1972; Kallio and Lehtonen synchrony. 1973; Bylund 1995; Lehtonen and Heikkinen 1995). Out- breaks of E. autumnata do not usually spread out from epicenters and can thus be classified as cyclic gradients (Berryman 1987). Olle Tenow published in 1972 an extensive survey of 12 successive outbreaks of E. autumnata in northern and K. Ruohomäki (*) · M. Tanhuanpää · P. Kaitaniemi · E. Haukioja mountainous Fennoscandia (Scandinavia plus Finland), Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, covering the period from 1862 to 1968 (Tenow 1972). Later, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland three further outbreak periods occurred in the same area: in Tel. 1358-2-3335766; Fax 1358-2-3336550 e-mail: kairuo@utu.fi the middle of the 1970s (Hogstad 1997), in the middle of the 1980s (Bylund 1995; Ruohomäki and Haukioja 1992a; M.P. Ayres Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, Itämies et al. 1995; Tenow 1996; Hogstad 1997), and in the NH, USA first half of the 1990s (Bylund 1995; Tenow 1996; Hogstad T. Tammaru 1997; Ruohomäki et al. 1997). By using published records, Institute of Zoology and Botany, Riia, Tartu, Estonia Haukioja et al. (1988a) demonstrated a statistically 212 Fig. 1. Dead mountain birch forest in Finnish Lapland, destroyed by defoliation during an Epirrita autumnata outbreak in the middle of the 1960s significant 9- to 10-year regional periodicity in outbreak cyclicity (e.g., by showing that it can reduce the perfor- dynamics in northern Fennoscandia. mance of the herbivore in a density-dependent way, with Large-scale outbreaks of E. autumnata have been re- time lags), but it is much more difficult to determine corded only in northernmost Europe, i.e., in northern and whether the reduction is a cause or a consequence of the mountainous Fennoscandia and northwesternmost Russia change in herbivore density (i.e., whether the factor really (Tenow 1972), although the species is common and drives cycles under natural conditions) and to estimate its abundant in many parts of its Holarctic range. The relative importance compared to other factors. However, nonmountainous populations south of the polar cycle do these latter steps are necessary if our intention is to predict not produce outbreaks (Tenow 1972). E. autumnata what happens in natural populations. matches the larch budmoth (Baltensweiler et al. 1977) in Occurrence of cyclic outbreaks in E. autumnata has that the same insect–host plant association displays both stimulated several research projects, especially during outbreaks and relatively stable densities in different geo- the last quarter of the previous century. These projects, graphic regions. like many other projects on forest lepidopterans, have con- At a general level, stability versus fluctuations in popula- centrated on factors that could lead to density-dependent tion densities are well understood. Stability is achieved in time lags in population density. The key questions have traditional models by direct negative density dependence been effects of inducible resistance of the host tree on E. in population growth (Murdoch 1994; Krebs 1995): an in- autumnata and other herbivores and the efficiency of crease in mortality or decrease in natality with increasing parasitism and predation. However, in the case of E. population densities. In contrast, cyclic dynamics results autumnata, a basic problem is encountered at a very basic from delayed density-dependent factors (Berryman 1995). level: while the cyclicity is statistically significant at the re- According to the traditional approach, for the relatively gional level (Haukioja et al. 1988a), it is not necessarily the stable southern E. autumnata populations the primary same forest stands that experience successive outbreaks causal forces leading to stability might be detrimental (Bylund 1995). In other words, even demonstrations of factor(s) that act in a direct density-dependent manner negative density-dependent factors with time lags, operat- without time lags. In contrast, for the northern populations ing in a local scale, may not be sufficient when trying to the critical factors are detrimental (during the decrease explain regional cyclicity across a scale of hundreds of phase) or promoting (during increase) factor(s) operating kilometers. in a delayed density-dependent way, with an appropriate In this review, we first introduce the species and then the time lag. problem of regional versus local cyclicity. We then turn to Models of this type have been used to analyze recorded possible mechanisms in the cyclic dynamics, treating sepa- density fluctuations, for instance in cyclically fluctuating rately the scenarios of local and regional cyclicity, including forest insect and rodent populations, and with suitable synchrony in population dynamics over vast areas. We also parameterization they accurately describe past dynamics. briefly discuss possible reasons why northern but not south- Problems often start, however, when trying to identify the ern populations have outbreaks, as well as empirical pitfalls causal factors behind the delayed feedbacks and especially in practical research. Throughout this article, “northern” when trying to test the importance of particular factors. and “southern” populations (in Fennoscandia) refer to cy- Two questions have to be separated. It is relatively straight- clic outbreaking and more stable nonoutbreaking popula- forward to demonstrate that a certain factor contributes to tions, respectively. 213 The species breaks. However, they are not sufficient to explain out- breaks (Tammaru and Haukioja 1996). For instance, the same basic features characterize populations within and The spring-feeding green (cryptic) larvae with five instars outside the outbreak range (Ruohomäki 1991). Accord- are highly polyphagous, having been recorded on more than ingly, the extent to which potential reproductive capacity is 15 species of deciduous trees, shrubs, and dwarf-shrubs realized is critical, i.e., whether internal constraints, exter- (Seppänen 1970). In Fennoscandia, birches are the most nal environmental conditions, or their interactions allow an frequently used hosts, apparently because of their abun- increase. dance. The larvae eclose in spring in synchrony with birch leaf flush (Kaitaniemi et al. 1997a; Kaitaniemi and Ruohomäki 1999). The synchrony between larval and leafing phenologies is important for successful larval devel- Local versus regional cyclicity opment because fast growth can only be maintained on young leaves (Haukioja et al. 1978; Ayres

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us