Brad Garrett 8 From: Kyle Stanfield Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 7:08 PM To: Brad Garrett Subject: FW: Play‐down candidates Please add to correspondence. Thanks Kyle Stanfield, Assistant Executive Director 503.682.6722 x239 | [email protected] | C: 503.919.8525 From: Dan Smith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 10:13 AM To: Peter Weber <[email protected]>; Kyle Stanfield <[email protected]> Subject: Play‐down candidates Here's the updated list I have through a few weeks ago. 6A David Douglas McKay North Salem Madison Benson Jefferson Roosevelt 2 of 3 criteria, close on #3 5A Woodburn Eagle Pt Redmond Milwaukie 2/3 Parkrose 2/3 4A Mac-Hi 2/3 3A Illinois Valley Gervais Chemawa Jefferson Rogue River 2/3 2A Riddle Myrtle Pt Waldport 2/3 Nestucca 2/3 1 Brad Garrett 9 From: Kyle Stanfield Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:45 PM To: Brad Garrett Subject: FW: Enrollment Question Please add to correspondence. Kyle Stanfield, Assistant Executive Director 503.682.6722 x239 | [email protected] | C: 503.919.8525 From: Usher, Larry [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:21 PM To: Kyle Stanfield <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Enrollment Question Today we are at 1592 in grades 9‐12 9th 376 10th 440 11th 391 12th 385 6th 440 7th 448 8th 405 Also, I know it’s a ways out, but 3rd 4th and 5th are all near 500 each. I am aware that we are going to have a huge impact on reclassification. Please let me know if there is anything else we can do to help. From: Kyle Stanfield [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 1:06 PM To: Usher, Larry <[email protected]> Subject: Enrollment Question Hey Larry, Hope that this e‐mail finds you well. Quick question for you, can you give me a number of how many students are in Hermiston this year and then some possible projections at grades 6‐8? The C&D committee is trying to figure out if your numbers will put you at the 6A level next time block. Thanks for the time! Kyle Stanfield, Assistant Executive Director 503.682.6722 x239 | [email protected] | C: 503.919.8525 Oregon School Activities Association OSAA.org Foundation 1 Brad Garrett 10 From: Kyle Stanfield Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 9:38 AM To: Brad Garrett Subject: FW: Projections Please add to correspondence. Kyle Stanfield, Assistant Executive Director 503.682.6722 x239 | [email protected] | C: 503.919.8525 From: Zysett, Rusty [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 9:32 AM To: Kyle Stanfield <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Projections Kyle, I can provide that information. This includes all of our "Feeder" schools (Adel and Union). 8th grade 55 7th grade 54 6th grade 53 5th grade 63 (large class) 4th grade 56 That is 225 without anyone being taken away due to free and reduced lunch numbers. I hope this helps the comittee. Rusty On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Kyle Stanfield <[email protected]> wrote: Hey Rusty, Quick question for you – is it possible to get your current ADM and then your class sizes from grades 8- 4th? That would help us gain any information on where your placement may be for Classification next time block. Thanks! Kyle Stanfield, Assistant Executive Director 503.682.6722 x239 | [email protected] | C: 503.919.8525 1 Brad Garrett 11 From: Kyle Stanfield Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 10:58 AM To: Zysett, Rusty; Peter Weber; Jesse Hamilton Cc: Brad Garrett Subject: RE: Reclassification Hey Rusty, Thanks for the e‐mail. We sincerely appreciate it. We will log this note for the committee for the review at their next meeting. We will be in touch if we have any questions. Thanks! Kyle Stanfield, Assistant Executive Director 503.682.6722 x239 | [email protected] | C: 503.919.8525 From: Zysett, Rusty [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 9:45 AM To: Peter Weber <[email protected]>; Kyle Stanfield <[email protected]>; Jesse Hamilton <[email protected]> Subject: Reclassification Peter and Kyle, I hope this email finds both of you well. As you start this process of reclassification, it is interesting to see the number of proposals that will come out and watch everyone scramble to do what's best for "their kids" and I suppose, I am no exception to that. I wanted to reach out to you today to let you know that Lakeview will do what is in the best interest of all kids, not just ours. Our community has changed over the years and it is reflected on the walls of our cafeteria where hangs the portraits of past classes. Classes that were over 100 strong and now are half that size. What I have always judged our competitiveness with other communities no matter where I have been (Jefferson, Culver, La Pine, Summit and now Lakeview) is what they look like when we drive in. I remember my years in La Pine driving into communities for games (Cottage Grove, Junction City, La Salle, Gladstone, Astoria, etc) and thinking.....Toto, we're not in Kansas anymore. It just didn't feel right. When I look at the proposals that are out, we, obviously, prefer the five classification model as proposed by the committee. I know that this will morph and change many times before this process is done. But, it seems to Jesse Hamilton and I, that this "feels right". I am available any time to toss ideas out and appreciate your efforts. Rusty Zysett Athletic Director Lakeview High School 1 Brad Garrett 12 From: Kyle Stanfield Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 11:36 AM To: Mike Glasgow Cc: Brad Garrett Subject: RE: Re‐classification Thanks Mike, we will forward to the committee for the review at their next meeting. Thanks! Kyle Stanfield, Assistant Executive Director 503.682.6722 x239 | [email protected] | C: 503.919.8525 From: Mike Glasgow [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 11:34 AM To: Kyle Stanfield <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Re‐classification We have a strong desire to stay in Mountain Valley League if all possible. Thank You Michael Glasgow Athletic Director Boy's Basketball coach Rogue Valley Adventist Academy 541-773-2955 (W) 541-890-4926 (C) On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Kyle Stanfield <[email protected]> wrote: Mike, Thank you for your e‐mail. The committee is trying to look at scenarios in the Skyline that would help bring more full programs into that league for the next time block. Even with that addition of Melrose Christian, they are going to co‐op everything with UVC and then Milo usually has a limited number of programs and games to play. If you feel strongly one way or another please let us know and we can add that information into the correspondence for next time. Nothing final until next October . Kyle Stanfield, Assistant Executive Director 503.682.6722 x239 | [email protected] | C: 503.919.8525 From: Mike Glasgow [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 8:34 AM 1 Brad Garrett 13 From: Kelly Bokn <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 9:40 AM To: Brad Garrett Subject: Classification ideas Good morning Brad! Hope all is well. I got a couple of ideas to ponder and am curious of your thoughts: Draft 2: 5 Classification system: 1. Use 1265 as the number: 2. What this does: Drops 8 5A Schools to 4A: Willamette, West Albany, Mountain View, Forest Grove, Canby, Hermiston, Woodburn and Hillsboro. 3. Moves the 58 in 5A to 50. Moves the 39 in 5A to 47. (Much closer....until the PIL is willing to shift....no way to get the numbers even...but his is much closer.) Also puts some schools that struggle into a classification that gives them a better chance for success. 4. Hermiston. That puts them into the Intermountain conference...which they have stated that they will not do......or they can put their money where their mouth is and opt to play up and stay in the proposal of being in the Mt. Hood conference.......it would be interesting how they might decide that predicament. 5. Mountain View: I don't know their situation...are they growing, etc. Either way....they could be in 4A or choose to go up. 6. Last thought: I am not sure why Sheldon and South Eugene are in bed with Southern Oregon.....when they can travel 1 hour up to Salem and be in the Valley League. (McKay, McNary, North Salem, South Salem, Sprague, West Salem, Sheldon, South Eugene: 8 teams) would make a great league and they have similar demographics.....Salem vs. Eugene) So what to do with Central Oregon and Southern Oregon schools...you know my answer....their demographics are almost exactly the same. They both are rural areas and have to both jump on a bus no matter what they do and their towns are used to traveling to support their teams. (Bend, Summit, possibly Mountain View, with Roseburg, Grants Pass, North Medford, South Medford make a 7 member league.) Pretty good concepts so far to look at. It looks like the Mid-Willamette would be absolutely dominated by Silverton and Wilsonville by removing some of the other big hitters....but maybe that is what has to happen for geographic decisions. Thanks for any thoughts before I submit any proposal from my end.