of the workshop ARCHITECTURE, ARCHAEOLOGY AND CONTEMPORARY CITY PLANNING Multi-Layered Settlements Sinan Burat, Giorgio Verdiani, Per Cornell (Editors) MERSIN, TURKEY 21-24th November 2018 Mersin, Turkey 21-24th November 2018 ARCHITECTURE, ARCHAEOLOGY AND CONTEMPORARY CITY PLANNING Multi-Layered Settlements PROCEEDINGS editors: Sinan Burat Giorgio Verdiani Per Cornell Published in May 2019 Mersin, Turkey 21-24th November 2018 Scholar workshop: ARCHITECTURE, ARCHAEOLOGY AND CONTEMPORARY CITY PLANNING Multi-Layered Settlements The workshop took place at the Mersin University, Faculty of Architecture, Me.Ü. Mimarlık Fakültesi Çiftlikköy Merkez Kampusu 33343, Yenişehir/ Mersin, Turkey. Workshop organizing committee: Sinan Burat, Esra Şahin Burat, Seda Sakar, Giorgio Verdiani, Per Cornell, Züleyha Sara Belge, Burak Beige The workshop has been realized in collaboration between University of Mersin, Turkey, the Architecture Department of the Florence University, Italy, the Department of Historical Studies, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Editors: Sinan Burat, Giorgio Verdiani, Per Cornell [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected] Chairmen/Chairwomen and Speakers participating at the workshop: Sinan Burat, Per Cornell, Giorgio Verdiani, Alessandro Camiz, Seda Sakar, Sofia Pieri, Esra Şahin Burat, H. Kübra Gür Düzgün, Züleyha Sara Belge, Burak Belge, Ümit Aydınoğlu, Mert Nezih Rifaioğlu, Zeynep Ceylanlı, Leyla Etyemez Çıplak, Bedel Emre, Remzi Yağcı, Güliz Bilgin Altınöz. The present volume has been reviewed by the Workshop Committe before the publication AACCP @ LULU.COM - ISBN PROCEEDINGS INDEX INDEX WORKSHOP PRESENTATION Sinan Burat, Per Cornell, Giorgio Verdiani .......................................................................... 7 URBAN RESCUE EXCAVATIONS FROM AN ARCHITECT’S VIEW H. Kübra GÜR D ................................................................................................................... 13 THE CONFLICT BETWEEN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY AND NEW URBAN PATTERN Bedel Emre ...................................................................................................................... 23 SUBMERGED WORLDS - TARANTO: THE IMAGE OF A HIDDEN MEDITERRANEAN HISTORICAL CENTER Vincenzo Moschetti ......................................................................................................... 43 STONES AND DIGITAL COLLISIONS: MUSEUM ARCHITECTURES STANDING BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND VIRTUAL LAYERS Zeynep Ceylanlı, Ezgi Çiçek, Pelin Arslan ............................................................................ 54 AN INTER-DISCIPLINARY STUDENT WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS MULTI-LAYERED STRUCTURE OF TARSUS Züleyha Sara Belge, Burak Belge, Ümit Aydinoğlu ............................................................... 64 EVALUATION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIO-CULTURAL CHANGE AND SPATIAL CHANGE IN GOKCEADA (IMBROS) AFTER 1950S IN THE CONTEXT OF MULTI- LAYEREDNESS Serkan Gokalp, Seda Sakar ................................................................................................ 70 THE DOUBLE-CHAIRED VOUSSOIR BARREL VAULT OF THE GYMNASIUM CALIDARIUM: SALAMIS, CYPRUS Alessandro Camiz, Alessandra Tedeschi, Marika Griffo ....................................................... 80 NATURAL/HUMAN EVENTS AND URBAN TRANSFORMATION: WHEN THE ARCHITECTURAL AND NATURAL LAYERS CHEAT THE INTERPRETATION Giorgio Verdiani ................................................................................................................ 93 COASTAL FORTIFICATIONS’ SYSTEM, AS A FRAGMENT, A LIMIT, AN EMERGENCY WITH A GREAT POTENTIALITY IN THE ITALIAN MEDITERRANEAN AREA Sofia Pieri ...................................................................................................................... 104 LAYERED HORIZONS OF THE CITY: THE CASE OF SOLI POMPEIOPOLIS Esra Şahin Burat ............................................................................................................. 113 ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE AACCP Per Cornell ...................................................................................................................... 121 PICTURES FROM THE WORKSHOP Giorgio Verdiani .............................................................................................................. 123 WORKSHOP PRESENTATION In recent discussions on urbanism, the need possible contributions from archaeology to involve new actors has been a major theme. include questions related to preservation In this field, throughout Europe, various ways and conservation of the past, diffusion of of allowing citizens to take a more direct part archaeological information with different in planning are being developed. It is also means including practical knowledge about important to look at the role or lack of the role the development of particular districts over played by particular research fields. time, knowledge of comparative studies of urbanism, questions of design or of ‘gestalt’ Traditionally, architecture plays a major in urban settings, and the intersections role in city planning. While archaeological (or dialogues?) between archaeology, surveys and excavations are intimately architecture and public art. related to land use and construction projects in historical urban environments, In the 5th AACCP workshop in Turku in 2017, the discipline seldom plays an important with the theme ‘Reformation, regeneration role in city planning. In several countries and revitalisation’, the workshop was open to and particular cities, this situation has been several topics including regeneration of urban questioned during the last decades. areas, building complexes or single buildings, dialogues between urban development and The approaches and case studies are various cultural heritage, the understanding about with different perspectives and results, but all cultural heritage through single-site research, these experiences seem to move to collective the potential of cultural heritage for the and, little by little, well-structured knowledge. revitalisation of the city and the impact of All case studies, attempts and discussions individuals, ideologies, values and politics in underline how intelligent (or visionary?) city planning at different times. Furthermore, approaches, correct documentation, critic many presentations reflected the topics reasoning and in-depth analysis can contribute related to interpreting, creating and reforming to taking next steps in comprehension about the identities, experiences and narratives of the profitable coexistence of the past and different places and why dialogues between future of our cities. different fields and parties are needed in more holistic understanding and more We wish to open a new kind of communication comprehensive development of the city. between these research fields and related praxis in contemporary city planning. The These topics were reflected both in several 9 (or in nineteen) presentations and in formal publication for inspiration and discussion and informal discussions during two related to urban studies and collaboration seminar days and four different thematic in urban development and city planning in excursions combining archaeology, the future. architecture, history, art and city planning in Turku and Helsinki in mid May in Finland Sinan Burat in 2017. The majority of the papers given Per Cornell during the seminar days are collected in this Giorgio Verdiani 10 PROCEEDINGS PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORKSHOP URBAN RESCUE EXCAVATIONS FROM AN ARCHITECT’S VIEW H. Kübra Gür D. Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Turkey Abstract: The Marmaray Project was the most important transportation project in Istanbul connecting two sides of Bosphorus which created a great opportunity for the city’s history with a lot of new ar- chaeological discoveries. There were rescue excavations of the major stations of Marmaray held under the authority of Istanbul Archaeology Museums between 2004-2012. The author of this paper worked in Sirkeci Station Excavations within the Historical Peninsula as an architect for six years. With the experience of Marmaray and other rescue excavations in Istanbul, an interdisciplinary system will be discussed for future urban archaeology with the mitigation of the law from an architect’s point of view. There are fundamental differences between working in urban and rural archaeological sites in terms of time and priorities. Urban rescue excavations are obliged to process fast enough for the project require- ments according to the regulations decided by the Regional Council for the Conservation of Cultural Property. However, there could always be conflicts about the methodologies between construction and archaeology teams. So multi-disciplinary environment of the rescue excavations ought to be prepared before the project starts. Convenient legislation for urban archaeology is upon to the upper authorities. Besides the law perspective, there could be some interdisciplinary phases before, during and after the excavations. The construction and archaeology teams must have the proper knowledge about what they deal with for field operations. One of the most important approaches is to integrate archaeological re- search into the evolving methodologies through the process. Also, documentation, inventory, publication and later displaying of rescue excavations is crucially important for future heritage protection. Keywords: urban archaeology, rescue excavations, Istanbul, Marmaray Project, Sirkeci. Introduction Even the rescue excavations are still in need un-