Nos. 19-416 & 19-453 In The Supreme Court of the United States ———— NESTLÉ USA, INC., Petitioner, v. JOHN DOE I, ET AL., Respondents. ———— CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. JOHN DOE I, ET AL., Respondents. ———— On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ———— JOINT APPENDIX ———— NEAL KUMAR KATYAL PAUL L. HOFFMAN Counsel of Record for Counsel of Record for Petitioner Nestlé USA, Inc. Respondents Hogan Lovells US LLP Schonbrun Seplow Harris 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Hoffman & Zeldes LLP Washington, DC 20004 200 Pier Avenue, #226 (202) 637-5600 Hermosa Beach, CA 90245 [email protected] (310) 396-0731 [email protected] ANDREW J. PINCUS Counsel of Record for Petitioner Cargill, Incorporated Mayer Brown LLP 1999 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 263-300 [email protected] PETITION FOR CERTIORARI NO. 19-416 FILED: SEPT. 25, 2019 PETITION FOR CERTIORARI NO. 19-453 FILED: OCT. 2, 2019 CERTIORARI GRANTED: JULY 2, 2020 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Relevant Docket Entries From U.S. District Court For The Central District Of California, No. 2:05-cv-05133-SVW-MRW ........ 1 Relevant Docket Entries From The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, No. 10-56739 ....................................... 10 Relevant Docket Entries From The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, No. 17-55435 ....................................... 19 First Amended Class Action Complaint For Injunctive Relief And Damages, filed July 10, 2009 ............................................................. 25 Order Granting Defendants Archer–Daniels– Midland Co., Nestle U.S.A., And Cargill Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) For Failure To State A Claim, filed Sept. 8, 2010 ................................ 61 Opinion, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-56739, filed Sept. 4, 2014 .......................... 239 Amended Order denying rehearing, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-56739, filed June 10, 2015 .........................................280 Second Amended Complaint For Injunctive Relief And Damages, filed July 14, 2016....... 303 The following have been omitted from this Joint Ap- pendix because they appear in the appendix of the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Nestlé USA, Inc. v. ii John Doe I, et al., No. 19-416, on the following pages: APPENDIX A – Ninth Circuit’s Order Denying Rehearing En Banc and Amended Opin- ion (July 5, 2019) .............................................. 1a APPENDIX B – Ninth Circuit’s Opinion (Oct. 23, 2018) ......................................................... 47a APPENDIX C – District Court’s Order Grant- ing Motion to Dismiss (Mar. 2, 2017) ........... 63a 1 Relevant Docket Entries From The U.S. District Court For The Central District Of Cali- fornia (Western Division – Los Angeles), Civil Docket For Case # 2:05-cv-05133-SVW-MRW NO. DATE DESCRIPTION n/a 7/14/2005 LODGED COMPLAINT for- warded to Judge. Complaint sought to be filed by plain- tiffs John Doe, II, John Doe, I, John Doe, III, Global Ex- change.(pj) (Entered: 07/18/2005) 109 07/10/2009 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiffs John Doe, II, John Doe, I, John Doe, III, Global Exchange. First Amended Complaint (per Court Order) (Collingsworth, Terry) (Entered: 07/10/2009) 111 07/20/2009 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plain- tiffs' Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Cargill Cocoa. Motion set for hearing on 9/21/2009 at 01:30 PM be- fore Judge Stephen V. Wil- son. (Rubin, Lee) (Entered: 07/20/2009) 117 08/06/2009 Opposition re: MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended 2 Complaint 111 filed by Plain- tiffs John Doe, II, John Doe, I, John Doe, III, Global Ex- change. (Hoffman, Paul) (En- tered: 08/06/2009) 119 08/24/2009 REPLY Support MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 111 filed by De- fendant Cargill Incorporated Company. (Rubin, Lee) (En- tered: 08/24/2009) 138 09/08/2010 ORDER GRANTING DE- FENDANTS ARCHER-DAN- IELS-MIDLAND CO., NES- TLE U.S.A., AND CARGILL INC.S MOTION TO DIS- MISS PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) FOR FAIL- URE TO STATE A CLAIM by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: 111. Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend. If Plaintiffs elect to file an amended com- plaint, they shall do so no later than September 20, 2010. If Plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint at that time, Defendants shall submit a proposed final judg- 3 ment no later than Septem- ber 22, 2010. (im) (Entered: 09/08/2010) 145 10/13/2010 ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson Dismissing Claims With Prejudice and Dismiss- ing Plaintiff Global Ex- change's California Business and State Law Claim for Lack of Jurisdiction. In view of Plaintiffs' Response and the Court's September 8, 2010 Order, the Court holds that Plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJU- DICE. The claim of Plaintiff Global exchange for the al- leged violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17200 is dis- missed for lack of jurisdic- tion. (Made JS−6. Case Ter- minated.) (mg) (Entered: 10/15/2010) 146 11/04/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiff John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe, III, Global Ex- change. Appeal of Order on Motion to Dismiss,, 138 , Or- der, Terminated Case,,,, 145 (Appeal fee of $455 receipt number 0973-7765055 paid.) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 4 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Ex- hibit B)(Hoffman, Paul) (En- tered: 11/04/2010) 155 12/19/2013 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 146 filed by John Doe, II, Global Exchange, John Doe, I, John Doe, III, CCA # 10-56739. The Appeal is VACATED AND REMANDED. Order re- ceived in this district on 12/19/13. (mat) (Entered: 12/23/2013) 208 07/14/2016 SECOND AMENDED COM- PLAINT against Defendants Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill Cocoa, Cargill Incorporated Com- pany, Cargill West Africa S A, Nestle Ivory Coast, Nestle USA, Nestle', S.A. amending Complaint - (Discovery), 118 , filed by Plaintiffs John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe, III, John Doe, IV, John Doe, VI, John Doe, V (Attorney Cathe- rine Elizabeth Sweetser added to party John Doe, IV (pty:pla), Attorney Catherine Elizabeth Sweetser added to party John Doe, V (pty:pla), Attorney Catherine Eliza- beth Sweetser added to party 5 John Doe, VI (pty:pla)) (Sweetser, Catherine) (En- tered: 07/14/2016) 212 09/15/2016 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Doe Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint filed by Defend- ant Nestle USA. Motion set for hearing on 1/9/2017 at 01:30 PM before Judge Ste- phen V. Wilson. (Attach- ments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proof of Service) (Boutrous, Theodore) (Entered: 09/15/2016) 211 09/16/2016 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by defendants Archer Daniels Midland Co, Cargill Incorporated Company. Mo- tion set for hearing on 1/9/2017 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Pincus, Andrew) (En- tered: 09/15/2016) 222 11/07/2016 MEMORANDUM in Opposi- tion to NOTICE OF MO- TION AND MOTION to Dis- miss Doe Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 212 filed by Plaintiffs John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe, III, John Doe, IV, John Doe, VI, 6 John Doe, V. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF David J. Scheffer, # 2 Declaration OF Equal Exchange, Inc., # 3 Declaration of William J Acevez)(Sweetser, Catherine) (Entered: 11/07/2016) 229 12/08/2016 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff John Doe, I, John Doe, IV, John Doe, VI, John Doe, V, Global Ex- change, John Doe, II, John Doe, III pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) WITH PREDJUDICE as to Archer Daniels Midland Co. (Hoffman, Paul) (En- tered: 12/08/2016) 233 12/19/2016 REPLY in support of NO- TICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case 211 filed by Defendant Car- gill Incorporated Company. (Pincus, Andrew) (Entered: 12/19/2016) 234 12/19/2016 REPLY In Support Of NO- TICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Doe Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 212 filed by De- fendant Nestle USA. (Attach- ments: # 1 Declaration of Jan Paulsson Submitted Pursu- ant To FRCP 44.1, # 2 Proof 7 of Service)(Boutrous, Theo- dore) (Entered: 12/19/2016) 240 01/09/2017 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAM- BERS REQUESTING SUP- PLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The parties are ordered to do the following: File their sup- plemental briefs within five (5) days. The briefs shall not exceed ten (10) pages in length. Defendants are or- dered to file one joint brief. (mrgo) (Entered: 01/10/2017) 243 01/17/2017 REPLY in opposition to NO- TICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Doe Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 212 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case 211 SUP- PLEMENTAL BRIEF filed by Plaintiffs John Doe, I, John Doe, IV, John Doe, VI, John Doe, V, John Doe, II, John Doe, III, Global Ex- change. (Hoffman, Paul) (En- tered: 01/17/2017) 244 01/17/2017 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Doe Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 212 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss 8 Case 211 filed by Defendant Cargill Incorporated Com- pany. (Pincus, Andrew) (En- tered: 01/17/2017) 249 03/02/2017 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: ORDER GRANTING MO- TIONS TO DISMISS 211 , 212 WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The prevailing party shall submit a pro- posed judgment consistent with this order. (lc) (Entered: 03/10/2017) 251 03/30/2017 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by plaintiff John Doe, I, John Doe, IV, John Doe, VI, John Doe, V, John Doe, II, John Doe, III, Global Ex- change.