Divergent discourse between protests and counter-protests: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter Ryan J. Gallagher,∗ Andrew J. Reagan, Christopher M. Danforth, and Peter Sheridan Dodds Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Computational Story Lab, Vermont Complex Systems Center, and Vermont Advanced Computing Core The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 (Dated: October 20, 2016) Since the shooting of Black teenager Michael Brown by White police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri, the protest hashtag #BlackLivesMatter has amplified critiques of extrajudicial killings of Black Americans. In response to #BlackLivesMatter, other Twitter users have adopted #AllLivesMatter, a counter-protest hashtag whose content argues that equal attention should be given to all lives regardless of race. Through a multi-level analysis, we study how these protests and counter-protests diverge by quantifying aspects of their discourse. In particular, our method- ology facilitates additional qualitative analysis by measuring whether these divergences result from widespread discussion or a few popular retweets within these groups. We find that #BlackLivesMat- ter exhibits many informationally rich conversations, while those within #AllLivesMatter are more muted and susceptible to hijacking. We also show that the discussion within #BlackLivesMatter is more likely to center around the deaths of Black Americans, while that of #AllLivesMatter is more likely to sympathize with the lives of police officers and express politically conservative views. I. INTRODUCTION surrounding the broader Black Lives Matter movement and activist organization of the same name. Some have Protest movements have a long history of forcing dif- likened Black Lives Matter to the New Civil Rights move- ficult conversations in order to enact social change, and ment [17, 18], though the founders reject the comparison the increasing prominence of social media has allowed and self-describe Black Lives Matter as a \human rights" these conversations to be shaped in new and complex movement [19]. ways. Indeed, significant attention has been given to Researchers have only just begun to study the emer- how to quantify the discourse and dynamics of such social gence and structure of #BlackLivesMatter and its asso- movements. Recent work has studied movements such as ciated movement. To date and to the best of our knowl- Occupy Wall Street [1{3], the Arab Spring [4], and large- edge, Freelon et al. have provided the most comprehen- scale protests in Egypt and Spain [5, 6], and how they sive data-driven study of Black Lives Matter [20]. Their evolved with respect to their causes. The network struc- research characterizes the movement through multiple tures of movements have been also leveraged to answer frames and analyzes how Black Lives Matter has evolved questions about how protest networks facilitate informa- as a movement both online and offline. Other researchers tion diffusion [7], align with geospatial networks [8], and have given particular attention to the beginnings of the impact offline activism [9{11]. Both offline and online movement and its relation to the events of Ferguson, Mis- activists have been shown to be crucial to the formation souri. Jackson and Welles have shown that the initial up- of protest networks [12, 13] and play a critical role in the take of #Ferguson, a hashtag that precluded widespread eventual tipping point of social movements [14, 15]. use of #BlackLivesMatter, was due to the early efforts The protest hashtag #BlackLivesMatter has come to of \citizen journalists" [21], and Bonilla and Rosa argue represent a major social movement. The hashtag was that these citizens framed the story of Michael Brown in started by three women, Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, such a way that facilitated its eventual spreading [22]. arXiv:1606.06820v4 [cs.CL] 19 Oct 2016 and Opal Tometi, following the death of Trayvon Martin, Other related work has attempted to characterize the a Black teenager who was shot and killed by neighbor- demographics of #BlackLivesMatter users [23], and how hood watchman George Zimmerman in February 2012 these demographics are associated with spatial and lin- [16]. The hashtag was a \call to action" to address anti- guistic patterns of online and offline protesters [15]. Black racism, but it was not until November 2014 when The protest hashtag #BlackLivesMatter has found it- White Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson was not in- self contended by a relatively vocal counter-protest hash- dicted for the shooting of Michael Brown that #Black- tag: #AllLivesMatter. Advocates of #AllLivesMatter LivesMatter saw widespread use. Since then, the hashtag affirm that equal attention should be given to all lives, has been used in combination with other hashtags, such while #BlackLivesMatter supporters contend that such as #EricGarner, #FreddieGray, and #SandraBland, to a sentiment derails the Black Lives Matter movement. highlight the extrajudicial deaths of other Black Ameri- Such polarization has largely been studied within the cans. #BlackLivesMatter has organized the conversation context of the more traditional political sphere [24{26], though there has been some research of protest polar- ization of views of Occupy Wall Street [27] and of sec- ∗ [email protected] ularist versus Islamic views in Egypt during the Arab 2 20000 Number of #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter Tweets (10% Gardenhose Sample) #BlackLivesMatter #AllLivesMatter 15000 Death of Two NYPD Officers Outrage Over Darren Wilson Sandra Bland Death non-indictment Baltimore Protests Beyonce, John Legend 10000 Grammy Performances and Chapel Hill Shooting Daniel Pantaleo Charleston Church non-indictment Walter Scott Death Shooting Number of Tweets 5000 0 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 2014 2015 Time (Days) FIG. 1. Time series showing the number of #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter tweets from Twitter's 10% Gardenhose sample. The plot is annotated with several major events pertaining to the hashtags. Shaded regions indicate one-week periods where use of both #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter peaked in frequency. These are the periods we focus on in the present study. Spring [28, 29]. Like the aforementioned studies of social #AllLivesMatter more prominently discusses deaths of movements, much of the research on political polariza- law enforcement officers; #BlackLivesMatter facilitates tion has focused on the network structure of these polar- a rich structure of topic discussion, while #AllLivesMat- ized groups. Even in the cases where content analysis is ter yields a more clustered and less diverse set of topics; employed [25, 26, 28, 29], these studies largely focus on and #BlackLivesMatter is less susceptible to content in- trends of hashtags, discarding a significant portion of the jection and \hijacking" than #AllLivesMatter. We fin- textual data surrounding these movements. ish with a discussion of some implications of these find- In this paper, we comprehensively quantify the ways ings, and how these methods relate to the broader lit- in which the protest and counter-protest discourse of erature surrounding large-scale analysis of protest move- #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter differs most ments and political polarization. significantly. To do so, we first apply entropy-based tools to detect word-level differences between the text of the two hashtags. In the context of Twitter, these meth- II. MATERIALS AND METHODS ods allow us to not only quantify discourse divergences between #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter, but A. Data Collection to also discern whether these divergences are due to a small number of popular retweets or diverse conversa- We collected tweets containing #BlackLivesMatter tion among many users. Unlike previous studies, this and #AllLivesMatter (case-insensitive) from the period facilitates more careful qualitative interpretation of di- August 8th, 2014 to August 31st, 2015 from the Twit- vergences between politically polarized groups. ter Gardenhose feed. The Gardenhose represents a We follow the study of word-level divergences with the 10% random sample of all public tweets. Our sub- construction of \hashtag topic networks" that allow us to sample resulted in 767,139 #BlackLivesMatter tweets perform a topic-level analysis. The last section of analy- from 375,620 unique users and 101,498 #AllLivesMatter sis measures the overall information diversity of #Black- tweets from 79,753 unique users. Of these tweets, 23,633 LivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter, finding that #Black- of them contained both hashtags. When performing our LivesMatter exhibits more diverse conversations than analyses, these tweets appear in each corpus. #AllLivesMatter. By framing our analyses through sev- Previous work has emphasized the importance of view- eral different methods, we are able to analyze the dynam- ing protest movements through small time scales [20, 21]. ics of #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter at mul- In addition, we do not attempt to characterize all of tiple levels and validate several findings: #BlackLives- the narratives that exist within #BlackLivesMatter and Matter more prominently discusses Black deaths, while #AllLivesMatter. Therefore, we choose to restrict our 3 analysis to eight one-week periods where there were si- twice that of the first text, even though we would expect multaneous spikes in #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLives- the second text to be twice as diverse. In order to make Matter. These one-week periods are labeled on Fig. 1 and