The Tectonostratigraphic Setting of Stratabound Sulphide Deposits in the Southern Trondheim Region, Central Norwegian Caledonides

The Tectonostratigraphic Setting of Stratabound Sulphide Deposits in the Southern Trondheim Region, Central Norwegian Caledonides

The Tectonostratigraphic Setting of Stratabound Sulphide Deposits in the southern Trondheim Region, Central Norwegian Caledonides ODD NILSEN Nilsen, O. 1988: The tectonostratigraphic setting 01 stratabound sulphide deposits in the southern Trondheim region, Central Norwegian Caledonides. Nor. geol. under. Buff. 412. 55-66. The large number 01 mainly massive, polyrnetallic, stratabound sulphide deposits within the sout­ hern Trondheim region are spatially conlined to the different nappe units 01the central Scandinavi­ an Caledonides. The rocks 01 the parautochthon and Lower Allochthon comprise metasandstones and arkoses which are virtually barren 01 any sulphide mineralizations, except lor a lew showings 01 "sandstone lead' disseminat ions. The middle and lowermost parts 01 the Upper Allochthon are dominated by sediment-ho sted chalcopyr itelpyrrhotite assemblage s within calcareous mixed pelitic and psammitic rocks with minor malic metavolcanic and plutonic intercalations. The structurally higher Gula and St0renlMerAker units 01 the Trondheim Nappe Complex 01 the Upper Allochthon contain chiefly pyrite-dominated assemblages in malic and mixed malicllels ic volcanogenic settings and have highly variable Cu, Zn and Pb contents. The stratabound sulphides 01 the Trondheim region were deposited during successive stages and within restricted sedimentary and volcano­ sedimentary environment s related to the development 01 the lapetus Ocean. Deposition started in basin sediments during Late Protero zoic rilt ing, but was mainly the result 01 early subduction and the development 01 an active island-arc magmatism in the Early Ordovician. The structural and strat igraphical sequences were subsequently affected by Caledonian lolding and metamorphism prior to and during eastward transport as composite nappe units in Silurian times. The post­ depositional tectoni c and metamorphic events have affected the different ores and their wallrocks to various degree as revealed by apparent tectonic control and the internal metamorphic tabric 01 the deposits. Odd Nilsen, Institutt for Geotoql, Universitetet i Oslo. P.OBox 1047. Blindern, 0316 Oslo 3. Norway. Introduction Recent research has led to significant advan­ The Trondheim region const itutes one of the ces in our general understand ing of the structu­ most important mining districts in the Scandina­ ral geometry and the tectonostratigraphical vian Caledonides . For more than 350 years the relationships between the different major tecto­ district has served as a main producer of nic units of the Scandinavian Caledonides. In coppe r and pyrite, and the region can still be particular, within the context of IGCP Project reagarded as one of the most important copper no. 60 (CCSS) the palaeogeographic and pa­ districts in Norway. laeotectonic environments of deposition of the The geology of the southern part of the massive sulphide deposits of the orogen have region covered by 1:250.000 map-sheet "R0­ been reexamined and redefined (Zachrisson ros ' has recently been comp iled (Nilsen & 1977,1980,1986, Bjerlykke et al. 1980, Grenne Wolff, in press), and the present account covers et al. 1980, Yokes 1980, Stephens et al. 1984, the geolog ical setting of the stratabound sulphi­ Grenne & Lagerblad 1985). However, in compa­ de mineral deposits of this map area, with rison with similar deposits in the Caledonides special reference to the tectonostratigraphical of Sweden and the western and north-sentral framework of the region. Earlier reviews on the parts of the Norwegian Caledonides, limited stratabound sulphide depos its of the region attention has been paid over the last decade have been given by Helland (1873), Holmsen to the setting and nature of these deposits in (1919), Foslie (1925, 1926), Wolff (1967), Yokes the south-sentral part of the Trondheim region (1976), Rui (1977), Bugge (1978) and Nilsen (Fig. 1). (1978). 56 Odd Nilsen NGU- BULL.4 12,19 88 TECTONOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE SOUTHERN TRONDHEIM REGION UPPER ALLOCHTHON Storen Meroker Nappe Nappe Gula Gula Nappe Nappe BlOho Essonchjo·0yfjell Nappe Nappe MI DDLE ALLOCHTHON Seetrc Remsklepp Risberget Nappe Nap pe Amotsdal Kvitvola Nap pe Noppe LOW ER AllOC HTHO N Osen­ Roe Nappe Fig. 1. Tectonostrat igraphic map of the southern Trondheim Region, centra l Norway (on facing page). In the key map (above) the Caledonian auocntnon is stippled. In the legend (this page), nappe names to the left are for the western part of the region, and those to the right for eastern areas. PARAUTOCHTHON/ AUTOCHTHON .................. Precombrion ..............····· crystalline ... ... ... ... .. ... .. The southern Trond heim region comprises ............... CB...... ... ... ......... basement a sequence of nappes emplaced above an autochthonous or parautochthonous Precam­ • - Sulphide ore deposit brian crystalline basement with a thin cover of Vendian to Lower Palaeozoic sediments. The allochthonous complexes are derived from four groups of allochthonous comp lexes: the av wide variety of environments and include Lower, Middle, Upper and Uppermost Alloch­ elements of the Precambrian basement. Syn­ thons, the last-mentioned not being present theses of the tectonostratigraphic development in the area under discussion. A correlation of the Trondheim region Caledonides have of the different formal and informal nappe been given by Roberts (1978), Wolff (1979), units of the region in the framework of this Wolff & Roberts (1980) and Roberts & Wolff tectonostratigraphy is presented in Table 1, (1981 ), and a descr iption of the central-sout­ and the setting of the strata bound mineralizati­ hern part of the Scandinavian Caledonides has ons will be described accord ing to these sub­ been presented by Gee et al. (1985b). Ro­ divisions (Table 1, Fig. 1). berts & Wolff (1981) distinguished three major allochthonous complexes within the Trondheim region; the Basal, Lower and Upper AIIoch­ Tectonostratigraphyand thons. More recently, a compilation of the tecto­ mineralizations nostratigraphy of the Scandinavian Caledoni­ Lower Allochthon des has been published in a 1:2 M map by The Lower Allochthon is developed in the Gee et al. (1985a). They distinguish between eastern and southern part of the region (Fig. NGU- BULL. 412, 1988 The Tectonostratigraphic Setting ofStratabound Sulphide Deposits 57 58 OddNilsen NGU- 8U LL. 412 ,1988 TEGONOSTRATIGRAPH Y WESTERN SUCCESSION EASTERN SUCC ESSION Robe , ', & Wolf! Gee et 01. (19811 (1985) Hovin G p . ST0REN MERAKER Sulcimo G p . UPPER NAPPE Stc ren G p. AL LOC HT HO N NAPPE Fund sjo O p . Undol Fm. G ULA (Trond heim G ULA Asli Fm. G ulo Gp No ppe Comp lex) G ulo G p . NAPPE UPPER NAPPE Singse s f m. Sing so s Fm. A LLO CHTHO N ESSANDSJ0- Rosjo Fm, BLAH 0 0 YFJEll Aursund G p. NAPPE NAPPE LOWER Stug USjD Fm. S,URA- AL LO CH THO N Tynset G p . RISBERGET REMSKLEPP N APPE NAPPE A ugen gne iu M IDDLE ""nit ALLOCHT HON AMOTSDAL KVITVOL A NAPP E BASAL NAPPE ALLOCHTHON LOWER OSEN-R0A A LLOCHTH O N NAP PE PARAUTOCH THO N AUTOC HTHO N PRECAMBR IAN CRYSTALLINEBASEM EN T Table 1. Tectonostratigraphy of the southern Trondheim region. The main tectonic units according to Roberts & Wolff (1981) and Gee et al. (1985a, b) are shown in the centre of the diagram. They are flanked by their corresponding sub-units of the western and eastern parts of the region which are mentioned in the text. The nomenclature of major units adopted in this account is that of Gee et al. (1985a, b). 1), and includes part of the Oseri-Re« Nappe 1981). No economic sandstone lead deposits Camp/ex (Nystuen 1981). It comprises Late are known within the region, but two minor Proterozoic sandsto nes, arkoses and quart­ pyritic lead/zinc pro spects in Tufsingdalen are zites of the so-ca lled "Sparagmite basin". In the confin ed to an intercalated black phyllite unit. western part of the region major repetitions of parautochthonous basement gneisses appe­ ar as slices within the Lower and Middle Alloch­ Middle AI/ochthon thons which, in this district, were more strongly The Middle Allochthon compr ises a comp lex recumbently folded and refolded during the of several separate nappe units above the Caledonian orogeny than correlatives in the Lower Allochthon. In its lower part the Kvitvole eastern and southern areas. and Amotsda/ Nappes consist of barren arko­ The Lower Allochthon is virtually barren of ses and feldspathic quartzites, generally devel­ any sulphide mineralization of economic signifi­ ped as flagstones. A conspicuous zone of ance. However , several low-grade lead minera­ mylonites and phyllonites usually separates the lizations have recently been discove red within Kvitvola and Amotsdal Nappes from the overly­ the autochthonous and parautoc hthonous ing Remsklepp Nappe. sandst one/black shale sequences close to the The Remsk/epp Nappe (Wolff 1979) compri­ contact to the Precambrian basement granites ses an augen-gn eiss unit which has been in the Femund area in the southeastern part corr elated with the Tannas Augen Gneiss of the region (Krause & Bakke 1986). There. Napp e in southern Jarntlano in Sweden (Ask­ galena occurs as disseminations within the lund 1960, Stromberq 1962). The major part Late Proterozo ic to Cambrian sandstones, and of the Remsklepp Nappe consists of a series apparently represents the class of "sandstone of strong ly imbricated, mostly flat-lying sheets lead' ores of the Laisvall-type which extent of feldspathic quartzites with intercalations of along the Caledonian fron t zone through quartz phyllites, crysta lline limestones, mafic Sweden and

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us