Michael J. Almeida

Michael J. Almeida

1 MICHAEL J. ALMEIDA UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO • DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY AND CLASSICS • SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78249 • (210) 458-7748 • [email protected] HTTPS://PHILPEOPLE.ORG/PROFILES/MIKE-ALMEIDA HTTPS://MIKEALMEIDA.WEEBLY.COM/ EDUCATION Ph. D. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH B. A. Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA TEACHING EXPERIENCE 2004-present Professor of Philosophy University of Texas at San Antonio 2007-2014 Chair, Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy and Classics University of Texas at San Antonio 1996-2003 Associate Professor of Philosophy University of Texas at San Antonio 1990-1995 Assistant Professor of Philosophy University of Texas at San Antonio AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Philosophy of Religion, Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Metaphysics AREAS OF COMPETENCE Ethical Theory, Modal Logic PUBLICATIONS Books • Cosmological Arguments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018) • Freedom, God, and Worlds (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) • The Metaphysics of Perfect Beings (London: Routledge, 2008) 2 • Imperceptible Harms and Benefits (ed.) M.J. Almeida (Dordrecht-Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000). Articles • 'Deontic Problems with Prohibition Dilemmas' Logique et Analyse, No. 127-128 (1989) 163-175 • 'Deontic Logic and the Possibility of Moral Conflict' Erkenntnis, 33 (1990) 51-71 • 'The Paradoxes of Feldman's Neo-Utilitarianism' Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1992) 455-468. • 'Collective Rationality and Simple Utilitarian Theories' Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review XXXIII (1994) 363-375 • 'Refuting van Inwagen's "Refutation": Evidentialism Again' International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (1998) 23-29 • 'Too Much (and Not Enough) of a Good Thing: How Agent Neutral Theories Fail in Prisoner's Dilemmas' Philosophical Studies 94, No. 3 (1999) 309-328 • 'Rule Utilitarianism and the Right to Die' in (eds.) Robert Almeder and James Humber, Is There a Duty to Die? Volume XVII Biomedical Ethics Review (New York: Humana Press Co., 1999) 81-97. • 'Utility Pumps and the Value of Partial Compliance' in (ed.) M.J. Almeida, Imperceptible Harms and Benefits (Dordrecht-Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000) 95-110. • 'Why We Ought to be a Little Less Beneficent' Analysis 60 No. 1 (2000) 97-106 • 'Opportunistic Carnivorism', (with M. Bernstein) Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol. 17, No. 2, (2000) 205-212 • 'Introduction' in (ed.) M. J. Almeida, Imperceptible Harms and Benefits (Dordrecht- Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000) pp. ix - xiii • 'A New Cosmological Argument Undone' (with N. Judisch) International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Vol. 51, (2002) 55-64. 3 • 'Rowe’s Argument from Freedom' International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Vol. 52 (2003a) 83-91 • 'Lucky Libertarianism' (with M. Bernstein) Philosophical Studies 113, No. 2: (2003b) 93-119. • 'Sceptical Theism and Evidential Arguments from Evil' (with G. Oppy) Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol.81, No. 4, (2003c) 496-516. • 'A Paradox for Significant Freedom' International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 54 (2003d) 175-184 • 'Marginal Cases and the Moral Status of Embryos' in (eds.) Robert Almeder and James Humber, Stem Cell Research Volume XXI Biomedical Ethics Review (New York: Humana Press Co., 2004a) 25-42. • 'Ideal Worlds and the Transworld Untrustworthy' Religious Studies Vol. 40, No. 1 (2004b) 113-123 • 'Evidential Arguments from Evil and Skeptical Theism' (with G. Oppy) Philo Vol. 8, No. 2 Fall-Winter (2004c) 84 - 94 • 'Supervenience and Property-Identical Divine Command Theory' Religious Studies Vol. 40 No. 3 (2004d) 323-333 • 'The New Evidential Argument Defeated' Philo Vol. 7, No. 1 Spring-Summer (2005a) 22-35 • 'Is it Impossible to be Moral?' Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review Vol. XLVI (2005b) 3-14 • 'Is it Impossible to Relieve Suffering?' (with M. Bernstein) Philosophia Vol. 32, Nos. 1-4 (2005c) 313-324 • 'Reply to Trakakis and Nagasawa' (with G. Oppy) Ars Disputandi Vol. 5 (2005d) 5-11 • 'Infinitely Improving Worlds' Philo Vol. 8, No. 1, Spring-Summer (2005e) 37-45 • 'Evidential Arguments from Evil' in Arguing About Gods (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006) (w/ G. Oppy) 289 – 313 4 • 'On Stone’s Evidential Atheism' Theoria Vol. 76, No. 1 (2006b) 5-22 • 'The Unreal Problem of No Best World' Philo Vol. 9, No. 2 (2006c) 103-112 • 'Rowe’s Argument from Improvability' Philosophical Papers Vol. 31, No. 6, (2006a) 1-26 • 'Martin on Miracles' Philo Vol. 10, No. 1, Spring-Summer 2007 • 'On Vague Eschatology' Faith and Philosophy Vol. (25) No. 4 (2008) 359-375 • 'On Evil's Vague Necessity', Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Volume II Jon Kvanvig (ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009a) 1-16. • 'Critically Muddled: Reply to Carrier' Philo Vol. 11, No. 1 (2009b) • 'Rollbacks, Endorsements, and Indeterminism', The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd edition, ed. Robert Kane (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010a) 484-498 (with M. Bernstein). • 'Two Challenges to Moral Nihilism' The Monist Vol. 93 (2010b) 96-105 • 'Chance, Epistemic Probability, and Saving Lives: Reply to Bradley' Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (2010c) 1-7. • 'O'Connor's Permissive Multiverse' Philosophia Christi Vol. 12, No. 2 (2010d) 297-308. • 'Theistic Modal Realism?', Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Volume III Jon Kvanvig (ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) 1-15. • 'The Logical Problem of Evil Regained', Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume XXXVI: “The Concept of Evil.” (2012) 163-176. • 'Skeptical Theism and Undercutting Defeaters', in T. Dougherty and J. McBrayer (eds.) New Essays on Skeptical Theism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014) 115- 131. 5 • 'Best Worlds and Multiverses' in Klaas Kraay (ed.), God and the Multiverse: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Perspectives, (London: Routledge, 2014). 149-161 • 'C. S. Lewis is Great But You Should Be Reading Alvin Plantinga', The Critique (2015) 1 – 13. • 'Bringing About Perfect Worlds', in K. Timpe and D. Speak (eds.) Free Will and Theism: Connections, Contingencies and Concerns (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016). 195 – 213. • 'Compatibilism and the Free Will Defense', in David Hunt and H. McCann (eds.) Free Will and Classical Theism: The Significance of Free Will in Perfect Being Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016) 56 – 70. • 'Theistic Modal Realism I: The Challenge of Theistic Actualism', Philosophy Compass Vol. 12, (2017) 1 - 14 • 'Theistic Modal Realism II: Theoretical Benefits', Philosophy Compass Vol. 12 (2017) 1 – 17. • 'A posteriori Anselmianism', Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy Vol. 36, Issue 4 (2017) 599–607 • 'The Multiverse and Divine Creation', Special Issue on Theodicy, Religions 8 (12) (2017) 1 – 10 • 'Endurantism, Fixity, and Fatalism', Symposium on Our Fate: Essays on God and Free Will, in Science, Religion and Culture 4(2): (2018) 47-55. • 'What Norms or Values Define Excellent Philosophy of Religion?' www.PhilosophyOfReligion.org (March 2018) • 'Actuality and Anselm', in Graham Oppy (ed.) Ontological Arguments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018) 155-175. o ' Unrestricted Actualization and Perfect Worlds: A Reply to Langtry', Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion (ed.) Dean Zimmerman, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming) o 'Absolute Explanations and Theistic Modal Realism', in Kirk Loughheed (ed.) The Axiology of Theism (Oxford: Bloomsbury, forthcoming) o 'Comments on Oppy', in Kirk Loughheed (ed.) The Axiology of Theism (Oxford: Bloomsbury, forthcoming) 6 o 'Comments on Dumsday', in Kirk Loughheed (ed.) The Axiology of Theism (Oxford: Bloomsbury, forthcoming) o 'Comments on Hendricks', in Kirk Loughheed (ed.) The Axiology of Theism (Oxford: Bloomsbury, forthcoming) o 'Reply to Oppy, Dumsday, and Hendricks', in Kirk Loughheed (ed.) The Axiology of Theism (Oxford: Bloomsbury, forthcoming) RESEARCH IN PROGRESS _____________________________________________________________ 'Against Agnosticism' 'Single Assassin Grim Reapers' 'Necessary Gratuitous Evils' 'Salmon's Paradox Resolved' 'Chisholm's Paradox and Divine Omnipotence' ENCYCLOPEDIA ENTRIES 'Perfect Being Theology' Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion (forthcoming) BOOK REVIEWS _____________________________________________________________ Free Will and Universal Causality W. Matthews Grant, (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019) European Journal for Philosophy of Religion (forthcoming) Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter van Inwagen John A. Keller (ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) Faith and Philosophy, 35 (2) (2018) 264-271 (3900 wrds.) God, Modality, and Morality William E. Mann (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015) Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2016, 3500 wrds.) The Mechanics of Divine Foreknowledge and Providence: A Time-Ordering Account T. Ryan Byerly (New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014) International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (2015) 255-259. 7 God, Reason, and Reality Anselm Ramelow (ed.) (Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 2014) Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2014) God and Moral Law: On the Theistic Explanation of Morality Mark C. Murphy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2012) God and Necessity Brian Leftow (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) The Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 64, No. 254 (2014) 152-4 A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil Andrew Gleeson (Basingstoke:

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us