1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF JULY, 2013 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN .M. SHANTANAGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO.100674/2013 (S-RES) BETWEEN: Chandrashekar S/o Subhashchandra Kolekar Age: 33 years, Occ: Asst. Teacher Higher Primary school, Wandal Tq. Basavana Bagewadi Dist: Bijapur. …Petitioner (By Sri. B.K.Hiremath, Advocate) AND: 1. The State of Karnataka By its Secretary Department of Primary & Secondary Education M.S. Building, Bangalore-560006. 2. The Karnataka Residential Education Institutions Society 2 And organization of Social Welfare Department, Represented by its Secretary, No.179, 3 rd Floor, 1st Main, Seshadirpuram Bangalore-560020. 3. The Secretary Selection Committee and the Karnataka Residential Education Institutions Society No.179, 3 rd Floor, 1 st Main Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560020. ... Respondents (Sri Sharanabasappa K. Babshetty, HCGP) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner filed under Annexure-G dated 20.12.2011 and select the petitioner for the post of Principal for Morarji Desai or Kittur Rani Channamma Schools run by respondents. This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following: ORDER Petitioner has sought for direction to consider his representation Annexure-‘G’ dated 20.12.2011. He has also sought for his selection to the post of Principal of 3 Morarji Desai or Kittur Rani Channamma Schools run by the respondents. 2. Petitioner has served as Assistant Teacher in Government Higher Primary School. According to him, now he is not serving in any institution. However, it seems he has applied for the post of Principal of Morarji Desai or Kittur Rani Channamma Schools run by the respondents. Since his application is not considered, this writ petition is filed. 3. Learned Government Pleader submits that the selection list is already issued and the name of the petitioner does not find place in the selection list. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of appointments to be issued, it is open for him to question the same in accordance with law. Be that as it may, at this stage this Court cannot issue direction to the respondents to consider the 4 application of the petitioner for the post of Principal, since the selection is already made. Petition fails and the same stands dismissed . Sd/- JUDGE swk.