Transnational Pilot River Basin Lusatian Neisse Lužická Nisa (CEC) Lausitzer Neiße (GER) Nysa Łużycka (POL) Testing of CIS Guidance Documents Final Report Phase I Transnational Pilot River Basin Lusatian Neisse Lužická Nisa (CEC) Lausitzer Neiße (GER) Nysa Łużycka (POL) Testing of CIS Guidance Documents Final Report Phase I Partner: Scientific Coordinator Sponsor Umweltbundesamt Federal Environmental Agency Dr. Heidemeier Postfach 330022 Staatliches Umweltfachamt Bautzen 14191 Berlin Dr. Bernd Fritzsche (Coordinator), Silvina Gondlach, Heiko Sonntag Phone: +49 (0)30 8903-0 Postfach 1343 02603 Bautzen Phone: +49 3591/273-130 Email: [email protected] Partner Consultants Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic umweltbüro essen (ube) Mr. Oldrich Novicky Martin Halle, Dr. Petra Podraza Vršovická 65 Rellinghauser Str. 334 f 100 10 Praha 10 45136 Essen Phone: +420 267 122 313 Email: [email protected] Phone: +49 2 01 / 86 061-0 [email protected] RZGW – Wrocław Ingenieurgesellschaft Prof.Dr. Sieker mbH (IPS) dr inż. Halina Szymańska Dr. Heiko Sieker ul. Norwida 34 Rennbahnallee 109 A 50-950 Wroclaw 2 15366 Hoppegarten Phone: +48 71 328 3030 Phone: +49 33 42 / 35 95-15 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Wrocław Branch, Dr. Jan Błachuta ul. Parkowa 30, 51-616 Wrocław Phone (71) 32 00 161 [email protected] T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute Branch Ostrava, Ing. Jan Sviták Podbabská 30, Praha 6, 160 62 Phone: +420 220 197 111 Email: [email protected] PRB Lusatian Neisse 3 CONTENT CONTENT ................................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................8 1.1 Pilot River Basins ........................................................................................................8 1.2 Purpose of the PRB Neisse project.............................................................................9 1.3 Partners.....................................................................................................................10 1.3.1 Germany .......................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Poland.............................................................................................................................. 11 1.3.3 Czech Republic................................................................................................................ 11 2 Catchment Characterization .........................................................................................13 2.1 General description ...................................................................................................13 2.2 Specific characterizations of the Czech part of the catchment..................................15 2.3 Specific characterizations of the Polish part of the catchment..................................16 2.3.1 Identification of significant changes in morphology of water bodies................................ 17 2.3.2 Surface waters................................................................................................................. 18 2.3.3 Ground waters ................................................................................................................. 18 2.4 Specific characterizations of the German part of the catchment...............................19 3 Identification of water bodies .......................................................................................20 3.1 Czech strategy for water bodies delineation .............................................................20 3.2 Polish strategy for water body delineation.................................................................25 3.2.1 Characteristics of water types.......................................................................................... 25 3.2.2 Identification of water bodies [WB] and artificial water bodies [AWB] ............................. 25 3.2.3 Identification of heavily modified water bodies ................................................................ 28 3.3 German strategy for water bodies delineation...........................................................30 3.3.1 Categories of water bodies .............................................................................................. 30 3.3.2 Typology .......................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.3 Significant natural physical features ................................................................................ 32 3.3.4 Other criteria .................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.5 Results for the Saxonian part of the Neisse Basin .......................................................... 37 3.4 Common map for water bodies .................................................................................38 3.4.1 Ground water bodies ....................................................................................................... 38 3.4.2 Surface Water Bodies...................................................................................................... 39 3.5 ToR-Answers on water bodies delineation................................................................40 4 Classification of surface water status and reference conditions (REFCOND) ........44 4.1 Czech strategy for classification of surface water status and reference conditions ..44 4.2 Polish strategy for classification of surface water status and reference conditions...44 4.2.1 Classification of reference conditions .............................................................................. 44 4.2.2 Comparison of water bodies with reference conditions................................................... 46 4.2.3 Description of the results of classification........................................................................ 48 4.3 German strategy for classification of surface water status and reference conditions49 4.3.1 Lakes ............................................................................................................................... 49 4.3.2 Rivers............................................................................................................................... 50 4.3.3 Steckbriefe der deutschen Fließgewässertypen.............................................................. 52 PRB Lusatian Neisse 4 4.4 Common REFCOND results .....................................................................................52 4.5 ToR-Answers on REFCOND.....................................................................................53 5 Analysis of pressures and impacts (IMPRESS)..........................................................54 5.1 Czech strategy for pressures and impacts analysis..................................................54 5.2 Polish strategy for pressures and impacts analysis ..................................................56 5.2.1 Identification of pressures on surface waters .................................................................. 56 5.2.2 Evaluation of pressures ................................................................................................... 57 5.2.3 Description of causes of pressures.................................................................................. 58 5.2.4 Pressures forecast........................................................................................................... 65 5.3 German strategy for pressures and impacts analysis ...............................................66 5.3.1 Driving forces................................................................................................................... 67 5.3.2 Pressures......................................................................................................................... 68 5.3.3 State................................................................................................................................. 79 5.3.4 Impacts ............................................................................................................................ 80 5.4 Common results of pressures and impacts analysis.................................................81 5.4.1 Mandau-Catchment ......................................................................................................... 81 5.4.2 Polish-Catchment Czerwona Woda River ....................................................................... 86 5.5 Risk Assessment for the surface water bodies .........................................................91 5.6 ToR-Answers on pressures and impacts analysis ....................................................93 6 Monitoring (MONITORING). ..........................................................................................94 6.1 Czech strategy for monitoring ...................................................................................94 6.2 Polish strategy for monitoring....................................................................................95 6.2.1 Description of the monitoring of surface water ................................................................ 95 6.2.2 Surveillance monitoring ..................................................................................................