Bibliography• _____, “Can you Remember When . .,” Bradenton Herald, 22 August 1948. _____, “Tavernier Man Recalls Storm of 1935,” Bradenton Herald, 6 September 1948. 2fla Vacation and Travel Guide, “History of the Gulf Beaches of Bradenton / Sarasota Florida: History – Anna Maria Island,” Online, http://www.2fla.com/history.htm, Accessed: August 2002. Anderson, Al, “Neighbors: Yesterday and today,” Bradenton Herald, 19 April 1988. Anna Maria Island Chamber of Commerce, “Island History,” 2000, Online, http://annamariaislandchamber.org/history.cfm, Accessed: August 2002. Burger, B.W, Archaeological Investigations at Perico Island North Midden (8-Ma-6A), Perico Island, Manatee County, Florida (1982): 36-43. City of Bradenton, City of Bradenton Comprehensive Plan, Revised 24 October 1001. City of Holmes Beach, City of Holmes Beach Comprehensive Plan, Adopted May 1989, Revised 16 April 1997. Daughters of the American Revolution, Osceola Chapter, “Manatee County, Florida,” 2002, Online, http://home.att.net/~osceoladar/ manateeco.htm, Accessed: August 2002. Drysdale, William, “A Visit to Palma Sola in 1884,” New York Times, 1884. Reprint from the papers of Carl D. King. Florida Department of Transportation Central Environmental Management Office, Florida Scenic Highways Program Manual (Transportation Consulting Group, Inc.: January 1996; Carter & Burgess: October 1998). Palma Sola Scenic Highway Bibliography• Florida Department of Transportation, SR 64 PD&E Study – Preliminary Engineering Report and Final Location Hydraulic Report, (Harland Bartholomew & Associates: 1991). Hunsicker, Charlie. Telephone conversation with author, 29 August 2002. Hunsicker, Charlie. “Robinson Preserve Application,” Florida Communities Trust Florida Forever Program. 2002. Kimball, Steve, ed., “Let’s Build a Museum!” The Islander, 1 April 1965. Leffingwell, Jack B, “Story of Palma Sola, ‘The Lumber City’, Given,” Bradenton Herald, 16 November 1947. Manatee County, Manatee County Comprehensive Plan, selected elements, January 2002. Manatee County, Paddle Manatee: A Guide to Area Canoe and Kayak Trails. Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program, Sarasota Bay – The Voyage to Paradise Reclaimed: The Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for Sarasota Bay, 1995. Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program, Sarasota Bay Blueways: Recreational Opportunities for the Boater, 1999. Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program; National Park Service, Rivers, Trails, & Conservation Assistance Program; Manatee and Sarasota Counties; City of Sarasota, Gulf Coast Heritage Trail, 1999. Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program, Sarasota Bay 2000 – A Decade of Progress, 2000. Sarasota-Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization, Transportation Improvement Program: Fiscal Year 2001 / 2002 – 2005-2006, Adopted 25 June 2001. Palma Sola Scenic Highway Bibliography• Sarasota-Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization, Year 2025 Financially Feasible Transportation Plan, Adopted 26 February 2001. Warner, Joe. “Palma Sola,” Chapter 7 of Singing River. Self- published, 1986. 19-20. Warner, Joe. “Balis’ Bayou,” Chapter 8 of Singing River. Self- published, 1986. 25. McMurria, Mary. “The Story of Palma Sola. Bradenton, Florida,” Bradenton Herald Sunday Magazine, 14 May 1967. Siam Garden Resort, “Anna Maria Island – A 500 Year History,” Online, http://www.siamgardenresort.com/history.htm, Accessed: August 2002. Steiger, Jean, “Perico Bayou – a beautiful mosaic,” The Islander, 10 April 2002. Stinemetz, Morgan, “Perico Bayou has a colorful history,” Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 22 May 1996. Wierenga, Scott, “Palma Sola: . an 1880s Eden ‘Smaller Than New York, Bigger Than No Place At All,’ Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 30 November 1980. Wilkinson, Jerry, “History of the Seminoles,” Online, http://www.keyshistory.org/seminolespage1.html, Accessed: August 2002. Palma Sola Scenic Highway CAG Monthly Meeting Notes• Appendix A• Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. Architectural, Engineering, Planning and Environmental Services MEETING NOTES Subject: Palma Sola Scenic Highway Designation Study Date: March 28, 2002 Project No. 101 0772-012 Note Taker: Carmen Chronister Task No. 7702 Meeting Location: Room 939 Meeting Date: March 20, 2002 Shared Conference Room Manatee Cty Gov’t Bldg 1112 Manatee Avenue West (34205) Meeting Participants: Sandy Haas-Martens – City of Holmes Beach Darenda Marvin – Grimes Goebel John Czerepak – FDOT District 1 Planning Gene Gallo - City of Bradenton Mike Guy – MPO Pat Copeland – Anna Maria Island Sun Paul Road – Anna Maria Islander Jane von Hahmann – Manatee County Carmen Chronister – RS&H Ken Crayton – Perico Isle Myra Monreal – RS&H Joan Dunn – Perico Bay Club Following are the Minutes of this Meeting: Please review and direct any required revisions to Carmen Chronister at 904-279-2144 (phone), 904-279-2491 (fax), [email protected] (email) within two weeks from the above date. The following is a summary (rather than minutes) of the activities that occurred in the March Corridor Advocacy Group Meeting of the Palma Sola Scenic Highway Designation Study. • Co-Chair brought the meeting to order shortly after 3:30 pm. • Ms. Chronister explained that Ms. Susan King, Florida Scenic Highways Program Coordinator for FDOT District 1 was absent due to a recent death in the family. Agenda Item 1 – Letter of Intent Update • Since Ms. King had been scheduled to present the final draft of the Letter of Intent to the CAG for their approval, Ms. Chronister proposed that the CAG take action to permit Ms. King to send the draft electronically to the co-chairs only for final review and comment. The motion was made and seconded, with the CAG expressing their support of this action. Agenda Item 2 – Vision Statement Comments • Ms. Chronister asked the CAG to review and adopt the Draft “Working Vision.” It was explained that the Working Vision was an informal document which could be modified prior to submittal of the Eligibility document. • To further clarify the concept of the Working Vision, Ms. Chronister provided an explanation of the terms “Vision,” “Goals,” “Objectives,” “Policies,” and “Strategies.” It was iterated that the “Vision” is an ideal that the fulfillment of all the stated goals would achieve. It was Meeting Notes Held March 20, 2002 Page 2 further explained that, with diligence and hard work, achieving the vision might be something our grandchildren would experience – that the “Vision” was something that would take a lot of time and money to achieve. • Ms. Chronister stated that in the next meeting, a draft set of goals would be presented for review and comment. The draft goals would be provided to the CAG in the meeting packets they would receive approximately one week prior to the next meeting. Agenda Items 3 and 4 – Schedule and Workshop Special Note: These two agenda items were discussed concurrently since the first part of the Workshop agenda item entailed establishing a Date and Location for the Workshop. • Ms. Chronister suggested that the CAG set a standard time and established place for their meetings. This would enable public notification about the meeting schedule to be published. • Ms. Chronister noted, however, that for the next two months, there should be exceptions to this arrangement. The exceptions would allow the CAG to review and comment on the materials and format of the Public Workshop to be held during the month of April. For this reason, April 10 was set for the next CAG meeting. • For reasons discussed below, the CAG also voted to hold their May meeting on May 22. • The CAG moved and approved the establishment of the third Wednesday of the month for their meetings, beginning in June. • Ms. Monreal reviewed the materials prepared for the Public Workshop that they had received in their meeting packets. - The first item on the list was “Date and Time.” After much discussion, it was decided that the greatest public participation would come from holding two meetings, rather than one, at each end of the project corridor. - Ms. Sandy Haas-Martens offered to contact the Elks Lodge at 75th Street. - Commissioner von Hahmann offered to see about sites at the east end of the project. - Mr. Guy stated that the MPO’s website could be used to post notice of the meeting. He requested that a copy of the notice in HTML text be submitted. - Ms. von Hahmann suggested use of the Government Access Television. - Mr. Crayton inquired about the format of the Public Workshop and how the CAG would be expected to participate. Ms. Chronister explained that FDOT and RS&H would make the initial presentation but that most of the information would be conveyed through presentation boards and/or PowerPoint-style presentation. CAG members would be asked to participate in the breakout session, where a CAG member and a Project Team member would serve as facilitators in eliciting the public’s comments about the proposed Vision and Goals for the project. - It was also recommended that the meeting “Comment Form” be amended. Suggestions included correction of the missing word in Line 3 ( . Please provide us with . ), replacing “Viewshed” with “View,” providing a fuller explanation of “Facilities” by using words such as “Restrooms” and “Drinking Fountains,” and adding “Landscaping” before the “& Aesthetics.” X:\P\1010772.013 SR64\SR 64 - ORLANDO HOME\ORLANDO FINAL DA \APP MISC\A - 032002 CAG MTG NOTES - FINAL.DOC Meeting Notes Held March 20, 2002 Page 3 Agenda Item 5: Community Participation Program • Ms. Monreal concluded by reviewing what was intended to be distributed, the FDOT standard FSHP