University College Cork – National University of Ireland

University College Cork – National University of Ireland

Neutral Citation [2015] IEHC 598 THE HIGH COURT Record No. 2012/129P BETWEEN: UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK – NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND Plaintiff AND THE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY BOARD Defendant JUDGMENT of Mr Justice Max Barrett delivered on 5th October, 2015. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS [Square bracketed numbers in Table of Contents are paragraph numbers ]. CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW. [1]. CHAPTER 2: STATUTORY BEGINNINGS [2]. The Act of 1945. [2]. Preparing and approving schemes. [3]. Executing approved schemes. [4]. Generating and distributing electricity. [5]. Section 28 and statutory immunity. [6]. Section 34 and statutory duty. [9]. Interim Electricity Generation Licence. [10]. CHAPTER 3:THE RIVER LEE AND ITS CATCHMENT. [11]. Source and flow of river Lee. [11]. Characteristics of catchment. [12]. CHAPTER 4: THE RIVER LEE WITHIN CORK CITY. [13]. A city on a floodplain. [13]. The modern city and the river. [14]. UCC buildings. [15]. 2 CHAPTER 5: HISTORY OF FLOODING IN CORK CITY. [27]. CHAPTER 6: OVERVIEW OF THE LEE HYDROELECTRIC SCHEME. [28]. Approval of Scheme. [28]. General description. [29]. Carrigadrohid Dam and Reservoir. [30]. Spillways. [31]. Fish pass. [32]. Inniscarra Dam and Reservoir. [33]. Spillway. [34]. Scour. [35]. Fish pass. [36]. Size of Scheme. [37]. Fresh-water supply. [38]. River-flow levels. [39]. Fishery protection. [40]. Wetland protection. [41]. CHAPTER 7: HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF UCC CAMPUS. [42]. 1845–1972. [42]. Master-plans. [43]. The Development Plan Review (1993). [44]. The Master-plan Review (2004). [45]. History and Development of Tyndall National Institute. [46]. The Buildings Committee. [47]. 3 Previous History of Flooding at UCC. [48]. Mitigation of Flood Risks Known to UCC. [50]. Flood protection and flooding at Glucksman Gallery. [52]. Flood protection and flooding at Western Gateway. [53]. Flood protection and flooding at the Environmental Research Institute. [54]. UCC’s response to the flooding of November, 2009. [56]. Heightened awareness of flood risk. [58]. CHAPTER 8: RESERVOIR TYPES. [59]. Purpose(s) of reservoirs. [59]. Flood-control reservoir. [60]. Hydropower reservoir. [61]. Comparison of flood-control/hydropower reservoirs. [62]. Dual-purpose reservoirs. [63]. The ‘design flood’. [64]. CHAPTER 9: MAXNOL AND TTOL. [65]. MaxNOL defined. [65]. Use of space above MaxNOL. [66]. TTOL. [67]. Is TTOL a level? [68]. Obligation to achieve TTOL. [69]. Some summary conclusions regarding TTOL. [71]. 4 CHAPTER 10: THE LEE REGULATIONS. [72]. Use and substance of operational rules. [72]. The Lee Regulations: overview. [73]. Dam integrity. [74]. Water discharge-levels. [75]. Communication breakdown between dams. [76]. Evolution of Lee Regulations. [77]. General structure of current Lee Regulations. [84]. Summary of staff responsibilities. [85]. Part I (“Regulations for Flood Management”). [86]. Flood periods. [92]. Notifications and warnings. [94]. ESB’s Flood Model. [95]. Flood operations: Carrigadrohid. [97]. Flood operations: Inniscarra. [98]. Falling flood. [99]. Inniscarra tables. [100]. Water Management Guidelines. [101]. The Gearagh Wetlands. [102]. Water abstraction. [103]. CHAPTER 11: HYDROELECTRIC OPERATION. [104]. A natural tension. [104]. Electricity generation versus flood alleviation. [105]. TTOL. [106]. 5 Consequences of preferring hydro-electric generation. [107]. Dam safety. [108]. Acceptance that Lee Dams operate with objective of flood alleviation. [109]. CHAPTER 12: WEATHER, RAINFALL, LEVEL AND DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS. [110]. Private weather forecasts. [110]. Rain-gauges. [111]. Level and discharge measurements. [112]. Cross-checking and averaging. [113]. Calculation of in-flow. [114]. River-gauging. [115]. CHAPTER 13: A RAINY NOVEMBER. [116]. Rainfall data. [116]. Recorded rainfall. [117]. CHAPTER 14: THE FLOOD EVENTS OF NOVEMBER 2009. [118]. Introduction. [118]. Monday, 16 th November, 2009. [119]. Tuesday, 17 th November, 2009. [129]. Wednesday, 18 th November, 2009. [134]. Thursday, 19 th November, 2009. [140]. Friday, 20 th November, 2009. [218]. 6 CHAPTER 15: DAMAGE DONE TO UCC’S PROPERTY. [240]. Overview. [240]. Castlewhite Apartments. [241]. Connolly Building. [242]. Enterprise and Butler Buildings. [243]. Glucksman Building. [244]. Sports facilities. [245]. Tyndall Buildings. [246]. University Hall Apartments. [247]. Victoria Lodge Apartments. [248]. Western Gateway. [249]. Western Road houses and Ferry Lodge. [250]. CHAPTER 16: ESB’S APPROACH TO DAM SAFETY. [251]. ESB’s hydro-electric portfolio. [251]. Flood Control and Dam Safety Study. [252]. ‘Overtopping’. [253]. Results of Flood Control and Dam Safety Studies. [254]. Dam safety as operated today. [255]. Chief Civil Engineer. [256]. The External Dam Safety Committee. [257]. Hydro Stations Manager and Supervising Engineer. [258]. The Lee Regulations. [259]. 7 CHAPTER 17: GENERAL PROVISION OF INFORMATION BY ESB. [260]. Overview. [260]. Commencement of Dams – 2009. [261]. 22 nd June, 1987. [262]. 22 nd February, 1988. [263]. 21 st March, 1988. [264]. 11 th November, 1993. [265]. Circa. April 2002. [266]. Information provided to local authorities on 19 th November, 2009. [267]. CHAPTER 18: FLOOD WARNINGS. [268]. Duty to warn? [268]. Usefulness and need for warnings. [270]. Flood prediction. [272]. Assumption of responsibility. [274]. A chronology of the flood warnings of November 2009. [275]. Deficiencies in warnings. [276]. UCC’s Response to Warnings Received. [277]. ESB’s 25 contentions. [279]. Some conclusions. [280]. CHAPTER 19: ESB’S FLOOD INUNDATION STUDIES. [281]. Various inundation studies. [281]. [1] River Lee Inundation Study (March 1988). [282]. [2] Carrigadrohid Inundation Study (August 1992). [283]. 8 [3] Cork City Inundation Study (September 1994). [284]. [4] River Lee Levels – Cork City (September 1994). [285]. Interaction with local authorities and others. [286]. Significance of inundation studies. [287]. CHAPTER 20: FLOOD ALLEVIATION EFFECTS OF LEE RESERVOIRS. [288]. CHAPTER 21: CFRAMS AND FLOOD RELIEF. [289]. CFRAMS and Lower Lee Flood Relief Scheme. [289]. Interim flood relief measures. [290]. Significance of CFRAMS, etc . [291]. CHAPTER 22: THE BUSINESS AND BENEFITS OF HYDRO-ELECTRICITY. [292]. Commercial purpose of Lee Dams. [292]. Hydro-electricity and electricity prices. [293]. Scale of revenue earned. [294]. Hydro-electricity and grid system support. [295]. ‘Black-start’ support. [296]. Hydro-electricity generation and CO 2 emissions. [297]. Water-supply. [298]. CHAPTER 23: KEY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. [299]. Limited number of key documents. [299]. Interim Electricity Generation Licence granted to ESB. [300]. Lee Dams Publicity Brochure. [301]. 9 The Contribution to Irish Society of Irish Hydro-Electric Dams. [303]. “River Lee: Assessment of dam safety ” (1987). [304]. Internal Paper on “Hydro Generating Plant: Limits on Use of Storage” (1979). [305]. “River Lee Levels – Cork City (Sensitivity to Inniscarra Discharges)” (September 1994). [306]. Report on Management of Lee Floods of February 1997. [307]. Presentation to National Hydrological Conference (2001). [308]. Cork Joint Emergency Group Presentation (2002). [309]. Submission to Review of Government Policy on Flood Relief (2003). [310]. Report of AXA Insurance (2004). [311]. Report on Lee Flood of December 2006. [317]. CIBSE Presentation (2007). [319]. Lee Stations Presentation to UCC BSc Environmental Studies Group (2007). [320]. Note during Hydrometric Review done by OPW (2007). [321]. Dam Safety Presentation to the OPW (2009). [322]. ESBI Reports on Lee Flood Events of November 2009. [323]. CHAPTER 24: EXPERT EVIDENCE. [326]. CHAPTER 25: MR SHIBATANI’S EVIDENCE. [327]. Description of expert and overview of evidence. [327]. Multi-purpose or single purpose? [328]. Water-levels (rule curves). [329]. Flood-damage reduction. [330]. Management of the flood events of November 2009. [331]. [1]. Static water levels. [332]. 10 [2]. ‘Empty space’ failures. [333]. [3]. Reliance on prescribed actions. [334]. [4]. Specificity in the Regulations. [336]. [5]. Transparency in decision-making.[337]. [6]. Non-compliance with ESB’s operating levels. [338]. [7]. Tie between prescribed water/discharge levels. [339]. [8]. Reactive decision-making. [340]. [9]. High refill potential. [341]. [10]. Quick reduction of water storage. [342]. [11]. ‘Ramping-up’. [343]. [12]. Operational/institutional failings. [344]. [13]. Tide and storm surges. [345]. Warnings. [346]. Alternative management actions. [347]. Hydrometric information. [348]. River-gauge failings. [349]. Reverse routing. [350]. Hydrometric data that should have been used. [351]. CHAPTER 26 : MR BENN’S EVIDENCE. [352]. Description of expert and summary of evidence. [352]. CHAPTER 27 : MR COWIE’S EVIDENCE. [353]. Description of expert and summary of evidence. [353]. ‘Design flood’-focus of Lee Regulations. [354]. 11 Practical application of abstract design. [355]. Choice of spillway over reduced water-levels. [356]. Alternative flood-gate operation. [357]. Conjunctive use of dams. [358]. Greater discretionary powers for staff. [359]. CHAPTER 28: MR FAULKNER’S EVIDENCE. [361]. Description of expert and summary of evidence. [361]. [1] General characteristics of November 2009 flood. [362]. [2] Foreseeability of November 2009 flood. [363]. [3] Management of November 2009 flood. [364]. [4] Alternative actions available. [365]. Available data. [368]. [1] Rainfall data. [369]. [2] River data. [370]. [3] Tide-level data. [371]. [4] Reservoir-level data. [372]. [5] Reservoir discharge data. [373]. [6] Reservoir in-flow data.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    555 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us