Notes on the Growth and Ultrastructure of Biddulphia Laevis Ehr. (Bacillariophyceae) in the Maumee River, Ohio1

Notes on the Growth and Ultrastructure of Biddulphia Laevis Ehr. (Bacillariophyceae) in the Maumee River, Ohio1

OhioJ. Sci. CAECIDOTEA IN MASSACHUSETTS 125 Copyright © 1983 Ohio Acad. Sci. OO3O-O95O/83/OOO3-O125 $2.00/0 NOTES ON THE GROWTH AND ULTRASTRUCTURE OF BIDDULPHIA LAEVIS EHR. (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE) IN THE MAUMEE RIVER, OHIO1 J. P. KOCIOLEK,2 M. A. LAMB and R. L. LOWE, Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403 ABSTRACT. Masses of the chain-forming diatom Biddulphia laevis Ehr. were ob- served in the Maumee River in the summer of 1981. Standing crop of this diatom was de- termined at different thalli portions of its green algal substrate, Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kutz. Ultrastructural observations of valve morphology with SEM indicate this spe- cies is typical of other biddulphioid diatoms, except in the structure of the ocellus-like process, which appears to be intermediate between a typical rimless pseudocellus and the thickened rim of an ocellus. Attachment of B. laevis to Cladophora and the zigzag filamen- tous nature of the chains was observed with SEM and noted to be similar to that of marine centric diatoms of the same type. OHIOJ. SCI. 83 (3): 125-130, 1983 INTRODUCTION current. Cray ton and Sommerfield (1979) Biddulphia laevis Ehr., a relatively large encountered this diatom as a dominant centric diatom, is most commonly associ- member of the phytoplankton in the same ated with marine or brackish water. 2 streams. In Elves Chasm they observed Cholnoky (1968) characterizes this taxon to 6,500 cells/liter. They correlated distri- be oligo-to-mesohalobous while Simonsen bution of this diatom with high nitrate lev- (1962) considers it to be mesohalobous. els in the water. Reinke (1979) reported This diatom has been reported from a B. laevis from 2 small creeks in Kansas but number of rivers in the United States. In did not comment on abundance or environ- most instances, these occurrences have been mental conditions. The first report of this from arid regions in rivers with relatively diatom from the Laurentian Great Lakes high total dissolved solids. Czarnecki and came in 1981 from Wujek and Welling who collected B. laevis from Lake Blinn (1978) reported B. laevis in Diamond Michigan. They refer to it as a halophil and Creek and Elves Chasm, 2 tributaries of comment that it probably is indicative of the Colorado River. They observed it is increasing near shore chloride levels. primarily epilithic and seems to prefer The only reports of B. laevis in Ohio have been by Hirsch and Palmer (1958) in 'Manuscript received 28 June 1982 and in revised the Scioto River and by Collins and form 27 September 1982 (#82-14). Kalinsky (1977) in Big Darby Creek. Nei- 2Present Address: Dept. of Botany and Plant Path- ology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR ther report offers details of the growth or 97331-2902. microhabitat of this diatom. When con- 126 KOCIOLEK ET AL. Vol. 83 spicuous growth of B. laevis began ap- Water samples were taken from the study site pearing in the Maumee River (Wood on 21 August 1981 for estimation of total dissolved solids. Two water samples of 100 ml were filtered County) in the fall of 1981, it provided an through Millipore filters (pore size 0.45 /xm) and opportunity to learn more about the were processed according to standard methods for microhabitat, attachment and growth of determination of total dissolved solids as filtrable this species. residue (American Public Health Association 1971). METHODS AND MATERIALS RESULTS Large brown masses of the diatom Biddulphia Measurement of total dissolved solids laevis were observed in late August 1981 in the from the Maumee River, 21 August 1981 Maumee River, approximately 1.5 km upstream yielded a value of 600 ppm. This figure from Waterville, Ohio (fig. 1). Collections were taken from portions of older and younger Cladophora appears to be similar to reports of other glomerata thalli in riffle areas of the river where water systems in the area; for example masses of the diatom were encountered. A bar-clamp values of 532 ppm for Maumee Bay sampler (Gale 1975) was employed to sample specific (Fraleigh et al. 1979) and 964 ppm for substrate surface area. Three replicate counts were the Sandusky River (Martin 1976) have made on each sample by examining one-half of a standard Palmer counting cell. been reported. Material was collected for ultrastructural observa- Colonies of Biddulphia laevis were ob- tions with light and scanning electron microscopy. served throughout the study area, however Material to be viewed with the light microscope was best development occurred on older fila- "cleaned" by boiling in nitric acid for 2 hours, rinsed several times in distilled water and air-dried onto ments of Cladophora glomerata. Densities coverslips. The dried coverslips were permanently of B. laevis ranged from 9 to 3,924 mounted onto standard microscope slides with cells/mm2, with younger thalli averaging Hyrax. Slides were viewed with a Leitz Dialux-20 13 cells/mm2 and older thalli averaging light microscope. Collections taken for scanning 2 electron microscopy were field-fixed with 2.5% 2,816 cells/mm . phosphate-buffered glutaraldehyde for 2 hours, then Ultrastructural observations made with osmicated with 2.0% osmium tetroxide for 2 hours. light and scanning electron microscopy Following fixation, material was washed in phos- support previously documented observa- phate buffer (pH 7.2), dehydrated through an tions of Biddulphia laevis made with the ethanol series, critical-point dried with CO2, then sputter-coated with approximately 20 nm of a light microscope. Terminology of ultra- gold-palladium source. Material cleaned for light structural components follows that of microscopy was also prepared for SEM. Material was Anonymous (1975) and Ross et al. (1979). air-dried on a coverslip which was attached to an alu- The population of B. laevis observed in the minum stub with tube coat then coated with approx- imately 20 nm of a gold-palladium source. Material Maumee River ranged in valve diameter was viewed on a Hitachi HHR-2S scanning electron from 40 to 60 /xm, and possessed 14—16 microscope at an operating voltage of 20 KV and at a areolae in 10 /am. These observations fall tilt angle of approximately 20°. within the ranges noted by Hustedt (1930) and Cleve-Euler (1951). Two ocelli, 2—4 central labiate processes and short periph- eral spines were evident in the light micro- Waterville LUCAS CO. scope (fig. 2A and B). Observation of the external valve face with SEM shows it sup- porting many small granules and spines in both cleaned and uncleaned material (fig. 2C and D); however, internally the openings of the areolae are much clearer WOOD CO. (fig. 2E). Labiate processes, peripheral spines and the ocelli-like processes bor- dered by a thin distal rim and comprised of FIGURE 1. Map of Maumee River in the vicinity of many porelli are evident on the external Waterville, Ohio. valve face (fig. 2F). Examination of the in- OhioJ. Sci. BIDDULPHIA LAEVIS IN MAUMEE RIVER 127 FIGURE 2. A. Light micrograph of valve face. B. Light micrograph of girdle view showing peripheral spines. C. Scanning electron micrograph of cleaned external valve face. D. SEM of uncleaned valve face. E. SEM of internal valve face. F. SEM close-up of ocellus, showing peripheral rim and porelli. G. SEM of gir- dle view. H. SEM of girdle band. (Bar in A-E, G, H = 5 /im. In F = 1 /am.) 12S KOCIOLEK ET AL. Vol. 83 ternal valve face indicates the stalked na- ments by means of a mucilage-like mass re- ture of the labiate processes and the radial sembling the pads located between cells, nature of the areolae. A girdle view of although the anchoring mass was larger B. laevis reveals a wide, punctate girdle and more complex in its appearance band (fig. 2G) which has peripheral finger- (fig. 3C). Cells of B. laevis dislodged from like projections (fig. 2H). the attachment areas revealed the masses to Like other species of Biddulphia, cells of consist of a depressed ovoid center and an B. laevis were arranged in zigzag filamen- elevated circular area which surrounds the tous colonies (fig. 3A). Previous reports of center (fig. 3D). It has not been deter- the colonies of this diatom have described mined if the entire structure assists in an- filaments of relatively short length choring B. laevis to the Cladophora (Czarnecki and Blinn 1978). In the present substrate. study, some filaments of B. laevis were ob- served to contain 50 cells. The cells of fila- DISCUSSION ments were connected by pads of mucilage Ultrastructural observations of Bid- associated with the ocelli-like processes of dulphia laevis by light and scanning elec- adjoining cells (fig. 3B). The filaments tron microscopy reveal this diatom to be were attached to Cladophora glomerata fila- morphologically similar to other members FIGURE 3. A. SEM of Biddulphia filament around Cladophora glomerata. B. SEM of mucilage pad between two connected cells. C. SEM of attached Biddulphia filament on Cladophora. D. SEM of attachment site. (Bar in A-D = 10 /urn.) OhioJ. Sci. BIDDULPHIA LAEVIS IN MAUMEE RIVER 129 of the genus Biddulphia (Helmcke and longer growing time, allowing the diatom Krieger 1963, Helmcke etal. 1974). How- filaments to increase in length. ever, the ocellus-like process, with its dis- The method of attachment to a sub- tinct rim, appears to be a true ocellus strate via a mucilage-like mass is similar to rather than pseudocellus which is charac- that of the marine diatoms Isthmia nervosa, teristic of the subfamily Biddulphinaea of I. enervis, Melosira borreii (Smith 1853) and which the genus Biddulphia is a member other Biddulphia species (Hendey 1964). (Simonsen 1979). The rim of the ocellus in The structure of the attaching mass is no- B.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us