The Golden-Tailed Gecko: a Disturbance-Tolerant Species in a Fragmenting Environment

The Golden-Tailed Gecko: a Disturbance-Tolerant Species in a Fragmenting Environment

CSIRO PUBLISHING Wildlife Research https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20115 The golden-tailed gecko: a disturbance-tolerant species in a fragmenting environment Chris R. Pavey A,B,E, Eric VanderduysC and S. RaghuD ACSIRO Land and Water, PMB 44 Winnellie, NT 0822, Australia. BWorkgroup for Endangered Species, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute of Zoology, Georg-August University, Go¨ttingen, Germany. CCSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. DCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract Context. In central Queensland, Australia, the development of a coal-seam gas (CSG) industry is creating additional fragmentation of landscapes consisting of woodland and open forest that are already highly fragmented. Aims. To assess the response to fragmentation of Strophurus taenicauda (golden-tailed gecko). The species is ‘near threatened’ in Queensland. Methods. Occurrence and abundance were examined across three categories of patch size – small (#10 ha), medium (10–100 ha) and large ($100 ha) – across three geographic areas of the species’ range. Minimal impact (i.e. sighting only) active searches for geckos were conducted at night. A minimum of three replicate sites of each patch size category was surveyed in each of the three geographic areas. Eleven additional patches (each ,4 ha and located in the southern geographic area) were surveyed to investigate how size and spatial isolation of small patches affected occurrence and abundance of S. taenicauda. At all sites a standardised set of 22 habitat variables was collected, and the presence of other species of arboreal gecko was recorded. Key results. The species was located across patches of all sizes, including those as small as 1.11 ha. It was also located opportunistically in the matrix among patches and occurred in isolated trees within an urban area. The abundance of another commonly occurring arboreal gecko, Gehyra dubia (dubious dtella), was negatively correlated with S. taenicauda abundance in small patches. The most important habitat variable for S. taenicauda was average basal area of trees. As this increased, especially above 5.7 m2 haÀ1, it was more likely to be present. When considering only the small patches, the main factors influencing presence and abundance of S. taenicauda were the average basal area of Callitris glaucophylla (white cypress) and grazing (negligible or absent). Conclusions. Strophurus taenicauda is a species that is tolerant of disturbance and can persist in fragmented habitat, provided the fragments have adequate cover of white cypress. Implications. The species appears to be resilient to the current level of CSG development within its geographic range. Keywords: brigalow, matrix, patch size, remnant, white cypress. Received 7 July 2020, accepted 15 April 2021, published online 21 May 2021 Introduction involves both a decline in the area of habitat and alteration of Understanding the habitat requirements of animal and plant its spatial configuration (Yeager et al. 2016). When considering species is a fundamental aspect of ecology. This task takes on changes in spatial configuration, a range of attributes have been heightened importance when the species concerned is classified shown to be important. These factors include patch size (the area as threatened or potentially at risk from anthropogenic or natural of a fragment of potential habitat), patch isolation, number of disturbances. The loss and fragmentation of habitat, driven by patches, matrix (the areas between the remaining fragments) anthropogenic disturbance, has been identified as a significant quality and edge characteristics (Fahrig 2003). Members of driver of wildlife defaunation globally, triggering extinctions of different species vary in their responses to the fragmentation species and populations, and local declines in abundance of of their habitat (Keinath et al. 2017). In one recent major review individuals (Dirzo et al. 2014). of the literature, most studies that demonstrated a response to Species responses to habitat fragmentation can be difficult to fragmentation reported a positive one for the species concerned predict because fragmentation is an aggregate process that (Fahrig 2017; Fahrig et al. 2019). Journal compilation Ó CSIRO 2021 Open Access CC BY-NC www.publish.csiro.au/journals/wr B Wildlife Research C. R. Pavey et al. Although further fragmentation of already fragmented land- Strophurus taenicauda was chosen as the focal species over scapes can result from a range of development types, develop- several other potentially impacted candidate species because of ment of unconventional gas resources has recently emerged as a its overlap with the broad CSG footprint and its relative ease of significant fragmenting process and hence as an emerging detection, which we predicted would make subsequent statisti- conservation issue (Brittingham et al. 2014; Hobday and McDo- cal analysis possible. nald 2014; Souther et al. 2014). Optimisation of underground We sought to understand how fragmentation influences the coal-seam gas (CSG) exploitation generally involves a trade-off occurrence and abundance of S. taenicauda across its range, and between interference from adjacent gas boreholes and infra- whether this exposed it to risks from the activities of a CSG structure costs, meaning accessing these resources inherently industry. Using a space-for-time approach, we designed a study results in high levels of fragmentation (Baker et al. 2012). The that assessed both the occurrence of the species in fragments that high degree of fragmentation exists primarily because of the differed in size, and the relationship between fragment size and road infrastructure necessary to access the optimally placed presence of white cypress and other dominant tree species on boreholes. Unconventional gas developments are often imple- abundance. We predicted that the species would favour areas mented rapidly and over very large areas (.1 million ha). In the with continuous vegetation and with a high proportion of white Brigalow Belt region of central and southern Queensland, cypress, leaf litter and dead trees. Australia, landscapes of woodland and open forest that have been heavily fragmented by over 150 years of agricultural Materials and methods development are being further disturbed by the rapid construc- Study location tion and operation of an unconventional CSG industry (Hobday and McDonald 2014). Fieldwork took place in three areas of southern and central The Brigalow Belt had lost 60% of its original vegetation by Queensland. This region has been heavily targeted for clearing 1999, with a high rate of ongoing clearing for grazing and crop for grazing, mining and other projects since the 1960s; clearing production (Wilson et al. 2002). The construction and operation and modification (and their attendant fragmentation) are ongo- of a CSG industry, commencing in 2011, has produced addi- ing and rapid (Accad et al. 2006; Young et al. 1999). tional clearing and fragmentation of the original vegetation The broad study area encompasses a mix of habitat types, (APLNG Project EIS 2010), with the potential for interaction mostly woodland to open forest ecosystems, many of which are with existing threats including introduced carnivores and inva- characterised by the presence of Acacia harpophylla, from sive plants. The amount of clearing resulting from well and road which the bioregion derives its name. As well as A. harpophylla, construction varies and is ongoing, but in the Dalby (Brigalow other significant components of the canopy layer in the particu- Belt South) region, development footprints average 3.5%, so in lar study areas we targeted include ‘she-oaks’(Casuarina cris- forested areas, 3.5% of the remnant forest will be cleared. It also tata and Allocasuarina luehmannii), ‘eucalypts’ (e.g. creates an average of 208 parcels of land, separated by roads, per Eucalyptus crebra and Corymbia species) and Callitris glauco- 100 km2 (eco logical Australia 2012). phylla. Shrubby Acacia species and sparse grasses are common Here, we report on our study, which assessed the response to components of the understorey and ground layer. fragmentation of a focal animal species of conservation signifi- The climate is generally warm to hot and semiarid (mean cance in the Brigalow Belt of Queensland, the golden-tailed minima–mean maxima ,19–348C) and has average annual gecko (Strophurus taenicauda). This species is found only in the rainfall ,642 mm, with a dry season through the winter months. Brigalow Belt North and Brigalow Belt South bioregions of Queensland and New South Wales, eastern Australia (Brown Survey methods et al. 2012). The golden-tailed gecko is a mostly arboreal, Survey methods for this study are detailed in full in Pavey et al. nocturnal lizard (70 mm snout–vent length) that feeds on a (2016). Here we provide an outline of the main approaches used. variety of insects and other invertebrates. The species occupies a Field work was undertaken during February, October and range of vegetation types, particularly where Acacia harpo- November 2015. These months were chosen because they are phylla (brigalow), Casuarina cristata (belah), Allocasuarina typically warm, and geckos are likely to be active and thus luehmannii (bull oak), Eucalyptus crebra (narrow-leaved detectable by the methods we employed. ironbark) and Callitris glaucophylla (white cypress) are grow- Strophurus taenicauda occurs at night

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us